Abstract
The development of standards, or indicators, for global/international education has lagged behind that of the national curriculum. To address this, we developed a set of core concepts and competence indicators of global/international education for Taiwan’s Grade 1–9 Curriculum Guidelines and revised these through three rounds of Delphi surveys. The final version is composed of five core concepts, three dimensions, and 60 competence indicators across seven learning areas accessed through four learning stages. To explore the extent to which the national curriculum overlaps with global/international education, we conducted content analysis to examine the global/international components of the guidelines. This revealed that 10.70 % of the competence indicators in the guidelines were related to global core concepts. Numerous indicators were related to multiculture, whereas only a few were related to human rights and social justice. The comparison of the indicators for learning areas showed that integrative activities indicators were the most closely related to global education, whereas social studies indicators were related to all global core concepts. The mathematics indicators were unintegrated with global core concepts, with most of the learning areas emphasizing only one or two such concepts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Betts, B. (2004). The challenge of global citizenship in our schools. Journal of Innovative Teaching, 2, 4–5.
Bourn, D. (2012). Global learning and subject knowledge (DERC Research Paper No. 4). London: IOE.
Collins, H. T., Czarra, F. R., & Smith, A. F. (1996). Guidelines for global and international studies education: Challenges, culture, connections. Resource document. American Forum for Global Education. http://www.edscuola.it/archivio/ped/globed/geguidelines.pdf. Accessed 09 May 2014.
Collins, H. T., Czarra, F. R., & Smith, A. F. (1998). Resources on global education. Social Education, 62(5), 306–310.
Commonwealth of Australia. (2008). Global perspectives: A framework for global education in Australian schools. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
Department for Education and Skills. (2005). Developing a global dimension in the school curriculum. Glasgow: DfES.
Europe-Wide Global Education Congress. (2002). European strategy framework for improving and increasing global education in Europe to the year 2015. Maastricht: Europe-Wide Global Education Congress.
Gadsby, H., & Bullivant, A. (2010). Global learning and sustainable development. London: Routledge.
Global Education Guidelines Working Group. (2010). Global education guidelines: A handbook for educators to understand and implement global education. Lisbon: North-South Centre of the Council of Europe.
Hicks, D. (2008). Ways of seeing: The origins of global education in the UK. Paper presented at the Conference of UK Initial Teacher Education Network for Education for Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship, London.
Hicks, D. (2012). Sustainable schools, sustainable futures: A resource for teachers. Godalming: Worldwide Fund for Nature UK.
Hicks, D., & Holden, C. (2007). Remembering the future: What do children think? Environmental Education Research, 13(4), 501–512.
Lewis, C. (2005). What must a school do to be globally responsible? International Schools Journal, 24(2), 17–23.
Ministry of Education. (2011a). Grade 1–9 curriculum guidelines. Taipei: MOE.
Ministry of Education. (2011b). Developing 21st century competencies for our next generation: A white paper on international education for primary and secondary schools. Taipei: MOE.
Ministry of Education. (2012). Competence indicators for international education for grade 1–9: Resource handbook for curriculum infusion. Taipei: MOE.
Mundy, K., Manion, C., Masemann, V., & Haggerty, M. (2007). Charting global education in Canada’s elementary schools: Provincial, district and school level perspectives. Toronto: UNICEF.
Oden, T. (2007). The role of standards in K-12 international education. In M. Hayden, J. Levy, & J. Thompson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of research in international education (pp. 176–187). London: SAGE Publications.
Oxford Committee for Famine Relief. (2006). Education for global citizenship: A guide for schools. London: Oxfam.
Pike, G., & Selby, D. (2000). In the global classroom 2. Toronto: Pippin.
Rauner, M. (1998). The worldwide globalization of civics education topics from 1955 to 1995. Stanford: Stanford University.
Scott, W. A. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public opinion quarterly, 17, 321–325.
Tye, K. A. (2003). World view: Global education as a worldwide movement. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(2), 165–168.
van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Elia, I. (2012). Developing a framework for the evaluation of picture books that support kindergartners’ learning of mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(1), 17–47.
Wen, J. R., & Shih, W. L. (2008). Exploring the information literacy competence standards for elementary and high school teachers. Computers & Education, 50(3), 787–806.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Ministry of Science and Technology for funding this research (NSC 100-2410-H-110 -030 -MY3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chou, PI., Cheng, MC., Lin, YL. et al. Establishing the Core Concepts and Competence Indicators of Global/International Education for Taiwan’s Grade 1–9 Curriculum Guidelines. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 24, 669–678 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0215-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0215-0