Abstract
Purpose of Review
Numerous investigations have explored the potential link between periodontitis and low birth weight (LBW) as well as preterm birth (PTB). However, the evidence remains inconclusive. Bacteria, their by-products, and proinflammatory cytokines originating from periodontal tissues can reach the placenta, inducing inflammatory changes that may contribute to pregnancy complications.
Recent Findings
A total of 35 studies involving 2,510,556 women were analyzed. The quality of the studies varied, but the meta-analysis consistently showed a moderate association between periodontitis and low birth weight. The observed association between periodontitis and low birth weight was moderate (OR 2.48; 95% CI 1.72–3.59), and it became even stronger when analyzing case–control studies independently (OR 3.94; 95% CI 1.95–7.96). On the other hand, the association between periodontitis and preterm birth was weak (OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.57–2.22) with highly significant heterogeneity. However, the presence of high heterogeneity and publication bias in the studies casts some limitations on the confidence in the results.
Summary
The available evidence, albeit of low quality, supports a moderate association between periodontitis and low birth weight, as well as a weak association with preterm delivery. Nonetheless, these findings must be interpreted cautiously, given the limited confidence in the effect estimates due to potential biases and heterogeneity in the studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Periodontitis is an inflammatory process that degrades periodontal supporting tissues which eventually lead to the loss of the tooth. Bacteria in the dental biofilm cause an inflammatory reaction in the marginal gingiva that becomes chronic over time and when it advances to the supporting tissues (alveolar bone, periodontal ligament) produces its irreversible destruction. The formation of the periodontal pocket creates a dysbiotic environment for the thriving of microorganisms (e.g. Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, Campylobacter spp.) with pathogenic potential that could eventually have an impact on the systemic health [1, 2].
Low birth weight (LBW) and preterm birth (PTB) are two important complications during pregnancy that can impact the health and survival of newborns. A birth weight of less than 2,500 g, regardless of gestational age, is defined as LBW. PTB is characterized by a birth before 37 weeks of gestation. Both LBW and PTB are associated with increased risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality, as well as long-term developmental problems [3, 4•, 5•].
Several investigations have revealed a link between periodontitis and LBW and PTB, however, the evidence is still uncertain. Two likely explanations have been put forward for this relationship. The direct pathway involves the transfer of bacteria from the dental biofilm or its bacterial products into the bloodstream, traveling to and invading the placenta and, as a result, causing inflammation. The indirect pathway involves the systemic production of proinflammatory cytokines from inflamed periodontal tissues, which can interfere with the feto-placental unit and cause intrauterine growth restriction and preterm birth [4•, 5•, 6].
Given the great importance of oral health and pregnancy complications and to inform clinical practice and public health policy, this systematic review is necessary to update the current knowledge on the subject. Additionally, it can also help in the identification of potential risk factors, prevention methods, and treatment options for pregnant women suffering from periodontitis. Consequently, the objective of this systematic review was to determine the association between periodontitis and LBW/PTB.
Methods
This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA) and registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF; https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GCYPN).
PECO Question
Population: pregnant women without restrictions of age, ethnicity, race with and without low birth weight/preterm delivery.
-
Exposure: periodontitis
-
Comparator: without periodontitis
-
Outcome: frequency of women with periodontitis in each group
What is the association between periodontitis and low birth weight/preterm delivery in pregnant women?
Population, Exposure and Comparator
The population of interest included pregnant women regardless of age, ethnicity, or race with and without pregnancy complications such as low birth weight or preterm delivery. The exposure of interest was the presence of periodontitis, determined by clearly established periodontal clinical parameters or by means of periodontal indices. The comparator group exhibited no clinical signs of periodontitis, determined by clearly established periodontal clinical parameters or by means of periodontal indices.
Outcomes
The primary outcome of interest was the prevalence of periodontitis associated with the presence of low birth weight or preterm delivery. As a measure of effect size, the odds ratio (Odds Ratio; 95% confidence interval) was calculated. As secondary outcomes, the means of probing depth (PD) and periodontal attachment level (AL) were evaluated.
Search Strategy
A comprehensive search was performed from inception to May 2023 in the following electronic databases: PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus. The search strategy included appropriate combinations of free keywords and relevant controlled vocabulary (e.g. Medical Subject Headings-MeSH) terms related to 'low birth weight', 'preterm birth' and 'periodontitis'. Keywords were searched in English, Spanish and Portuguese. In addition to the electronic database search and to identify any potentially eligible studies, snowballing and screening of relevant reference lists of included studies, as well as gray literature search, was performed through Google Scholar and SciELO.
Study Selection Process
Only human, case–control, cohort, and cross-sectional studies that focused on evaluating the presence of periodontitis in women with pregnancy complications were included. Intervention studies, animal studies, previous systematic reviews, conference proceedings, and case reports were excluded.
The inclusion language was limited to English, Spanish and Portuguese.
Initial screening of titles and abstracts was performed by two independent reviewers based on pre-determined eligibility criteria. Full text articles were retrieved for potentially eligible studies. Two independent reviewers then assessed the full-text articles for final eligibility based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Any discrepancies were resolved by discussion or consultation with a third reviewer.
Data Extraction
A standardized data extraction form was developed to collect relevant data from the included studies. The following data elements were extracted: study characteristics (author, year, study design), participant characteristics, sample size, exposure details, comparison details, outcome measures, and statistical results. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction. Extracted data were checked for accuracy and any discrepancies were resolved by discussion or consultation with a third reviewer.
Risk of Bias (RoB)
The methodological quality and risk of bias of the included studies were assessed using appropriate tools, such as the Newcastle–Ottawa scale for cohort and case–control studies. The quality result was rated as (7–9) Low risk, (4–6) Moderate risk and (0–3) High risk.
For cross-sectional studies, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI-NIH) Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional Studies was used. The guide is not intended to be a checklist, but rather a tool to identify potential issues that could introduce bias. The quality of each study was rated as low, medium or high (good) as follows:
-
Low quality: High risk of bias for all questions, or any potential bias could seriously affect confidence in the results.
-
Medium quality: risk of bias is unclear for one or more questions, or any plausible bias raises some concerns about the study results.
-
High quality: Low risk of bias for all questions, or any plausible bias is unlikely to seriously affect the study results.
Meta-analysis
Heterogeneity between included studies was assessed using statistical tests, such as Cochran's Q test and the I2 statistic. As substantial heterogeneity (I2 > 50%) was detected, a random effects model was used for meta-analysis. Sensitivity and subgroup analysis were performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity, including study design, participant characteristics, and methodological quality. All analyses were performed in Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.0. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008.
Publication Bias
We visually analyzed funnel plots and statistical tests such as Egger's regression test to assess for publication bias to detect any potential reporting bias.
Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendation
The quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The GRADE framework assesses the quality of evidence based on factors such as study design, risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and publication bias. Based on the overall quality of the evidence, the strength of the association between periodontitis and pregnancy complications was determined and graded as high, moderate, low, or very low.
Results
A total of 2,867 potential records were identified in the databases. Of these, 2,582 records were excluded during title and abstract review, while 185 records were duplicated and also deleted. Therefore, 100 records were selected for further review. After this review, 65 records were removed as they did not meet the inclusion criteria (see supplement 1). Finally, 35 full-text studies, including a total of 2,510,556 women, were analyzed in their entirety and included in the qualitative and quantitative analysis (Fig. 1; Table 1). Most studies were from Brazil (6) followed by USA (4), India (5), Spain (4), Colombia (2), England (1), United Kingdom (1), Taiwan (1), Cuba ( 1), Pakistan (1), Italy (1), Argentina (1), Republic of Kosovo (1), Germany (1), Switzerland (1), Romania (1), Malaysia (2) and France (1). The age of the participating women was between 18 and 48 years of age. Eight studies were cohort, 15 case–control, and 12 cross-sectional.
The quality of the studies (Supplement 2) was rated as low in 4 studies [7,8,9,10], medium in 9 studies [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19] and high in 22 studies [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37, 38••, 39,40,41].
No significant differences were observed in probing depth and periodontal attachment level between women with pregnancy complications and the control group except for the study by Bhavsar et al. [41] who reported a considerably greater probing depth (4.6 mm vs. 2.9 mm) in the case group compared to the control group (Table 2).
The studies by Noack et al. [19] and Davenport et al. [20] were excluded from the meta-analysis because they did not report the number of women with periodontitis in each group and therefore only 33 studies were included for analysis. According to the meta-analysis, a moderate association (OR 2.48; 95% CI 1.72–3.59) was observed between periodontitis and low birth weight, and the association was much stronger when case–control studies were analyzed independently (OR 3.94; 95% CI 1.95–7.96) (Fig. 2). The heterogeneity of the studies was significantly high. In contrast, cross-sectional studies did not show an association between periodontitis and low birth weight. However, by excluding the 4 studies [17, 36, 40, 41] with the largest effect size and wide confidence interval, the association between periodontitis and low birth weight was weak (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.26–1.89) and with less heterogeneity (I2 71%). For its part, the association between periodontitis and preterm birth was weak (OR 1.87; 95%CI 1.57–2.22) with highly significant heterogeneity (Fig. 3). When low-quality studies [7,8,9,10] were omitted from the meta-analysis, there was no discernible change in the effect.
The visual analysis of the funnel plot revealed the presence of publication bias, most likely due to the effect of studies with a small sample (Figs. 4 and 5).
The quality level of the evidence was rated as low (Table 3). This means that we have limited confidence in the estimate of the effect, and the actual effect may be far from the estimate.
Discussion
Main Findings
The results from our analysis showed an association between periodontitis and adverse pregnancy outcomes but some aspects merit the discussion and interpretation of these findings.
In our study, differences in probing depth and periodontal attachment level between women with pregnancy complications and the control group were evaluated but due to limited data, no meta-analysis of periodontal variables was undertaken. The results did not show significant differences between studies in these variables. Davenport et al. [20] reported in a case–control study that there was no evidence supporting the association between probing depth and the risk of preterm low birth weight after controlling for maternal age, ethnicity, maternal education, smoking, alcohol consumption, infections, and hypertension during pregnancy. Similar findings were reported by Noack et al. [19]. This suggests that the presence of pregnancy complications is not directly related to periodontal disease by itself. In contrast, a recent study [41] found a difference in probing depth of almost 2 mm between groups. Furthermore, research differed in how periodontal condition was evaluated, which could explain the lack of a clear and significant difference between groups. Nevertheless, in the meta-analysis of the prevalence of periodontitis, a moderate association between periodontitis and low birth weight was found and this is in agreement with a previous systematic review [42]. This association was stronger when case–control studies were analyzed independently with high heterogeneity. In contrast, cross-sectional studies did not show a significant association between periodontitis and low birth weight. Furthermore, when studies that carried large effects and confidence intervals were excluded in the sensitivity analysis, the association decreased and was weak. This suggests that the association between periodontitis and low birth weight may vary depending on the study design utilized and the consequent extent of the effect, which should be taken into account when interpreting these findings.
A weak but significant association between periodontitis and preterm birth was detected, which also corresponds with a prior systematic review [42]. However, significant heterogeneity was also observed between the studies. It is important to mention that the sensitivity analysis according to the quality of the studies did not show significant changes in the results, which supports the robustness of the findings. Furthermore, when examining the funnel plots, publication bias was observed probably due to the influence of studies with small samples. Small study effects and publication bias are closely related. Because of publication bias, smaller studies with statistically significant results may be overrepresented in the literature, while larger studies with non-significant results may go unpublished. Hence, publication bias can have major consequences for evidence-based decision-making, leading to overestimation of association or treatment effects.
Methodological and Quality Issues of the Studies
It was observed that most frequently, cross-sectional studies were medium/low quality which indicates that the risk of bias was high as compared to cohort and case–control studies. In terms of bias, cross-sectional studies are more prone to biases such as recall bias and selection bias due to their snapshot nature and lack of temporal sequence. In this systematic review, cross-sectional studies generally failed to offer precise information such as a defined purpose, sample size, group characteristics, and measures to prevent bias and confounding. In contrast, cohort studies are generally considered to have lower risk of bias as they allow for the investigation of temporal relationships, and the exposure is measured before the outcome develops. Case–control studies need careful design and analysis to minimize bias, usually related to the selection of cases and controls and the reliance on participant recall of past exposures. Our examination of cohort and case–control studies found that they were of high quality, implying that researchers utilizing these study designs take additional steps to reduce bias. In general, while cross-sectional studies may have higher risk of bias compared to cohort and case–control studies, each study design serves different purposes and can be valuable in specific research contexts. Researchers should be aware of these considerations when interpreting and generalizing the findings of different study designs and specially in challenging topics such as adverse pregnancy outcomes and periodontitis.
Limitations of this Systematic Review
There are some limitations of this systematic review. Some studies may have had significant bias or problems that impacted reliability. Significant outcomes may be presented, while null/negative findings may be withheld, skewing the review. Small sample sizes restrict statistical power and result in weaker evidence. The heterogeneity of included research (study designs, demographics, exposures, and outcome measures) makes meta-analysis difficult and reduces precision.
Perspective
Although there appears to be an association between periodontitis and adverse pregnancy outcomes, causal inference using the Bradford-Hill criteria does not support such an association [43•]. Given the complexities of this topic and the necessity of making informed healthcare decisions, further high-quality research is required to show a definite causal association between periodontitis and pregnancy outcomes. Until then, healthcare providers should emphasize the importance of oral health during pregnancy and incorporate periodontal examinations and relevant therapies into prenatal care. By doing so, we can help to improve maternal and fetal health outcomes while also pursuing evidence-based approaches in periodontal health management throughout pregnancy.
Conclusion
Low-quality evidence indicates that periodontitis is moderately associated with low birth weight and weakly associated with preterm delivery. This means that we have limited confidence in the estimate of the effect, and the actual effect may be far from the estimate.
Data Availability
Data sharing not applicable – no new data generated.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Slots J. Periodontitis: facts, fallacies and the future. Periodontology 2000. 2017;75(1):7–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12221.
Kwon T, Lamster IB, Levin L. Current concepts in the management of periodontitis. Int Dent J. 2021;71(6):462–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12630.
Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet (London, England). 2008;371(9606):75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4.
Wu M, Chen SW, Jiang SY. Relationship between gingival inflammation and pregnancy. Mediat Inflamm. 2015;2015:623427. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/623427. This article reviews the effects of progesterone and estrogen on the change of subgingival microbiota and immunologic physiological mediators in periodontal tissue.
Xu B, Han YW. Oral bacteria, oral health, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Periodontology 2000. 2022; 89 (1): 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12436. This article reviews the mechanistic and interventional studies of oral health and adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Bobetsis YA, Graziani F, Gürsoy M, Madianos PN. 2020 Periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Periodontology 2000. 2000;83(1):154–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12294.
Davenport ES, Williams CE, Sterne JA, Murad S, Sivapathasundram V, Curtis MA. Maternal periodontal disease and preterm low birthweight: case-control study. J Dent Res. 2002;81(5):313–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100505.
Moore S, Ide M, Coward PY, Randhawa M, Borkowska E, Baylis R, Wilson RF. A prospective study to investigate the relationship between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcome. Br Dent J. 2004;197(5):251–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4811620.
Cruz SS, Costa Mda C, Gomes Filho IS, Vianna MI, Santos CT. Doença periodontal materna como fator associado ao baixo peso ao nascer [Maternal periodontal disease as a factor associated with low birth weight]. Rev Saude Publica. 2005;39(5):782–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-89102005000500013. Portuguese.
Lunardelli AN, Peres MA. Is there an association between periodontal disease, prematurity and low birth weight? A population-based study. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(9):938–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00759.x.
Jarjoura K, Devine PC, Perez-Delboy A, Herrera-Abreu M, D’Alton M, Papapanou PN. Markers of periodontal infection and preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(2):513–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.018.
Noack B, Klingenberg J, Weigelt J, Hoffmann T. Periodontal status and preterm low birth weight: a case control study. J Periodontal Res. 2005;40(4):339–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2005.00808.x.
Offenbacher S, Boggess KA, Murtha AP, Jared HL, Lieff S, McKaig RG, Mauriello SM, Moss KL, Beck JD. Progressive periodontal disease and risk of very preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(1):29–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000190212.87012.96.
Alves RT, Ribeiro RA. Relationship between maternal periodontal disease and birth of preterm low weight babies. Braz Oral Res. 2006;20(4):318–23. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-83242006000400007.
Bassani DG, Olinto MT, Kreiger N. Periodontal disease and perinatal outcomes: a case-control study. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34(1):31–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01012.x.
Siqueira FM, Cota LO, Costa JE, Haddad JP, Lana AM, Costa FO. Intrauterine growth restriction, low birth weight, and preterm birth: adverse pregnancy outcomes and their association with maternal periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2007;78(12):2266–76. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.070196.
Agueda A, Ramón JM, Manau C, Guerrero A, Echeverría JJ. Periodontal disease as a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(1):16–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01166.x.
Saddki N, Bachok N, Hussain NH, Zainudin SL, Sosroseno W. The association between maternal periodontitis and low birth weight infants among Malay women. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2008;36(4):296–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00383.x.
Nabet C, Lelong N, Colombier ML, Sixou M, Musset AM, Goffinet F, Kaminski M, Epipap Group. Maternal periodontitis and the causes of preterm birth: the case-control Epipap study. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37(1):37–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01503.x.
Santa Cruz I, Herrera D, Martin C, Herrero A, Sanz M. Association between periodontal status and pre-term and/or low-birth weight in Spain: clinical and microbiological parameters. J Periodontal Res. 2013;48(4):443–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.12024.
Arteaga-Guerra J, Cerón-Souza V, Mafla A. Dynamic among periodontal disease, stress, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Revista de Salud Pública. 2010;12(2):276–86.
Wolff FC, Ribotta de Albera EM, Jofré ME. Riesgo de complicaciones perinatales en embarazadas con periodontitis moderada y severa, en la ciudad de Córdoba. Argentina. Rev Clin Periodoncia Implantol Rehabil Oral. 2010;3(2):73–8.
Baskaradoss JK, Geevarghese A, Kutty VR. Maternal periodontal status and preterm delivery: a hospital based case-control study. J Periodontal Res. 2011;46(5):542–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2011.01371.x.
Schenkein HA, Koertge TE, Sabatini R, Brooks CN, Gunsolley JC. Birth weight of infants of mothers with aggressive periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2012;83(3):279–86. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.110192.
Ali TB, Abidin KZ. Relationship of periodontal disease to pre-term low birth weight infants in a selected population–a prospective study. Community Dent Health. 2012;29(1):100–5.
Martinez de Tejada B, Gayet-Ageron A, Combescure C, Irion O, Baehni P. Association between early preterm birth and periodontitis according to USA and European consensus definitions. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(11):2160–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2012.663827.
Jacob PS, Nath S. Periodontitis among poor rural Indian mothers increases the risk of low birth weight babies: a hospital-based case control study. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2014;44(2):85–93. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2014.44.2.85.
Souza LM, Cruz SS, Gomes-Filho IS, Barreto ML, Passos-Soares JS, Trindade SC, Figueiredo AC, Alves CM, Coelho JM, Vianna MI. Effect of maternal periodontitis and low birth weight–a case control study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2016;74(1):73–80. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2015.1049374.
Meqa K, Dragidella F, Disha M, Sllamniku-Dalipi Z. The association between periodontal disease and preterm low birthweight in Kosovo. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2017;51(1):33–40. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc51/1/4.
Wazir SS, Arora P, Ghosh S, Bhagat V, Khurana S, Mahanta S. Influence of maternal periodontal health as a risk factor for low-birth-weight infants in Terai population of Nepal. J Educ Health Promot. 2019;8:233. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_408_18. eCollection 2019.
Lafaurie GI, Gómez LA, Montenegro DA, De Avila J, Tamayo MC, Lancheros MC, Quiceno J, Trujillo TG, Noriega LA, Grueso ML, Cepeda K. Periodontal condition is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes and premature rupture of membranes in low-income pregnant women in Bogota, Colombia: a case-control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(1):16–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1484092.
Micu IC, Roman A, Ticala F, Soanca A, Ciurea A, Objelean A, Iancu M, Muresan D, Caracostea GV. Relationship between preterm birth and post-partum periodontal maternal status: a hospital-based Romanian study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;301(5):1189–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05521-6.
Pozo E, Mesa F, Ikram MH, Puertas A, Torrecillas-Martínez L, Ortega-Oller I, Magán-Fernández A, Rodríguez-Martínez MD, Padial-Molina M, Sánchez-Fernández E, Galindo-Moreno P, O’Valle F. Preterm birth and/or low birth weight are associated with periodontal disease and the increased placental immunohistochemical expression of inflammatory markers. Histol Histopathol. 2020;35(10):1211. https://doi.org/10.14670/HH-18-282.
Choi SE, Choudhary A, Ahern JM, Palmer N, Barrow JR. Association between maternal periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes: an analysis of claims data. Fam Pract. 2021;38(6):718–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmab037.
Ferrillo M, Migliario M, Roccuzzo A, Molinero-Mourelle P, Falcicchio G, Umano GR, Pezzotti F, Foglio Bonda PL, Calafiore D, de Sire A. Periodontal disease and vitamin d deficiency in pregnant women: which correlation with preterm and low-weight birth? J Clin Med. 2021;10(19):4578. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194578.
Jyotirmay KA, Gulati S, Kumari S, Nazeer J, Singh P. Association of maternal periodontal health with preterm birth and a low birth weight among newborns: A cross-sectional study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2021;12(1):67–71. https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_135_20.
Gallagher-Cobos G, Almerich-Torres T, Montiel-Company JM, Iranzo-Cortés JE, Bellot-Arcís C, Ortolá-Siscar JC, Almerich-Silla JM. Relationship between periodontal condition of the pregnant woman with preterm birth and low birth weight. J Clin Med. 2022;11(22):6857. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226857.
Lee YL, Hu HY, Chou SY, Lin CL, Cheng FS, Yu CY, Chu D. Periodontal disease and preterm delivery: a nationwide population-based cohort study of Taiwan. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):3297. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07425-8. The largest study assessing the association between periodontal disease and preterm delivery.
Peña Sisto M, Pascual LV, Peña Sisto LA. Enfermedades periodontales en puérperas con partos pretérmino y bajo peso al nacer. Rev haban cienc méd. 2022;21(1):e4374.
Hussain V, Waseem A, Husain I, Waseem U, Shahbaz M, Qureshi F. The association of periodontal disease with low birth weight infants: A case control study. Matern Child Health J. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-023-03620-9.
Bhavsar NV, Trivedi S, Vachhani KS, Brahmbhatt N, Shah S, Patel N, Gupta D, Periasamy R. Association between preterm birth and low birth weight and maternal chronic periodontitis: A hospital-based case-control study. Dent Med Probl. 2023;60(2):207–17. https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/152234.
Zhang Y, Feng W, Li J, Cui L, Chen ZJ. Periodontal disease and adverse neonatal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:799740. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.799740.
Lavigne SE, Forrest JL. An umbrella review of systematic reviews of the evidence of a causal relationship between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A position paper from the Canadian Dental Hygienists Association. Can J Dent Hyg. 2020;54(2):92–100. This article reviews the causal relationship between periodontitis and pregnancy outcomes according to Bradford-Hill criteria.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by Colombia Consortium
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally to the design, data collection, analysis and interpretation and writing of the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Statement
This systematic review did not need review by the institutional ethics committee.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
Not applicable to a review article. No human photographs were included.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Castaño-Suárez, L., Paternina-Mejía, G.Y., Vásquez‑Olmos, L.D. et al. Linking Periodontitis to Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: a Comprehensive Review and Meta-analysis. Curr Oral Health Rep 11, 125–137 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-024-00371-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-024-00371-6