Skip to main content
Log in

An Improved MPPT Approach Based on Analytical Inverter Input Impedance Computation for PV Water Heating Systems

  • Published:
Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An emerging type of photovoltaic (PV) system for which maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithms are scarce in the literature is the PV water heating system (PWHS). The application of existing PWHS-specific MPPT algorithms presents a significant difficulty in that none of them is able to provide, concurrently, low-complexity implementations and high tracking efficiencies. This paper addresses such challenge by proposing a novel impedance matching-based MPPT algorithm that has O(1)-complexity iterations and high efficiency for typical PWHS loads. Such efficiency improvement is achieved via generalization of a previous impedance matching algorithm, which is obtained by taking into account the effect of current harmonics into the impedance matching computations. The proposed algorithm is validated by means of simulation experiments, whose results confirm that it yields superior performance when compared to other low-complexity MPPT methods in the PWHS literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Clearly, if a more traditional algorithm such as P &O is used for carrying out MPPT, the irradiance and temperature sensors should be replaced by voltage and current sensors.

  2. In any case, all derivations carried out in this work can be readily adapted to any modulation scheme with a known ratio between input and output voltages (see Sect. 3.1).

  3. Since only the inverter-load subsystem is simulated in this experiment, a DC input voltage value must be specified; we have thus adopted \(V_o=200\ \textrm{V}\). Identical results shall be obtained for any \(V_o\) which is sufficiently large (as is the case in practice) so that the voltage drop through the MOSFET on-resistance \(r_{on}\) (see Table 2) may be deemed negligible.

References

  • Alajmi, A., Rodríguez, S., & Sailor, D. (2018). Transforming a passive house into a net-zero energy house: A case study in the pacific northwest of the u.s. Energy Conversion and Management, 172, 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, N., DiOrio, N., Freeman, J., Gilman, P., Janzou, S., Neises, T., & Wagner., M. (2018). System advisor model (sam) general description (version 2017.9.5). NREL/ TP6A20-70414 .

  • Bollipo, R. B., Mikkili, S., & Bonthagorla, P. K. (2021). Hybrid, optimal, intelligent and classical pv mppt techniques: A review. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 7(1), 9–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, B. L. (2016). Photovoltaic dc heater systems (No. Patent 9518759B2).

  • Cheng, G. S.-X., Mulkeym, S. L., & Chow, A. J. (2018). Smart microgrids and dualoutput off-grid power inverters with dc source flexibility (No. Patent 9871379B2).

  • Corrêea, H. P., & Vieira, F. H. T. (2021). Explicit two-piece quadratic current–voltage characteristic model for solar cells. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 68(12), 6273–6278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrêea, H. P., & Vieira, F. H. T. (2022). Analytical maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic water heating system based on inverter input impedance. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering.

  • De Soto, W., Klein, S., & Beckman, W. (2006). Improvement and validation of a model for photovoltaic array performance. Solar Energy, 80(1), 78–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Brito, M. A. G., Alves, M. G., & Canesin, C. A. (2019). Hybrid mppt solution for double-stage photovoltaic inverter. Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems, 30(2), 253–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehghanimadvar, M., Egan, R., & Chang, N. L. (2022). Economic assessment of local solar module assembly in a global market. Cell Reports Physical Science, 3(2), 100747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgendy, M. A., Zahawi, B., & Atkinson, D. J. (2012). Assessment of perturb and observe mppt algorithm implementation techniques for pv pumping applications. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 3(1), 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, R., & Maksimović, D. (2020). Fundamentals of power electronics. Springer.

  • Fanney, A. H., & Dougherty, B. P. (1994). Photovoltaic solar water heating system (No. Patent 5293447A).

  • Femia, N., Petrone, G., Spagnuolo, G., & Vitelli, M. (2005). Optimization of perturb and observe maximum power point tracking method. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 20(4), 963–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasner, I., & Appelbaum, J. (1996). Advantage of boost vs. buck topology for maximum power point tracker in photovoltaic systems. In Proceedings of 19th convention of electrical and electronics engineers in israel (p. 355–358).

  • Harsito, C., & Triyono, T., & Rovianto, E. (2022). Analysis of heat potential in solar panels for thermoelectric generators using ansys software. Civil Engineering Journal, 8(7)

  • Hauke, B. (2014). Basic calculation of a boost converter’s power stage. Application Report SLVA372C , 1–49.

  • Ishaque, K., Salam, Z., & Lauss, G. (2014). The performance of perturb and observe and incremental conductance maximum power point tracking method under dynamic weather conditions. Applied Energy, 119, 228–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matuska, T., & Sourek, B. (2017). Performance analysis of photovoltaic water heating system. International Journal of Photoenergy, 2017, 7540250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, N., Undeland, T., & Robbins, W. (2003). Power electronics: Converters, applications, and design. Wiley.

  • Musa, W., Ponkratov, V., Karaev, A., Kuznetsov, N., Vatutina, L., Volkova, M., & Masterov, A. (2022). Multi-cycle production development planning for sustainable power systems to maximize the use of renewable energy sources. Civil Engineering Journal, 8(11)

  • Ncir, N., & El Akchioui, N. (2023). An intelligent improvement based on a novel configuration of artificial neural network model to track the maximum power point of a photovoltaic panel. Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems, 34(2), 363–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M., & Newman, G. (2014). Solar photovoltaic water heating system (No. Patent 0153913A1).

  • Njomo, T., Flanclair, A., Sonfack, L. L., Douanla, R. M., & Kenne, G. (2021). Nonlinear neuro-adaptive control for mppt applied to photovoltaic systems. Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems, 32(3), 693–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, J., & Lu, L. (2013). Investigation on the development potential of rooftop pv system in hong kong and its environmental benefits. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, M. (2014). Power electronics: Devices, circuits, and applications. Pearson.

  • Santos, A. J. L., & Lucena, A. F. (2021). Climate change impact on the technical-economic potential for solar photovoltaic energy in the residential sector: A case study for brazil. Energy and Climate Change, 2, 100062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddique, H. A. B., Xu, P., & De Doncker, R. W. (2013). Parameter extraction algorithm for one-diode model of pv panels based on datasheet values. In 2013 international conference on clean electrical power (iccep) (pp. 7–13).

  • Subudhi, B., & Pradhan, R. (2013). A comparative study on maximum power point tracking techniques for photovoltaic power systems. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 4(1), 89–98.

  • Tahiri, F. E., & Chikh, K., & Khafallah, M. (2021). Optimal management energy system and control strategies for isolated hybrid solar-wind-battery-diesel power system. Emerging Science Journal, 5(2)

  • Yap, K. Y., Sarimuthu, C. R., & Lim, J.M.-Y. (2020). Artificial intelligence based mppt techniques for solar power system: A review. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 8(6), 1043–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henrique Pires Corrêa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no known competing interests to declare. No funding was received. The datasets generated and analyzed are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corrêa, H.P., Vieira, F.H.T. An Improved MPPT Approach Based on Analytical Inverter Input Impedance Computation for PV Water Heating Systems. J Control Autom Electr Syst 34, 820–830 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-023-01009-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-023-01009-1

Keywords

Navigation