Purpose of Review
Chagas disease (CD) is a neglected tropical disease caused by the protozoan parasite, Trypanosoma cruzi. Parasite transmission primarily occurs through direct interaction with an infected triatomine insect vector (kissing bug), but other routes are known. We aim to review the literature and discuss the unique circumstances of CD in the US state of Florida.
Florida is home to naturally occurring kissing bugs that are invading homes and harbor T. cruzi. The state is also home to a diverse population of immigrants from Chagas-endemic regions in Latin America. In the USA, Florida is the state with the third highest estimated burden of CD, although the true prevalence is unknown.
Chagas disease is a chronic infection that often remains silent for decades. Those who manifest chronic disease may eventually die from debilitating cardiac and/or gastrointestinal manifestations. Florida is an opportune region of the USA for the study of CD, due to the existence of endemic transmission cycles in addition to the burden among people born in Chagas-endemic regions.
Chagas disease (CD) is a neglected tropical disease endemic to at least 21 Latin American countries. Approximately 75 million people are at-risk, and six to seven million people worldwide are estimated to be infected [1–3]. The etiological agent of Chagas disease is the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi. Parasite transmission occurs via direct interaction with an infected triatomine bug vector known as the “kissing bug” [4•]. Other known routes of transmission include oral ingestion of T. cruzi–contaminated food products and beverages, transplacental infection (infected mother to fetus in utero), and blood transfusion or organ transplantation from a T. cruzi–infected donor [2, 3, 4•]. Some experts have proposed other potential routes, including infection from contact with mammalian host(s) infected with T. cruzi, such as contamination of the environment with opossum anal gland secretions or eating under undercooked wildlife meat infected with T. cruzi [5, 6]. Such contact may contribute to further infection among other mammals and possibly even human beings . Diverse mammal species, including humans, serve or can serve as T. cruzi reservoir hosts that allow the parasite to complete its life cycle as an obligate intracellular parasite [4• , 7].
In the USA, more than 300,000 people are estimated to be living with CD among those who have emigrated from endemic regions [8, 9•]. Unfortunately, less than 1% of infected persons have been diagnosed, and Florida is thought to carry the third highest T. cruzi infection burden among US states, with an estimated 18,000 people infected [9•]. Epidemiological studies have shown that approximately 30% of those with serological evidence of infection will develop a potentially fatal chronic illness. Clinical manifestations include dilated cardiomyopathy and progressive heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias that can advance to cardiac arrest, gastrointestinal and neurological diseases, as well as thrombotic events, such as stroke and pulmonary embolism [1–3, 10–13].
Triatomine bugs (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae), the only known vectors of T. cruzi, occur in Florida, and have been shown to harbor the parasite . Two species of Triatoma are considered native to Florida (Triatoma sanguisuga and Triatoma lecticularia), and another potentially invasive species (Triatoma rubrofasciata) has been recorded at a seaport in Florida [4•]. Some studies have investigated sylvatic reservoirs and identified infected wildlife in Florida [4•], but data are limited and the extent of T. cruzi transmission in the state is largely unknown. Our objective is to review the existing literature and address current research being done to help understand the scope of CD in Florida, both among immigrant populations and autochthonous transmission among susceptible mammalian hosts.
Chagas Disease in the USA
The extent of CD in the USA is unknown and the only national prevalence estimates come from blood bank data collected by the American Academy of Blood Banks Chagas Biovigilance Network between 2007 and 2019. A total of 2462 confirmed cases of CD are reported over this 13-year period among blood donors nationally . Regional studies among at-risk Latin American populations have found individuals with CD in several US communities. A landmark study conducted in Los Angeles County revealed a prevalence of 1.24% in a cohort of 4755. The authors estimate that 30,000 or more individuals in the greater Los Angeles area may be living with CD [16•]. Furthermore, among this same population, 189 family members of 86 CD patients were tested and 7.4% (N = 14/189) also had CD . A similar study in the Washington D.C. metropolitan region revealed an overall prevalence of 3.8% in a convenience sample of 1514. The majority of those with serological evidence of infection in this study was born in Bolivia or El Salvador . Finally, the largest known assessment to date has been conducted in east Boston (well outside the known range of any CD vector species), revealing a seroprevalence of 0.9% among N = 8142 Latin Americans who have been screened . In the USA, few large-scale studies have assessed transplacental infection among at-risk mothers who have immigrated from endemic regions. This is another area that needs attention in the USA. A review of the literature conducted by Edwards and Montgomery  highlights the importance of pregnancy-based screening, which has been shown to be cost-effective and efficacious in identifying new cases in mothers and infants . In Texas, one study revealed a prevalence of 0.25% among N = 3376 Latin American pregnant women who were mainly of Mexican descent . More research is needed to better understand the dynamics of CD among our diverse population of Latin Americans living in the USA.
Chagas Disease in Florida
Chagas disease in Florida, as elsewhere in the USA, is highly neglected by the health care system. Very little is known on the actual prevalence of CD in the state, and a statewide assessment among at-risk Latin American populations is needed. This would include screening those who were born in or who have lived in endemic countries for more than 6 months, those exposed to the vector in endemic countries and here in the USA (including Florida), and those with known family members with CD [22••]. Furthermore, CD is not a reportable disease to the Florida Department of Health, which severely limits the ability to track any cases that are found from routine blood and organ donor screening or other clinical concerns for the disease.
Chagas disease neglect is especially concerning in Florida, due to the high numbers of residents born in Chagas-endemic regions of Latin America. According to the most recent U.S. Census data, approximately 5.6 million people in Florida identify as Hispanic or Latino (26.5% of the total population of Florida; ), but the true number of people who emigrated from Chagas-endemic regions is difficult to estimate due to the ebb and flow of undocumented migration. The Migration Policy Institute estimates that at least 666,000 Central Americans (including Mexico) and 916,000 South Americans are living in Florida. Our calculations based on census data suggest the number to be somewhere around 2.8 million . Additionally, Florida is a major US destination for Venezuelan immigrants seeking temporary protective status or asylum. Migration from Venezuela alone was projected to rise to 7 million in 2021 . Data from U.S. Census Bureau 2018 ACS reveal that more than half of Venezuelan immigrants to the USA reside in Florida . The reported prevalence of CD in Venezuela has changed over time but estimates suggest that certain regions have as high as 11.7% and 12.5% seroprevalence, including a recent report indicating 15.7% national seroprevalence among certain regions in the country [26, 27]. Migration of individuals from Latin America due to humanitarian crises likely impact states like Florida due to these fluctuating movements of people at-risk for the disease prior to immigration.
We know that CD exists among at-risk populations in the state, based on blood bank data and a single case study. Since 2007, the American Academy of Blood Banks initiated guidelines on screening blood donors for CD among Latin American populations after blood-product related T. cruzi infection was found among recipients of these products from infected donors [4•]. From 2007 to 2019, Florida had the second highest number of blood donors in the USA, with 325 confirmed cases of CD, second only to California (n = 890; ). However, these cases represent just 1.8% of the estimated 18,000 people living with T. cruzi infection in Florida . Several other studies have shown increased T. cruzi prevalence among Florida blood donors with serological evidence of CD [25, 29, 30]. One such study found that, in 2008, 1:3800 blood donations were positive for CD screening assays among 14 million donations studied. This finding was the highest T. cruzi seropositivity rate found in the USA at the time .
Transplacental T. cruzi transmission has also been documented in Florida. Two adult males born in the USA to a mother from Bolivia had confirmed CD. Neither son had vector exposure, so the case was considered to be probable congenital transmission. One of the sons had evidence of chronic CD and likely cardiac involvement while the other did not have clinical evidence of disease at the time of publication . The true extent of transplacental T. cruzi transmission in Florida is unknown, and efforts are needed to implement screening among at-risk women seeking prenatal care.
Presently, our team at the University of Florida with support in part from Mundo Sano Foundation and Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative are conducting a statewide prevalence study to assess CD among at-risk Latin Americans, following new guidelines for screening and diagnosing CD in the USA [22••]. Using rapid lateral flow diagnostic tests (Chagas Detect™ Plus; InBios International, Inc.; DPP® Chagas System; Chembio Diagnostic Systems, Inc.) in primary care and mobile clinic settings (Fig. 1), we have unearthed new cases of CD, but our work is ongoing at the time of this submission. We aim to collect enough data to generate the first state-wide Chagas disease prevalence assessment in Florida over a 3-year investigation.
Triatomine Bugs in Florida
Triatomine research in Florida has received little attention compared to other vector groups, particularly mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) and no-see-ums (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae: Culicoides). Current and past research indicates that triatomine bugs in the state are widespread, are T. cruzi competent, and that some populations do live in close proximity to humans and their animals. Modern molecular techniques can be applied to triatomine research to better understand their importance in T. cruzi transmission risk in Florida.
Two species of triatomine bugs are endemic to the state of Florida (Fig. 2), Triatoma sanguisuga (LeConte) and Triatoma lecticularia (Stal). The two species are easily differentiated by presence (T. lecticularia) or absence (T. sanguisuga) of dark “hairs” covering the body (pubescence; ). Both species were formerly designated subspecies which were determined based upon the size of the adult and minor differences in geographical distribution. Validity for the subspecies designations was not supported by a thorough taxonomic revision , although the topic has not been revisited with molecular techniques. Relatively little research has been published on Florida triatomines, compared with states in the southwestern USA, such as Texas or Arizona. The most thorough studies were conducted over 50 years ago, beginning with work by Thurman et al. , who provided a useful key to Florida Triatoma with valuable distribution records revealing our first statewide record. Thurman’s robust entomological survey was conducted over 4 years and yielded Triatoma spp. collected from a total of 32 counties . This assessment included previous field work conducted by Usinger’s original work on Triatominae . A further detailed collection conducted by Irons Jr. and Butler investigated 15 sites among five counties (Alachua, Hardee, Leon, Levy, Orange) over a 2-year period from 1969 until 1971. They describe immature nymphs and adults being found year-round and associated with certain sylvatic habitats. This includes fallen trees and stumps, and loose bark of rotting logs primarily located near animal runs . Interestingly, nymphs were frequently found in the presence of the Florida wood-roach (Eurycotis floridana), which may have been acting as a food source in times of starvation . Over the last four to five decades since the majority of triatomine research was conducted in Florida, our state has changed drastically with respect to overall population growth and environmental changes such as human development of natural spaces. These changes have increased human exposure to sylvatic and peridomestic vectors such as ticks [37, 38], mosquitoes [39, 40], and even triatomines [41, 42] throughout the globe, supporting the need for ongoing research of this vector here in Florida.
Triatoma sanguisuga (s.l.) is considered to be the most widespread and common triatomine species in Florida, and has been recorded virtually statewide, including in the panhandle and the north, central, and southern regions of the state . Triatoma sanguisuga (recorded as now-defunct subspecies Triatoma sanguisuga ambigua (Neiva), and Triatoma sanguisuga sanguisuga (LeConte), has been found in 31 of 32 Florida counties sampled in this survey among a total of 67 counties in the state . T. sanguisuga was found from Jackson County in northern Florida to Broward County in southern Florida.
Triatoma lecticularia (Stal) is not considered to be common in Florida and is infrequently reported in published entomological surveys [32–34]. The recorded distribution of this species in Florida is restricted to the Gulf Coast Counties (Citrus, Pasco, and Lee Counties) and two inland counties (Suwanee and Hardee [32, 33]). Very little is known about the biology of T. lecticularia, including its potential for transmitting T. cruzi. The species is distributed widely throughout the southern USA and the border state of Nuevo Leon in northern Mexico . The species has been found naturally infected with T. cruzi in Texas [4•], so it could theoretically play a role in T. cruzi transmission to humans in Florida. T. lecticularia is considered a sylvatic species that is typically associated with rodent nests. We have not found T. lecticularia in our sylvatic or peridomestic field work in Florida, and we suspect that it is an elusive triatomine species that poses a low epidemiological risk to human beings.
Triatoma rubrofasciata (De Geer) is an invasive species that has been recorded from historical collections in Jacksonville, Florida [4•]. However, it is unclear if the species is still present in Florida, as it has not been reported in > 50 years, nor collected in our current entomological survey work.
T. cruzi infection in field-collected triatomines
The first detection of T. cruzi from a field-collected Florida triatomine was described by Beard et al. in 1988 . Trypanosoma cruzi was successfully cultured from an adult female T. sanguisuga individual that was found at night on a screened door of a lit porch in Gainesville, Florida. Previous attempts to detect T. cruzi in triatomines from Florida until this point had yet to find T. cruzi infection, including a survey of 99 triatomines collected in north Florida . Since detection of this naturally infected Florida triatomine in 1988, not much was done by local researchers to further investigate T. cruzi among Florida triatomines. However, findings from a national citizen science program conducted at Texas A&M (TAMU) have recently revealed human interaction with triatomines in Florida . The research demonstrated that in Florida, T. sanguisuga that invaded homes, was found commonly in the peridomestic environment and was infected with two distinct T. cruzi DTU’s (DTU tcIV and DTU TcI) [44, 45].
Our team at the University of Florida is conducting research into the ecological and environmental associations with triatomine bug presence in and around human homes in Florida. So far, we have collected over 300 T. sanguisuga specimens throughout the panhandle, northern, and central Florida regions. We have yet to isolate the species in southern regions, likely due to sampling bias. Our preliminary analysis reveals that the majority of triatomines collected were in the adult stage (Fig. 3) and were found inside or around human dwellings. The homes were typically located in rural settings or in suburban landscapes located close to the interface with wild spaces. Several homes with triatomines have been identified due to residents being bitten by the insect. Nymphal triatomine stages (Fig. 4) have also been found nearby or inside human dwellings, and we are investigating the possibility of domiciliation, but this is unclear at this time.
Trypanosoma cruzi Infection in Wildlife and Companion Animals
A wide range of mammal species in the USA have been shown to be infected with T. cruzi, including the North American raccoon (Procyon lotor), Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana), striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis), gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus), armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus), and multiple species of woodrat (Neotoma spp.) and other rodents [4•, 46•]. Other species have been documented to produce antibodies to T. cruzi, and are considered potential reservoirs including bobcat (Felis rufus), and coyote (Canis latrans; ).
In Florida, sylvatic T. cruzi transmission among wildlife reservoirs has been found, but data are sparse. Brown et al. [46•] sampled racoons and opossums from three Florida counties (Leon, Wakulla, Hendry), and found that 54% of racoons (n = 38/70) and 52% of opossums (n = 14/27) were seropositive via indirect immunofluorescent anti-T. cruzi antibody testing . In mammals collected from Georgia and Florida, the authors found that 30% (50/168) of raccoons and 13% (11/83) of opossums were T. cruzi culture positive. Finally, an earlier investigation of T. cruzi genotypes from 107 isolates from wild mammals in the USA found that DTU 1 was the predominant T. cruzi genotype in Florida racoons and opossums .
Perhaps also meriting attention are non-human primates (NHP) in Florida. A 2018 study of 980 captive NHP (rhesus macaques) in Texas found that 4% of the macaques sampled (41/980) were seropositive for T. cruzi, of which 33 (80%) were also PCR positive for the parasite . In the 1930s, rhesus macaques were introduced into Silver Spring State Park in central Florida in an effort to bolster tourism to the area . A troop of approximately 12 macaques were intentionally released during that time, and the population grew to an estimated 400 or more animals in the 1980s, and spread to an adjacent forest in a region along the Ocklawaha River [50, 51]. In 2015 and 2016, Wisely et al., working with local wildlife trappers, collected venous blood from 317 macaques in order to test them for macacine herpesvirus-1. The assessment revealed that rhesus macaques still thrive in the Silver Spring State Park (5000 total acres), which is adjacent to the Ocala National Forest (387,000 total acres) in north central Florida . Currently, there are three species of non-native NHP populations in Florida, including Saimiri spp. (squirrel monkey), Chlorocebus pygerythrus (vervet monkey) and as discussed, the Macaca mulatta (rhesus macaque; ). Squirrel monkeys, which are found naturally in endemic regions of Chagas disease, can be naturally infected with T. cruzi, as well as Macaca spp. in non-endemic regions, including the USA [49, 53, 54]. Captive or invasive NHPs living in Florida have yet to be investigated for T. cruzi infection but given reports of known populations into the hundreds (exact number unknown) of free-ranging invasive NHP in the north central and possibly other regions of south Florida [50, 52], these populations could play a role in the maintenance of sylvatic T. cruzi transmission in the state.
Finally, companion animals can be infected with T. cruzi, and awareness is increasing in the USA that both domestic canines and felines are at risk [46•]. Several studies have found T. cruzi infection among domestic mammals and zoo-raised exotic mammals [46•], but there is no research on the subject in Florida. Researchers in Texas have found widespread T. cruzi infection among canines, including working government and military dogs . T. cruzi infection among mammalian pets such as cats and dogs may serve as a source for ongoing peridomestic and/or domestic infection cycles near human dwellings. The increase of small ruminant livestock and chicken flocks in urban and periurban US households  may also serve as a source for increasing triatomine exposure near the human dwelling. Birds are not competent T. cruzi hosts, but they do serve as a food source for the vectors. Further research is needed in Florida to assess the role of synanthropic animals in T. cruzi transmission cycles.
Our team at the University of Florida is investigating raccoons and opossums in Florida to assess their role in peridomestic or even domestic transmission cycles. Preliminary findings have detected T. cruzi in both rural and urban racoons and opossums in north Florida . T. cruzi DNA was detected in 26% (18/69) of opossums and 5% (3/55) of raccoons sampled. Our work is ongoing, and more research is needed to better understand the community of mammalian reservoirs and the prevalence of T. cruzi infection in Florida animals.
Risk for Human Autochthonous Transmission in Florida
Autochthonous transmission of CD in the USA has been suspected or confirmed in Texas, California, Arizona, Tennessee, Louisiana, Missouri, Arkansas, and Mississippi [4•]. T. cruzi transmission to humans through exposure to T. sanguisuga vector-borne exposure has been found in southeastern portions of the USA, including an infestation documented in rural New Orleans, Louisiana . In Florida, T. cruzi has been found to infect triatomine bugs, wildlife, and companion animals such as domestic canines [14, 46•, 47, 48, 55, 57]. At this time, a human case has not been described. Nonetheless, Florida does have all the necessary elements to permit T. cruzi transmission to humans, including T. cruzi-infected triatomines invading human dwellings [44, 45, Beatty pers. comm.] and a changing landscape, which may facilitate further triatomine invasion or establishment in peridomestic or domestic areas.
Triatomine invasion into human dwellings was first documented during our field investigations in Florida in 2019 (Fig. 4), and interestingly the first known T. cruzi infected triatomine was found on someone’s porch in Alachua County in 1986 . In fact, the earliest historical entomological surveys conducted by Usinger et al. and Thurman et al. in 1944 and 1947 document triatomines collected at human dwellings and other domestic animal structures, like chicken coops [32, 34]. Triatomines near human homes have been described in other regions of North America [4•, 5] and well documented in Texas, where multiple autochthonous human Chagas disease cases have been described . This includes a recent case of acute Chagas in a rancher from central Texas who presented with classic features of Romaña’s sign and T. cruzi DNA isolated from the blood [60•]. Canine Chagas disease appears to be common in Texas in certain regions, and may act as a sentinel for peridomestic and domestic transmission in and around human inhabitants, thus emphasizing the need for more research on the subject in Florida.
Anthropogenic landscape changes of wild spaces may also impact triatomine biology and likely T. cruzi sylvatic cycles in endemic regions of Chagas disease. One such study looking at deforestation in eastern Amazonia has shown that manipulating the natural landscape can increase vector-population densities in this region . Florida, like many regions of the USA where triatomines inhabit the landscape, may be at risk for increasing exposure to the vector due to deforestation and resulting changes to vector ecology, which may facilitate peridomestic invasion into the human habitation (Fig. 5). More research is needed to better understand how anthropogenic landscape changes can impact the risk that Florida’s residents and its millions of annual visitors face for vector-borne diseases like Chagas.
Improving Knowledge, Awareness, and Linkage to Care for those with Chagas Disease
Within the USA and including Florida, few people get tested for CD outside of routine screening among blood and organ donations. Moreover, it is likely that few of the individuals with confirmed positive results have received treatment and management. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention only 15 of the 365 people who received benznidazole under Investigational New Drug Protocols from 2011 to 2018 were treated by physicians in Florida, or about 2 people per year . While both benznidazole (2017) and nifurtimox (2020) are now FDA-approved, most people with Chagas disease remain without access to testing and treatment.
Several interrelated barriers perpetuate the neglect of CD in the USA [8, 63]. One of the biggest barriers is low awareness, both among healthcare personnel and people at risk. Because of the disease’s long asymptomatic phase, most people are unaware they have the infection, so provider-initiated screening is critical for identifying patients. Several studies have documented low awareness of CD among healthcare providers in the USA [20, 64–66], and patients with CD have indicated this lack of awareness as a major impediment to accessing testing [67•]. Considering that up to 86% of people at risk may have never heard of Chagas disease , there is also an absence of information, education and communication activities directed toward the disease, which is a critical public health gap.
Nonetheless, even if healthcare providers recognize the importance of CD, simply testing patients and navigating them to care can pose major challenges. In a recent survey of obstetricians-gynecologists and Family Medicine practitioners (N = 178), most considered CD to be an important public health concern. However, 2/3 were unsure of how to order a test, and fewer still were certain what to do with a positive test result . Of the four assays with FDA clearance for clinical use, only one is a point-of-care test [22••] which may limit the ability to screen the most vulnerable and underserved populations such as farmworkers and other seasonal or temporary workers with limited resources. Moreover, CD testing may not be accounted for in medical information systems, and providers may not be aware of criteria for diagnosis or in which cases antiparasitic treatment should be initiated.
On the other hand, new guidelines are available in the USA to help clinicians understand what populations should be screened and how to navigate a diagnosis of CD in the USA [22••]. For example, people who were born in or with significant travel to a CD endemic region (21 countries in total) located in Mexico, Central or South America should receive CD testing at least once [22••]. In Florida, this guideline will ideally lead to increased awareness and clear standards linking at-risk populations to necessary testing. Given that the at-risk population is heterogeneous, ranging from business owners and service workers in major urban centers to seasonal workers in agricultural areas throughout the state, attention will be needed to reach this diverse community and the clinical providers who care for them. One strategy being undertaken is the use of rapid, point-of-care CD testing that can provide screening in the outpatient clinic and other mobile health care venues like health fairs. Results are generally ready within 15–20 min, easy to administer with a single drop of blood, and provide sensitivity reported between 93.6 and 97.5% among US-based populations [18, 70], thus allowing for ideal screening opportunities.
Comprehensive training of the healthcare workforce in identification of CD risk factors and processes for diagnosis and treatment is needed in the state of Florida. A state task force dedicated to CD linked with a network of providers in key locations throughout the state could also help ramp up testing and treatment. An awareness campaign targeted to people at risk, based on linguistically and culturally appropriate messages, should accompany these efforts to encourage demand for testing .
CD is one of the most hidden, neglected diseases in the USA, and poses a public health challenge demanding urgent attention. There are significant gaps in epidemiological knowledge of the incidence, prevalence, and transmission; evidence provided by ongoing and future research in Florida will provide key pieces of the puzzle. Florida is a state with both naturally infected vectors and mammalian hosts of T. cruzi, which drives concern for the potential of autochthonous transmission to our mammalian companion animals and ourselves. Furthermore, this region of North America is home to a diverse population of Latin Americans who have emigrated from endemic regions where T. cruzi DTU strains are different and serological testing can be discordant. Guidelines are now available for health care providers who are practicing in the USA which will hopefully bring awareness and further aid in screening and diagnosing at-risk populations with CD. Creating comprehensive public health responses in Florida and other high-burden states that focus on raising awareness, building capacity among healthcare providers to address CD, including adequate diagnosis and timely antiparasitic treatment, and strengthening research to better understand the epidemiology of the disease, including the local risk of vector transmission, will be key to addressing this hidden public health challenge.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Perez-Molina JA, Molina I. Chagas disease. Lancet. 2018;391:82–94.
World Health Organization Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis) Fact Sheet. Accessed 11/11/2021.
Drugs for Neglected Tropical Diseases initiative Chagas Disease Fact Sheet. Accessed 11/11/2021.
Bern C, Messenger LA, Whitman JD, et al. Chagas disease in the United States: a public health approach. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;33(1):e00023-e119. (Comprehensive review of Chagas disease in the Unites States. Authors review all known data on the epidemiology and ecology of T. cruzi, including naturally occurring triatomines, T. cruzi reservoirs and molecular epidemiology. Infections in humans, including among those emigrating from endemic regions and autochthonous cases is also reviewed.)
Franco-Paredes C, Villamil-Gomez WE, Schultz J, et al. A deadly feast: elucidating the burden of orally acquired acute Chagas disease in Latin America – public health and travel medicine importance. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020;36:101565.
Velásquez-Ortiz N, Ramírez JD. Understanding the oral transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi as a veterinary and medical foodborne zoonosis. Res Vet Sci. 2020;132:448–61.
Beatty NL, Klotz SA. Autochthonous Chagas disease in the United States: how are people getting infected? Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;103(3):967–9.
Bern C, Montgomery S. An estimate of the burden of Chagas disease in the United States. Clin Inf Dis. 2009;49:e52-54.
Manne-Goehler J, Umeh CA, Montgomery SP, et al. Estimating the burden of Chagas disease in the United States. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10: e0005033. (Dr. Mann-Goehler and colleagues assessed the overall burden of Chagas disease in the United States utilizing national prevalence data from Chagas disease endemic Latin American countries provided by the World Health Organization and the U.S. American Community Survey data available at the time (2008-2012). Florida was estimated to have 18,096 people living with Chagas disease.)
Forsyth C, Meymandi S, Moss I, et al. Proposed multidimensional framework for understanding Chagas disease healthcare barriers in the United States. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(9):e0007447.
Geraix J, Ardisson LP, Marcondes-Machado J, et al. Clinical and nutritional profile of individuals with Chagas disease. Braz J Infect Dis. 2007;11(4):411–4.
Hidron AI, Gilman RH, Justiniano J, et al. Chagas disease working group in Peru and Bolivia Chagas cardiomyopathy in the context of the chronic disease transition. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;18(4):5-e688.
Lima-Costa MF, Matos DL, Ribeiro AL. Chagas disease predicts 10-year stroke mortality in community-dwelling elderly: the Bambui cohort study of aging. Stroke. 2010;41(11):2477–82.
Beard CB, Young DG, Butler JF, et al. First isolation of Trypanosoma cruzi from a wild-caught Triatoma sanguisuga (LeConte) (Hemiptera: Triatominae) in Florida, USA. J Parasitol. 1988;74(2):343–4.
https://www.aabb.org/news-resources/resources/hemovigilance/chagas-biovigilance-network (accessed 11/29/2021)
• Meymandi SK, Forsyth CJ, Soverow J, et al. Prevalence of Chagas disease in the Latin American-born population of Los Angeles. Clin Inf Dis. 2017;64:1182–8. (Dr. Meymandi and her team conducted the first large-scale screening for Chagas disease among Latin American immigrants in Los Angeles County, California. Overall prevalence among this cohort was 1.24% and further estimates indicate that >30,000 people are possibly living with Chagas disease in this region.)
Hernandez S, Forsyth CJ, Flores CA, et al. Prevalence of Chagas disease among family members of previously diagnosed patients in Los Angles. California Clin Inf Dis. 2019;69(7):1226–8.
Castro-Sesquen YE, Saldaña A, Patino Nava D, et al. Use of a Latent class analysis in the diagnosis of chronic chagas disease in the Washington Metropolitan Area. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(9):e303–10.
Manne-Goehler J, Davis J, Huanuco JP, et al. Screening for Chagas disease in East Boston, Massachusetts from 2017–2020 reveals 09% prevalence, abstract 773 IDWeek Virtual Event, 21 to 25 Oct 2020. Open Forum Inf Dis. 2020;7(1):S431.
Edwards MS, Montgomery SP. Congenital Chagas disease: progress toward implementation of pregnancy-based screening. Curr Opin Inf Dis. 2021;34(5):538–45.
Edwards M, Rench M, Todd C, et al. Perinatal screening for Chagas disease in southern Texas. J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc. 2015;4(1):67–70.
Forsyth CJ, Manne-Goehler J, Bern C. et al (2021) Recommendations for screening and diagnosis of Chagas disease in the United States. J Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 8:jiab513. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiab513. Epub ahead of print. The United States Chagas Diagnostic Working Group has constructed guideline recommendations for screening and diagnosing at-risk populations for Chagas disease among those who are living in the United States. The objective of these guidelines are to increase provider recognition of Chagas and evidence-based screening practices to improve health care delivery for this neglected disease.
https://www.oas.org/en/media_center/press_release.asp?sCodigo=E-073/21. Accessed 6/9/2022.
Article: Venezuelan Immigrants in the United States | migrationpolicy.org. Accessed 6/9/2022.
Añez N, Crisante G, Rojas A, Segnini S, Espinoza-Álvarez O, Teixeira MMG. Update on Chagas disease in Venezuela during the period 2003–2018. A review Acta Trop. 2020;203:105310.
Grilet ME, Hernández-Villena JV, Llewellyn MS, et al. Venezuela’s humanitarian crisis, resurgence of vector-borne diseases, and implications for spillover in the region. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(5):e149–61.
Leiby DA, Herron RM Jr, Read EJ, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi in Los Angeles and Miami blood donors: impact of evolving donor demographics on sero- prevalence and implications for transfusion transmission. Transfusion. 2002;42:549–55.
Leiby DA, Read EJ, Lenes BA, et al. Seroepidemiology of Trypanosoma cruzi, etiologic agent of Chagas’ disease. US blood donors J Infect Dis. 1997;176(4):1047–52.
Bern C, Montgomery SP, Katz L, et al. Chagas disease and the US blood supply. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2008;21:476–82.
Murillo J, Bofill LM, Bolivar H, et al. Congenital Chagas disease transmission in the United States: diagnosis in adulthood. ID cases. 2016;5:72–5.
Thurman DC, Mulrennan JA, Basham E, et al. Key to Florida Triatoma with Additional Distribution Records for the Species (Hemiptera, Reduviidae). The Florida Entomologist. 1948;31(3):57–62.
Lent H, Wygodzinsky P. Revision of the Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae), and their significance as vectors of Chagas’ disease. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 1979;163(3):123–520.
Usinger RL. the Triatominae on North and Central America and the West Indies and their public health significance. Public Health Bulletin No.288, Federal Security Agency, U.S. Public Health 81 pps. 1944.
Irons EM, Butler JF. American Trypanosomiasis Survey of Florida Triatoma Species. The Florida Entomologist. 1978;61(1):31–3 (Florida Entomological Society).
Schmidt JO, Dorn PL, Klotz SA. Second-best is better than nothing: cockroaches as a viable food source for the kissing bug Triatoma recurva (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). J Med Entomol. 2019;56(3):651–5.
Ledger KJ, Beati L, Wisely SM. Survey of ticks and tick-borne rickettsial and protozoan pathogens in Eswatini. Pathogens. 2021;10(8):1043.
Hansford KM, Wheeler BW, Tschirren B, Medlock JM. Questing Ixodes ricinus ticks and Borrelia spp in urban green space across Europe: a review. Zoonoses Public Health. 2022;69(3):153–66.
Fornace KM, Alexander N, Abidin TR, Brock PM, Chua TH, Vythilingam I, Ferguson HM, Manin BO, Wong ML, Ng SH, Cox J, Drakeley C. Local human movement patterns and land use impact exposure to zoonotic malaria in Malaysian Borneo. Elife. 2019;22(8):e47602.
Fornace KM, Abidin TR, Alexander N, et al. Association between landscape factors and spatial patterns of Plasmodium knowlesi infections in sabah. Malaysia Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:201–9.
de Sousa PH, Scofield A, Júnior PSB, et al. Chagas disease in urban and peri-urban environment in the Amazon: sentinel hosts, vectors, and the environment. Acta Trop. 2021;217:105858.
Weinberg D, Porcasi X, Lanfri S, et al. Spatial analyzes of triatomine infestation indices and their association to the actions of a Chagas disease program and environmental variables during a 5-year intervention period. Acta Trop. 2018;188:41–9.
Curtis-Robles R, Wozniak EJ, Auckland LD, et al. Combining public health education and disease ecology research: using citizen science to assess Chagas disease entomological risk in Texas. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(12):e0004235.
Curtis-Robles R, Hamer SA, Lane S, et al. Bionomics and spatial distribution of triatomine vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi in Texas and other southern states, USA. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98(1):113–21.
Curtis-Robles R, Auckland LD, Snowden KF, et al. Analysis of over 1500 triatomine vectors from across the US, predominantly Texas, for Trypanosoma cruzi infection and discrete typing units. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;58:171–80.
Busselman RE, Hamer SA. Chagas disease ecology in the United States: recent advances in understanding Trypanosoma cruzi transmission among triatomines, wildlife, and domestic animals and a quantitative synthesis of vector-host interactions. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2021 Nov 10. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-013120-043949. Epub ahead of print. Busselman and Hamer thoroughly review our current understanding of the ecology and transmission of T. cruzi in the sylvatic, peridomestic and domestic cycles here in the United States.
Brown EL, Roellig DM, Gompper ME, et al. Seroprevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi among eleven potential reservoir species from six states across the southern United States. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010;10(8):757–63.
Roellig DM, Brown EL, Barnabé C, et al. Molecular typing of Trypanosoma cruzi isolates. United States Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14(7):1123–5.
Hodo CL, Wilkerson GK, Birkner EC, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi transmission among captive nonhuman primates, wildlife, and vectors. EcoHealth. 2018;15(2):426–36.
Anderson CJ, Hostetler ME, Johnson SA. History and status of introduced non-human primate populations in Florida. Southeast Nat. 2017;16(1):19–36.
Wolfe LD, Peters EH. History of the freeranging rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) of Silver Springs. Fla Sci. 1987;50:234–45.
Wisely SM, Sayler KA, Anderson CJ, et al. Macacine herpesvirus 1 antibody prevalence and DNA shedding among invasive rhesus macaques, Silver Springs State Park, Florida, USA. Emerg infect dis. 2018;24(2):345.
Pung OJ, Spratt J, Clark CG, Norton TM, Carter J. Trypanosoma cruzi infection of free-ranging lion-tailed macaques (Macaca silenus) and ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta) on St Catherine’s Island, Georgia, USA. J Zoo Wildl Med. 1998;29(1):25–30.
Ziccardi M, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R. The infection rates of trypanosomes in squirrel monkeys at two sites in the Brazilian Amazon. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1997;92(4):465–70.
Meyers AC, Purnell JC, Ellis MM, Auckland LD, Meinders M, Hamer SA. Nationwide exposure of U.S. working dogs to the Chagas disease parasite, Trypanosoma cruzi. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;102(5):1078–85.
Pollock SL, Stephen C, Skuridina N, et al. Raising chickens in city backyards: the public health role. J Community Health. 2012;37:734–42.
Beatty NL, White ZS, Bhosale CR. Et al. Trypanosoma cruzi infection among rural and urban Virginia opossums and North American raccoons found in North Florida, USA. Abstract 1363, ASTMH 69th Annual meeting, virtual event, 15 to 19 November, 2020.
Dorn PL, Perniciaro L, Yabsley MJ, et al. Autochthonous transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi. Louisiana Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13(4):605–7.
Gunter SM, Murray KO, Gorchakov R, et al. Likely Autochthonous transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi to humans, South Central Texas, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(3):500–3. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2303.161157.
Hudson F, Homer N, Epstein A, et al. Acute Chagas disease manifesting as orbital cellulitis, Texas, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27(11):2937–9. Example of ongoing autochthonous transmission in the United States presenting initially with concerns for orbital cellulitis and diagnosed after advanced molecular testing revealed T. cruzi DNA in patient’s blood. Patient lived in central Texas in a suburban home but frequently worked on a local ranch with domestic animals. No known exposure to the vector reported.
Santos WS, Gurgel-Gonçalves R, Garcez LM, et al. Deforestation effects on Attalea palms and their resident Rhodnius, vectors of Chagas disease, in eastern Amazonia. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(5):e0252071.
Herwaldt BL, Dougherty CP, Allen CK, et al. Characteristics of patients for whom benznidazole was released through the CDC-sponsored investigational new drug program for treatment of Chagas disease - United States, 2011–2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(29):803–5.
Manne-Goehler J, Reich MR, Wirtz VJ. Access to care for Chagas disease in the United States: a health systems analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93(1):108–13.
Stimpert KK, Montgomery SP. Physician awareness of Chagas disease, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(5):871–2.
Amstutz-Szalay S. Physician knowledge of Chagas disease in Hispanic immigrants living in Appalachian Ohio. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017;4(3):523–8.
Verani JR, Montgomery SP, Schulkin J, et al. Survey of obstetrician-gynecologists in the United States about Chagas disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83(4):891–5.
Forsyth CJ, Hernandez S, Flores CA, et al. “It’s like a phantom disease”: patient perspectives on access to treatment for Chagas disease in the United States. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98(3):735–41. Dr. Forsyth and his colleagues at the Center of Excellence for Chagas Disease at Olive View-UCLA Medical Center conduct a cross-sectional study highlighting patient perspectives among those living with Chagas disease. Results reveal significant barriers to health care and stigma associated with the disease.
Sanchez DR, Traina MI, Hernandez S, et al. Chagas disease awareness among Latin American immigrants living in Los Angeles. California Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;91(5):915–9.
Mahoney West H, Milliren CE, Vragovic O, et al. Perceived barriers to Chagas disease screening among a diverse group of prenatal care providers. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(2):e0246783.
Kelly EA, Bulman CA, Gunderson EL, Irish AM, Townsend RL, Sakanari JA, Stramer SL, Bern C, Whitman JD. Comparative performance of latest-generation and FDA-cleared serology tests for the diagnosis of Chagas disease. J Clin Microbiol. 2021;59(6):e00158-e221.
The Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi) is grateful to its donors, public and private, who have provided funding to DNDi since its inception in 2003. A full list of DNDi’s donors can be found at http://www.dndi.org/donors/donors/.
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Beatty reports funding to conduct Chagas disease research from Mundo Sano Foundation (AWD08818). All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
All the figures are original and have not been published previously. The Florida triatomine distribution map (Fig. 2) is an original creation by Dr. Burkett-Cadena, produced by compiling data from older publications. It is not an adaptation of a previous work.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
All reported studies/experiments with human or animal subjects performed by the authors have been previously published and complied with all applicable ethical standards (including the Helsinki declaration and its amendments, institutional/national research committee standards, and international/national/institutional guidelines).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Emerging Vector Borne Diseases in the U.S.
About this article
Cite this article
Beatty, N.L., Forsyth, C.J., Burkett-Cadena, N. et al. Our Current Understanding of Chagas Disease and Trypanosoma cruzi Infection in the State of Florida — an Update on Research in this Region of the USA. Curr Trop Med Rep (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40475-022-00261-w
- Chagas disease
- Trypanosoma cruzi
- Neglected tropical disease
- Kissing bug