Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling of Power Cables with Arbitrary Cross Section: From Parameter Calculation to Electromagnetic Transients Simulation

  • Published:
Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A full computer-based methodology is proposed for electromagnetic transient simulations in power cables characterized by an arbitrary cross-section geometry. The frequency-dependent parameters of the cables are calculated using finite element method, and the three-phase cable modeling is carried out using modal decoupling and fitting techniques. The multiconductor representation of a sector-shaped cable is possible from the calculation of a constant and real modal transformation matrix, resulting four independent propagation modes (three phases and cable shield), which are modeled from the inclusion of frequency effect in the classic Bergeron method. The currents and voltages are expressed as a system of differential equations, which are presented as state equations and solved using numerical integration methods. The proposed modeling technique allows the inclusion of time-variable and nonlinear elements during electromagnetic transient simulations in the time domain, which is not possible from frequency-domain models that are solved using inverse transforms. The proposed model is validated from results simulated using numerical Laplace transform and exact modal transformation matrix for calculation of phase currents and voltages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ametani, A. (1980). A general formulation of impedance and admittance of cables, IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus and Systems, 3, PAS-99, pp. 902–910.

  • Ametani, A., & Fuse, I. (1992). Approximate method for calculating the impedances of multiconductors with cross sections of arbitrary shapes. Electrical Engineering in Japan, 112(2), 117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ametani, A., Ohno, T., & Nagaoka, N. (2015). Cable system transients: Theory, modeling and simulation. New York: Wiley-IEEE Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bonyadi-ram, S., Kordi, B., & Bridges, G. E. (2012). A full-space conformal mapping for the calculation of series impedance of overhead transmission lines and underground cables. Electric Power System Research, 91, 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brito, A. I., Machado, V. M., Almeida, M. E., & Neves, M. G. (2016). Skin and proximity effects in the series-impedance of three-phase underground cables. Electric Power Systems Research, 130, 132–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, P. T., Costa, E. C. M., & Kurokawa, S. (2015). Frequency-dependent multiconductor line model based on the Bergeron method. Electric Power System Research, 127, 314–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien, C. H., & Bucknall, R. W. G. (2006). Theoretical aspects of the harmonic performance of subsea AC transmission systems for offshore power generation schemes. IEE Proceedings Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 153(5), 599–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, E. C. M., Kurokawa, S., Pinto, A. J. G., Kordi, B., & Pissolato, J. (2013). Simplified computational routine to correct modal decoupling in transmission lines and power systems modeling. IET Science Measurement and Technology, 7(1), 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, E. C. M., Kurokawa, S., Pissolato, J., & Prado, A. J. (2010). Efficient procedure to evaluate electromagnetic transients on three-phase transmission lines. IET Generation Transmission and Distribution, 4, 1069–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dular, P., & Geuzaine, C. (2013). GetDP Reference Manual.

  • Geuzaine, C., & Remacle, J. (2013). Gmsh Reference Manual.

  • Gómes, P., & Uribe, F. A. (2009). The numerical Laplace transform: An accurate technique for analyzing electromagnetic transients on power system devices. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 31(2–3), 116–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouda, O. E., & Dein, A. Z. E. (2015). Improving underground power distribution capacity using artificial backfill materials. IET Generation Transmission and Distribution, 9(15), 2180–2187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudmundsdottir, U. S. (2014). Proximity effect in fast transient simulations of an underground transmission cable. Electric Power System Research, 115, 50–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen, B., & Semlyen, A. (1998). Combined phase and modal calculation of transmission line transients based on vector fitting. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 13(2), 596–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habib, S., & Kordi, B. (2013). Calculation of multiconductor underground cables high-frequency per-unit-length parameters using electromagnetic modal analysis. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 28(1), 276–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafner, A. A., & Luz, M. V. F. (2015). Impedance and admittance calculations of a three-core power cable by the finite element method. In International conference on power systems transients—IPST, Cavtat, Croatia.

  • Kabalci, E., Kabalci, Y., & Develi, I. (2012). Modelling and analysis of a power line communication system with QPSK modem for renewable smart grids. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 34(1), 19–28.

  • Kariyawasam, K. K. M. A., Gole, A. M., & Kordi, B. (2011). Accurate electromagnetic transient modeling of sector-shaped cables. In International conference on power systems transients—IPST, Delft, Netherlands.

  • Lazaropoulos, A. G. (2014). Numerical evaluation of broadband transmission characteristics of underground low-voltage networks - introducing techno-pedagogical (TP) method. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 55, 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R., & Talukdar, S. (1978). Advances in finite element techniques for calculating cable resistances and inductances. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 3, 875–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. S., Hines, P. D., Zhang, J. D., Minervini, F., & Rinjitham, S. (2013). Modeling the impact of electric vehicle charging on heat transfer around underground cables. Electric Power Systems Research, 97, 76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orton, H. E., & Samm, R. (1997). Worldwide underground transmission cable practices. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 12(2), 533–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, T. A., Chrysochos, A. I., & Papagiannis, G. K. (2013). Analytical study of the frequency-dependent earth conduction effects on underground power cables. IET Generation Distribution and Transmission, 7(3), 276–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salles, M. B. C., Costa, M. C., Filho, M. L. P., Cardoso, J. R., & Marzo, G. R. (2010). Electromagnetic analysis of submarine umbilical cables with complex configurations. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 46, 3317–3320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

São Paulo Research Foundation – FAPESP (Procs. 14/17051-0 and 15/10204-8) and National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development – CNPq (306142/2015-5)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angelo Alfredo Hafner.

Appendix: Impedance and Admittance Parameters

Appendix: Impedance and Admittance Parameters

The numerical approach for calculation of the self and mutual parameters of multiconductor cables, including phase conductors and shield mesh, can be carried out applying a current of 1.0 A at one of the conductors and calculating the voltage at all conductors. In the case of a sector-shaped cable, there are four conductors: three-phase cores and shield wire (armor). The self-impedances are calculated dividing the induced voltage by the impressed current, whereas the mutual are calculated dividing the induced voltage on other elements without impressed current (Hafner and Luz 2015). This procedure is illustrated in Fig. 15.

Initially, considering a current of 1.0 A through the phase conductor a, the mutual parameters can be calculated between a and other two phase conductors and armor. The procedure is valid considering the same current imposed in phases b or c. Thus, the frequency-dependent impedances of the sector-shaped cable can be calculated using the FEM, as a function of the current density (A/m\(^{2})\) and the magnetic flux (Wb/m).

Fig. 15
figure 15

Cable representation for calculation of the impedance parameters

Figure 15 shows that the cable is composed of phase cores ab and c and armor wire g. Thus, from the voltage drops along the sector-shaped cable, the impedance matrix can be expressed in (41) (Ametani et al. 2015).

$$\begin{aligned} \left[ {\begin{array}{llll} {V_{{ag}} - V_{{a^{\prime }g^{\prime }}} } \\ {V_{{bg}} - V_{{b^{\prime }g^{\prime }}} } \\ {V_{{cg}} - V_{{c^{\prime }g^{\prime }}} } \\ {V_{{gg}} - V_{{g^{\prime }g^{\prime }}} } \\ \end{array} } \right] = \left[ {\begin{array}{llll} {Z_{{aa}} } &{} {Z_{{ab}} } &{} {Z_{{ac}} } &{} {Z_{{ag}} } \\ {Z_{{ba}} } &{} {Z_{{bb}} } &{} {Z_{{bc}} } &{} {Z_{{bg}} } \\ {Z_{{ca}} } &{} {Z_{{cb}} } &{} {Z_{{cc}} } &{} {Z_{{cg}} } \\ {Z_{{ga}} } &{} {Z_{{gb}} } &{} {Z_{{gc}} } &{} {Z_{{gg}} } \\ \end{array} } \right] \left[ {\begin{array}{l} {I_{a} } \\ {I_{b} } \\ {I_{c} }\\ {I_{g} } \\ \end{array} } \right] \end{aligned}$$
(41)

Terms \({Z}_{aa}, {Z}_{bb}, Z_{cc}\) are the self-impedances of the phase conductors, whereas \(Z_{ab}, Z_{ac}\) and \({Z}_{bc}\) are mutual impedances. The impedances \({Z}_{ag}, {Z}_{bg }\) and \({Z}_{cg}\) are the mutual terms between phases ab and c and the shield/ground wire g, respectively.

The self and mutual capacitances are considered as invariable in power cables and overhead transmissions lines up to very high frequencies. Therefore, the capacitances are usually considered constant in transmission line and cable modeling for electromagnetic transient analysis (Ametani et al. 2015).

Fig. 16
figure 16

Circuit representation for calculation of the capacitances

The self and mutual capacitances are calculated as a function of the electric charge and the voltage at the conductors. Thus, the capacitance matrix of the sector-shaped cable can be expressed as (Hafner and Luz 2015; Ametani et al. 2015):

$$\begin{aligned} \left[ {\begin{array}{llll} {I_{a} - I_{{a^{\prime }}} } \\ {I_{b} - I_{{b^{\prime }}} } \\ {I_{c} - I_{{c^{\prime }}} } \\ {I_{g} - I_{{g^{\prime }}} } \\ \end{array} } \right] = \left[ {\begin{array}{llll} {C_{{aa}} } &{} {C_{{ab}} } &{} {C_{{ac}} } &{} {C_{{ag}} } \\ {C_{{ba}} } &{} {C_{{bb}} } &{} {C_{{bc}} } &{} {C_{{bg}} } \\ {C_{{ca}} } &{} {C_{{cb}} } &{} {C_{{cc}} } &{} {C_{{cg}} } \\ {C_{{ga}} } &{} {C_{{gb}} } &{} {C_{{gc}} } &{} {C_{{gg}} } \\ \end{array} } \right] \left[ {\begin{array}{llll} {V_{{ag}} } \\ {V_{{bg}} } \\ {V_{{cg}} } \\ {V_{{gg}} } \\ \end{array} } \right] \end{aligned}$$
(42)

The voltage and current vectors at the left hand in (41) and (42) are implicitly represented in terms of current density, magnetic flux and electric field, which are obtained using FEM and following the proposed boundary conditions for impedance and capacitance calculation in Figs. 15 and 16, respectively.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hafner, A.A., Caballero, P.T., Monteiro, J.H.A. et al. Modeling of Power Cables with Arbitrary Cross Section: From Parameter Calculation to Electromagnetic Transients Simulation. J Control Autom Electr Syst 28, 405–417 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-017-0308-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-017-0308-0

Keywords

Navigation