Abstract
This paper investigates the use of latent variable models in assessing escalation in crime seriousness. It has two aims. The first is to contrast a mixed-effects approach to modelling crime escalation with a latent variable approach. The paper therefore examines whether there are specific subgroups of offenders with distinct seriousness trajectory shapes. The second is methodological—to compare mixed-effects modelling used in previous work on escalation with group-based trajectory modelling and growth mixture modelling (mixture of mixed-effects models). The availability of software is an issue, and comparisons of fit across software packages is not straightforward. We suggest that mixture models are necessary in modelling crime seriousness, that growth mixture models rather than group-based trajectory models provide the best fit to the data, and that R gives the best software environment for comparing models. Substantively, we identify three latent groups, with the largest group showing crime seriousness increases with criminal justice experience (measured through number of conviction occasions) and decreases with increasing age. The other two groups show more dramatic non-linear effects with age, and non-significant effects of criminal justice experience. Policy considerations of these results are briefly discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For identifiability,the lcmm package in R estimates the variance–covariance matrix of the last latent class, and then a set of estimated class-specific proportional parameters is used to multiply the variance–covariance matrix in order to compute the variances and covariances of each of the other classes.
Note that age is treated as piecewise linear through a one breakpoint representation as described in Sect. 6.1
The posterior probability is the probability of each individual belongs to certain class k given data \({\varvec{X}}\), \(P(c_{i}=k\mid {\varvec{X}}_{it})\).
References
Aitkin, M.: A general maximum likelihood analysis of variance components in generalized linear models. Biometrics 55, 117–128 (1999)
Bartolucci, F., Farcomeni, A., Pennoni, F.: Latent Markov Modsls for Longitudinal Data. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2013)
Bartolucci, F., Pennoni, F., Francis, B.: A latent Markov model for detecting pattern of criminal activity. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 170, 115–132 (2007)
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J., Visher, C.A. (eds.): Criminal Careers and “Career Criminals”, vol. 1. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. (1986)
Bushway, S.D., Sweeten, G., Nieuwbeerta, P.: Measuring long term individual trajectories of offending using multiple methods. J. Quant. Criminol. 25, 259–286 (2009)
Collins, L., Lanza, S.: Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences. Wiley, New York (2009)
Diggle, P., Heagerty, P., Liang, K.-Y., Zeger, S.: Analysis of Longitudinal Data, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)
Eberly, E.L., Thacheray, M.L.: On Lange and Ryan’s plotting technique for diagnosing non-normality of random effects. Stat. Probab. Lett. 75, 77–85 (2005)
Fagan, A.A., Western, J.: Escalation and deceleration of offending behaviours from adolescence to early adulthood. Aust. N. Z. J. Criminol. 38, 59–76 (2005)
Fearn, T.: A two-stage model for growth curves which leads to rao’s covariance-adjusted estimates. Biometrika 64, 141–143 (1977)
Francis, B., Liu, J., Soothill, K.: Criminal lifestyle specialization: female offending in England and Wales. Int. Criminal Justice Rev. 20, 188–204 (2010)
Francis, B., Soothill, K., Humphreys, L., Bezzina, A.: Developing measures of severity and frequency of reconviction (2005). http://www.maths.lancs.ac.uk/~francisb/seriousnessreport.pdf
Holgersson, H.: A graphical method for assessing multivariate normality. Comput. Stat. 21, 141–149 (2006)
Hwang, H., Takane, Y.: Estimation of growth curve models with structured error covariances by generalized estimating equations. Behaviormetrika 32, 155–163 (2005)
Jacqmin-Gadda, H., Sibillot, S., Proust, C., Molina, J., Thiébaut, R.: Robustness of the linear mixed model to misspecified error distribution. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 51, 5142–5154 (2007)
Jones, B., Nagin, D., Roeder, K.: A sas procedure based on mixture models for estimating develpmental trajectories. Soc. Methods Res. 29, 374–393 (2001)
Kreuter, F., Muthèn, B.: Analyzing criminal trajectory profiles: bridging multilevel and group-based approaches using growth mixture modeling. J. Quant. Criminol. 24, 1–31 (2008)
Laird, N.: Non-parametric maximum likelihood estimation of a mixing distribution. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 73, 805–811 (1978)
Laird, N., Ware, J.: Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38, 963–974 (1982)
Lange, N., Ryan, L.: Assessing normality in random effects models. Ann. Stat. 17, 624–642 (1989)
Liu, J., Francis, B., Soothill, K.: A longitudinal study of escalation in crime seriousness. J. Quant. Criminol. 27, 175–196 (2011)
Lukacs, E.: A characterization of the normal distribution. Ann. Math. Stat. 13, 91–93 (1942)
Mahalanobis, P.C.: On the generalised distance in statistics. Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. India 2, 49–55 (1936)
Marquardt, D.: An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 11, 431–441 (1963)
McLachlan, G., Peel, D.: Finite Mixture Models. Wiley-Interscience, New York (2004)
Muggeo, V.: Estimating regression models with unknown break-points. Stat. Med. 22, 3055–3071 (2003)
Muthèn, B., Asparouhov, T.: Growth Mixture Modeling: Analysis with Non-Gaussian Random Effects. In: Fitzmaurice, G., Davidian, M., Verbeke, G., Molenberghs, G. (eds.) Longitudinal data analysis, chapter 6, pp. 143–162. Chapman and Hall, New York (2009)
Muthèn, B., Shedden, K.: Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics 55, 463–469 (1999)
Nagin, D.: Analyzing developmental trajectories: a semiparametric, group-based approach. Psychol. Methods 4, 139–157 (1999)
Nagin, D.: Group-Based Modeling of Development. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge (2005)
Nagin, D., Land, K.C.: Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed poisson model. Criminology 31, 327–362 (1993)
Nagin, D., Tremblay, R.E.: Developmental trajectory groups: fact or a useful statistical fiction? Criminology 43, 873–904 (2005)
Pennoni, F.: Latent Markov Modsls for Longitudinal Data. Scholars’ Press, Saarbrücken (2014)
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D.: Mixed Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New York (2000)
Piquero, R., Brame, R., Fagan, J., Moffitt, E.: Assessing the offending activity of criminal domestic violence suspects: offense specialization, escalation, and de-escalation evidence from the spouse assault replication program. Public Health Rep. 121, 409–418 (2006)
Proust, C., Jacqmin-Gadda, H.: Estimation of linear mixed models with a mixture of distribution for the random-effects. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 78, 165–173 (2005)
Proust-Lima, C., Liquet, B.: The lcmm package version 1.4 (2011). http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lcmm/lcmm.pdf
Rao, C.R.: The theory of least squares when the parameters are stochastic and its application to the analysis of growth curves. Biometrika 52, 447–458 (1965)
Raudenbush, S.: How do we study “what happens next”? Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 602, 131–144 (2005)
Sampson, R.J., Laub, J.H.: Seductions of methods: rejoinder to Nagin and Tremblay’s “developmental trajectory groups: fact or fiction?”. Criminology 43, 905–913 (2005)
Skarðhamar, T.: Distinguishing facts and artifacts in group-based modeling. Criminology 48, 295–320 (2010)
Soothill, K., Francis, B., Liu, J.: Does serious offending lead to homicide? Exploring the interrelationships and sequencing of serious crime. Br. J. Criminol. 48, 522–537 (2008)
Titterington, D., Smith, A., Makov, U.E.: Statistical Analysis of Finite Mixture Models. Wiley, New York (1985)
Verbeke, G., Lesaffre, E.: A linear mixed-effects model with heterogeneity in the random-effects population. Am. Stat. Assoc. 91, 217–221 (1996)
Verbeke, G., Molenberghs, G.: Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data. Springer, New York (2000)
Verbyla, A.: Conditioning in the growth curve model. Biometrika 73, 475–483 (1986)
Verbyla, A., Venables, W.: An extension of the growth curve model. Biometrika 75, 129–138 (1988)
Vermunt, J., Magidson, J.: Latent Gold 4.0 User Manual. Statistical Innovations Inc., Belmont (2005)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) who funded this work under the AQMEN Phase 2 Initiative (Grant Number ES/K006460/1). This study was a re-analysis of existing data that are publicly available from the UK Data Service at http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-3935-1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Francis, B., Liu, J. Modelling escalation in crime seriousness: a latent variable approach. METRON 73, 277–297 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40300-015-0073-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40300-015-0073-4