Abstract
Purpose of Review
The brain’s salience network (SN), primarily comprising the anterior insula and anterior cingulate cortex, plays a key role in detecting salient stimuli and processing physical and socioemotional pain (e.g., social rejection). Mounting evidence underscores an altered SN in the etiology and maintenance of substance use disorders (SUDs). This paper aims to synthesize recent functional neuroimaging research emphasizing the SN’s involvement in SUDs and physical/socioemotional pain and explore the therapeutic prospects of targeting the SN for SUD treatment.
Recent Findings
The SN is repeatedly activated during the experience of both physical and socioemotional pain. Altered activation within the SN is associated with both SUDs and chronic pain conditions, characterized by aberrant activity and connectivity patterns as well as structural changes. Among individuals with SUDs, functional and structural alterations in the SN have been linked to abnormal salience attribution (e.g., heightened responsiveness to drug-related cues), impaired cognitive control (e.g., impulsivity), and compromised decision-making processes. The high prevalence of physical and socioemotional pain in the SUD population may further exacerbate SN alterations, thus contributing to hindered recovery progress and treatment failure. Interventions targeting the restoration of SN functioning, such as real-time functional MRI feedback, neuromodulation, and psychotherapeutic approaches, hold promise as innovative SUD treatments.
Summary
The review highlights the significance of alterations in the structure and function of the SN as potential mechanisms underlying the co-occurrence of SUDs and physical/socioemotional pain. Future work that integrates neuroimaging with other research methodologies will provide novel insights into the mechanistic role of the SN in SUDs and inform the development of next-generation treatment modalities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Allocating attentional resources wisely to relevant and important information is vital for overall adaptability in a constantly changing world. The brain’s salience network (SN), which primarily comprises the anterior insula (AI) and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), plays a pivotal role in facilitating information prioritization by directing attention to salient stimuli that are emotionally charged, novel, or otherwise behaviorally relevant or important for survival [1]. Notably, the SN is strongly implicated in the processing of pain – both physical [2, 3] and socioemotional [4, 5]. Individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) exhibit structural and functional alterations in the salience network (SN) that are linked to various cognitive and behavioral deficits [6,7,8]. In this article, we review the growing evidence from functional neuroimaging research that highlights the SN in underlying the mutually reinforcing effects of SUDs and physical/socioemotional pain as well as the therapeutic prospects of targeting the SN for SUD treatment.
The Brain Salience Network
Studies of interregional brain connectivity using functional MRI have unveiled distinct large-scale networks of brain regions that support various cognitive processes. The SN is one of the most well-characterized brain networks and is involved in dynamically monitoring internal and external stimuli, directing attention toward salient and relevant information while filtering out distractions [1]. It is primarily anchored in two hub regions: the bilateral AI and the dorsal portion of the ACC [8,9,10] (see Fig. 1). Other brain regions, such as the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, the inferior parietal lobule/temporoparietal junction, the thalamus, and the amygdala have also been considered components of the SN though with less clear consensus [8, 9]. While the exact anatomical boundaries of the SN are not well-defined, the reciprocal anatomical connections among the SN regions are assumed to underpin their coordinated neurocognitive functions [11, 12] that extend beyond mere sensory processing but also include affective processing, decision making, error monitoring, social cognition, interoceptive awareness, among others [1]. Stimuli of high perceived importance and relevance consistently activate brain regions in the SN, which guides the direction of attention and cognitive resources toward the process of decision-making and behavior selection [10, 13]. The SN closely interacts with other brain networks such as the default mode network (DMN), which is involved in internally directed tasks (e.g. self-reflection) and mind-wandering [14], and the central executive network, which is involved in working memory and goal-directed cognitive processes [15]. The seminal paper by Sridharan et al. [16], later replicated by Goulden et al. using a different methodology [17], evidenced the role of the SN in cognitive flexibility, facilitating the switch between DMN and CEN in response to internally and externally salient stimuli, respectively [8, 9, 13, 18]. The SN is also functionally connected to various subcortical and limbic structures such as the amygdala, thalamus, and striatum, which collectively contribute to the encoding of stimuli that are of high emotional, hedonic, and homeostatic salience [10, 19].
Salience Network in the Processing of Physical and Socioemotional Pain
The processing of physical pain recruits a widespread collection of cortical and subcortical regions, known as the “pain matrix”, that largely overlaps with the SN [20]. The AI is postulated to be responsible for integrating sensory and interoceptive inputs to form subjective perceptions about the intensity and emotional aspects (i.e., unpleasantness) of pain. This information is transmitted to the ACC for evaluation of the saliency of the pain stimuli to inform attention allocation and decision-making [9, 21]. Meta-analysis shows robust activations of the insula and ACC in response to experimentally induced pain stimulation [2]. Instead of transient responses to the onset and offset of non-painful somatosensory stimuli, SN activation is prolonged throughout the delivery of painful stimuli [22]. Activation of SN regions is associated with the objective intensity of the pain stimuli [3] but is additionally modulated by varying cognitive processes and environmental factors to shape individuals’ perception of pain. The ability of the SN to integrate internal and external stimuli in processing pain allows individuals to prioritize attention to potential harm and execute adaptive responses [20], such as attributing more saliency to stimuli previously associated with harm or less to pain in the context of competing cognitive demands (i.e., fighting a war). Reducing expectation of pain intensity without changing the actual pain intensity attenuates neural responses to pain in SN regions (e.g., ACC, insula, and thalamus) as well as subjective ratings of pain intensity (i.e., the “placebo analgesia” effect) [23, 24]. Similarly, engaging in a cognitively demanding task that serves to distract subjects from pain stimulation reduces the neural response of the SN to pain stimulation [25], possibly by diverting saliency from the painful stimuli to the cognitive task.
Alterations in SN structure and function were reported in individuals with chronic pain. Meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry data across chronic pain disorders indicates reduced gray matter volume within the SN, including the bilateral insula, cingulate cortex, and thalamus [26]. Meta-analysis of functional MRI data further shows that chronic pain elevates SN response to acute pain stimuli [27]. Functional connectivity within the SN also differs between healthy controls and individuals with chronic pain, but the directionality of change varies across studies, such that both enhanced [28, 29] and decreased [30] connectivity in chronic pain patients vs. controls have been reported. Nonetheless, aberrant SN functioning may contribute to impaired connectivity with other brain networks and have implications for altering pain processing. The activity of the SN is normally negatively correlated with that of the DMN [31], but individuals with chronic pain show increased SN-DMN functional connectivity (i.e., attenuated negative correlation) [32, 33]. These changes were associated with clinical pain symptomatology and pain sensitivity [29, 32] and may reflect deficits in cognitive flexibility that bias attention toward pain. Studies demonstrating increased SN functional connectivity with the attention and sensorimotor networks in pain patients compared to healthy controls [28, 33] further support the role of attentional focus to nociceptive afference in chronic pain.
Socioemotional pain encompasses feelings of distress stemming from social disconnectedness, rejection, disapproval, or loss. Research indicates similarities in the neural mechanisms involved in both physical and socioemotional pain. The mu-opioid system is implicated in both physical pain relief and social bonding [34]. Mu-opioid receptor agonists such as buprenorphine alleviate both the physical [35] and socioemotional pain [36], while mu-opioid receptor antagonist naloxone exacerbates them [37, 38]. The non-opioid pain reliever acetaminophen has also been found to alleviate socioemotional pain resulting from social rejection [39]. Clinically, pain disorders often coincide with psychological problems including feelings of social exclusion and loneliness, which in turn intensify physical pain [40, 41]. Addressing socioemotional pain and providing social support are crucial for the effective management of chronic physical pain [42]. Interestingly, there is a significant overlap between the neural substrates for physical and socioemotional pain. The ACC and AI are consistently activated during experiences of socioemotional pain [4, 5]. The AI is further involved in the processing of general physiological and psychosocial stress [43]. Protective factors such as self-esteem [44] and social support [45] are linked to reduced activity in these regions during socioemotional pain. Moreover, the ACC and AI facilitate the interplay between physical and socioemotional pain: physical pain reliever acetaminophen reduces SN brain response to social rejection [39], while social rejection heightens SN response to physical pain [46]. Together, these data highlight the role of the SN in the shared neural representation of physical and socioemotional pain.
Salience Network Dysfunction in Substance Use Disorders
SUDs encompass a chronically relapsing cycle of binge/intoxication, withdrawal/negative affect, and preoccupation/anticipation that propels continual substance use despite negative consequences [47]. Studies examining the neurobiological underpinnings of SUDs traditionally focused on the reward pathways but have shifted toward recognizing the role of other brain networks [8, 48]. Specifically, structural and functional connectivity aberrations in the SN have been identified in individuals with SUDs. Across substances, patients with SUDs display lower gray matter volume in SN brain structures [6, 7, 49,50,51,52] and alterations in the connectivity pattern between the SN and other brain networks [53, 54]. Compared to healthy controls, individuals with opioid and cocaine use disorders demonstrate lower insula and ACC connectivity with brain regions of the CEN (e.g., dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, posterior parietal cortex) and the DMN (e.g., medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex) [55,56,57]. Additionally, opioid and alcohol use disorders are associated with increased connectivity between the ACC and regions of the reward circuitry, such as the nucleus accumbens and caudate nucleus, suggesting abnormal incentive salience processing [57,58,59]. Changes in functional connectivity within the SN have also been observed, with decreased within-network insula/ACC connectivity in cocaine use disorder [60] and increased connectivity in alcohol use disorder [61].
The impaired Response Inhibition and Salience Attribution (iRISA) model of addiction underscores SN neuroadaptations in perpetuating SUDs by heightening the saliency of substances of abuse at the expense of other non-drug-related processes, such as inhibitory control and natural reward processing [48]. In line with this model, meta-analyses of task-based functional MRI studies indicated drug cue-induced activation in SN regions in individuals with SUDs that is linked to increased drug craving [62,63,64]. Behavioral data further corroborated the model by demonstrating attentional biases toward drug vs. neutral cues across substances [65,66,67,68]. In cocaine use disorder, such attentional bias has been linked to increased functional connectivity among brain regions involved in salience attribution, including the bilateral frontoinsular cortex, dorsal ACC, and bilateral frontoparietal regions [66]. Likewise, attentional bias positively correlated with cue-induced brain activation in the insula and ACC in individuals with alcohol use disorder [68] and with ACC connectivity with the hippocampus in opioid use disorder [69].
In addition to contributing to biased salience attribution, SN aberrations in individuals with SUDs are also linked to impairments in cognitive control. Functional MRI studies (reviewed in [70]) demonstrated reduced activation of SN brain regions during cognitive control (e.g., measured by the Stroop and go/no-go paradigms) in smokers [71] and individuals with methamphetamine [72], cocaine [73], and opioid [74, 75] use disorders compared to healthy controls. Meta-analyses corroborated the findings of hypoactivity of the ACC [76] and insula [77, 78] across SUDs, though more research is warranted given potential publication bias and insufficient behavioral evidence [78]. Interestingly, a meta-analysis that focused on alcohol use disorder revealed increased rather than decreased ACC activation during inhibitory control in patients than healthy controls [79], suggesting potential discrepancy across substances and the need for future studies.
Additionally, SUDs are associated with increased risk propensity in decision-making [80] that may be attributable to increased ACC and reduced prefrontal activity [81, 82]. Several studies examining risky decision-making in individuals with SUDs reported less engagement of the insula during monetary gain and loss processing [83, 84]. ACC hypoactivity during decision-making was also reported in one meta-analysis of functional MRI data in individuals with alcohol use disorder [84]. Contrarily, individuals with cocaine use disorder exhibit increasing ACC activity when choosing riskier options, whereas ACC activity in control participants decreased with increasing risk-taking [85]. Gowin et al. also demonstrated increased ACC activation and lower insula activation during risky decision-making in individuals with methamphetamine use disorder compared to healthy controls [86]. In addition to functional MRI-measured SN activity during cognitive and decision tasks, structural deficits (e.g., reduced gray matter volume) and reduced connectivity within the SN have been implicated in poor executive performance [87, 88], increased impulsivity [89], and slower decision making in individuals with alcohol use disorder [90]. Similar associations were found between SN connectivity with other brain networks (e.g., DMN, CEN, reward circuitry) and increased behavioral impulsivity and executive dysfunction in alcohol [91, 92] and cocaine use disorders [93, 94].
Salience Network at the Intersection of Pain and Substance Use Disorders
Chronic physical pain is highly comorbid with nicotine [95], alcohol [96], cannabis [97], opioid [98], and stimulant [99] use disorders [(see review [100]]. People struggling with chronic pain often turn to these substances as a way to cope [101]. In a cross-sectional analysis of individuals with illicit drug use in the last 3 months, 51% of individuals who used marijuana, cocaine, or heroin and 81% of individuals who misused prescription drugs reported having used drugs to self-medicate for physical pain [102]. More severe physical pain has been linked to a higher risk of relapse in patients being treated for opioid use disorder (OUD) [103]. Healthcare providers caring for patients with both pain and SUDs, especially OUD, face the challenge of weighing the benefits of prescribing opioids for pain relief against the risks of misuse, dependence, and diversion [104]. The task is further complicated by alterations in patients’ pain perception as a result of chronic exposure to opioids (e.g., opioid-induced hyperalgesia) [105, 106] and other drugs (nicotine [107, 108]; stimulants [109]; alcohol [110]), combined with impaired interoception [111] and poor self-awareness/insight [112, 113] that may hamper the accuracy in self-reported pain. In addition, patients grappling with SUDs are often confronted with various socioemotional difficulties, such as financial constraints [114], loneliness [115], interpersonal conflict [116], and experience of stigma and discrimination [117]. Such difficulties can lead to various consequences, including increased stress sensitivity [118], poor treatment adherence [119], and heightened risk of relapse [120]. The impact of socioemotional adversity can be particularly fatal in OUD, as socially isolated patients are more likely to die from opioid overdose [121]. The COVID-19 pandemic has further compounded these issues, with increased unemployment rates and social distancing measures exacerbating social adversities [122], contributing to a surge in opioid overdose deaths [123].
Altered SN function in SUDs may impair normal salience detection and result in aberrant responses to physical and socioemotional pain [8]. Among the limited MRI research that examined pain processing in SUDs patients, one study found that compared to healthy controls, patients with comorbid OUD and chronic pain had increased connectivity among regions of the SN and the reward circuitry during acute pain stimulation [124]. However, it is unclear to what extent the abnormal SN connectivity can be attributed to OUD or chronic pain. Another study showed a lack of the characteristic SN activation in response to physical and socioemotional pain in OUD patients, but direct comparison between OUD and control individuals did not reveal significant differences under stringent whole-brain correction for multiple comparisons [125]. The same team additionally found a negative correlation between insular gray matter volume and social pain in OUD patients [126]. Non-imaging studies on OUD revealed blunted subjective emotional reactions, heightened physiological responses, and deficient regulation in response to social rejection [127, 128], which was further associated with increased drug craving [128]. Lastly, we recently found preliminary evidence that family/social problems (e.g., abuse, interpersonal conflict, parental drug use, etc.) increased AI response to drug-related stimuli compared to natural reward stimuli in OUD patients [129]. It should also be noted that both SUDs and physical/socioemotional pain are closely related to various psychiatric problems (e.g., depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder) [130,131,132]. Functional and structural alterations in the SN are a recurring phenomenon across psychiatric disorders and may serve as a key mechanism for their comorbidity with SUDs and pain [133, 134]. Therefore, the identification of better treatment options for physical and socioemotional pain is critical and may have implications for preventing SUD, and vice versa.
The involvement of the SN in the processing of physical and socioemotional pain and its perturbations in SUDs underscore its potential as a target for treatment. Functional MRI-measured ACC and insula hyperactivity in response to drug cues and hypoactivity during cognitive tasks have been prospectively linked to treatment outcomes in patients with SUDs (e.g., relapse) [135,136,137]. Similar findings were obtained for the treatment of pain disorders, such that individual differences in the baseline connectivity and structural integrity of the SN were shown to predict treatment effectiveness [138, 139] and future recovery [140, 141]. Therefore, interventions targeting the SN may have therapeutic potential for treating SUDs. Real-time functional MRI neurofeedback is a technique that allows subjects to observe and modulate their own brain activity by viewing feedback provided in the form of a graphical “thermometer” of real-time neural responses in brain regions of interest. One study has shown the effectiveness of real-time functional MRI in helping smokers reduce cigarette cravings by volitionally reducing their ACC activity [142]. The method has also been examined in the intervention for alcohol use disorder, though with less success [143, 144]. In addition to real-time functional MRI, neuromodulation has been explored for its potential in SUD treatment [145, 146]. Non-invasive neuromodulation techniques include transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which apply magnetic fields and low-intensity electrical currents, respectively, to the scalp to modulate regional neuronal activity [145]. While most TMS and tDCS research on SUDs have focused on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [145, 146], several studies suggest that TMS targeting the insula and ACC may reduce the craving for and/or the consumption of alcohol [147,148,149], tobacco [150,151,152,153], and cocaine [154] (but see [155]). Invasive neuromodulation such as deep brain stimulation has mostly focused on the effect of blocking neural transmission in the nucleus accumbens [146, 156]. Nevertheless, two studies showed the feasibility and effectiveness of ACC stimulation via implanted electrodes for reducing alcohol craving and consumption [157, 158].
Psychotherapies have also shown promise for improving SUD treatment outcomes, potentially by influencing the SN. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a highly effective psychotherapeutic approach that teaches individuals to identify and counteract harmful thought patterns and environmental risk factors [159, 160]. One functional MRI study revealed decreased ACC engagement during cognitive control among individuals with SUDs following CBT, which might reflect reduced cognitive effort [161]. Another psychotherapeutic technique, mindfulness meditation, trains individuals to develop and maintain non-judgmental, non-overly reactive, and present-moment awareness of their thoughts and feelings. Mindfulness meditation has demonstrated efficacy in treating SUDs and related comorbidities (e.g., depression, anxiety) [162,163,164,165]. In healthy individuals, a month-long mindfulness meditation training increased SN functional connectivity with brain regions of the DMN and the CEN [166]. In individuals with OUD, mindfulness increased the correlation between the gray matter volume of the SN and that of the striatum and prefrontal cortex [167]. Lastly, among smokers, mindfulness increased ACC activity during resting state [168] and attenuated ACC activity and ACC-insula connectivity during exposure to smoking cues [169]. These findings demonstrated the SN’s involvement in psychotherapeutic interventions for SUDs, though more research is needed to further elucidate the mechanistic role of the SN.
Conclusions and Future Directions
The review highlights the significance of the SN in mediating the interplay between SUDs and physical/socioemotional pain. It also identifies several critical gaps in knowledge that require future research. First, despite the emphasis of this review on the SN, it is important to recognize SUDs as a group of multifaceted neurocognitive disorders affecting a broad range of brain structures. The SN interacts with other brain regions, such as the prefrontal cortex and the limbic system [8,9,10, 13, 18, 19], that collectively contribute to the etiology and maintenance of SUDs [48, 170]. Similarly, both physical and socioemotional pain have profound effects on the brain that extend beyond the SN [2, 3, 171, 172]. Future studies should aim to deepen our understanding of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying the role of the SN in pain and SUDs. This includes exploring the SN’s interactions with other brain networks and their joint effects in shaping the experience of pain and the trajectories of substance use. Secondly, the role of the SN in SUDs may vary depending on the type of substance. For example, opioids are directly involved in the modulation of physical pain, and both the ACC and AI have high mu-opioid receptor availability [173]. In addition, consumption of substances such as nicotine [174] and cannabis [175] is heavily influenced by social context and potentially more closely related to socioemotional pain. A more fine-grained comparison across substances is warranted. Lastly, despite the significant advances in functional MRI research, the technique is not without its limitations. The spatial and temporal resolutions of functional MRI are insufficient for a precise understanding of neuronal processes. Additionally, whether functional MRI data can reliably predict clinical outcomes remains a subject of debate [176, 177]. Future work that integrates neuroimaging discoveries with other preclinical and clinical studies will not only promise a more holistic and precise delineation of the SN’s involvement in pain and SUDs but also pave the way for the development of next-generation treatments.
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Uddin LQ. Salience network of the human brain. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press [Book that introduces the anatomy and function of the SN as well as its role in psychopathology]; 2017.
Xu A, Larsen B, Baller EB, Scott JC, Sharma V, Adebimpe A et al. Convergent neural representations of experimentally-induced acute pain in healthy volunteers: a large-scale fMRI meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2020;112:300 – 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.004 [Meta-analysis of brain response to acute pain in healthy individuals].
Wager TD, Atlas LY, Lindquist MA, Roy M, Woo C-W, Kross E. An fMRI-based neurologic signature of physical pain. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(15):1388–97. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1204471. [Study that identified a functional MRI-based neural biomarker of physical pain using machine learning].
Eisenberger NI, Lieberman MD, Williams KD. Does rejection hurt? An FMRI study of social exclusion. Science. 2003;302(5643):290–2. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089134.
Eisenberger NI. Social pain and the brain: controversies, questions, and where to go from here. Ann Rev Psychol. 2015;66:601–29. 10.1146. [Review of the shared neurobiological mechanisms for physical and socioemotional pain]. /annurev-psych-010213-115146.
Pando-Naude V, Toxto S, Fernandez-Lozano S, Parsons CE, Alcauter S, Garza-Villarreal EA. Gray and white matter morphology in substance use disorders: a neuroimaging systematic review and meta-analysis. Translational Psychiatry. 2021;11(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-01128-2. [Meta-analysis of brain structural alterations in SUDs].
Zhang M, Gao X, Yang Z, Wen M, Huang H, Zheng R, et al. Shared gray matter alterations in subtypes of addiction: a voxel-wise meta-analysis. Psychopharmacology. 2021;238(9):2365–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-021-05920-w.
Cushnie AK, Tang W, Heilbronner SR. Connecting circuits with networks in addiction neuroscience: a salience network perspective. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(10):9083. : 10.3390/ijms24109083 [Review of the role of the SN in SUDs].
Uddin LQ. Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16(1):55–61. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3857.
Seeley WW. The salience network: a neural system for perceiving and responding to homeostatic demands. J Neurosci. 2019;39(50):9878–82. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1138-17.2019.
Augustine JR. Circuitry and functional aspects of the insular lobe in primates including humans. Brain Res Rev. 1996;22(3):229–44.
Vogt BA. Cingulate cortex in the three limbic subsystems. Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;166:39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-64196-0.00003-0.
Menon V, Uddin LQ. Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function. Brain Struct Function. 2010;214(5–6):655–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-010-0262-0.
Buckner RL, Andrews-Hanna JR, Schacter DL. The brain’s default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1124:1–38. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.011.
Fox MD, Corbetta M, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Raichle ME. Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(26):10046–51. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0604187103.
Sridharan D, Levitin DJ, Menon V. A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(34):12569–74. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800005105. [Study that showed the role of SN in modulating DMN and CEN activity].
Goulden N, Khusnulina A, Davis NJ, Bracewell RM, Bokde AL, McNulty JP, et al. The salience network is responsible for switching between the default mode network and the central executive network: replication from DCM. NeuroImage. 2014;99:180–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.052.
Uddin LQ. Cognitive and behavioural flexibility: neural mechanisms and clinical considerations. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021;22(3):167–79. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-021-00428-w.
Seeley WW, Menon V, Schatzberg AF, Keller J, Glover GH, Kenna H, et al. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J Neurosci. 2007;27(9):2349–56. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007.
Legrain V, Iannetti GD, Plaghki L, Mouraux A. The pain matrix reloaded: a salience detection system for the body. Prog Neurobiol. 2011;93(1):111–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.10.005.
Wiech K, Lin CS, Brodersen KH, Bingel U, Ploner M, Tracey I. Anterior insula integrates information about salience into perceptual decisions about pain. J Neurosci. 2010;30(48):16324–31. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2087-10.2010.
Downar J, Mikulis DJ, Davis KD. Neural correlates of the prolonged salience of painful stimulation. NeuroImage. 2003;20(3):1540–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00407-5.
Koyama T, McHaffie JG, Laurienti PJ, Coghill RC. The subjective experience of pain: where expectations become reality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(36):12950–5.
Wager TD, Rilling JK, Smith EE, Sokolik A, Casey KL, Davidson RJ, et al. Placebo-induced changes in fMRI in the anticipation and experience of pain. Science. 2004;303(5661):1162–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1093065.
Bantick SJ, Wise RG, Ploghaus A, Clare S, Smith SM, Tracey I. Imaging how attention modulates pain in humans using functional MRI. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 2):310–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf022.
Cauda F, Palermo S, Costa T, Torta R, Duca S, Vercelli U, et al. Gray Matter alterations in chronic pain: a network-oriented meta-analytic approach. NeuroImage: Clin. 2014;4:676–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.04.007. [Meta-analysis of brain structural alterations in chronic pain].
Xu A, Larsen B, Henn A, Baller EB, Scott JC, Sharma V et al. Brain responses to noxious stimuli in patients with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Network Open. 2021;4(1):e2032236. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32236 [Meta-analysis of brain response to acute pain in individual with chronic pain].
Kim J, Kang I, Chung Y-A, Kim T-S, Namgung E, Lee S, et al. Altered attentional control over the salience network in complex regional pain syndrome. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):7466. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25757-2.
van Ettinger-Veenstra H, Lundberg P, Alföldi P, Södermark M, Graven-Nielsen T, Sjörs A, et al. Chronic widespread pain patients show disrupted cortical connectivity in default mode and salience networks, modulated by pain sensitivity. J Pain Res. 2019;12:1743–55. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S189443.
Xu H, Seminowicz DA, Krimmel SR, Zhang M, Gao L, Wang Y. Altered structural and functional connectivity of salience network in patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia. J Pain. 2022;23(8):1389–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2022.02.012.
De Ridder D, Vanneste S, Smith M, Adhia D. Pain and the triple network model. Front Neurol. 2022;13:757241. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.757241.
Hemington KS, Wu Q, Kucyi A, Inman RD, Davis KD. Abnormal cross-network functional connectivity in chronic pain and its association with clinical symptoms. Brain Struct Function. 2016;221(8):4203–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-015-1161-1.
Kim J, Mawla I, Kong J, Lee J, Gerber J, Ortiz A, et al. Somatotopically specific primary somatosensory connectivity to salience and default mode networks encodes clinical pain. Pain. 2019;160(7):1594–605. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001541.
Meier IM, van Honk J, Bos PA, Terburg D. A mu-opioid feedback model of human social behavior. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews. 2021;121:250–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.013.
Johnson RE, Fudala PJ, Payne R. Buprenorphine: considerations for pain management. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2005;29(3):297–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.07.005.
Bershad AK, Seiden JA, de Wit H. Effects of buprenorphine on responses to social stimuli in healthy adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016;63:43–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.09.011.
Levine JD, Gordon NC, Jones RT, Fields HL. The narcotic antagonist naloxone enhances clinical pain. Nature. 1978;272(5656):826–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/272826a0.
Herman BH, Panksepp J. Effects of morphine and naloxone on separation distress and approach attachment: evidence for opiate mediation of social affect. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1978;9(2):213–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-3057(78)90167-3.
Dewall CN, Macdonald G, Webster GD, Masten CL, Baumeister RF, Powell C, et al. Acetaminophen reduces social pain: behavioral and neural evidence. Psychol Sci. 2010;21(7):931–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610374741.
Loeffler A, Steptoe A. Bidirectional longitudinal associations between loneliness and pain, and the role of inflammation. Pain. 2021;162(3):930–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002082.
Allen SF, Gilbody S, Atkin K, van der Feltz-Cornelis C. The associations between loneliness, social exclusion and pain in the general population: a N = 502,528 cross-sectional UK Biobank study. J Psychiatr Res. 2020;130:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.06.028.
Sturgeon JA, Zautra AJ. Social pain and physical pain: shared paths to resilience. Pain Manage. 2016;6(1):63–74. https://doi.org/10.2217/pmt.15.56.
Kogler L, Müller VI, Chang A, Eickhoff SB, Fox PT, Gur RC, et al. Psychosocial versus physiological stress - meta-analyses on deactivations and activations of the neural correlates of stress reactions. NeuroImage. 2015;119:235–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.059.
Onoda K, Okamoto Y, Nakashima K, Nittono H, Yoshimura S, Yamawaki S, et al. Does low self-esteem enhance social pain? The relationship between trait self-esteem and anterior cingulate cortex activation induced by ostracism. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci. 2010;5(4):385–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq002.
Morese R, Lamm C, Bosco FM, Valentini MC, Silani G. Social support modulates the neural correlates underlying social exclusion. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci. 2019;14(6):633–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsz033.
Landa A, Fallon BA, Wang Z, Duan Y, Liu F, Wager TD, et al. When it hurts even more: the neural dynamics of pain and interpersonal emotions. J Psychosom Res. 2020;128:109881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109881.
Koob GF, Volkow ND. Neurobiology of addiction: a neurocircuitry analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(8):760–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(16)00104-8.
Zilverstand A, Huang AS, Alia-Klein N, Goldstein RZ. Neuroimaging impaired response inhibition and salience attribution in human drug addiction: a systematic review. Neuron. 2018;98(5):886–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.048. [Overview of SUD-related brain alterations and the impaired Response Inhibition and Salience Attribution (iRISA) model].
Fritz H-C, Wittfeld K, Schmidt CO, Domin M, Grabe HJ, Hegenscheid K, et al. Current smoking and reduced gray matter volume—a voxel-based morphometry study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014;39(11):2594–600. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2014.112.
Spindler C, Trautmann S, Alexander N, Bröning S, Bartscher S, Stuppe M, et al. Meta-analysis of grey matter changes and their behavioral characterization in patients with alcohol use disorder. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):5238. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84804-7.
Meade CS, Bell RP, Towe SL, Hall SA. Cocaine-related alterations in fronto-parietal gray matter volume correlate with trait and behavioral impulsivity. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;206:107757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107757.
Wollman SC, Alhassoon OM, Hall MG, Stern MJ, Connors EJ, Kimmel CL, et al. Gray Matter abnormalities in opioid-dependent patients: a neuroimaging meta-analysis. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2017;43(5):505–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2016.1245312.
Taebi A, Becker B, Klugah-Brown B, Roecher E, Biswal B, Zweerings J, et al. Shared network-level functional alterations across substance use disorders: a multi-level kernel density meta-analysis of resting-state functional connectivity studies. Addict Biol. 2022;27(4):e13200. https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.13200. [Meta-analysis of aberrant functional brain connectivity in SUDs].
Tolomeo S, Yu R. Brain network dysfunctions in addiction: a meta-analysis of resting-state functional connectivity. Translational Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):41. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-01792-6.
Abdulaev SK, Tarumov DA, Shamrey VK, Trufanov AG, Puchkov NA, Markin KV, et al. Functional impairments in the large-scale resting networks of the brain in opioid addiction. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2023;53(9):1502–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-023-01545-y.
Liang X, He Y, Salmeron BJ, Gu H, Stein EA, Yang Y. Interactions between the salience and default-mode networks are disrupted in cocaine addiction. J Neurosci. 2015;35(21):8081–90. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3188-14.2015.
Ma N, Liu Y, Li N, Wang C-X, Zhang H, Jiang X-F, et al. Addiction related alteration in resting-state brain connectivity. NeuroImage. 2010;49(1):738–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.037.
Müller-Oehring EM, Jung Y-C, Pfefferbaum A, Sullivan EV, Schulte T. The resting brain of alcoholics. Cereb Cortex. 2015;25(11):4155–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu134.
Arienzo D, Happer JP, Molnar SM, Alderson-Myers A, Marinkovic K. Binge drinking is associated with altered resting state functional connectivity of reward-salience and top down control networks. Brain Imaging Behav. 2020;14(5):1731–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-019-00107-6.
Geng X, Hu Y, Gu H, Salmeron BJ, Adinoff B, Stein EA, et al. Salience and default mode network dysregulation in chronic cocaine users predict treatment outcome. Brain. 2017;140(5):1513–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx036.
Suk JW, Hwang S, Cheong C. Functional and structural alteration of default mode, executive control, and salience networks in alcohol use disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:742228. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.742228.
Zeng J, Yu S, Cao H, Su Y, Dong Z, Yang X. Neurobiological correlates of cue-reactivity in alcohol-use disorders: a voxel-wise meta-analysis of fMRI studies. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews. 2021;128:294–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.06.031.
Pollard AA, Hauson AO, Lackey NS, Zhang E, Khayat S, Carson B, et al. Functional neuroanatomy of craving in heroin use disorder: voxel-based meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) drug cue reactivity studies. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2023;49(4):418–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2023.2172423.
Hill-Bowen LD, Riedel MC, Poudel R, Salo T, Flannery JS, Camilleri JA, et al. The cue-reactivity paradigm: an ensemble of networks driving attention and cognition when viewing drug and natural reward-related stimuli. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews. 2021;130:201–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.08.010.
O’Neill A, Bachi B, Bhattacharyya S. Attentional bias towards cannabis cues in cannabis users: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;206:107719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107719.
Kilts CD, Kennedy A, Elton AL, Tripathi SP, Young J, Cisler JM, et al. Individual differences in attentional bias associated with cocaine dependence are related to varying engagement of neural processing networks. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014;39(5):1135–47. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2013.314.
Lubman DI, Peters LA, Mogg K, Bradley BP, Deakin JF. Attentional bias for drug cues in opiate dependence. Psychol Med. 2000;30(1):169–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291799001269.
Vollstädt-Klein S, Loeber S, Richter A, Kirsch M, Bach P, von der Goltz C, et al. Validating incentive salience with functional magnetic resonance imaging: association between mesolimbic cue reactivity and attentional bias in alcohol-dependent patients. Addict Biol. 2012;17(4):807–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-1600.2011.00352.x.
Ma L, Steinberg JL, Bjork JM, Taylor BA, Arias AJ, Terplan M, et al. Cingulo-hippocampal effective connectivity positively correlates with drug-cue attentional bias in opioid use disorder. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging. 2019;294:110977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2019.08.005.
Luijten M, Machielsen MW, Veltman DJ, Hester R, de Haan L, Franken IH. Systematic review of ERP and fMRI studies investigating inhibitory control and error processing in people with substance dependence and behavioural addictions. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2014;39(3):149–69. https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.130052.
Nestor L, McCabe E, Jones J, Clancy L, Garavan H. Differences in bottom-up and top-down neural activity in current and former cigarette smokers: evidence for neural substrates which may promote nicotine abstinence through increased cognitive control. NeuroImage. 2011;56(4):2258–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.054.
Nestor LJ, Ghahremani DG, Monterosso J, London ED. Prefrontal hypoactivation during cognitive control in early abstinent methamphetamine-dependent subjects. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging. 2011;194(3):287–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.04.010.
Robert H, Hugh G. Executive dysfunction in cocaine addiction: evidence for discordant frontal, cingulate, and cerebellar activity. J Neurosci. 2004;24(49):11017. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3321-04.2004.
Fu L-p, Bi G-h, Zou Z-t, Wang Y, Ye E-m, Ma L, et al. Impaired response inhibition function in abstinent heroin dependents: an fMRI study. Neurosci Lett. 2008;438(3):322–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2008.04.033.
Forman SD, Dougherty GG, Casey BJ, Siegle GJ, Braver TS, Barch DM, et al. Opiate addicts lack error-dependent activation of rostral anterior cingulate. Biol Psychiatry. 2004;55(5):531–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.09.011.
Le TM, Potvin S, Zhornitsky S, Li C-SR. Distinct patterns of prefrontal cortical disengagement during inhibitory control in addiction: a meta-analysis based on population characteristics. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews. 2021;127:255–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.04.028.
Qiu Z, Wang J. Altered neural activities during response inhibition in adults with addiction: a voxel-wise meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2021;51(3):387–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721000362.
•Fascher M, Nowaczynski S, Spindler C, Strobach T, Muehlhan M. Neural underpinnings of response inhibition in substance use disorders: weak meta-analytic evidence for a widely used construct. Psychopharmacology. 2024;241(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-023-06498-1. [Meta-analysis of brain activity during inhibitory control in SUDs].
Cao Y, Tian F, Zeng J, Gong Q, Yang X, Jia Z. The brain activity pattern in alcohol-use disorders under inhibition response Task. J Psychiatr Res. 2023;163:127–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.05.009.
Chen S, Yang P, Chen T, Su H, Jiang H, Zhao M. Risky decision-making in individuals with substance use disorder: a meta-analysis and meta-regression review. Psychopharmacology. 2020;237(7):1893–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-020-05506-y.
Poudel R, Riedel MC, Salo T, Flannery JS, Hill-Bowen LD, Eickhoff SB, et al. Common and distinct brain activity associated with risky and ambiguous decision-making. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;209:107884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107884.
•Hüpen P, Habel U, Votinov M, Kable JW, Wagels L. A systematic review on common and distinct neural correlates of risk-taking in substance-related and non-substance related addictions. Neuropsychol Rev. 2023;33(2):492–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-022-09552-5. [Review of the brain correlates of risky decision making in SUDs].
Burnette EM, Grodin EN, Ghahremani DG, Galván A, Kohno M, Ray LA, et al. Diminished cortical response to risk and loss during risky decision making in alcohol use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021;218:108391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108391.
Zeng J, You L, Sheng H, Luo Y, Yang X. The differential neural substrates for reward choice under gain-loss contexts and risk in alcohol use disorder: evidence from a voxel-based meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023;248:109912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109912.
Gowin JL, May AC, Wittmann M, Tapert SF, Paulus MP. Doubling down: increased risk-taking behavior following a loss by individuals with cocaine use disorder is associated with striatal and anterior cingulate dysfunction. Biol Psychiatry: Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2017;2(1):94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.02.002.
Gowin JL, Stewart JL, May AC, Ball TM, Wittmann M, Tapert SF, et al. Altered cingulate and insular cortex activation during risk-taking in methamphetamine dependence: losses lose impact. Addiction. 2014;109(2):237–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12354.
Galandra C, Basso G, Manera M, Crespi C, Giorgi I, Vittadini G, et al. Salience network structural integrity predicts executive impairment in alcohol use disorders. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):14481. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32828-x.
Crespi C, Galandra C, Manera M, Basso G, Poggi P, Canessa N. Executive impairment in alcohol use disorder reflects structural changes in large-scale brain networks: a joint independent component analysis on gray-matter and white-matter features. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2479. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02479.
Grodin EN, Cortes CR, Spagnolo PA, Momenan R. Structural deficits in salience network regions are associated with increased impulsivity and compulsivity in alcohol dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;179:100–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.06.014.
Canessa N, Basso G, Carne I, Poggi P, Gianelli C. Increased decision latency in alcohol use disorder reflects altered resting-state synchrony in the anterior salience network. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):19581. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99211-1.
Zhu X, Cortes CR, Mathur K, Tomasi D, Momenan R. Model-free functional connectivity and impulsivity correlates of alcohol dependence: a resting-state study. Addict Biol. 2017;22(1):206–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.12272.
Galandra C, Basso G, Manera M, Crespi C, Giorgi I, Vittadini G, et al. Abnormal fronto-striatal intrinsic connectivity reflects executive dysfunction in alcohol use disorders. Cortex. 2019;115:27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.01.004.
Hobkirk AL, Bell RP, Utevsky AV, Huettel S, Meade CS. Reward and executive control network resting-state functional connectivity is associated with impulsivity during reward-based decision making for cocaine users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;194:32–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.09.013.
Zilverstand A, Parvaz MA, Moeller SJ, Kalayci S, Kundu P, Malaker P, et al. Whole-brain resting-state connectivity underlying impaired inhibitory control during early versus longer-term abstinence in cocaine addiction. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28(8):3355–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-023-02199-5.
Zvolensky MJ, McMillan K, Gonzalez A, Asmundson GJ. Chronic pain and cigarette smoking and nicotine dependence among a representative sample of adults. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11(12):1407–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntp153.
Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Lee S, Posada-Villa J, Kovess V, Angermeyer MC, et al. Mental disorders among persons with chronic back or neck pain: results from the World Mental Health surveys. Pain. 2007;129(3):332–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2007.01.022.
Zvolensky MJ, Cougle JR, Bonn-Miller MO, Norberg MM, Johnson K, Kosiba J, et al. Chronic pain and marijuana use among a nationally representative sample of adults. Am J Addictions. 2011;20(6):538–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1521-0391.2011.00176.x.
Tsui JI, Lira MC, Cheng DM, Winter MR, Alford DP, Liebschutz JM, et al. Chronic pain, craving, and illicit opioid use among patients receiving opioid agonist therapy. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;166:26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.06.024.
Beliveau CM, McMahan VM, Arenander J, Angst MS, Kushel M, Torres A, et al. Stimulant use for self-management of pain among safety-net patients with chronic non-cancer pain. Substance Abuse. 2022;43(1):179–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2021.1903654.
Martel MO, Shir Y, Ware MA. Substance-related disorders: a review of prevalence and correlates among patients with chronic pain. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry. 2018;87(Pt B):245 – 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.06.032.
Ditre JW, Zale EL, LaRowe LR. A reciprocal model of pain and substance use: transdiagnostic considerations, clinical implications, and future directions. Ann Rev Clin Psychol. 2019;15:503–28. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095440.
Alford DP, German JS, Samet JH, Cheng DM, Lloyd-Travaglini CA, Saitz R. Primary care patients with drug use report chronic pain and self-medicate with alcohol and other drugs. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(5):486–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3586-5.
Griffin ML, McDermott KA, McHugh RK, Fitzmaurice GM, Jamison RN, Weiss RD. Longitudinal association between pain severity and subsequent opioid use in prescription opioid dependent patients with chronic pain. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;163:216–21.
Bailey JA, Hurley RW, Gold MS. Crossroads of pain and addiction. Pain Med. 2010;11(12):1803–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00982.x.
Eyler EC. Chronic and acute pain and pain management for patients in methadone maintenance treatment. Am J Addictions. 2013;22(1):75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1521-0391.2013.00308.x.
Mao J. Opioid-induced abnormal pain sensitivity: implications in clinical opioid therapy. Pain. 2002;100(3):213–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00422-0.
Zhang Y, Yang J, Sevilla A, Weller R, Wu J, Su C, et al. The mechanism of chronic nicotine exposure and nicotine withdrawal on pain perception in an animal model. Neurosci Lett. 2020;715:134627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134627.
Ditre JW, Zale EL, LaRowe LR, Kosiba JD, De Vita MJ. Nicotine deprivation increases pain intensity, neurogenic inflammation, and mechanical hyperalgesia among daily tobacco smokers. J Abnorm Psychol. 2018;127(6):578–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000353.
Yamamotova A, Hruba L, Schutova B, Rokyta R, Slamberova R. Perinatal effect of methamphetamine on nociception in adult Wistar rats. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2011;29(1):85–92.
Robins MT, Heinricher MM, Ryabinin AE. From pleasure to pain, and back again: the intricate relationship between alcohol and nociception. Alcohol Alcohol. 2019;54(6):625–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agz067.
Herman AM. Interoception within the context of impulsivity and addiction. Curr Addict Rep. 2023;10(2):97–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-023-00482-7.
Macatee RJ, Schermitzler BS, Minieri JB, Moeller SJ, Afshar K, Preston TJ. Neurophysiological error processing and addiction self-awareness correlates of reduced insight in cannabis use disorder. Addiction. 2023;118(12):2397–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16321.
Moeller SJ, Maloney T, Parvaz MA, Alia-Klein N, Woicik PA, Telang F, et al. Impaired insight in cocaine addiction: laboratory evidence and effects on cocaine-seeking behaviour. Brain. 2010;133(Pt 5):1484–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq066.
Williams CT, Latkin CA. Neighborhood socioeconomic status, personal network attributes, and use of heroin and cocaine. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(6 Suppl):S203–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.006.
Ingram I, Kelly PJ, Deane FP, Baker AL, Goh MCW, Raftery DK, et al. Loneliness among people with substance use problems: a narrative systematic review. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2020;39(5):447–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.13064.
Rodriguez LM, Derrick J. Breakthroughs in understanding addiction and close relationships. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;13:115–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.011.
Volkow ND. Stigma and the toll of addiction. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(14):1289–90. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1917360.
Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985;98(2):310–57.
Dobkin PL, Civita MD, Paraherakis A, Gill K. The role of functional social support in treatment retention and outcomes among outpatient adult substance abusers. Addiction. 2002;97(3):347–56.
Panebianco D, Gallupe O, Carrington PJ, Colozzi I. Personal support networks, social capital, and risk of relapse among individuals treated for substance use issues. Int J Drug Policy. 2016;27:146–53.
Dasgupta N, Beletsky L, Ciccarone D. Opioid crisis: no easy fix to its social and economic determinants. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(2):182–6.
VanderWeele TJ. Challenges estimating total lives lost in COVID-19 decisions: consideration of mortality related to unemployment, social isolation, and depression. JAMA. 2020;324(5):445–6.
Slavova S, Rock P, Bush HM, Quesinberry D, Walsh SL. Signal of increased opioid overdose during COVID-19 from emergency medical services data. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;214:108176.
Smallwood RF, Price LR, Campbell JL, Garrett AS, Atalla SW, Monroe TB, et al. Network alterations in comorbid chronic pain and opioid addiction: an exploratory approach. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019;13:174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00174.
Bach P, Frischknecht U, Bungert M, Karl D, Vollmert C, Vollstadt-Klein S, et al. Effects of social exclusion and physical pain in chronic opioid maintenance treatment: fMRI correlates. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019;29(2):291–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.11.1109.
Bach P, Frischknecht U, Klinkowski S, Bungert M, Karl D, Vollmert C, et al. Higher social rejection sensitivity in opioid-dependent patients is related to smaller insula gray matter volume: a voxel-based morphometric study. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci. 2019;14(11):1187–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsz094.
Gerra ML, Ossola P, Ardizzi M, Martorana S, Leoni V, Riva P, et al. Divergent emotional and autonomic responses to Cyberball in patients with opioid use disorder on opioid agonist treatment. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2023;231:173619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2023.173619.
Kroll SL, Williams DP, Thoma M, Staib M, Binz TM, Baumgartner MR et al. Non-medical prescription opioid users exhibit dysfunctional physiological stress responses to social rejection. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019;100:264–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.09.023 [Study that showed association between opioid craving and aberrant physiological response to social rejection].
Shi Z, Fairchild VP, Childress AR, Langleben DD. Presence of social and family problems is associated with frontoinsular alterations in substance users: a preliminary study. The 20th Annual Convention of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology. Portland, OR2019.
Jane-Llopis E, Matytsina I. Mental health and alcohol, drugs and tobacco: a review of the comorbidity between mental disorders and the use of alcohol, tobacco and illicit drugs. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2006;25(6):515–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595230600944461.
Bondesson E, Larrosa Pardo F, Stigmar K, Ringqvist A, Petersson IF, Joud A, et al. Comorbidity between pain and mental illness - evidence of a bidirectional relationship. Eur J Pain. 2018;22(7):1304–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1218.
Reinhard MA, Dewald-Kaufmann J, Wustenberg T, Musil R, Barton BB, Jobst A, et al. The vicious circle of social exclusion and psychopathology: a systematic review of experimental ostracism research in psychiatric disorders. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin NeuroSci. 2020;270(5):521–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-019-01074-1.
Goodkind M, Eickhoff SB, Oathes DJ, Jiang Y, Chang A, Jones-Hagata LB, et al. Identification of a common neurobiological substrate for mental illness. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(4):305–15. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2206.
Menon V. Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15(10):483–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003.
Marhe R, Luijten M, van de Wetering BJ, Smits M, Franken IH. Individual differences in anterior cingulate activation associated with attentional bias predict cocaine use after treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38(6):1085–93. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2013.7.
Janes AC, Pizzagalli DA, Richardt S, de Chuzi BFB, Pachas S. Brain reactivity to smoking cues prior to smoking cessation predicts ability to maintain tobacco abstinence. Biol Psychiatry. 2010;67(8):722–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.12.034.
Clark VP, Beatty GK, Anderson RE, Kodituwakku P, Phillips JP, Lane TD, et al. Reduced fMRI activity predicts relapse in patients recovering from stimulant dependence. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35(2):414–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22184.
Isenburg K, Mawla I, Loggia ML, Ellingsen D-M, Protsenko E, Kowalski MH, et al. Increased salience network connectivity following manual therapy is associated with reduced pain in chronic low back pain patients. J Pain. 2021;22(5):545–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2020.11.007.
Tu Y, Ortiz A, Gollub RL, Cao J, Gerber J, Lang C, et al. Multivariate resting-state functional connectivity predicts responses to real and sham acupuncture treatment in chronic low back pain. NeuroImage: Clin. 2019;23:101885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101885.
Bosak N, Branco P, Kuperman P, Buxbaum C, Cohen RM, Fadel S, et al. Brain connectivity predicts chronic pain in acute mild traumatic brain injury. Ann Neurol. 2022;92(5):819–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.26463.
Baliki MN, Petre B, Torbey S, Herrmann KM, Huang L, Schnitzer TJ, et al. Corticostriatal functional connectivity predicts transition to chronic back pain. Nat Neurosci. 2012;15(8):1117–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3153.
Li X, Hartwell KJ, Borckardt J, Prisciandaro JJ, Saladin ME, Morgan PS, et al. Volitional reduction of anterior cingulate cortex activity produces decreased cue craving in smoking cessation: a preliminary real-time fMRI study. Addict Biol. 2013;18(4):739–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-1600.2012.00449.x.
Karch S, Keeser D, Hümmer S, Paolini M, Kirsch V, Karali T, et al. Modulation of craving related brain responses using real-time fMRI in patients with alcohol use disorder. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0133034. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133034.
Karch S, Krause D, Lehnert K, Konrad J, Haller D, Rauchmann BS, et al. Functional and clinical outcomes of FMRI-based neurofeedback training in patients with alcohol dependence: a pilot study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin NeuroSci. 2022;272(4):557–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-021-01336-x.
Mehta DD, Praecht A, Ward HB, Sanches M, Sorkhou M, Tang VM et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of neuromodulation therapies for substance use disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024;49(4):649 – 80. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-023-01776-0 [Meta-analysis of studies that examined the effectiveness of neuromodulation intervention for SUDs].
Spagnolo PA, Goldman D. Neuromodulation interventions for addictive disorders: challenges, promise, and roadmap for future research. Brain. 2017;140(5):1183–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aww284.
Harel M, Perini I, Kampe R, Alyagon U, Shalev H, Besser I, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in alcohol dependence: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled proof-of-concept trial targeting the medial prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices. Biol Psychiatry. 2022;91(12):1061–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.11.020.
Padula CB, Tenekedjieva LT, McCalley DM, Al-Dasouqi H, Hanlon CA, Williams LM, et al. Targeting the salience network: a mini-review on a novel neuromodulation approach for treating alcohol use disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:893833. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.893833.
De Ridder D, Vanneste S, Kovacs S, Sunaert S, Dom G. Transient alcohol craving suppression by rTMS of dorsal anterior cingulate: an fMRI and LORETA EEG study. Neurosci Lett. 2011;496(1):5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2011.03.074.
Zangen A, Moshe H, Martinez D, Barnea-Ygael N, Vapnik T, Bystritsky A, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for smoking cessation: a pivotal multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial. World Psychiatry. 2021;20(3):397–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20905.
Dinur-Klein L, Dannon P, Hadar A, Rosenberg O, Roth Y, Kotler M, et al. Smoking cessation induced by deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the prefrontal and insular cortices: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;76(9):742–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.05.020.
Moeller SJ, Gil R, Weinstein JJ, Baumvoll T, Wengler K, Fallon N, et al. Deep rTMS of the insula and prefrontal cortex in smokers with schizophrenia: proof-of-concept study. Schizophrenia. 2022;8(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-022-00224-0.
Ibrahim C, Tang VM, Blumberger DM, Malik S, Tyndale RF, Trevizol AP, et al. Efficacy of insula deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with varenicline for smoking cessation: a randomized, double-blind, sham controlled trial. Brain Stimul. 2023;16(5):1501–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2023.10.002.
Martinez D, Urban N, Grassetti A, Chang D, Hu MC, Zangen A, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of medial prefrontal and cingulate cortices reduces cocaine self-administration: a pilot study. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:80. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00080.
Perini I, Kampe R, Arlestig T, Karlsson H, Lofberg A, Pietrzak M, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation targeting the insular cortex for reduction of heavy drinking in treatment-seeking alcohol-dependent subjects: a randomized controlled trial. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020;45(5):842–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-019-0565-7.
Bari A, DiCesare J, Babayan D, Runcie M, Sparks H, Wilson B. Neuromodulation for substance addiction in human subjects: a review. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews. 2018;95:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.09.013.
De Ridder D, Manning P, Glue P, Cape G, Langguth B, Vanneste S. Anterior cingulate implant for alcohol dependence: case report. Neurosurgery. 2016;78(6):E883–93. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000001248.
Leong SL, Glue P, Manning P, Vanneste S, Lim LJ, Mohan A, et al. Anterior cingulate cortex implants for alcohol addiction: a feasibility study. Neurotherapeutics. 2020;17(3):1287–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-020-00851-4.
Ray LA, Meredith LR, Kiluk BD, Walthers J, Carroll KM, Magill M. Combined pharmacotherapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with alcohol or substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(6):e208279. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8279.
Magill M, Ray L, Kiluk B, Hoadley A, Bernstein M, Tonigan JS, et al. A meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioral therapy for alcohol or other drug use disorders: treatment efficacy by contrast condition. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019;87(12):1093–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000447.
DeVito EE, Worhunsky PD, Carroll KM, Rounsaville BJ, Kober H, Potenza MN. A preliminary study of the neural effects of behavioral therapy for substance use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;122(3):228–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.10.002.
Li W, Howard MO, Garland EL, McGovern P, Lazar M. Mindfulness treatment for substance misuse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017;75:62–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2017.01.008.
Goldberg SB, Tucker RP, Greene PA, Davidson RJ, Wampold BE, Kearney DJ, et al. Mindfulness-based interventions for psychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2018;59:52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.10.011.
Korecki JR, Schwebel FJ, Votaw VR, Witkiewitz K. Mindfulness-based programs for substance use disorders: a systematic review of manualized treatments. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020;15(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-020-00293-3.
Kirlic N, Cohen Z, Stewart JL. Neurocircuitry of mindfulness-based interventions for substance use prevention and recovery. Curr Addict Rep. 2021;8(4):520–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-021-00396-2.
Bremer B, Wu Q, Mora Álvarez MG, Hölzel BK, Wilhelm M, Hell E, et al. Mindfulness meditation increases default mode, salience, and central executive network connectivity. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):13219. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17325-6.
Fahmy R, Wasfi M, Mamdouh R, Moussa K, Wahba A, Wittemann M, et al. Mindfulness-based interventions modulate structural network strength in patients with opioid dependence. Addict Behav. 2018;82:50–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.02.013.
Tang Y-Y, Tang R, Posner MI. Brief meditation training induces smoking reduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(34):13971–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1311887110.
Westbrook C, Creswell JD, Tabibnia G, Julson E, Kober H, Tindle HA. Mindful attention reduces neural and self-reported cue-induced craving in smokers. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2013;8(1):73–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr076 [Study that showed the brain effects of mindfulness training in smokers].
Kwako LE, Momenan R, Litten RZ, Koob GF, Goldman D. Addictions neuroclinical Assessment: a neuroscience-based framework for addictive disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2016;80(3):179–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.10.024.
Wong NML, Mabel-Kenzie S, Lin C, Huang CM, Liu HL, Lee SH, et al. Meta-analytic evidence for the cognitive control model of loneliness in emotion processing. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews. 2022;138:104686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104686.
Mwilambwe-Tshilobo L, Spreng RN. Social exclusion reliably engages the default network: a meta-analysis of Cyberball. NeuroImage. 2021;227:117666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117666.
Kantonen T, Karjalainen T, Isojärvi J, Nuutila P, Tuisku J, Rinne J, et al. Interindividual variability and lateralization of µ-opioid receptors in the human brain. NeuroImage. 2020;217:116922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116922.
Liu J, Zhao S, Chen X, Falk E, Albarracín D. The influence of peer behavior as a function of social and cultural closeness: a meta-analysis of normative influence on adolescent smoking initiation and continuation. Psychol Bull. 2017;143(10):1082–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000113.
Caouette JD, Feldstein Ewing SW. Four mechanistic models of peer influence on adolescent cannabis use. Curr Addict Rep. 2017;4(2):90–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-017-0144-0.
Elliott ML, Knodt AR, Ireland D, Morris ML, Poulton R, Ramrakha S, et al. What is the test-retest reliability of common task-functional mri measures? New empirical evidence and a meta-analysis. Psychol Sci. 2020;31(7):792–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620916786.
Yip SW, Kiluk B, Scheinost D. Toward addiction prediction: an overview of cross-validated predictive modeling findings and considerations for future neuroimaging research. Biol Psychiatry: Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2020;5(8):748–58.
Funding
This work was supported by the NARSAD Young Investigator Grant from the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation (#30780) (ZS) and the following National Institutes of Health grants: T32DA028874 (XL), R00AA026892 (CEW), P30DA046345 (CEW), and K01DA051709 (ZS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XL and ZS wrote the main manuscript text. ZS prepared the figure. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
All studies with human or animal subjects are published and followed ethical standards.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, X., Kass, G., Wiers, C.E. et al. The Brain Salience Network at the Intersection of Pain and Substance use Disorders: Insights from Functional Neuroimaging Research. Curr Addict Rep 11, 797–808 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-024-00593-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-024-00593-9