Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multiobjective optimization of waterjet peening effects on high-cycle fatigue life of Al-7075-T6 alloy

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to propose and validate a numerical methodology for optimizing the Waterjet Peening (WJP) parameters on the surface integrity and High-Cycle Fatigue (HCF) strength of metallic materials. This methodology is composed of four principal steps: (i) the prediction of WJP surface integrity (residual stresses, plastic deformations, surface roughness and superficial damage) by using Finite Element (FE) simulation and considering different process conditions defined by the design-of-experiment method, (ii) the multi-objective optimization of the process parameters, (iii) the FE simulation of the elasto-plastic behavior of the peened surface under a cyclic loading and the determination of the quasi-stabilized surface integrity, and (iv) the prediction of the optimal S–N curve of the peened surface in the HCF regime by using the DangVan’s fatigue criterion. The proposed methodology is developed and validated for an Al 7075-T6 aluminum alloy peened at a given condition and subjected to 4-point rotative bending fatigue tests. Little discrepancy between experimental and theoretical fatigue lives is observed. In addition, the optimal WJP process parameters lead to about a 23% increase in the material fatigue limit in the range of 105–108 cycles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Srivastava M, Tripathi R, Hloch S, Chattopadhyaya S, Rai Dixit A (2016) Potential of using water jet peening as a surface treatment process for welded joints. Int Conf Manuf Eng Mater 149:472–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mochizuki M, Enomoto K, Sakata S, Saito H, Ichie K (1993) A study on residual stress improvement by water jet peening. In: Proceedings of 5th international conference on shot peening, Oxford University, Christ Church, pp 247–256

  3. Grinspan SA, Gnanamoorthy R (2006) A novel surface modification technique for the introduction of compressive residual stress and preliminary studies on Al alloy AA6063. Surf Coat Technol 201:1768–1775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhanshu H, Huixin Y, Shusen Z, Jiaqi X, Dalei L, Chao LC, Shuai W (2020) An experimental and numerical analysis of water jet peening of Al6061-T6. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107:3833–3845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05282-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mahmoudi AH, Salahi F, Ghasemi A (2016) Comparison between residual stress induced by waterjet peening and shot peening. In: International conference on surface modification technologies (SMT30), Milan; Italy.

  6. Krull P, Nitschke-Pagel T, Wohlfahrt H (1999) Influence of shot peening and high pressure water peening on near surface microstructure of 316 Ti stainless steel. Trans Eng Sci 25:292–300

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kong MC, Axinte D, Voice W (2010) Aspects of material removal mechanism in plain waterjet milling on gamma titanium aluminide. J Mater Process Technol 210:573–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang L, Folkes J, Kinnell P, Shipway PH (2012) Mechanisms of damage initiation in a titanium alloy subjected to water droplet impact during ultra-high. J Mater Process Technol 212:1906–1915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Colosimos BM, Monno M, Semeraro Q (2000) Process parameters control in water jet peening. Int J Mater Prod Technol 15:10–19. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMPT.2000.001232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Daniewicz SR, Cummings SD (1999) Characterization of water peening process. ASME J Eng Mater Technol 121:336–340. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2812383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Azmir A, Christian S, Eberhardb K, Jhislain N (2014) Surface Erosion of Carbon Steel 1045 during waterjet peening. J Mater Eng Perform 23(5):1870–1880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-0932-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kunaporn S, Ramulu M (2002) An experimental and numerical analysis of waterjet peening of 7075-T6 aluminum alloy. Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington

  13. Hashish M, Hopkins J, Kunaporn S, Ramulu M (2001) Ultra high-pressure water jet peening, Part I: surface texture. In: WJTA American Waterjet conference, pp 18–21

  14. Chillman A, Ramulu M, Hashish M (2007) Waterjet peening and surface preparation at 600 MPa: a preliminary experimental study. J Fluids Eng 129:485–490. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2436580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramulu M, Kunaporn S, Arola D, Hashish M, Hopkins J (2000) Water jet machining and peening of metals. J Pressure Vessel Technol 2000(122):90–95. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.556155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Epp J, Zoch HW (2016) Comparison of alternative peening methods for the improvement of fatigue properties of case-hardened steel parts. HTM J Heat Treat Mater 71:109–116. https://doi.org/10.3139/105.110288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rajesh N, Ramesh BN (2005) Empirical modelling of water-jet peening of 6063–T6 aluminium alloy. J Produc Eng 86:22–26

    Google Scholar 

  18. Macodiyo DO, Soyama H (2006) Optimization of cavitation peening parameters for fatigue performance of carburized steel using Taguchi methods. J Mater Process Technol 178:234–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Azmir A, Christian S, Bo L (2013) Effect of waterjet peening on aluminum alloy 5005. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:785–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4522-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ayeb M, Frija M, Fathallah R (2019) Prediction of residual stress profile and optimization of surface conditions induced by laser shock peening process using artificial neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100:2455–2471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2883-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maleki E, Farrahi GH (2018) Modelling of conventional and severe shot peening influence on properties of high carbon steel via artificial neural network. Int J Eng 31:382–393. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2017.30.11b.00

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Daoud M, Kubler R, Bemou A, Osmond P, Polette A (2021) Prediction of residual stress fields after shot peening of TRIP780 steel with second-order and artificial neural network models based on multiimpact finite element simulations. J Manuf Process Soc Manuf Eng 72:529–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.10.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Manual MU (2019) USA. MINITAB Inc. State College, PA

  24. Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1980.11980968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Amri R, Laamouri A, Fathallah R (2020) Finite element simulation of waterjet-peened Al 7075–T6 aluminum alloy surface by using multiple droplet impacts. J Mater Eng Perform 29:7336–7351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-05208-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hibbitt, Karlsson, Sorensen, Inc (2014) ABAQUS Standard User’s manual, version 6.14, USA

  27. Amri R, Laamouri A, Manchoul S, Fathallah R (2019) Transient dynamic finite element simulation for prediction of surface integrity induced by waterjet peening. Proc Inst Mech Eng L J Mater Design Appl. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420719874389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on ballistics, vol 54, pp 541–547

  29. Gregory Kay (2003) Failure modeling of titanium 6Al-4Vand aluminum 2024-T3 with the Johnson Cook material model, Office of Aviation Research Washington, DC 20591, September.

  30. Brar NS, Joshi VS, Harris BW (2009) Constitutive model constants for Al 7075T651 and Al 7075T6. AIP Conf Proc. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3295300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hsu C-Y, Liang C-C, Teng T-L, Nguyen A-T (2013) A numerical study on high-speed water jet impact. Ocean Eng 72:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chizari M, Al Hassani STS, Barrett LM, Wang B (2007) 3-D finite element modelling of water jet spot welding. In: Proceedings of the world congress on engineering

  33. Myers RH, Montgomery DC (2002) Response surface methodology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kartal ME, Basaga HB, Bayraktar A (2011) Probabilistic nonlinear analysis of CFR dams by MCS using response surface method. Appl Math Model 35:2752–2770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chi G, Hu S, Yang Y, Chen T (2012) Response surface methodology with prediction uncertainty: a multi-objective optimization approach. Chem Eng Res Des. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2011.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Vining GG (2001) Introduction to linear regression analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mattson RL, Coleman WS (1954) Effect of shot peening variables and residual stresses on fatigue life of leaf spring specimens. Trans Soc Autom Eng 62:546–556. https://doi.org/10.4271/540262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhuang WZ, Halford GR (2001) Investigation of residual stress relaxation under cyclic load. Int J Fatigue 23:S31–S37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00132-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Omar SZ, Aidy A, Sahari BB, Rizal Z (2009) Modelling of residual stress relaxation: a review. Pertanika J Sci Technol 17:325–336

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wick A, Schulze V, V¨ ohringer, O. (2000) Effects of warm peening on fatigue life and relaxation behavior of residual stresses in AISI 4140 steel. Mater Sci Eng A 293:191–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01035-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dang Van K, Douaron A, Lieurade HP (1984) Multiaxial fatigue limit: a new approach. In: Advances in fracture research, 6th Int. Conf. Fracture, pp 1879–1885

  42. Fathallah R, Laamouri A, Sidhom H, Braham C (2004) High cycle fatigue behavior prediction of shot-peened parts. Int J Fatigue 26:1053–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sidhom N, Laamouri A, Fathallah R, Braham C, Lieurade HP (2005) Fatigue strength improvement of 5083 H11 Al-alloy T-welded joints by shot peening experimental characterization and predictive approach. Int J Fatigue 27:729–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Laamouri A, Ghanem F, Braham C, Sidhom H (2019) Influences of up-milling and down-milling on surface integrity and fatigue strength of X160CrMoV12 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105:1209–1228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04280-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Laamouri A, Sidhom H, Braham C (2022) A predictive methodology for high-cycle fatigue behavior of machined metallic parts. J Mater Eng Perform. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-022-06594-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. MATLAB (2020) Version (R2020a). The MathWorks Inc, Natick

    Google Scholar 

  47. Taira S, Murakami Y (1960) On the changes in residual stresses due to repeated stressing. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Japan congress on testing materials, Kyoto, Japan, pp 52–55

  48. Kodama S (1972) The behaviour of residual stress during fatigue stress cycles. In: Proceedings of the international conference of mechanical behaviour of materials, vol II, pp 111–118

  49. Qui Q, Wang R (1987) Changes in the state of the material by shot peening. In: H Wohlfahrt, R Kopp, OV¨ Ohringer (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on shot peening (ICSP3), pp 231–238

  50. Basquin OH (1910) The exponential law of endurance tests. Am Soc Test Mater 10:625–630

    Google Scholar 

  51. Surajit Kumar P, Sivaprasad S, Dhar S, Tarafder S (2010) Ratcheting and low cycle fatigue behavior of SA333 steel and their life prediction. J Nucl Mater 401:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unit of Mechanical and Materials Production Engineering (UGPMM/UR17ES43), National Engineering School of Sfax (ENIS), University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia

    Rihem Amri & Raouf Fathallah

  2. National Engineering School of Sousse (ENISo), University of Sousse, Road Sahloul, City Hammam Mâarouf, 4054, Sousse, Tunisia

    Rihem Amri & Raouf Fathallah

  3. Laboratory of Mechanics, Materials and Processes (LMMP, LR99ES05), Higher National School of Engineers of Tunis (ENSIT), University of Tunis, 5, Avenue Taha Husseïn, Montfleury, 1008, Tunis, Tunisia

    Adnen Laamouri

  4. Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology of Sousse (ISSATSo), University of Sousse, Road Ibn Khaldoun, 4003, Sousse, Tunisia

    Adnen Laamouri

Authors
  1. Rihem Amri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adnen Laamouri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raouf Fathallah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rihem Amri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Izabel Fernanda Machado.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amri, R., Laamouri, A. & Fathallah, R. Multiobjective optimization of waterjet peening effects on high-cycle fatigue life of Al-7075-T6 alloy. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 46, 31 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04613-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04613-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation