Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The rheological behaviour of a water-soluble polymer (HEC) used in drilling fluids

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rheological properties of drilling fluids have been always considered as critical aspects to the success of drilling operations; in this fact, the control of these properties was of paramount importance. In this paper, the rheological behaviour of a water-soluble polymer, namely hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) used in drilling fluids, was investigated. Steady-state shear rheology and frequency experiment were carried out on the sample at different concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1.2 wt% and constant temperature of 25 ± 0.1 °C using a controlled-rate rheometer. The HEC solutions showed a shear thinning behaviour that was successfully fitted using the Cross model, where its parameters were found to increase with the HEC concentration. The steady-state shear rheological data allowed determining the intrinsic viscosity of the polymer (~ 15.05 dl/g) in distilled water; thereafter, an estimation of the molecular weight of HEC using the Mark–Houwink equation indicated that the studied sample was of high molecular weight (9.5 × 105 g/mol), which gave it good rheological properties for drilling fluid applications. The critical overlap concentration was found to be ~ 0.24 wt% using two methods, the intrinsic viscosity and the plot of the apparent viscosity versus the polymer concentration at specific shear rate. The frequency sweep measurements allowed confirming the viscoelastic behaviour of the polymer; HEC solutions behaved either as viscous or as elastic materials at low and high frequencies, respectively. This information is essential for mud engineers to develop and maintain the properties of drilling fluid to the required specifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a :

Mark–Houwink constant

\( C \) :

Concentration (%)

C* :

Overlap concentration (%)

C** :

Second critical concentration (%)

\( C. \left[ \eta \right] \) :

Overlap parameter

CMC:

Carboxymethyl cellulose

G′:

Storage modulus (Pa)

G′′:

Loss modulus (Pa)

HEC:

Hydroxyethyl cellulose

hmHEC:

hydrophobically modified hydroxyethyl cellulose

\( k \) :

Constant of the Mark–Houwink relationship (dl/g)

\( k^{{\prime }} \) :

Huggins constant

\( k^{{{\prime \prime }}} \) :

Constant

\( M \) :

Molecular weight (g/mol)

\( n \) :

Dimensionless constant

W :

Frequency (rad/s)

\( \dot{\gamma } \) :

Shear rate (s−1)

\( \lambda \) :

Time constant (s)

\( \eta \) :

Viscosity of the polymer solution (Pa s)

\( \eta_{\text{s}} \) :

Viscosity of the solvent (Pa s)

\( \eta_{0 } \) :

Zero shear rate viscosity (Pa s)

\( \eta_{\infty } \) :

Infinite shear rate viscosity (Pa s)

\( \left[ \eta \right] \) :

Intrinsic viscosity (cm3/g)

\( \eta_{\text{app}} \) :

Apparent viscosity (Pa.s)

\( \eta_{\text{inh}} \) :

Inherent viscosity (cm3/g)

\( \eta_{\text{r}} \) :

Relative viscosity

\( \eta_{\text{red}} \) :

Reduced viscosity (cm3/g)

\( \eta_{\text{sp}} \) :

Specific viscosity

References

  1. Beheshti N, Nguyen GTM, Kjøniksen A-L, Knudsen KD, Nyström B (2006) Structure and dynamics of aqueous mixtures of an anionic cellulose derivative and anionic or cationic surfactants. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 279:40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown W, Henley D, Öhman J (1963) Studies on cellulose derivatives. Part II. The influence of solvent and temperature on the configuration and hydrodynamic behaviour of Hydroxyethyl cellulose in dilute solution. Makromol Chem 64:49–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bueche F (1962) Physical properties of polymers. Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carico RD, Bagshaw FR (1978) Description and use of polymers used in drilling, work-overs and completions. Paper SPE 7747 presented at the SPE production technology symposium, Hobbs, NM

  5. Castelain C, Doublier JL, Lefebvre J (1987) A study of the viscosity of cellulose derivatives in aqueous solutions. Carbohyd Polym 7:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chatterji J, Borchardt JK (1981) Applications of water-soluble polymers in the oil field. JPT 2042–2056

  7. Clasen C, Kulicke W-M (2001) Determination of viscoelastic and rheo-optical material function of water-soluble cellulose derivatives. Prog Polym Sci 26:1839–1919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cole RC, Ali SA, Foley KA (1995) A new environmentally safe crosslinked polymer for fluid-loss control. Paper SPE 29525 presented at the SPE production operations symposium, Oklahoma City

  9. Cornett JE (1977) Polymer-Brine mud speeds austim well. Petroleum Engineer

  10. Cross MM (1965) Rheology of non-Newtonian fluids: a new flow equation for pseudoplastic systems. J Colloid Sci 20:417–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferry JD (1970) Viscoelastic properties of polymers. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Graessley WW (1974) The entanglement concept in polymer rheology. Advances in polymer science, vol 16. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  13. Graessley WW (1980) Polymer chain dimensions and the dependence of viscoelastic properties on concentration, molecular weight and solvent power. Polymer 21:258–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grigorescu G, Kuliche W-M (2000) Prediction of viscoe1astic properties and shear stability of polymers in solution. Adv Polym Sci 152:1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Harding SE (1997) The intrinsic viscosity of biological macromolecules, Progress in measurement, interpretation and application to structure in dilute solution. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 68(2/3):207–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huggins ML (1942) The viscosity of dilute solutions of long-chain molecules. IV. Dependence on concentration. J Am Chem Soc 64(11):2716–2718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hasani M, Cranston ED, Westmana G, Gray DG (2008) Cationic surface functionalization of cellulose nanocrystals. Soft Matter 4:2238–2244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang K, Lee LJ, Koelling KW (2005) High shear microfluidics and its application in rheological measurement. Exp Fluids 38:222–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kraemer E (1938) Molecular weights of celluloses and cellulose derivates. Ind Eng Chem 30(10):1200–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kulicke W-M, Kniewske R (1984) The shear viscosity dependence on concentration, molecular weight, and shear rate of polystyrene solutions. Rheol Acta 23:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lacey ES, and Wells PC (1979) Prevent formation damage. Drilling-DCW 46

  22. Laschet M, Plog JP, Clasen C, Kulicke W-M (2004) Examination of the flow behaviour of HEC and hmHEC solutions using structure–property relationships and rheo-optical methods. Colloid Polym Sci 282:373–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maleki A, Kjøniksen A-L, Knudsen KD, Nyström B (2006) Dynamical and structural behavior of hydroxyethyl cellulose hydrogels obtained by chemical gelation. Polym Int 55:365–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Morris ER, Rees DA, Welsh EJ (1980) Conformation and dynamic interactions in hyaluronate solutions. J Mot Biol 138:383–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Oppong FK, de Bruyn JR (2010) Microrheology and dynamics of an associative polymer. Eur Phys J E 31:25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rodriguez F (1983) Principles of polymer systems. Chemical engineering series. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Simha R, Zakin JL (1960) Compression of flexible chain molecules in solution. J Chem Phys 33:1791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tiner R (1976) Polymers and their use in the oilfield. In: Proceedings of Southwestern petroleum short course, Lubbock, TX

  29. Tuttle RN, and Barkman JH (1974) New non-damaging and acid-degradable drilling and completion fluids. JPT 1221-1226

  30. Vadodaria SS, English RJ (2016) Aqueous solutions of HEC and hmHEC: effects of molecular mass versus hydrophobic associations on hydrodynamic and thermodynamic parameters. Cellulose 23:1107–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang W, Li F, Yu J, Navard P, Budtova T (2015) Influence of substitution on the rheological properties and gelation of hydroxyethyl cellulose solution in NaOH–water solvent. Carbohyd Polym 124:85–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Hydrocarbons Physical Engineering, Faculty of Hydrocarbons and Chemistry, University of M’Hamed Bougara Boumerdes, Independence Avenue, 35000, Boumerdes, Algeria

    Hocine Ouaer & Mourad Gareche

Authors
  1. Hocine Ouaer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mourad Gareche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hocine Ouaer.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Cezar Negrao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ouaer, H., Gareche, M. The rheological behaviour of a water-soluble polymer (HEC) used in drilling fluids. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 40, 380 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1301-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1301-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation