Skip to main content
Log in

Focal mechanisms in Romania: statistical features representative for earthquake-prone areas and spatial correlations with tectonic provinces

  • Original Study
  • Published:
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fault plane solutions for earthquakes recorded in Romania (1929–2012) are analysed on three depth levels: crust (0–50 km), upper (50–110 km) and lower segment (110–201 km). For the Vrancea intermediate-depth source reverse faulting is predominant. However, local-scale variations occur at the upper and lower limits of the active volume: normal faulting (upper side) and strike-slip with normal faulting (lower side). These edge effects are probably caused by the interaction of cold descending lithosphere with hot surrounding asthenosphere acting there. Fault plane solutions of crustal earthquakes reflect complicated patterns associated to local stress sources perturbing the regional field. One important result of our analysis is the delimitation of specific active alignments in North Dobrogea Orogen, Bârlad Depression, Danubian and Banat zones, while seismicity is diffuse and close to random distribution in the other seismogenic zones. The polar diagrams for azimuthal and dip angle distributions and the ternary diagrams for P, T and B axes show prevalence of reverse faulting in Vrancea intermediate-depth source, strike-slip in combination with normal faulting in South Carpathians and Banat region and a deficit of strike-slip faulting south-east of Carpathians. Lack of strike-slip component makes us believe that the deformation field is controlled in the Carpathians Foredeep not by transcurrent deformation along the major faults crossing the region, but rather by subsidence and folding processes as stress release mechanisms in the crust in response to the intense tectonic processes beneath Vrancea region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Álvarez-Gómez JA (2014) FMC: a one-liner Python program to manage, classify and plot focal mechanisms. Geophys Res Abstr 16:EGU2014-10887

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez-Gómez JA (2015) FMC A program to manage, classify and plot focal mechanism data, version 1.01, March 2015. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvidsson R, Grünthal G, the SHARE Working Group on the Seismic Source Zone Model (2010) SHARE D3.1—compilation of existing regional and national seismic source zones. Seismic Hazard Harmonization in Europe (SHARE) Project (FP7 226967). http://www.share-eu.org/node/52.html

  • Bada G, Horváth F, Dövényi P, Szafián P, Windhoffer G, Cloetingh S (2007) Present-day stress field tectonic inversion in Pannonian basin. Global Planet Change 58:165–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bala A, Raileanu V (2017) Assessing of the crustal models and active faults systems in western part of Romania. Romanian Rep Phys 69(1):704

    Google Scholar 

  • Bala A, Radulian M, Popescu E (2003) Earthquakes distribution and their focal mechanism in correlation with the active tectonic zones of Romania. J Geodyn 36:129–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bala A, Raileanu V, Dinu C, Diaconescu M (2015) Crustal seismicity and active fault systems in Romania. Romanian Rep Phys 67(3):1176–1191

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloetingh S, Horvath F, Bada G, Lankreijer AC (2002) Neotectonics and surface processes: Pannonian Basin and Alpine/Carpathian System. EGU Steph Mueller Spec 3:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekström G, Nettles M, Dziewonski AM (2012) The global CMT project 2004-2010: centroid-moment tensors for 13,017 earthquakes. Phys Earth Planet Inter 200–201:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2012.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich C, Apperson KD (1992) Earthquake focal mechanisms, moment tensors, and the consistency of seismic activity near plate boundaries. Tectonics 11:279–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giardini D, Woessner J, Danciu L (2014) Mapping Europe’s Seismic Hazard. EOS 95:261–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser F, Raileanu V, Fielitz W, Bala A, Prodehl C, Polonic G, Schulze A (2001) VRANCEA’99—the crustal structure beneath SE Carpathians and the Moesian Platform from a seismic refraction profile in Romania. Tectonophysics 340:233–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser F, Raileanu V, Fielitz W, Dinu C, Landes M, Bala A, Prodehl C (2007) Seismic crustal structure between Transylvanian Basin and the Black Sea, Romania. Tectonophysics 430:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havskov J, Ottemöller L (eds) (2001) SEISAN: the Earthquake Analysis Software, Version 7.2. University of Bergen, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidbach O, Tingay M, Barth A, Reinecker J, Kurfeß D, Müller B (2010) Global crustal stress pattern based on the World Stress Map database release 2008. Tectonophysics 482:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidbach O, Rajabi M, Cui X, Fuchs K, Müller B, Reinecker J, Reiter K, Tingay M, Wenzel F, Xie F, Ziegler MO, Zoback M-L, Zoback MD (2018) The World Stress Map database release 2016: crustal stress pattern across scales. Tectonophysics 744:484–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hippolyte J-C (2002) Geodynamics of Dobrogea (Romania): new constraints on the evolution of the Tornquist-Teisseyre Line, the Black Sea and the Carpathians. Tectonophysics 357:33–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hippolyte J-C, Badescu D, Constantin P (1999) Evolution of the transport direction of the Carpathian belt during its collision with the east European Platform. Tectonics 18:1120–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyppolite J-C, Sandulescu M (1996) Paleostress characterization of the “Wallachian” phase in its type area, southeastern Carpathians, Romania. Tectonophysics 263:235–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INFP (National Institute for Earth Physics, Romania) (2016) Bigsees Project results. http://bigsees.infp.ro/Results.html. Accessed 26 May 2019

  • INFP (National Institute for Earth Physics, Romania) (2019) Romplus earthquake catalogue. http://www.infp.ro/romplus/. Accessed 26 May 2019

  • Kaverina AN, Lander AV, Prozorov AG (1996) Global creepex distribution and its relation with earthquake—source geometry and tectonic origin. Geophys J Int 125:249–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labay KA, Haeussler PJ (2007) 3D visualization of earthquake focal mechanisms using ArcScene. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey Publication, Data Series 241 version 1.1, https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/2007/241/

  • Lankreijer A, Mocanu M, Cloething S (1997) Lateral variations in lithosphere strength in the Romanian Carpathians: constraints on basin evolution. Tectonophysics 272:269–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin M, Wenzel F, CALIXTO working group (2006) High resolution teleseismic body wave tomography beneath SE-Romania—II. Imaging of a slab detachment scenario. Geophys J Int 164:579–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matenco L, Bertotti G (2000) Tertiary tectonic evolution of the external East Carpathians (Romania). Tectonophysics 316:255–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrofan H, Anghelache M-A, Chitea F, Damian A, Cadicheanu N, Vişan M (2016) Lateral detachment in progress within the Vrancea slab (Romania): inferences from intermediate-depth seismicity patterns. Geophys J Int 205:864–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oncescu MC, Mârza VI, Rizescu M, Popa M (1999) The Romanian earthquake catalogue between 984-1997. In: Wenzel F, Lungu D, Novak O (eds) Vrancea Earthquakes: tectonics, hazard and risk mitigation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 43–47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oros E, Popa M, Moldovan IA, Popescu E (2008) Seismological database for Banat seismic region (Romania)-Part 2: the Catalogue of the Focal Mechanism Solutions. Romanian J. Phys. 53:965–977

    Google Scholar 

  • Oros E, Popa M, Ghita C, Rogozea M, Rau-Vanciu A, Neagoe C (2016) Catalog of focal mechanism solutions for crustal earthquakes in Intra-Carpathian region of Romania. In: Paper presented at the 35th ESC (4–11 September 2016, Trieste, Italy), ESC2016-142

  • Oros E, Constantinescu EG, Diaconescu M, Popa M (2017) Stress field, seismicity and seismotectonic features in the Apuseni Mts area. In: Proceedings of the 17th international scientific geoconference SGEM 2017 (27 June-6 July, Albena, Bulgaria)

  • Pavel F, Vacareanu R, Douglas J, Radulian M, Cioflan C, Barbat A (2016) An updated probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Romania and comparison with the approach and outcomes of the SHARE project. Pure appl Geophys 173(6):1881–1905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popa M, Radulian M, Enescu D, Dragan S, Kissling E, Bonjer KP (2001) Local source tomography using body waves to deduce a minimum 1 D velocity model for the Vrancea, Romania, zone. Romanian Rep Phys 53(3–8):519–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Popescu E, Grecu B, Popa M, Rizescu M, Radulian M (2003) Seismic source properties: indications of lithosphere irregular structure on depth beneath Vrancea region. Romanian Rep Phys 55(3):303–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Radulian M (2014) Mechanisms of Earthquakes in Vrancea. In: Beer M, Patelli E, Kougioumtzoglou I, Siu-Kui Au I (eds) Encyclopedia of earthquake engineering. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36197-5_302_1

    Google Scholar 

  • Radulian M, Mandrescu N, Popescu E, Utale A, Panza GF (1999) Seismic activity and stress field in Romania. Romanian J Phys 44:1051–1069

    Google Scholar 

  • Radulian M, Vaccari F, Mândrescu N, Panza GF, Moldoveanu C (2000a) Seismic hazard of Romania: a deterministic approach. In: Panza GF, Radulian M, Trifu CI (eds) Seismic hazard of the circum-Pannonian Region, vol 157. Springer, Berlin, pp 221–247

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Radulian M, Mandrescu N, Popescu E, Utale A, Panza GF (2000b) Characterization of Romanian seismic zones. In: Panza GF, Radulian M, Trifu CI (eds) Seismic Hazard of the Circum-Pannonian Region, vol 157. Springer, Berlin, pp 57–77

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Radulian M, Popescu E, Bala A, Utale A (2002) Catalog of fault plane solutions for the earthquakes occurred on the Romanian territory. Romanian Rep Phys 47:663–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Radulian M, Popa M, Grecu B, Popescu E, Panza GF (2004) Seismic hazard of Romania due to Vrancea earthquakes: how asymmetric is the strong ground motion distribution. Acta Geod Geoph 39:309–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radulian M, Bala A, Popescu E, Toma-Danila D (2018) Earthquake mechanism and characterization of seismogenic zones in south-eastern part of Romania. Ann Geophys 61(1):108. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radulian M, Bala A, Ardeleanu L, Toma-Danila D, Petrescu L, Popescu E (2019) Revised catalogue of earthquake mechanisms for the events occurred in Romania until the end of twentieth century: REFMC. Acta Geod Geoph 54(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raileanu V, Dinu C, Ardeleanu L, Diaconescu V, Popescu E, Bala A (2009) Crustal seismicity and associated fault systems in Romania. Cahier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Raykova RB, Panza GF (2015) VS structure of the crust and upper mantle in the Balkan Peninsula region, In: 7th BgGS National Conference with International Participation “Geophysics 2015”

  • Sandulescu M (1984) Geotectonics of Romania (in Romanian), Ed. Tehnică (Technical Publishing House), Bucharest

  • Sandulescu M, Visarion M (1988) La structure des plate-formes situées dans l’avant-pays et au-dessous des nappes du flysch des Carpathes orientales. St tehn econ Geofiz 15:62–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Tondi R, Achauer U, Landes M, Davı R, Besutiu L (2009) Unveiling seismic and density structure beneath the Vrancea seismogenic zone, Romania. J Geophys Res 114:B11307. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tóth L, Mónus P, Zsıros T, Kiszely M (2002) Seismicity in the Pannonian Region—earthquake data. EGU Stephan Mueller Spec Publ Ser 3:9–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visarion M, Sandulescu M, Rosca V, Stanica D, Atanasiu L (1990) La Dobrogea dans le cadre de l’avant-pays carpathique. Rev Roum Geophys 34:55–65

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The ternary diagrams in this paper, as well as the assigning of different tectonic regimes to the individual events, are realized with a dedicated program which was kindly made available by the author and which is described properly in Álvarez-Gómez (2014, 2015). This study was founded by Project No. PN 19-08-01-01/2019, in the frame of NUCLEU Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dragos Toma-Danila.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bala, A., Toma-Danila, D. & Radulian, M. Focal mechanisms in Romania: statistical features representative for earthquake-prone areas and spatial correlations with tectonic provinces. Acta Geod Geophys 54, 263–286 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-019-00260-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-019-00260-w

Keywords

Navigation