Abstract
Using the self-determination theory (SDT), this study sought to understand motivational profiles and their links to psychological learning attributes. Participants were 90 secondary three (grade 9) students, aged 15 to 16 years old, from an elite all-girls school in Singapore. Hierarchical cluster analysis revealed three clusters of students with distinct motivational profiles. MANOVA, ANOVA and post hoc tests showed that the three clusters differed significantly in self-efficacy, intrinsic task value, effort and enjoyment in learning. A “highly motivated” cluster characterised by high introjected, identified and intrinsic regulations was found to be most adaptive, with the “highly motivated” cluster being associated with the most optimal psychological learning attributes. An “unmotivated” cluster characterised by high amotivation was found among this sample of high-ability students, with the “unmotivated” cluster being the least adaptive. The importance of understanding how the different motivational regulations were combined to influence psychological learning attributes was discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey, T. H., & Phillips, L. J. (2016). The influence of motivation and adaptation on students’ subjective well-being, meaning in life and academic performance. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1087474.
Balkis, M., & Duru, E. (2017). Gender differences in the relationship between academic procrastination, satisfaction with academic life and academic performance. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 15(1), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.41.16042.
Bandura, A. (1996). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
Dysvik, A., Kuvaas, B., & Gagne, M. (2013). An investigation of the unique, synergistic, and balanced relationships between basic psychological needs and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(5), 1050–1064. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12068.
Gillison, F., Osborn, M., Standage, M., & Skevington, S. (2009). Exploring the experience of introjected regulation for exercise across gender in adolescence. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10, 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.10.004.
Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
How, Y. M., & Wang, J. C. K. (2016). The effectiveness of an autonomy-supportive teaching structure in physical education. RICYDE Revista Internacional de Ciencias Del Deporte, 43(12), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.5232/ricyde2016.04301.
Hu, H. C. (1944). The Chinese concept of “face”. American Anthropologist, 46, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1944.46.1.02a00040.
Kanat-Maymon, Y., Benjamin, M., Stavsky, A., Shoshani, A., & Roth, G. (2015). The role of basic need fulfillment in academic dishonesty: A self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 43, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.08.002.
Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184.
Lepper, M. R., & Henderlong, J. (2000). Turning “play” into “work” and “work” into “play”: 25 years of research on intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 257–307). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Li, J. (2001). Expectations of Chinese immigrant parents for their children’s education: The interplay of Chinese tradition and the Canadian context. Canadian Journal of Education, 26(4), 477–494. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602178.
Liang, Y.W., Jones, D., Robles-Pina, R.A. (2018). Ethnic and gender stereotypes on college students’ academic performance. Research in Higher Education Journal, 35, 1–12. https://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/182858.pdf
Liu, J. D., & Chung, P. K. (2018). Motivational profiles in physical education: Evidence from secondary school students in Hong Kong. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37, 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2017-0153.
McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2001). A comparison of high achievers’ and low achievers’ attitudes, perceptions, and motivations. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5(2), 71–76.
Ng, B. L. L., Liu, W. C., & Wang, J. C. K. (2016). Student motivation and learning in mathematics and sciences: A cluster analysis. International Journal of Math and Science Education, 14, 1359–1376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9654-1.
Orsini, C., Binnie, V., Wilson, S., & Villegas, M. J. (2018). Learning climate and feedback as predictors of dental students’ self-determined motivation: The mediating role of basic psychological needs satisfaction. European Journal of Dental Education, 22(2), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12277.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Centre for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Larose, S., & Senécal, C. (2007). Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 734–746. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.734.
Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.450.
Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63, 397–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00501.x.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness. San Francisco: Freeman.
Senko, C., & Tropiano, K. L. (2016). Comparing three models of achievement goals: Goal orientations, goal standards, and goal complexes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(8), 1178–1192. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000114.
Sommet, N., & Elliot, A. J. (2017). Achievement goals, reasons for goal pursuit, and achievement goal complexes as predictors of beneficial outcomes: Is the influence of goals reducible to reasons? Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(8), 1141–1162. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000199.
Stevenson, H.W., & Lee, S.Y. (1996). The academic achievement of Chinese students. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Ullrich-French, S., & Cox, A. (2009). Using cluster analysis to examine the combinations of motivation regulations of physical education students. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 31, 358–379. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.31.3.358.
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1993). On the assessment of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education: Evidence on the concurrent and construct validity of the academic motivation scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053001018.
Wang, C. K. J., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2001). Young people’s motivational profiles in physical activity: A cluster analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 23, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.23.1.1.
Wang, C. K. J., Liu, W. C., Nie, Y. Y., Chye, Y. L. S., Lim, B. S. C., Liem, G. A., et al. (2017). Latent profile analysis of students’ motivation and outcomes in mathematics: an organismic integration theory perspective. Heliyon, 3, e00308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00308.
Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845.
Wilson, P. M., Sabiston, C. M., Mack, D. E., & Blanchard, C. M. (2012). On the nature and function of scoring protocols used in exercise motivation research: An empirical study of the behavioural regulation in exercise questionnaire. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 614–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.03.009.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This study was conducted with the approval of the Institutional Review Board of Nanyang Technological University.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
KONG, L.C., LIU, W.C. Understanding Motivational Profiles of High-Ability Female Students from a Singapore Secondary School: A Self-Determination Approach. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 29, 529–539 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00504-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00504-2