Abstract
The relationships among future-oriented motivation, self-efficacy, task values of science, and achievement outcomes were investigated among 15-year-olds across four Asian nations who participated in the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). The factor structure of theoretical constructs as well as the causal structure of the expectancy-value model is found to be invariant across the four countries. The future goals influence the perceptions of value among the variety of tasks individuals face. Students’ subjective task values predict their science-related activities more strongly than did their self-efficacy. Self-efficacy is more strongly linked to competence than is task values in terms of total effects. The results extend the expectancy-value theory into Eastern Asian cultures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ban, T., & Cummings, W. K. (1999). Moral Orientations of Schoolchildren in the United States and Japan. Comparative Education Review, 1999(43), 64–85.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Bong, M. (2001). Role of self-efficacy and task value in predicting college students’ course enrollments and intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 553–570. doi:10.1006/ceps.2000.1048.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen & J. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.
Cole, J. S., Bergin, D. A., & Whittaker, T. A. (2008). Predicting student achievement for low stakes testing with effort and task value. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 609–624. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.10.002.
Denissen, J. J., Zarrett, N. R., & Eccles, J. S. (2007). I like to do it, I’m able, and I know I am: Longitudinal couplings between domain specific achievement, self-concept, and interest. Child Development, 78, 430–447. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01007.x.
Durik, A. M., Vida, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 382–393. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.382.
Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task values and the Eccles et al. model of achievement related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York: Guilford.
Eccles (Parsons), J. S., Adler, T. F., Futlerman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In Spence, J. T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: Freeman.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the achiever: The structure of adolescents’ academic achievement related beliefs and self-perceptions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215–225.
Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R., & Blumenfeld, P. B. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–847.
Grewal, R., Cote, J. A., & Baumgartner, H. (2004). Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing. Marketing Science, 23(4), 519–529.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Heine, S. J. (2004). Positive self-view. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 2, 109–122.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/1070551990954011.
Hulleman, C. S., Durik, A. M., Schweigert, S. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 398–416. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.398.
Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (2003). LISREL 8.54 for Windows [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
Kaya, S., & Rice, D. (2010). Multilevel effects of student and classroom factors on elementary science achievement in five countries. International Journal of Science Education, 32(10), 1337–1436.
Kifer, E. A. (2002). Students’ attitudes and perceptions. In D. F. Robataille & A. E. Beaton (Eds.), Secondary analysis of the TIMSS data (pp. 251–275). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lin, H., Lawrenz, F., Lin, S. & Hong, Z. (2012). Relationships among affective factors and preferred engagement in science-related activities. Public Understanding of Science, 1–14. doi:10.1177/0963662511429412.
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widamna, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equating Modeling, 9, 151–173.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.
Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M., & Yeung, A. S. (1999). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Reanalysis of a pioneering study and revised recommendations. Educational Psychologist, 34, 155–167. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3403_2.
Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76, 397–416. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). Timss 2011 international results in science. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
Masters, G. N., & Wright, B. D. (1997). The partial credit model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 101–122). New York/Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its consequences for young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performances in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60–70.
Mettas, A., Karmiotis, I., & Cristoforou, P. (2006). Relationship between students’ self-beliefs and attitudes on science achievement in Cyprus: Findings from the third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Euroasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(1), 41–52.
Miller, R. B., & Brickman, S. A. (2004). A model of future oriented motivation and self-regulation. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 9–33.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2006/37464175.pdf. Accessed March 17, 2009.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow’s world. http://www.oecd.org/unitedstates/39722597.pdf. Accessed March 17, 2009.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2009). PISA 2006 technical report. http://www.pisa.oecd.org. Accessed March 17, 2009.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2012). Strong performers and successful reformers in education : Strong lessons from PISA for Japan. http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/49802616.pdf. Accessed March 18, 2013.
Özel, M., Caglak, S., & Erdogan, M. (2012). Are affective factors a good predictor of science achievement? Examining the role of affective factors based on PISA 2006. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 73–82. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.006.
Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1995). Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics performances: The need for specificity of assessment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 190–198. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.42.2.190.
Riodan, C., & Vandenberg, R. (1994). A central question in cross-cultural research: Do employees of different cultures interpret work-related measures in an equivalent manner? Journal of Management, 20(3), 643–671. doi:10.1177/014920639402000307.
Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., & Grolnick, W. S. (1992). When achievement is not intrinsically motivated: A theory and assessment of self-regulation in school. In A. K. Boggiano & T. S. Pittman (Eds.), Achievement and motivation: A social-developmental perspective (pp. 167–188). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schunk, D. H. (1984). Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 19, 45–58.
Shen, C. (2002). Revisiting the Relationship Between Students’ Achievement and their Self-perceptions: A cross-national analysis based on TIMSS 1999 data. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 9, 161–184. doi:10.1080/0969594022000001913.
Shen, C., & Pedulla, J. J. (2000). The relationship between students’ achievement and their self-perception of competence and rigour of mathematics and science: A cross-national analysis. Assessment in Education, 7(2), 237–253. doi:10.1080/713613335.
Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42, 70–83. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70.
Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95, 323–332.
Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. T. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312(5777), 1143–1144.
Updegraff, K. A., Eccles, J. S., Barber, B. L., & O’Brien, K. M. (1996). Course enrollment as self-regulatory behavior: Who takes optional high school math courses? Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 239–260.
Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 111–133.
Walker, R. A. (2010). Sociocultural issues in motivation. In E. Baker, B. McGaw, & P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Watt, H. (2004). Development of adolescents’ self-perceptions, values, and task perceptions according to gender and domain in 7th- through 11th-grade Australian students. Child Development, 75, 1556–1574. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00757.x.
Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010a). Expectancy-value theory: Retrospective and prospective. In Urdan, T. C. & Karabenick, S. A. (Eds.), The decade ahead : theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (Vol. 16a, pp. 35–70). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi:10.1108/S0749-7423(2010)000016A005.
Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010b). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30, 1–35. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265–310.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In A. Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 91–120). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Wilkins, J. L. M. (2004). Mathematics and science self-concept: An international investigation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(4), 331–346. doi:10.3200/JEXE.72.4.331-346.
Xiang, P., McBride, R. E., & Bruene, A. (2004). Fourth graders’ motivation in an elementary physical education running program. Elementary School Journal, 104, 253–266. doi:10.1086/499752.
Yang, S. (1998). A study on competitions of education in Asia Confucious societies. NSC Report, No: NS187-2418-M-003-S14. http://www.ntcu.edu.tw/hsin_hong/200802dissertation/24_6.pdf. Accessed March 27, 2011.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank National Science Council of Taiwan, for financially supporting this research under Contract No. NSC 97-2511-S-152-008-MY2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, Y. Science Motivation Across Asian Countries: Links among Future-Oriented Motivation, Self-Efficacy, Task Values, and Achievement Outcomes. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 24, 247–258 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0176-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0176-3