Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of fear on a tri-trophic food chain model with supplementary food source

  • Published:
International Journal of Dynamics and Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present article deals with the dynamical complexity of a three-species food chain model with the inclusion of supplementary food source for the predator at the expense of fear into the prey population. Basic preliminaries regarding existence, uniqueness, positivity, boundedness and dissipativity of the model system are provided as essential requirements. The existence of ecologically feasible equilibria of the system along with their stability analyses are carried out. The stable steady state turns out to be reactive if there is a unique interior equilibrium point. When the system grows bistability, the outcomes become complex. One of the two stable coexistence states changes from being non-reactive to reactive. However, it has been found that the disruption brought about by the fear component in the present system modifies the system ephemeral behaviour, making it more stable in every instance compared to the entire Hastings–Powell model system. Additionally, proper consideration is given to the local bifurcation analysis of codimensions 1 and 2 with respect to the significant system parameters. The source of chaotic dynamics (chaotic \(\rightarrow \) period doubling \(\rightarrow \) limit cycle \(\rightarrow \) stable focus) has been intriguingly investigated using the maximum Lyapunov exponent. Through quantitative simulations, certain fascinating dynamical complexity, such as the variation in the number of equilibria and the bifurcation scenario, have also been revealed. Numerical simulations are performed in order to explore the influence of both fear among the prey and supplementary food source for the predator on the interacting population. The numerical results reveal that the impact of both these factors can alter the stability/instability of the model system under consideration. The effects of the fear factor and supplemental food source are carefully examined in regard to the coexistence equilibrium point.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material:

Data sharing does not apply to this article as no dataset was generated or analysed during the present study.

Code Availability:

Code sharing does not apply to this article as no special code is used other than the in-built standard general code in MATLAB.

References

  1. Creel S, Dröge E, M’soka J, Smit D, Becker M, Christianson D, Schuette P (2017) The relationship between direct predation and antipredator responses: a test with multiple predators and multiple prey. Ecology 98(8):2081–2092

    Google Scholar 

  2. Suraci JP, Clinchy M, Dill LM, Roberts D, Zanette LY (2016) Fear of large carnivores causes a trophic cascade. Nat Commun 7(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang X, Zanette L, Zou X (2016) Modelling the fear effect in predator–prey interactions. J Math Biol 73(5):1179–1204

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang X, Zou X (2017) Modeling the fear effect in predator–prey interactions with adaptive avoidance of predators. Bull Math Biol 79(6):1325–1359

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Mondal S, Maiti A, Samanta GP (2018) Effects of fear and additional food in a delayed predator–prey model. Biophys Rev Lett 13(04):157–177

    Google Scholar 

  6. Han R, Guin LN, Dai B (2020) Cross-diffusion-driven pattern formation and selection in a modified Leslie–Gower predator–prey model with fear effect. J Biol Syst 28(01):27–64

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarkar K, Ali N, Guin LN (2021) Fear effect in a tri-trophic food chain model with Holling Type IV functional response. J Environ Account Manag 9(3):235–253

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lima S, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68(4):619–640

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pandey P, Pal N, Samanta S, Chattopadhyay J (2018) Stability and bifurcation analysis of a three-species food chain model with fear. Int J Bifurc Chaos 28(1):1850009

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor RJ (1984) Predation. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Srinivasu PDN, Prasad BSRV, Venkatesulu M (2007) Biological control through provision of additional food to predators: a theoretical study. Theor Popul Biol 72(1):111–120

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Srinivasu PDN, Prasad BSRV (2010) Time optimal control of an additional food provided predator–prey system with applications to pest management and biological conservation. J Math Biol 60(4):591–613

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Mondal S, Maiti A, Samanta GP (2018) Effects of fear and additional food in a delayed predator–prey model. Biophys Rev Lett 13(4):157–177

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mondal S, Samanta GP (2019) Dynamics of an additional food provided predator–prey system with prey refuge dependent on both species and constant harvest in predator. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 534:122310

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Qi Y, Li N (2021) Dynamics of an additional food provided predator–prey system with nonlinear harvest in predator. World Sci Res J 7(10):64–75

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guin LN, Mandal G, Mondal M, Chakravarty S (2022) A chaotic tri-trophic food chain model supplemented by Allee effect. Int J Dyn Control. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-022-01017-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hastings A, Powell T (1991) Chaos in three-species food chain. Ecology 72(3):896–903

    Google Scholar 

  18. Haque M, Ali N, Chakravarty S (2013) Study of a tri-trophic prey-dependent food chain model of interacting populations. Math Biosci 246(1):55–71

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Ali N, Chakravarty S (2014) Consequence of prey refuge in a tri-trophic prey-dependent food chain model with intraspecific-competition. J Appl Nonlinear Dyn 3(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pal N, Samanta S, Rana S (2017) The impact of constant immigration on a tri-trophic food chain model. Biophys Rev Lett 3(4):3615–3644

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Lima SL (1998) Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator–prey interactions. Bioscience 48(1):25–34

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zanette LY, Allen MC, White AF, Clinchy M (2011) Perceived predation risk reduces the number of offspring songbirds produce per year. Science 334(6061):1398–1401

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nagumo M (1942) Über die lage der integralkurven gewöhnlicher differentialgleichungen. Proc Phys Math Soc Japan 3rd Ser 24:551–559

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Birkhoff G, Rota GC (1982) Ordinary differential equations. Ginn, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Xiao Y, Chen L (2001) Modeling and analysis of a predator–prey model with disease in the prey. Math Biosci 171(1):59–82

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. LaSalle JP (1976) The stability of dynamical systems. SIAM, Philadelphia

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Gross T, Feudel U (2004) Analytical search for bifurcation surfaces in parameter space. Phys D Nonlinear Phenom 195:292–302

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Perko L (2001) Differential equations and dynamical systems. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Ali N, Haque M, Venturino E, Chakravarty S (2017) Dynamics of a three species ratio-dependent food chain model with intra-specific competition within the top predator. Comput Biol Med 85:63–74

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lotka AJ (1956) Elements of mathematical biology. Dover Publications, Mineola

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. May RM (2001) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Kot M (2001) Elements of mathematical ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Lv S, Zhao M (2008) The dynamic complexity of a three species food chain model. Chaos Solitons Fractals 37(5):1469–1480

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Kuznetsov YA (1998) Elements of applied bifurcation theory, vol 112. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Javaid M, Tahir M, Imran M, Baleanu D, Akgül A, Imran MA (2022) Unsteady flow of fractional Burgers’ fluid in a rotating annulus region with power law kernel. Alex Eng J 61(1):17–27

    Google Scholar 

  36. Akgül A (2018) A novel method for a fractional derivative with non-local and non-singular kernel. Chaos Solitons Fractals 114:478–482

  37. Ahmad S, Ullah A, Akgül A, Baleanu D (2022) Theoretical and numerical analysis of fractal fractional model of tumor–immune interaction with two different kernels. Alex Eng J 61(7):5735–5752

    Google Scholar 

  38. Akgül A, Baleanu D (2021) Analysis and applications of the proportional Caputo derivative. Adv Differ Equ 2021(1):1–12

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Akgül A, Ahmed N, Raza A, Iqbal Z, Rafiq M, Rehman MA, Baleanu D (2021) Analysis and applications of the proportional Caputo derivative. Fractals 29(05):2140015

    Google Scholar 

  40. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GA, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403(6772):853–858

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wang X, Efendiev M, Lutscher F (2019) How spatial heterogeneity affects transient behavior in reaction–diffusion systems for ecological interactions? Bull Math Biol 81(10):3889–3917

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Han R, Guin LN, Dai B (2021) Consequences of refuge and diffusion in a spatiotemporal predator–prey model. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl 60:103311

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Han R, Mandal G, Guin LN, Chakravarty S (2022) Dynamical response of a reaction–diffusion predator–prey system with cooperative hunting and prey refuge. J Stat Mech Theory Exp 2022(10):103502

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research has no funding at all.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SC and LNG visualized of the presented idea. LNG and GM developed the analytical theory and performed numerical simulations. NA verified the analytical methods. All authors discussed the simulated outcomes and contributed to the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santabrata Chakravarty.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest:

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Appendix

Appendix

A detailed flow chart of the present research work is given in Fig. 20.

!bA flow chart for current research methodology

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mandal, G., Ali, N., Guin, L.N. et al. Impact of fear on a tri-trophic food chain model with supplementary food source. Int. J. Dynam. Control 11, 2127–2160 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-022-01104-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-022-01104-2

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation