FormalPara Key Summary Points
Human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2) can be aberrantly expressed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through a variety of mechanisms, including HER2 mutation and/or amplification and/or protein overexpression.
HER2 mutations are found in 1–4% of NSCLC patients, and they may have sensitivity to anti-HER2 therapies such as monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates and small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).
We describe the case of a NSCLC patient with an activating exon 20 G776VinsC HER2 mutation who responded well to multiple lines of combination treatment with the anti-HER2 antibody trastuzumab administered beyond progression as well as to the pan-HER-TKI poziotinib given sequentially.
This case highlights the importance of detecting a HER2 mutation in patients with advanced NSCLC as this might positively affect the treatment scenario through the use of effective anti-HER2 therapies.


The human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) is a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family, which also includes EGFR, HER3 and HER4 [1]. Each receptor comprises an extracellular ligand-binding domain, a transmembrane segment and an intracellular portion with tyrosine kinase activity. In cancer cells, HER2 can promote tumour growth and survival through homo- and heterodimerization with other receptors of the EGFR family, which in turn activates intracellular signalling pathways such as the raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT cascades [1]. No natural ligand has been identified for HER2, which is consistent with the fact that this receptor acts as the preferred partner of dimerization of other receptors of the EGFR family. Importantly, HER2 can be found deregulated via gene mutation and/or amplification and/or protein overexpression in multiple malignancies, including breast cancer, gastric cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [1]. In NSCLC in particular, HER2 mutations are present in 1–4% of patients with lung adenocarcinoma, especially never smokers. Of note, HER2 mutation is mutually exclusive with other driver mutations such as EGFR, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), ROS proto-oncogene 1 receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1) and v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) [1, 2]. Even more importantly, HER2-mutated NSCLC patients appear to derive benefit from anti-HER2 therapies such as monoclonal antibodies, antibody–drug conjugates and small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, in some cases, conflicting results have been reported in clinical trials of HER2-mutated NSCLCs treated with anti-HER2 therapies, and the role of anti-HER2 therapies in this context is not fully understood [1].

In the present case report, we tackle the concept of continuous HER2 blockade in NSCLC by describing a HER2-mutated NSCLC patient who benefited from multiple lines of anti-HER2 therapies administered beyond progression.


In January 2014, a 42-year-old never-smoker woman who had been complaining of a dry cough for 2 months was diagnosed with a 2-cm-large lesion of the medium lobe of the lung. Biopsy of this lesion obtained during bronchoscopy was compatible with TTF1-positive adenocarcinoma. A PET/CT scan was positive for the presence of multiple metastatic ipsilateral mediastinal lymph nodes and a single metastasis in the contralateral lung, which configured T2N2M1–stage IV disease. As molecular biology was negative for EGFR mutation and ALK gene rearrangement, the patient started first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin/pemetrexed, of which she received four cycles with partial response followed by pemetrexed maintenance. In August 2014, disease progression in the right lung was observed at a PET/CT scan, and the patient received stereotactic radiotherapy on the primary lung lesion (62 Gy, 25 fractions). After radiotherapy to the lung, systemic therapy was halted and the patient was followed up with serial PET/CT scans every 3 months until May 2015, when a new PET/CT scan showed progressive disease in the left lung. A new 1-cm-large lesion in the left occipital region of the brain with no neurological symptoms was also detected at a brain MRI. At that time, since the patient was a young never-smoker woman who was negative for both EGFR and ALK, we carried out sequential molecular testing for select genetic drivers including HER2. Direct sequencing of the HER2 gene revealed the presence of a G776VinsC mutation (Fig. 1). This mutation configured a disease potentially responding to anti-HER2 therapies, so the patient was managed thereafter with multiple lines of anti-HER2 therapies (see Fig. 2 for a timeline of significant events). After receiving stereotactic radiotherapy (20 Gy, single fraction) to the new brain lesion, the patient resumed pemetrexed in combination with the anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab given at 8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg, both drugs being administered every 3 weeks. The choice of resuming pemetrexed was based on the fact that we aimed to further exploit a histologic-specific cytotoxic agent active in lung adenocarcinoma. In October 2015, a PET/CT scan was compatible with complete extracranial response, while an MRI showed disease stability of the brain lesion. The patient continued pemetrexed plus trastuzumab until February 2016 when a new PET/CT scan showed extracranial disease progression in both lungs. As a result, it was decided to continue tri-weekly trastuzumab and change the companion cytotoxic drug by switching to weekly paclitaxel. Importantly, a new PET/CT scan performed on June 2016 showed partial response at extracranial sites of disease that lasted for approximately 1 year until May 2017, when a PET/TC scan showed disease progression in both lungs. At that time, the patient had to withdraw from anti-tumour treatment because of the development of severe mitral insufficiency secondary to bacterial endocarditis, which was managed surgically with mitral valve repair. At recovery, a new restaging through a PET/TC scan on May 2018 showed further disease progression in the lung, with a new MRI showing stable disease in the brain. As the mitral insufficiency was not deemed to be trastuzumab-related, after careful discussion with the patient, a decision was made to resume tri-weekly trastuzumab with a change in the companion cytotoxic with the introduction of oral vinorelbine on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. A new PET/CT scan performed after 4 months showed stable disease at extracranial sites. In January 2019, a PET/CT scan revealed disease progression in the lung, while an MRI documented disease progression in the brain with the onset of a new centimetric lesion in the right cerebellum. In April 2019, following radiosurgery to the new brain lesion (20 Gy, single fraction), the patient started treatment with the pan-HER-TKI poziotinib at the dose of 16 mg daily p.o. within an expanded access program, from which she obtained a partial response in the lung. In October 2019, the disease progressed again in the lung and brain with the onset of multiple brain lesions. The patient then received whole brain radiotherapy (30 Gy, 10 fractions) and started chemotherapy with carboplatin/gemcitabine, which is still ongoing as of January 2020. Written informed consent to publish the patient’s case was provided by the patient in an anonymous form.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Diagnostic of HER2 mutation (patient no. TP35). Sanger sequencing read with heterozygous HER2 exon 20 insertion: c.2326_2327insTTT, p.(G776VinsC) (red arrow)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Patient timeline. DDP/PEM cisplatin/pemetrexed, PD progressive disease, PR partial response, SRS stereotactic radiosurgery


Our case shows that HER2 mutation in lung cancer is a druggable target as the patient experienced a significant clinical benefit from multiple anti-HER2 treatments, namely trastuzumab-based therapies beyond progression and the pan-HER-TKI poziotinib (Fig. 2), with a prolonged survival greater than 6 years. In HER2-positive breast cancer defined at immunohistochemistry (IHC) by a score of 3+ or 2+ and FISH positivity, the administration of multiple lines of trastuzumab-based therapies beyond progression has shown effectiveness with a potential improvement in survival [3, 4]. However, the administration of multiple anti-HER2 therapies in HER2-mutated NSCLC is largely unexplored, which renders the present case very interesting. Importantly, pemetrexed rechallenge with the addition of trastuzumab was associated with clinical benefit in our patient despite the fact that the patient experienced prior disease progression while on pemetrexed maintenance. Although data coming from other malignancies such as HER2-positive breast and gastric cancers suggest that trastuzumab exerts its maximal efficacy when administered in combination with chemotherapy, it is likely that in this specific case response to treatment could be largely due to trastuzumab treatment [5, 6]. Importantly, in studies of HER2-mutated NSCLC, trastuzumab has mostly been used in combination with chemotherapy. Table 1 lists selected studies evaluating anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies and antibody–drug conjugates for the treatment of HER2-mutated NSCLC.

Table 1 Selected studies examining the activity of anti-HER2 antibodies or antibody drug conjugates for NSCLC with HER2 mutation or a de novo HER2 amplification

The concept of continuing target inhibition at the time of disease progression, with or without the addition of chemotherapy, is not new in the management of oncogene-addicted NSCLC. As for EGFR-mutated and ALK-rearranged NSCLCs, targeted treatment beyond progression with an EGFR- and ALK-TKI, respectively, has been associated with some clinical benefit, especially in case of oligo-progressive disease [13, 14]. However, in EGFR-mutated NSCLC, the strategy of continuing an EGFR-TKI beyond progression with the addition of cytotoxic chemotherapy has not been found superior compared with switching to chemotherapy alone [15]. On the other hand, a recent study suggested partial benefit from continuing the same ALK-TKI with the addition of chemotherapy at the time of disease progression in ALK-rearranged NSCLC [16]. When it comes to HER2-mutated advanced NSCLC, Li et al. observed that T-DM1 was able to induce a partial response in eight out of 18 patients, including four patients who had been pretreated with anti-HER2-targeted therapies [11]. Similarly, our case shows that continuing targeted treatment with trastuzumab beyond progression with a change in the cytotoxic companion agent at the time of progression is feasible and could be beneficial in HER2-mutated NSCLC, thus deserving consideration, especially in patients who develop acquired resistance to treatment after an initial benefit.

Unfortunately, there is a lack of studies on the type of resistance mechanisms that develop on anti-HER2 therapies in HER2-mutated NSCLC, which could be crucial in addressing whether HER2-mutated NSCLC still depends on HER2 signalling at the time of disease progression. Several barriers to the exploration of such resistance mechanisms exist. First, HER2 mutation is a relatively rare genetic alteration in NSCLC, comprising approximately 1% of all lung adenocarcinomas [1, 2]. Second, this alteration might not be universally sought, although the widespread use of next-generation sequencing (NGS), as well as the development of accurate NGS platforms for liquid biopsy, has progressively overcome this issue [17]. In fact, NGS, which allows for simultaneous testing of multiple genetic alterations, has been already implemented in several clinical settings and is much more convenient when compared with the “old” approach based on each single molecular test performed sequentially at different times. Finally, data on the efficacy of anti-HER2 therapies in HER-2 mutated NSCLC are still conflicting, and these therapies may not be available in all countries, depending on local regulations governing drug access. However, we can speculate that the mechanism of resistance to anti-HER2 therapies in HER2-mutated NSCLC resemble those observed in other types of oncogene-addicted NSCLCs. For instance, resistance mechanisms in EGFR-mutated NSCLCs treated with an EGFR-TKI can be divided into on-target and off-target mechanisms, which impacts significantly the choice of the next line of therapy at the time of disease progression [18]. Similar findings have been proven to occur in case of ALK-positive disease treated with an ALK-TKI [19]. In our case, the repeat responses observed with each of the anti-HER2 therapies administered to the patient suggests the presence of on-target resistance mechanisms that might have been responsible for the benefit observed from continuous anti-HER2 blockade. However, lack of re-biopsy at the time of disease progression can only lead us to speculate on such a possibility. Certainly, clinical studies currently evaluating anti-HER2-directed therapies for HER2-mutated NSCLC need to include either tissue or liquid biopsy at the time of progression, especially in case of acquired resistance after prior response to anti-HER2 treatment, in order to increase our knowledge on the potential resistance mechanisms involved and provide useful suggestions on how to overcome them.

Interestingly, responses to anti-HER2-targeted therapies have been reported not only in the presence of HER2 mutation but also HER2 amplification [20]. De novo HER2 amplification occurs in approximately 3% of NSCLCs and should be regarded as a different biologic event from acquired HER2 amplification in EGFR-mutated patients that have been pretreated with an EGFR-TKI [21, 22]. Table 1 lists selected studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-HER2 antibodies for HER2-amplified NSCLC. With regard to our case, we do not know whether the exceptional benefit derived from anti-HER2 therapies could be due to the simultaneous presence of HER2 amplification, as we did not perform FISH analysis in the patient’s sample collected at the time of diagnosis. However, while some overlap has been reported between HER2 overexpression and HER2 amplification, meaning that some HER2 IHC 3+ patients are also HER2-amplified, an overlap between HER2 mutation and HER2 amplification has seldom been reported [11, 22, 23]. There have been at least two studies that have looked at the coexistence of both HER2 mutation and HER2 amplification in the same patients. On one hand, a study found a similar incidence of 3% for each of the two molecular aberrations with none overlapping [22]. On the other, another study conducted in a large Japanese population of 1126 NSCLC patients found that HER2 amplification was found at a frequency of 5.3% (n = 60), while HER2 mutation was found in 2.9% (n = 21) of 724 who had an EGFR wild-type status [23]. Importantly, only one patient had a concomitant HER2 mutation and amplification, and the clinical characteristics of HER2-mutated patients (i.e. prevalence of never/light smokers and female patients) were found to be far different from those with HER2 amplification. To conclude, these data strongly suggest that, despite the fact that HER2 mutation and HER2 amplification can both result in oncogene addiction, they appear to be clearly distinct molecular features since they are unlikely to coexist in the same patient.

Importantly, a small-molecule TKI may also be beneficial in HER2-mutated NSCLC, as it was with the pan-HER-TKI poziotinib for our patient. Of note, the patient responded to poziotinib despite multiple prior lines of anti-HER2 therapies. This suggests again continuous dependence on HER2 addiction of HER2-mutated NSCLC, with possible absence of cross-resistance between anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies and pan-HER-TKI. With regard to this, other authors have reported responses to the dual EGFR/HER2-TKI afatinib in patients who have previously responded to the anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies trastuzumab and pertuzumab [24]. Table 2 lists the results with different HER-TKI administered as single agent for HER2-mutated or HER2-amplified NSCLC.

Table 2 Selected studies examining the activity of HER-TKI for NSCLC with HER2 mutation or a de novo HER2 amplification

In conclusion, the present case shows that HER2 mutation is a druggable target in NSCLC, and that hitting the same target with multiple anti-HER2 therapies beyond progression could be an option in HER2-mutated NSCLC. However, ongoing clinical studies with newer anti-HER2 drugs and re-biopsy at the time of disease progression are crucial in order to provide insight into the mechanisms that underlie resistance to treatment and eventually help guide the choice of the next line of therapy.