Skip to main content
Log in

Bounds for the Hilbert-Kunz Multiplicity of Singular Rings

  • Published:
Acta Mathematica Vietnamica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we prove that the Watanabe-Yoshida conjecture holds up to dimension 7. Our primary new tool is a function, \(\varphi _J(R;z^t),\) that interpolates between the Hilbert-Kunz multiplicities of a base ring, R, and various radical extensions, \(R_n\). We prove that this function is concave and show that its rate of growth is related to the size of \(e_{\textrm{HK}}(R)\). We combine techniques from Celikbas et al. (Nagoya Math. J. 205, 149–165, 2012) and Aberbach and Enescu (Nagoya Math. J. 212, 59–85, 2013) to get effective lower bounds for \(\varphi ,\) which translate to improved bounds on the size of Hilbert-Kunz multiplicities of singular rings. The improved inequalities are powerful enough to show that the conjecture of Watanabe and Yoshida holds in dimension 7.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This limit was shown to be well defined by Paul Monsky in [17].

  2. The formally unmixed condition is necessary here; it is not difficult to construct examples of singular rings with embedded prime ideals that satisfy \(e_{\textrm{HK}}({R}) = 1.\) Recall that \((R, \mathfrak {m}_R)\) is formally unmixed if the \(\mathfrak {m}_R\)-adic completion, \(\widehat{R},\) is unmixed — that is, \(\dim \widehat{R}/\mathfrak {p} = \dim \widehat{R}\) for all associated primes of \(\widehat{R}.\)

  3. See Sect. 2.2 for details about radical extensions.

  4. This function was partly inspired by the convex function introduced by Blickle, Schwede, and Tucker in [3]. Our function is related to theirs when R is regular.

  5. As far as the authors know, this is the first time this formula has appeared in print.

  6. See [20, Section V.B.2] for details about the completed tensor product — and recall that \(\overline{\kappa }\) is the directed colimit of finite extensions of \(\kappa \).

  7. This reduction, to the case where R is complete with algebraically closed residue field, was first observed by Kunz in Section 3 of his famous paper on the Frobenius endomorphism [14].

  8. The inequality \(e_{\textrm{HK}}(R_{p,d})<2\) is easily verified from the identity \(e_{\textrm{HK}}(R_{p,d}) + s(R_{p,d}) = 2\) by observing that \(R_{p,d}\) is strongly F-Regular, and therefore \(s(R_{p, d})>0\) — where \(s(R_{p, d})\) denotes the F-signature of \(R_{p,d}.\)

  9. See Lemma 2.4.

  10. Note that we are assuming R is normal and \(z \not \in \mathfrak {m}_R^2\), and this ensures that \(X^n - z\) is the minimal polynomial for \(z^{1/n}\) over R — see [1, Remark 4.3] for details.

  11. Note that S is complete with perfect residue field, so S is F-finite.

  12. Observe that \(\nu _s\) is a non-negative increasing function with \(\nu _s = 1\) for \(s \ge d\) and \(\nu _s = 0\) for all \(s \le 0.\) Several interesting formulas are known for \(\nu _s\) — e.g., see [5, 16] — including the following, which hold for \(s \ge 0\):

    $$\begin{aligned} \nu _s = \sum _{j=0}^{\lfloor {s}\rfloor } \left( -1 \right) ^j \dfrac{(s-j)^d}{j! ( d-j)!} = \frac{2}{\pi } \int _{0}^s\int _{0}^{\infty } \left( \frac{\sin u}{u}\right) ^d \cos \left( (d-2w)u\right) du \,\, dw. \end{aligned}$$
  13. Note that the conditions of Lemma 2.4 are satisfied and, therefore, R and all of the \(R_n\)’s are complete domains, and, in particular, unmixed. The statement of [2, Theorem 3.2] assumes that \(\left( \left( (\underline{x})^*\right) R_n\right) ^* = \left( (\underline{x})R_n\right) ^* \subset (J, z^{k/n} )R_n,\) but the argument works if we only assume the weaker inclusion \(((\underline{x})^* ) R_n \subset (J, z^{k/n} )R_n.\) Also, note that \(z^{k/n}, z_2, \dots , z_r\) are clearly generators for \((J, z^{k/n})R_n / \left( (\underline{x})^{*}\right) R_n\) and that the proof in [2] goes through even if they are not minimal generators. With these (possibly) weaker assumptions, the strength of [2, Theorem 3.2] is slightly weakened as well.

  14. This holds because \(R \hookrightarrow R_n\) is split and therefore \(z_i^k \in (\underline{x})^\ell R_n \Longleftrightarrow z_i^k \in (\underline{x})^\ell \) in R.

  15. Recall that \(\nu _{s}\) is an increasing function of s.

  16. This is well known to be a generic condition — see [12, Theorem 8.6.6].

  17. When treating the dimension 7 case in the next section, we use this result with \(k=1\) — this turns out to give a more streamlined argument than taking larger k.

  18. Also, recall that \(z=z_1 \in \mathfrak {m}_S \setminus \mathfrak {m}_S^2\) is part of a minimal reduction of \(\mathfrak {m}_S\) in S, by construction.

  19. This can be seen immediately from the equality

    $$\frac{d}{dp} e_{\textrm{HK}}({R_{p, 7}}) = - \frac{488 p^5+896 p^3+128 p}{4725 p^8+8190 p^6+8589 p^4+4368 p^2+1344}.$$
  20. If \(e(R)=2\), then, by [2, Theorem 2.4 (iii)] either \(e_{\textrm{HK}}({R}) \ge \frac{2}{2-1} = 2\) or R is Cohen-Macauly, in which case it is a hypersurface and the result is known by [7]. For \(e(R) = 3, 4\) and 5, see the detailed discussion in [2] after the proof of Theorem 4.1.

  21. They show that either R is Cohen-Macaulay with minimal multiplicity, in which case the conjecture is known (see [2, Theorem 2.4 (iv)]), or the inequality \(\mu (R) \le e(R) - 2,\) holds.

  22. The bounds listed for \(\mu (R) =1, 2\) and 3 are achieved at \(s = 4\), \(s = 3.56745\), and \(s = 3.32317\), respectively.

  23. This is always possible as long as \(\mu (R) \ge 2\) — see [12, Theorem 8.6.6].

  24. The bounds in this table are not the best that our methods achieve for each specific value of \(e \ge 13\). The particular values of \(e_1\) and \(e_2\), and the corresponding bounds on \(e_{HK}\), were chosen, in an “informed trial and error” process, to make the overall presentation of the data as palatable as possible.

References

  1. Aberbach, I.M., Enescu, F.: Lower bounds for Hilbert-Kunz multiplicities in local rings of fixed dimension. Michigan Math. J. 57, 1–16 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Aberbach, I.M., Enescu, F.: New estimates of Hilbert–Kunz multiplicities for local rings of fixed dimension. Nagoya Math. J. 212, 59–85 (2013)

  3. Blickle, M., Schwede, K., Tucker, K.: F-signature of pairs and the asymptotic behavior of Frobenius splittings. Adv. Math. 231(6), 3232–3258 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Celikbas, O., Dao, H., Huneke, C., Zhang, Y.: Bounds on the Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity. Nagoya Math. J. 205, 149–165 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho, Y., Kim, S.: Volume of hypercubes clipped by hyperplanes and combinatorial identities. Electron. J. Linear Algebra 36, 228–255 (2020)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Cox-Steib, N.: \(\mathfrak{m} \)-adic perturbations in Noetherian local rings. University of Missouri, Thesis (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Enescu, F., Shimomoto, K.: On the upper semi-continuity of the Hilbert–Kunz multiplicity. J. Algebra 285(1), 222–237 (2005)

  8. Gessel, I.M., Monsky, P.: The limit as \(p\rightarrow \infty \) of the Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity of \(\Sigma x_i^{d_i}\) (2010). arXiv:1007.2004

  9. Han, C., Monsky, P.: Some surprising Hilbert-Kunz functions. Math. Z. 214, 119–135 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Hug, D., Weil, W.: Lectures on Convex Geometry. Springer (2020)

  11. Huneke, C.: Hilbert-Kunz multiplicities and the F-signature (2014). arXiv:1409.0467

  12. Huneke, C., Swanson, I., Press, C.U., Society, L.M.: Integral Closure of Ideals, Rings, and Modules. Cambridge University Press, New York (2006)

  13. Jeffries, J., Nakajima, Y., Smirnov, I., Watanabe, K.I., Yoshida, K.I.: Lower bounds on Hilbert–Kunz multiplicities and maximal F-signatures. In: Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 174, pp. 247–271. Cambridge University Press (2023)

  14. Kunz, E.: Characterizations of regular local rings of characteristic p. Amer. J. Math. 91(3), 772–784 (1969)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Kunz, E.: On Noetherian rings of characteristic p. Amer. J. Math. 98(4), 999–1013 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Marichal, J.L., Mossinghoff, M.J.: Slices, slabs, and sections of the unit hypercube. Online J. Anal. Comb. 3, 1–11 (2008)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Monsky, P.: The Hilbert-Kunz function. Math. Ann. 263(1), 43–49 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Monsky, P., Teixeira, P.: p-fractals and power series–ii.: Ssme applications to Hilbert–unz theory. J. Algebra. 304(1), 237–255 (2006)

  19. Polstra, T., Smirnov, I.: Continuity of Hilbert–Kunz multiplicity and F-signature. Nagoya Math. J. 239, 1–24 (2018)

  20. Serre, J.P.: Local Algebra. Springer, New York (2012)

  21. Trivedi, V.: The lower bound on the HK multiplicities of quadric hypersurfaces (2021).arXiv:2101.03905

  22. Trivedi, V.: The Hilbert-Kunz density functions of quadric hypersurfaces. Adv. Math. 430, 109–207 (2023)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Watanabe, K.i., Yoshida, K.i.: Hilbert–Kunz multiplicity and an inequality between multiplicity and colength. J. Algebra. 230(1), 295–317 (2000)

  24. Watanabe, K.i., Yoshida, K.i.: Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity of three-dimensional local rings. Nagoya Math. J. 177, 47–75 (2005)

  25. Yoshida, K.i.: Small Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity and (A1)-type singularity. In: Proceedings of the 4th Japan-Vietnam Joint Seminar on Commutative Algebra by and for Young Mathematicians (2009)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the University of Tulsa and the University of Missouri, Columbia. They would also like to thank ™ZOOM for making this collaboration possible without extensive commuting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Nicholas O. Cox-Steib and Ian M. Aberbach contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas O. Cox-Steib.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to Ngo Viet Trung on the occasion of his 70th birthday.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cox-Steib, N.O., Aberbach, I.M. Bounds for the Hilbert-Kunz Multiplicity of Singular Rings. Acta Math Vietnam (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40306-024-00525-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40306-024-00525-9

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Navigation