Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of synthetic data applied to artificial neural networks for fatigue life prediction in nodular cast iron

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prediction of fatigue life is essential in the development of products to avoid unexpected failures during their useful life. Although different linear and nonlinear damage accumulation approaches have been proposed, no model has been as universally used as Miner’s linear damage rule due to its simplicity and life prediction results. Discrepancies in the prediction of fatigue life are present within the manufacturing process, which is generated from the material through the manufacturing process and during applied loads. Owing to new design application areas, such as in biomedical devices and the aerospace industry, among others, the development of new ways to reduce errors in predicting fatigue has become an increasing necessity. This paper addresses fatigue life prediction improvement when if performed through a combination of synthetic data an artificial neural networks (ANNs). The novelty of this work is based on the proposal and validation of virtual synthetic fatigue data as a complementary input parameter in the ANN. For the design of the ANN, 116 experimental results of nodular cast iron direction knuckles were analyzed. As seen during the validation process, the employment of synthetic data as input increased significantly the forecast of the ANN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neviaser A, Andarawis-Puri N, Flatow E (2012) Basic mechanisms of tendon fatigue damage. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(2):158–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin C, Sun W (2015) Comparison of transcatheter aortic valve and surgical bioprosthetic valve durability: a fatigue simulation study. J Biomech 48(12):3026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Varvani-Farahani A, Najmi H (2010) A damage assessment model for cadaveric cortical bone subjected to fatigue cycles. Int J Fatigue 32(2):420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Landinez-Parra N, Garzn-Alvarado D, Vanegas-Acosta J (2011) A phenomenological mathematical model of the articular cartilage damage. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 104(3):e58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. dos Santos HA, Auricchio F, Conti M (2012) Fatigue life assessment of cardiovascular balloon-expandable stents: a two-scale plasticity damage model approach. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 15:78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fuentes-Aguilar RQ, Bello-Robles JC, Ruiz-León J (2018) Modeling of soft object deformation using finite element differential neural networks. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(13):474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bello-Robles JC, Begovich O, Ruiz-León J, Fuentes-Aguilar RQ (2018) Modeling of the temperature distribution of a greenhouse using finite element differential neural networks. Kybernetika 54(5):1033

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Durodola J, Ramachandra S, Gerguri S, Fellows N (2018) Artificial neural network for random fatigue loading analysis including the effect of mean stress. Int J Fatigue 111:321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barbosa JF, Correia JA, Jnior RF, Jesus AMD (2020) Fatigue life prediction of metallic materials considering mean stress effects by means of an artificial neural network. Int J Fatigue 135:105527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vassilopoulos AP, Georgopoulos EF, Dionysopoulos V (2007) Artificial neural networks in spectrum fatigue life prediction of composite materials. Int J Fatigue 29(1):20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramachandra S, Durodola J, Fellows N, Gerguri S, Thite A (2019) Experimental validation of an ANN model for random loading fatigue analysis. Int J Fatigue 126:112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kong Y, Abdullah S, Schramm D, Omar M, Haris S (2019) Optimization of spring fatigue life prediction model for vehicle ride using hybrid multi-layer perceptron artificial neural networks. Mech Syst Signal Process 122:597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Seifert J, Vera-Tudela L, Khn M (2017) Training requirements of a neural network used for fatigue load estimation of offshore wind turbines. Energy Procedia 137:315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoell S, Omenzetter P (2017) Fukunaga-Koontz feature transformation for statistical structural damage detection and hierarchical neuro-fuzzy damage localisation. J Sound Vib 400:329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lanzi L, Bisagni C, Ricci S (2004) Neural network systems to reproduce crash behavior of structural components. Comput Struct 82(1):93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Marzbanrad J, Ebrahimi MR (2011) Multi-objective optimization of aluminum hollow tubes for vehicle crash energy absorption using a genetic algorithm and neural networks. Thin-Walled Struct 49(12):1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hambli R (2011) Apparent damage accumulation in cancellous bone using neural networks. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 4(6):868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Worden K, Staszewski WJ, Hensman JJ (2011) Natural computing for mechanical systems research: a tutorial overview. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(1):4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Avci O, Abdeljaber O, Kiranyaz S, Hussein M, Gabbouj M, Inman DJ (2021) A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: from traditional methods to machine learning and deep learning applications. Mech Syst Signal Process 147:107077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Palanivel R, Dinaharan I, Laubscher RF (2019) Application of an artificial neural network model to predict the ultimate tensile strength of friction-welded titanium tubes. J Brazil Soc Mech Sci Eng 41:211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hassan AKF, Mohammed LS, Abdulsamad HJ (2018) Experimental and artificial neural network ANN investigation of bending fatigue behavior of glass fiber/polyester composite shafts. J Brazil Soc Mech Sci Eng 40:201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jimenez-Martinez M (2020) Fatigue of offshore structures: a review of statistical fatigue damage assessment for stochastic loadings. Int J Fatigue 132:105327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Da Silva IN, Spatti DH, Flauzino RA, Liboni LHB, dos Reis Alves SF (2017) Artificial neural networks. Springer, Cham, p 39

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Kayri M (2016) Predictive abilities of bayesian regularization and Levenberg-Marquardt algorithms in artificial neural networks: a comparative empirical study on social data. Math Comput Appl 21(2):20

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Fuentes-Aguilar RQ, Chairez I (2020) Adaptive tracking control of state constraint systems based on differential neural networks: a barrier lyapunov function approach. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 31(12):5390–5401

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Mia M, Dhar NR (2016) Prediction of surface roughness in hard turning under high pressure coolant using artificial neural network. Measurement 92:464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kullaa J (2019) Bayesian virtual sensing in structural dynamics. Mech Syst Signal Process 115:497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rocchetta R, Broggi M, Huchet Q, Patelli E (2018) On-line Bayesian model updating for structural health monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 103:174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ng CT (2014) Application of Bayesian-designed artificial neural networks in phase II structural health monitoring benchmark studies. Aust J Struct Eng 15(1):27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Adedipe T, Shafiee M, Zio E (2020) Bayesian network modelling for the wind energy industry: an overview. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 202:107053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li M, Wang L (2011) Feature fatigue analysis in product development using Bayesian networks. Expert Syst Appl 38(8):10631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bezazi A, Pierce SG, Worden K, Harkati EH (2007) Fatigue life prediction of sandwich composite materials under flexural tests using a Bayesian trained artificial neural network. Int J Fatigue 29(4):738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Belayadi A, Bourahla B (2019) Neural network model for 7000 (Al-Z) alloys: classification and prediction of mechanical properties. Physica B Condensed Matter 554:114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhu J, Zhang W, Li X (2019) Fatigue damage assessment of orthotropic steel deck using dynamic Bayesian networks. Int J Fatigue 118:44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kumar P, Merchant S, Desai UB (2004) Improving performance in pulse radar detection using Bayesian regularization for neural network training. Digital Signal Process 14(5):438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hagan MT, Menhaj MB (1994) Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5(6):989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Vako A, Trko L, Konen R (2015) Fatigue behaviour of synthetic nodular cast irons. Metalurgija 54(1):19

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lukhi M, Kuna M, Htter G (2018) Numerical investigation of low cycle fatigue mechanism in nodular cast iron. Int J Fatigue 113:290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Berto F, Ferro P, Salavati H (2017) Fatigue strength of sharp V-notched specimens made of ductile cast iron. Eng Failure Anal 82:308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nadot Y, Mendez J, Ranganathan N (2004) Influence of casting defects on the fatigue limit of nodular cast iron. Int J Fatigue 26(3):311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Khameneh MJ, Azadi M (2018) Evaluation of high-cycle bending fatigue and fracture behaviors in EN-GJS700-2 ductile cast iron of crankshafts. Eng Failure Anal 85:189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jimenez M (2017) Durability tests: statistical analysis for variable amplitude loads. Trans Canad Soc Mech Eng 41(5):910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee YL, Taylor D (2005) 4 - stress-based fatigue analysis and design. In: LEE YL, PAN J, HATHAWAY RB, BARKEY ME (eds) Fatigue testing and analysis. Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, pp 103–180

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Li ZD, Zhou ST, Yang CF, Yong QL (2019) High/very high cycle fatigue behaviors of medium carbon pearlitic wheel steels and the effects of microstructure and non-metallic inclusions. Mater Sci Eng A 764:138208

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moises Jimenez-Martinez.

Additional information

Technical Editor: João Marciano Laredo dos Reis.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jimenez-Martinez, M., Alfaro-Ponce, M. Effects of synthetic data applied to artificial neural networks for fatigue life prediction in nodular cast iron. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 43, 10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02747-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02747-y

Keywords

Navigation