Advertisement

Applicability of human rights standards in Turkish football arbitration: the contribution of the European Court of Human Rights

  • H. Burak GemalmazEmail author
Article
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

The sole governing body in the field of football, the Turkish Football Federation (TFF), performs official tasks assigned to it by the legislation and has been furnished with the opportunity to benefit from public privileges. The Arbitration Board of TFF is the compulsory and ultimate legal forum for disciplinary and administrative issues, and no appeal is allowed to court in accordance with Article 59 (3) of the Turkish Constitution and the relevant provisions of the Law No. 5894. However, constitutional law and human rights concerns are almost totally neglected in the field of Turkish football. TFF has rejected to apply human rights standards, and the Turkish Constitutional Court has approved TFF’s approach. That is why victims of alleged human rights violations have applied to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) for the actions and decisions of TFF. ECtHR has very recently started to examine the disputes regarding football matters brought against Turkey and has invited the Turkish Government to provide its responses in eight applications pending before it. Possible outcomes of these pending cases are not yet known. Thus, this article seeks to analyze whether and under which circumstances TFF’s activities and decisions can be attributed to the Turkish State under the ECHR, and the applicability of fair trial standards to compulsory arbitration. The article argues that taking into account of TFF’s legal nature as a quasi-public authority and the existence of the compulsory arbitration as a sole legal remedy in football-related disputes, governmental human rights responsibility, is triggered under European Convention on Human Rights.

Keywords

Sports Human rights European Court of Human Rights Fair trial Turkish Football Federation Compulsory/forced arbitration Sport governing bodies 

Notes

References

  1. Akil C (2013) Türkiye Futbol Federasyonu’nun Tahkim Kurulu’nun Yapısı ve Kararlarının Hukuki Niteliği. MÜHF-HAD 19:388–397Google Scholar
  2. Arai-Takahashi Y (2002) ‘Uneven, but in the Direction of Enhanced Effectiveness’—a critical analysis of ‘Anticipatory Ill-treatment’ under Article 3 ECHR. NQHR 20:5–27Google Scholar
  3. Arslan T (ed) (2004) Türkiye Futbol Federasyonu Tahkim Kurulu Örnek Kararları (1998–2003), İstanbulGoogle Scholar
  4. Arslan T, Kocasakal Ü (eds) (2008) Türkiye Futbol Federasyonu Tahkim Kurulu Örnek Kararları (19.01.2006-14.02.2008 Dönemi), İstanbulGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayanoğlu T (2008) Türkiye Futbol Federasyonu Tahkim Kurulu’nun İşlevi ve Kararlarının Niteliği. TBB Dergisi 74:43–76Google Scholar
  6. Besson S (2006) Arbitration and human rights. ASA Bull 24(Issue 3):395–415Google Scholar
  7. Casini L (2011) The Making of a Lex Sportiva by the Court of Arbitration for Sport. German Law J 12:1317–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clapham A (1993) The ‘drittwirkung’ of the Convention. In: Mcdonald RSJ et al (eds) The European system for the protection of human rights. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, pp 163–206Google Scholar
  9. Cornu P, Robert S, Vidal C L (2018) Human rights protection in Europe in the context of sports organisations’ disciplinary and arbitration procedures, Good practice handbook No: 5, Council of Europe, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  10. Duval A (2017) Not in My Name! Claudia Pechstein and the Post-Consensual Foundations of the Court of Arbitration for Sport, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law & International Law (MPIL) Research Paper No. 2017-01, 20 February 2017, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2920555. Accessed 7 Dec 2018
  11. Duval A, van Rompuy B (2015) Protecting athletes’ right to a fair trial through EU competition law: the Pechstein case. In: Paulussen C, Takács T, Lazic V, van Rompuy B (eds) Fundamental rights in international and European law: public and private law perspectives. T.M.C Asser Press, The Hauge, pp 245–278Google Scholar
  12. Faut F (2014) The prohibition of political statements by athletes and its consistency with article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights: speech is silver, silence is gold? Int Sports Law J 14:253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fax A (2012) Public international sports law: a ‘forgotten’ discipline? In: Siekmann RCR, Soek J (eds) Lex sportiva: what is sports law. Asser Press, The Hauge, pp 287–298Google Scholar
  14. Foppen TG (2010) Italian regulation of sports and its law n. 91 of 1981—a solution for sports-related problems in The Netherlands. Int Sports Law J 10:84–92Google Scholar
  15. Haas U (2012) Role and application of article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights in CAS procedures. Int Sports Law Rev 3:43–60Google Scholar
  16. Kalelioğlu C (2017) Domestic sports arbitration in Turkey: creating a sui generis sporting jurisdictional order Alla Turca. Int Sports Law J 17:33–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kanatova-Buchkova V (2010) The Bulgarian model of sports governance. Int Sports Law J 10:103–109Google Scholar
  18. Latty F (2012) Transnational sports law. In: Siekmann RCR, Soek J (eds) Lex sportiva: what is sports law. Asser Press, The Hauge, pp 273–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lukomski J (2013) Arbitration clauses in sport governing bodies’ statutes: consent or constraint? Analysis from the perspective of article 6 (1) of the European Convention on Human Rights. Int Sports Law J 13:60–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McArdle D (2015) Dispute resolution in sport. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  21. Nafziger JAR (2012) Lex sportiva. In: Siekmann RCR, Soek J (eds) Lex sportiva: what is sports law. Asser Press, The Hauge, pp 53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Observations of the Government of the Republic of Turkey on the Admissibility and Merits Concerning the Application No. 48924/16 Naki and Amed Sportif Faaliyetler Kulübü Derneği v. Turkey Before the European Court of Human Rights”, May 2018 (On file with author)Google Scholar
  23. Observations of the Government of the Republic of Turkey on the Admissibility and Merits Concerning the Applications No. 2006/13 Ekşioğlu v. Turkey and No. 10857/13 Mosturoğlu v. Turkey Before the European Court of Human Rights”, December 2018 (On file with author)Google Scholar
  24. Observations of the Government of the Republic of Turkey on the Admissibility and Merits Concerning the Application No. 5506/16 Serkan Akal v. Turkey Before the European Court of Human Rights”, 19 November 2018, (On file with author)Google Scholar
  25. Pijetlovic K (2015) Sports law and breakaway leagues in football. Asser Press, The HaugeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rigozzi A, Robert-Tissot F (2015) Consent in sports arbitration: Its multiple aspects. In: Geisinger E, Trabaldo-de Mestral E (eds) Sports arbitration: a coach for other players? ASA special series, no 41. Juris, USA, pp 59–94Google Scholar
  27. Schabas WA (2015) The European convention on human rights—a commentary. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Schönwald L (2016) ‘For the game, for the world’—and also for human rights? Analysing human rights obligations of international sports associations. In: Reinisch A, Footer ME, Binder C (eds) International law and …: select proceedings of the European Society of International Law, Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 323–352Google Scholar
  29. Siekmann RCR (2012) What is sports law? A reassessment of content and terminology. In: Siekmann RCR, Soek J (eds) Lex sportiva: what is sports law. Asser Press, The Hauge, pp 359–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Siekmann R, Soek J (2010) Models of sport governance in the European Union: the relationship between state and sport authorities. Int Sports Law J 10:93–102Google Scholar
  31. Thomassen W (2015) Arbitration and the European convention on human rights-general principles. Bull TAS/CAS 2:31–38Google Scholar
  32. Türkkan A, Amasya S (eds) (2011) Tahkim Kurulu Örnek Kararları (14.02.2008–29.06.2011 Dönemi), 2 Volumes, İstanbulGoogle Scholar
  33. Verheyden D (2010) The organization of sports in France. Int Sports Law J 10:25–32Google Scholar
  34. Yaşar D (2018) FIFA ve UEFA Düzenlemeleri Doğrultusunda Üye Federasyonların ve Özel Olarak Türkiye Futbol Federasyonu’nun Hukuki Yapısı. Sporda Hak İhlalleri ve Denetim Çalıştay Raporu. Kamu Denetçiliği Yayınları, Ankara, pp 31–35Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Instituut 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawIstanbul UniversityBeyazıt, IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations