Abstract
This study presents an investigation into the mechanical behavior of geogrid-reinforced ballast subjected to cyclic loading focusing on the macro- and micromechanical features of the geogrid-ballast interaction mechanism. Key areas of interest include the effects of geogrid placement depth, aperture size, and stiffness on the motion of ballast particles, formation of contact force chains, and energy dissipation. A three-dimensional discrete element model, calibrated with experimental data, simulates ballast box tests performed on 300-mm-thick ballast layers reinforced by geogrids placed at depths ranging from 50 to 250 mm below the tie. The findings reveal that geogrids located within the upper 150 mm of the ballast layer significantly reduce tie settlement by minimizing particle movement, creating well-connected soil structures, and decreasing energy dissipation. Upon identifying 150 mm as the optimal geogrid placement depth, a parametric study evaluates the impact of the geogrid aperture size (A) and stiffness on the behavior of geogrid-reinforced ballast. The geogrid aperture size (A) is varied to give aperture size to ballast diameter (D) ratios ranging from 1.09 to 2.91, while the geogrid’s stiffness ranges from 9.54 to 18.00 kN/m. Results indicate that A/D ratios greater than or equal to 1.45 are required for geogrids to perform satisfactorily, while stiffness appears to wield a negligible influence on the response of geogrid-reinforced ballast.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data supporting the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.
Abbreviations
- A :
-
Contact area between two contacting pieces or geogrid aperture size
- \(\overline{A }\) :
-
Parallel bond cross-sectional area
- D 50 :
-
Mean ballast particle diameter
- Δ δ n :
-
Relative normal displacement increment
- Δ δ s :
-
Adjusted relative shear displacement increment
- \({\varvec{\Delta}}{{\varvec{\delta}}}_{{\varvec{s}}}^{{\varvec{k}}}\) :
-
Shear displacement’s elastic component
- \({\varvec{\Delta}}{{\varvec{\delta}}}_{{\varvec{s}}}^{{\varvec{\mu}}}\) :
-
Shear displacement’s slip component
- E m :
-
Mechanical energy
- E mb :
-
Mechanical body energy
- E mc :
-
Mechanical contact energy
- E pot :
-
Potential energy
- E kin :
-
Kinetic energy
- E damp :
-
Energy dissipated by non-viscous damping
- E k :
-
Strain energy stored in the linear springs
- E µ :
-
Energy dissipated by frictional slip
- \(\overline{{E }_{k}}\) :
-
Strain energy stored in a geogrid’s parallel bond springs
- E* :
-
Linear effective modulus
- \(\overline{{E }^{*}}\) :
-
Parallel bond effective modulus
- ε 1 :
-
Major principal strain
- ε 3 :
-
Minor principal strain
- F c :
-
Contact force between contacting clumps
- \({F}_{n}^{l}\) :
-
Linear normal force
- \({{\varvec{F}}}_{{\varvec{s}}}^{{\varvec{l}}}\) :
-
Linear shear force
- \(\overline{{\varvec{F}} }\) :
-
Parallel-bond force
- \(\overline{{F }_{c}}\) :
-
Mean interparticle contact force
- \(\overline{{F }_{n}}\) :
-
Normal component of the parallel-bond force
- \(\overline{{{\varvec{F}} }_{{\varvec{s}}}}\) :
-
Shear component of the parallel-bond force
- g s :
-
Surface gap
- \(\overline{I }\) :
-
Parallel bond cross section’s moment of inertia
- \(\overline{J }\) :
-
Parallel bond cross section’s polar moment of inertia
- k n :
-
Linear normal stiffness
- k s :
-
Linear shear stiffness
- k t :
-
Geogrid torsional stiffness
- \(\overline{{k }_{n}}\) :
-
Parallel bond normal stiffness
- \(\overline{{k }_{s}}\) :
-
Parallel bond shear stiffness
- κ*:
-
Linear normal-to-shear stiffness ratio
- \(\overline{{\kappa }^{*}}\) :
-
Parallel bond normal-to-shear stiffness ratio
- κ :
-
Deviatoric strain
- L :
-
Distance between the centroid of two contacting pieces
- M t :
-
Twisting moment
- \(\overline{{\varvec{M}} }\) :
-
Parallel-bond moment
- \(\overline{{M }_{t}}\) :
-
Twisting moment component of the parallel-bond moment
- \(\overline{{{\varvec{M}} }_{{\varvec{b}}}}\) :
-
Bending moment component of the parallel-bond moment
- N c :
-
Number of contacts in a ballast layer
- N p :
-
Number of particles in a ballast layer
- n c :
-
Unit vector defining the contact place
- µ :
-
Friction coefficient
- p :
-
Hydrostatic stress invariant
- q :
-
Deviatoric stress invariant
- R :
-
Radius of a PFC ball
- \(\overline{R }\) :
-
The parallel bond’s radius
- σ d :
-
Deviator stress
- σ max :
-
Maximum normal stress at the parallel-bond periphery
- σ 1 :
-
Major principal stress
- σ 3 :
-
Minor principal stress
- τ max :
-
Maximum shear stress at the parallel-bond periphery
- θ t :
-
aperture rotation
References
Alabbasi, Y., Hussein, M.: Geomechanical modelling of railroad ballast: a review. Arch Comput Methods Eng 28(3), 815–839 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09390-4
AREMA.: Manual for railway engineering. American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association, Lanham (2010)
Bathurst, R.J., Raymond, G.P.: Geogrid reinforcement of ballasted track. Transp Research Rec 1153, 8–14 (1987)
Bathurst, R.J., Raymond, G.P., Jarrett, P.M.: Performance of geogrid-reinforced ballast railroad track support. Third Int Conf Geotextiles 80, 43–48 (1986)
Bian, X., Li, W., Qian, Y., Tutumluer, E.: Analysing the effect of principal stress rotation on railway track settlement by discrete element method. Geotechnique 70(9), 803–821 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.18.P.368
Brown, S.F., Kwan, J., Thom, N.H.: Identifying the key parameters that influence geogrid reinforcement of railway ballast. Geotextiles Geomembr 25(6), 326–335 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.06.003
Chen, C., McDowell, G.R., Thom, N.H.: Discrete element modelling of cyclic loads of geogrid-reinforced ballast under confined and unconfined conditions. Geotextiles Geomembr 35, 76–86 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.07.004
Chen, C., McDowell, G.R., Thom, N.H.: A study of geogrid-reinforced ballast using laboratory pull-out tests and discrete element modelling. Geomech Geoeng 8(4), 244–253 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2013.805253
Chen, C., McDowell, G.R., Thom, N.H.: Investigating geogrid-reinforced ballast: experimental pull-out tests and discrete element modelling. Soils Found 54(1), 1–11 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2013.12.001
Chen, C., Indraratna, B., McDowell, G., Rujikiatkamjorn, C.: Discrete element modelling of lateral displacement of a granular assembly under cyclic loading. Comp Geotechnics 69, 474–484 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.06.006
Chen, J., Bao, N., Sun, R.: Three-dimensional discrete-element-method analysis of behavior of geogrid-reinforced sand foundations under strip footing. Int J Geomech 22(9), 1–16 (2022a). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0002543
Chen, W., Zhang, Y., Wang, C., Xiao, Y., Lou, P.: Effect of ballast pockets and geogrid reinforcement on ballasted track: numerical analysis. Transportation Geotechnics 42, 101108 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2023.101108
Chen, J., Vinod, J. S., Indraratna, B., Ngo, N. T., Gao, R., Liu, Y.: A discrete element study on the deformation and degradation of coal-fouled ballast. Acta Geotechnica, 4. (2022b). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01453-4
D’Angelo, G., Sol-Sanchez, M., Moreno-Navarro, F., Lo Presti, D., Thom, N.: Use of bitumen-stabilised ballast for improving railway trackbed conventional maintenance. Geotechnique 68(6), 518–527 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.17.P.022
Dahlberg, T.: Some railroad settlement models—a critical review. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit 215(4), 289–300 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1243/0954409011531585
Das, B.M.: Use of geogrid in the construction of railroads. Innov Infrastruct Solutions 1(1), 15 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-016-0017-8
Desbrousses, R.L.E., Meguid, M.A.: On the analysis and design of reinforced railway embankments in cold climate: a review. In: Tighe, S., Walbridge, S., Henderson, V. (eds.) CSCE 2021 Annual Conference, pp. 588–598. Springer (2021)
Desbrousses, R.L.E., Meguid, M.A., Bhat, S.: Experimental investigation of the effects of subgrade strength and geogrid location on the cyclic response of geogrid-reinforced ballast. Int J Geosynthe Ground Eng 9(6), 67 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-023-00486-3
Desbrousses, R.L.E., Meguid, M.A.: Effect of subgrade compressibility on the reinforcing performance of railroad geogrids: insights from finite element analysis. In: Canadian Geotechnical Society (eds.) GeoCalgary. Canadian Geotechnical Society, Calgary (2022)
Desbrousses, R. L. E., & Meguid, M. A: Geogrids in cold climates: insights from in-isolation tensile tests at low temperatures. In Geosynthetics: Leading the Way to a Resilient Planet (pp. 467–473). CRC Press. (2023a). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003386889-45
Desbrousses, R.L.E., Meguid, M.A.: On the design of a pneumatic cyclic loading setup for geotechnical testing. In: C. G. Society (ed.) GeoSaskatoon 2023. Canadian Geotechnical Society (2023b)
Desbrousses, R. L. E., Meguid, M. A., Bhat, S: Effect of temperature on the mechanical properties of two polymeric geogrid materials. Geosynthetics International, 1–31. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.21.00032a
Desbrousses, R.L.E., Meguid, M.A., Bhat, S.: On the effect of subgrade strength on the performance of geogrid-reinforced ballast. GeoAmericas, Toronto (2024)
Esmaeili, M., Zakeri, J.A., Babaei, M.: Laboratory and field investigation of the effect of geogrid-reinforced ballast on railway track lateral resistance. Geotextiles Geomembr 45(2), 23–33 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.11.003
Fei, W., Narsilio, G.A.: Impact of three-dimensional sphericity and roundness on coordination number. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 146(12), 1–7 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0002389
Feng, S. J., & Wang, Y. Q. (2023). DEM simulation of geogrid–aggregate interface shear behavior: optimization of the aperture ratio considering the initial interlocking states. Computers and Geotechnics, 154(December 2022), 105182. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105182
Ferellec, J.-F., McDowell, G.R.: Modelling of ballast–geogrid interaction using the discrete-element method. Geosynth Int 19(6), 470–479 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.12.00031
Fernandes, G., Palmeira, E.M., Gomes, R.C.: Performance of geosynthetic-reinforced alternative sub-ballast material in a railway track. Geosynth Int 15(5), 311–321 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2008.15.5.311
Gao, G., Meguid, M.A.: Effect of particle shape on the response of geogrid-reinforced systems: insights from 3D discrete element analysis. Geotextiles Geomembr 46(6), 685–698 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.07.001
Gu, X., Huang, M., Qian, J.: DEM investigation on the evolution of microstructure in granular soils under shearing. Granular Matter 16(1), 91–106 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-013-0467-z
Guo, Y., Zhao, C., Markine, V., Shi, C., Jing, G., Zhai, W.: Discrete element modelling of railway ballast performance considering particle shape and rolling resistance. Railway Eng Sci 28(4), 382–407 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-020-00216-9
Guo, Y., Markine, V., Jing, G.: Review of ballast track tamping: mechanism, challenges and solutions. Construct Build Mater 300, 123940 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123940
Han, J., Bhandari, A., Wang, F.: DEM analysis of stresses and deformations of geogrid-reinforced embankments over piles. Int J Geomech 12(4), 340–350 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000050
Hussaini, S.K.K., Sweta, K.: Application of geogrids in stabilizing rail track substructure. Front Built Environ 6(February), 1–13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00020
Hussaini, S.K.K., Sweta, K.: Investigation of deformation and degradation response of geogrid-reinforced ballast based on model track tests. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit 235(4), 505–517 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409720944687
Hussaini, S.K.K., Indraratna, B., Vinod, J.S.: Performance assessment of geogrid-reinforced railroad ballast during cyclic loading. Transportation Geotechnics 2, 99–107 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2014.11.002
Hussaini, S.K.K., Indraratna, B., Vinod, J.S.: A laboratory investigation to assess the functioning of railway ballast with and without geogrids. Transp Geotech 6, 45–54 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2016.02.001
Indraratna, B., Lackenby, J., Christie, D.: Effect of confining pressure on the degradation of ballast under cyclic loading. Géotechnique 55(4), 325–328 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2005.55.4.325
Indraratna, B., Nimbalkar, S., Christie, D., Rujikiatkamjorn, C., Vinod, J.: Field assessment of the performance of a ballasted rail track with and without geosynthetics. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(7), 907–917 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000312
Indraratna, B., Ngo, N.T., Rujikiatkamjorn, C.: Behavior of geogrid-reinforced ballast under various levels of fouling. Geotextiles Geomembr 29(3), 313–322 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.01.015
Indraratna, B., Karimullah Hussaini, Sd.K., Vinod, J.S.: On the shear behavior of ballast-geosynthetic interfaces. Geotech Test J 35(2), 103317 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ103317
Indraratna, B., Hussaini, S.K.K., Vinod, J.S.: The lateral displacement response of geogrid-reinforced ballast under cyclic loading. Geotextiles Geomembr 39, 20–29 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.07.007
Indraratna, B., Ngo, T., Bessa Ferreira, F., Rujikiatkamjorn, C., Shahkolahi, A.: Laboratory examination of ballast deformation and degradation under impact loads with synthetic inclusions. Transportation Geotechnics 25, 100406 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100406
Itasca Consulting Group Inc.: Pavement Design Package for PFC3D. Itasca Consulting Group Inc. (2019). https://www.itasca.ca/software/pavement-design-package-in-pfc
Itasca.: Particle Flow Code 3D (Version 7.0) [Computer software]. Itasca Consulting Group Inc. (2022). https://www.itasca.ca/software/pfc
Jiang, Y., Nimbalkar, S.: Finite element modeling of ballasted rail track capturing effects of geosynthetic inclusions. Front Built Environ 5(May), 1–11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00069
Kumar, N., Suhr, B., Marschnig, S., Dietmaier, P., Marte, C., Six, K.: Micro-mechanical investigation of railway ballast behavior under cyclic loading in a box test using DEM: effects of elastic layers and ballast types. Granular Matter 21(4), 1–17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-019-0956-9
Lackenby, J., Indraratna, B., McDowell, G., Christie, D.: Effect of confining pressure on ballast degradation and deformation under cyclic triaxial loading. Géotechnique 57(6), 527–536 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2007.57.6.527
Lai, H.J., Zheng, J.J., Zhang, J., Zhang, R.J., Cui, L.: DEM analysis of “soil”-arching within geogrid-reinforced and unreinforced pile-supported embankments. Comp Geotech 61, 13–23 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.04.007
Li, H., McDowell, G.R.: Discrete element modelling of under sleeper pads using a box test. Granular Matter 20(2), 1–12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-018-0795-0
Li, H., McDowell, G.: Discrete element modelling of two-layered ballast in a box test. Granular Matter 22(4), 1–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-020-01046-6
Li, D., Hyslip, J., Sussmann, T., Chrismer, S.: Railway Geotechnics. CRC Press (2015). https://doi.org/10.1201/b18982
Li, C., Gao, R., Hu, Q., Chen, J.: Effect of the combination of geogrid and rubber granules on the performance of ballast under impact loads. Granular Matter 26(1), 10 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-023-01384-1
Lim, W.L., McDowell, G.R.: Discrete element modelling of railway ballast. Granular Matter 7(1), 19–29 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-004-0189-3
Liu, S., Huang, H., Qiu, T., Kwon, J.: Effect of geogrid on railroad ballast particle movement. Transp Geotech 9, 110–122 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2016.08.003
Liu, J., Zhou, W., Ma, G., Yang, S., Chang, X.: Strong contacts, connectivity and fabric anisotropy in granular materials: a 3D perspective. Powder Technol 366, 747–760 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.03.018
Liu, Y., & Yan, Z.:Study on strong contact system by sub-network partitioning method for binary mixtures. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 1–25. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2023.2268691
Luo, Z., Zhao, C., Bian, X., Chen, Y.: Discrete element analysis of geogrid-stabilized ballasted tracks under high-speed train moving loads. Comp Geotech 159(March), 105451 (2023a). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105451
Luo, Z., Zhao, C., Cai, W., Gu, Q., Lin, W., Bian, X., & Chen, Y.: Full-scale model tests on ballasted tracks with/without geogrid-stabilization under high-speed train loads. Geotechnique, 1–15. (2023b). https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.22.00339
Malisetty, R. S., Indraratna, B., Qi, Y., & Rujikiatkamjorn, C.: Shakedown response of recycled rubber-granular waste mixtures under cyclic loading. Geotechnique, 1. (2022).https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.21.00040
McDowell, G.R., Stickley, P.: Performance of geogrid-reinforced ballast. Ground Eng 39(1), 26–30 (2006)
McDowell, G.R., Harireche, O., Konietzky, H., Brown, S.F., Thom, N.H.: Discrete element modelling of geogrid-reinforced aggregates. Proc Inst Civil Eng - Geotech Eng 159(1), 35–48 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.2006.159.1.35
Minh, N.H., Cheng, Y.P.: A DEM investigation of the effect of particle-size distribution on one-dimensional compression. Geotechnique 63(1), 44–53 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.10.P.058
Minh, N.H., Cheng, Y.P., Thornton, C.: Strong force networks in granular mixtures. Granular Matter 16(1), 69–78 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-013-0455-3
Mishra, D., Qian, Y., Kazmee, H., Tutumluer, E.: Investigation of geogrid-reinforced railroad ballast behavior using large-scale triaxial testing and discrete element modeling. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 2462(1), 98–108 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3141/2462-12
Ngo, N.T., Indraratna, B.: Improved performance of rail track substructure using synthetic inclusions: experimental and numerical investigations. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 2(3), 1–16 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-016-0065-3
Ngo, N.T., Indraratna, B., Rujikiatkamjorn, C.: DEM simulation of the behaviour of geogrid stabilised ballast fouled with coal. Comp Geotech 55, 224–231 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.09.008
O’Sullivan, C.: Particulate discrete element modelling. In Particulate Discrete Element Modelling. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482266498
Offenbacher, S., Antony, B., Barbir, O., Auer, F., Landgraf, M.: Evaluating the applicability of multi-sensor equipped tamping machines for ballast condition monitoring. Measurement 172, 108881 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108881
Ouadfel, H.: Numerical simulations of granular assemblies with three-dimensional ellipsoid-shaped particles [Doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo]. University of Waterloo's Institutional Repository (1998). https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/handle/10012/331
Qian, Y., Mishra, D., Tutumluer, E., Kazmee, H.A.: Characterization of geogrid reinforced ballast behavior at different levels of degradation through triaxial shear strength test and discrete element modeling. Geotextiles Geomembr 43(5), 393–402 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.04.012
Qian, Y., Tutumluer, E., Mishra, D., Kazmee, H.: Triaxial testing and discrete-element modelling of geogrid-stabilised rail ballast. Proc Inst Civil Eng: Ground Improv 171(4), 223–231 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1680/jgrim.17.00068
Radjai, F., Wolf, D.E., Jean, M., Moreau, J.-J.: Bimodal character of stress transmission in granular packings. Phys Rev Lett 80(1), 61–64 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.61
Radjai, F., Wolf, D.E., Roux, S., Jean, M., Moreau, J.J.: Force networks in dense granular media. Powders and grains, Durham, pp. 211–214 (1997)
Sadeghi, J., Tolou Kian, A.R., Ghiasinejad, H., Fallah Moqaddam, M., Motevalli, S.: Effectiveness of geogrid reinforcement in improvement of mechanical behavior of sand-contaminated ballast. Geotextiles Geomembr 48(6), 768–779 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.05.007
Sadeghi, J., Tolou Kian, A. R., Khanmoradi, A., & Chopani, M.: Behavior of sand-contaminated ballast reinforced with geogrid under cyclic loading. Construction and Building Materials, 362(August 2022), 129654. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129654
Selig, E. T., Waters, J. M.: Track geotechnology and substructure management. Thomas Telford Publications, London (1994). https://doi.org/10.1680/tgasm.20139
Shi, S., Gao, L., Cai, X., Xiao, Y., Xu, M.: Mechanical characteristics of ballasted track under different tamping depths in railway maintenance. Transportation Geotechnics 35, 100799 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100799
Shi, D., Niu, J., Zhang, J., Chao, Z., & Fowmes, G.: Effects of particle breakage on the mechanical characteristics of geogrid-reinforced granular soils under triaxial shear: a DEM investigation. Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment, 34. (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2023.100446
Shin, E.C., Das, B.M.: Experimental study of bearing capacity of a strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geosynth Int 7(1), 59–71 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.7.0166
Shin, E.C., Kim, D.H., Das, B.M.: Geogrid-reinforced railroad bed settlement due to cyclic load. Geotech Geol Eng 20(3), 261–271 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016040414725
Stahl, M., Konietzky, H., te Kamp, L., Jas, H.: Discrete element simulation of geogrid-stabilised soil. Acta Geotechnica 9(6), 1073–1084 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-013-0265-0
Suhr, B., Six, K.: Parametrisation of a DEM model for railway ballast under different load cases. Granular Matter 19(4), 1–16 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-017-0740-7
Suhr, B., Six, K.: Simple particle shapes for DEM simulations of railway ballast: influence of shape descriptors on packing behaviour. Granular Matter 22(2), 1–17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-020-1009-0
Suhr, B., Six, K.: Efficient DEM simulations of railway ballast using simple particle shapes. Granular Matter 24(4), 1–19 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-022-01274-y
Suiker, A.S.J., Selig, E.T., Frenkel, R.: Static and cyclic triaxial testing of ballast and subballast. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(6), 771–782 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:6(771)
Sweta, K., Hussaini, S.K.K.: Effect of shearing rate on the behavior of geogrid-reinforced railroad ballast under direct shear conditions. Geotextiles Geomembr 46(3), 251–256 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.12.001
Sweta, K., Hussaini, S.K.K.: Behavior evaluation of geogrid-reinforced ballast-subballast interface under shear condition. Geotextiles Geomembr 47(1), 23–31 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.09.002
Sweta, K., Hussaini, S.K.K.: Effect of geogrid on deformation response and resilient modulus of railroad ballast under cyclic loading. Const Buil Mater 264, 120690 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120690
Sweta, K., Hussaini, S.K.K.: Role of particle breakage on damping, resiliency and service life of geogrid-reinforced ballasted tracks. Transp Geotech 37(July), 100828 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100828
Thakur, P.K., Vinod, J.S., Indraratna, B.: Effect of confining pressure and frequency on the deformation of ballast. Geotechnique 63(9), 786–790 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.12.T.001
Thornton, C., Antony, S.J.: Quasi-static deformation of particulate media philosophical transactions of the royal Society of London. Series A: Math, Phys Eng Sci 356(1747), 2763–2782 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1998.0296
Titan Environmental Containment.: Titan Rail Grid 30 (2023). https://titanenviro.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Titan-Rail-Grid-30.pdf
Tolomeo, M., McDowell, G.R.: Modelling real particle shape in DEM: a comparison of two methods with application to railway ballast. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 159(December 2021), 105221 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2022.105221
Tutumluer, E., Huang, H., Bian, X.: Geogrid-aggregate interlock mechanism investigated through aggregate imaging-based discrete element modeling approach. I J Geomech 12(4), 391–398 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000113
Wang, K., Zhuang, Y., Kouretzis, G., Sloan, S.W.: Shakedown analysis of ballasted track structure using three-dimensional finite element techniques. Acta Geotechnica 15(5), 1231–1241 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00818-6
Wang, Y.-Q., Feng, S.-J., Zhao, Y., Zheng, Q.-T.: Microscale analysis of geogrid–aggregate interface cyclic shear behavior using DEM. Comp Geotech 166, 105973 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105973
Yu, Z., Woodward, P.K., Laghrouche, O., Connolly, D.P.: True triaxial testing of geogrid for high speed railways. Transp Geotech 20(May), 100247 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.100247
Zhang, F., Yao, Q., Wang, H., Feng, H., Chang, J., Lu, L., Yue, Z., Jiang, M.: DEM analysis of the cyclic behavior of ballast mixed with crumb rubber. Construct Build Mater 375(March), 130975 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130975
Acknowledgements
The first author is grateful for the technical advice provided by Prof. Ge Gao from Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Funding
This research is funded by an NSERC Alliance grant (NSERC ALLRP 5617) in partnership with Titan Environmental Ltd. and by the McGill Engineering Vadasz Doctoral Fellowship sponsored by the Vadasz Family Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RLED: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, visualization, resources, writing—original draft. MAM: funding acquisition, resources, supervision, writing—review and editing. SB: funding acquisition, writing—review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Desbrousses, R.L.E., Meguid, M.A. & Bhat, S. Discrete Element Study on the Effects of Geogrid Characteristics on the Mechanical Response of Reinforced Ballast Under Cyclic Loading. Transp. Infrastruct. Geotech. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-024-00413-7
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-024-00413-7