Skip to main content
Log in

The Evaluation of a Teaching Intervention in Iranian EFL Writing

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The curriculum for teaching undergraduate university students in Iran majoring in English generally includes paragraph writing in the second year and essay writing (4–5 paragraphs) in the third year. The first-year course ‘Grammar and Writing (I & II)’ offered in two consecutive semesters covers grammar only, despite the inclusion of writing in the title, and rarely goes beyond sentence-level writing in support of the newly taught grammar. This one-year delay in focusing on writing per se has been a source of frustration for those students who have to deal with the demanding writing tasks or large-scale written assignments such as extended essays and papers later during their academic or professional life. The current study describes and evaluates a teaching intervention for the potential development of a writing curriculum in first-year writing classes. A pre-test–post-test control group design was employed to compare the effect of the writing instruction within the process genre approach with that of the traditional grammar and sentence-level writing on the fluency, accuracy and quality of students’ (n = 68) paragraph and essay writing during two consecutive semesters. Findings from the tests and a focus group discussion revealed that students in the treatment group outperformed their control group counterparts at both paragraph and essay levels. The findings could inspire similar EFL programmes to design a writing curriculum and instruction commensurate with the real needs of their students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdollahzadeh, E. (2010). Undergraduate Iranian EFL learners’ use of writing strategies. Writing and Pedagogy, 2(1), 65–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Jarrah, S. R., & Al-Ahmad, S. (2013). Writing instruction in Jordan: Past, present, and future trends. System, 41, 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atai, M. R., & Mazlum, F. (2012). English language teaching curriculum in Iran: Planning and practice. The Curriculum Journal, 21(2), 123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azar, B. S., & Stacy A. H. (2009). Understanding and using English grammar (4th ed.). New York: Pearson Longman.

  • Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birjandi, P., & Hadidi Tamjid, N. (2012). The role of self-, peer and teacher assessment in promoting Iranian EFL learners’ writing performance. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(5), 513–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, H. (2013). Positioning writing as meaning-making in writing research: An introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, J., & Leki, I. (Eds.). (1993). Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. (2003). Key concepts in ELT: Language awareness. ELT Journal, 57(1), 64–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casanave, C. (2009). Training for writing or training for reality? Challenges facing EFL writing teachers and students in language teacher education programs. In R. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 256–277). Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.

  • Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Baba, K., Erdosy, U., Eoanzoui, K., & James, M. (2005). Differences in writing discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOEFL. Assessing Writing, 10, 5–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, X. (2007). A pedagogical response to the different approaches to the teaching of ESL/EFL essay writing. STETS Language & Communication Review, 6(1), 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (1998). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(1), 365–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. An applied linguistic perspective. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirose, K. (2003). Comparing L1 and L2 organizational patterns in the argumentative writing of Japanese EFL students. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(2), 181–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirvela, A. (2004). Connecting reading and writing in second language writing instruction. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, S., Grant, L., Bikowski, D., & Ferris, D. (2003). Exploring multiple profiles of highly rated learner compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 377–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., & Kim, J. (2005). Teaching Korean university writing class: Balancing the process and the genre approach. Asian EFL Journal, 7(2), 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kormos, J. (2012). The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 390–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Adjusting expectations: The study of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 579–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I. (2011). Formative assessment in EFL writing: An exploratory case study. Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education, 18(1), 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I. (2013). Becoming a writing teacher: Using ‘‘identity’’ as an analytic lens to understand EFL writing teachers’ development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 330–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manchón, R. M. (2011). Writing to learn the language: Issues in theory and research. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 61–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Min, H. T. (2009). A principled eclectic approach to teaching EFL writing in Taiwan. Bulletin of Educational Research, 55(1), 63–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahimi, M. (2009). The role of teacher’s corrective feedback in improving Iranian EFL learners’ writing accuracy over time: Is learner’s mother tongue relevant? Reading and Writing, 22(2), 219–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahimi, M. (2013). Is training student reviewers worth its while? A study of how training influences the quality of students’ feedback and writing. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raimes, A. (1985). What unskilled ESL writers do as they write: A classroom study of composing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 229–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichelt, M. (2009). A critical evaluation of writing teaching programmes in different foreign language settings. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 183–206). Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, M. (2000). Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 259–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidlhofer, B. (2005). English as a lingua franca. ELT Journal, 59, 339–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction: Developments, issues, and directions in ESL. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language and writing (pp. 11–23). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2012). The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 321–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zare-ee, A. (2009). The effects of teaching genre moves on EFL learners’ performance in letter writing. Pazhuhesh-e Zabanha-ye Khareji, 49, 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C. (2013). Effect of instruction on ESL students’ synthesis writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bakhtiar Naghdipour.

Appendix

Appendix

A modular instructional writing model within the process genre approach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naghdipour, B., Koç, S. The Evaluation of a Teaching Intervention in Iranian EFL Writing. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 24, 389–398 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0191-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0191-4

Keywords

Navigation