Detection of Biofilm Production of Yersinia enterocolitica Strains Isolated from Infected Children and Comparative Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Biofilm Versus Planktonic Forms
Background and Objectives
The ability of Yersinia species to produce biofilms has not been hitherto systematically studied, although there is evidence, that Y. enterocolitica is able to form biofilms on inanimate surfaces. The present study aimed to detect the production of biofilms by 60 clinical strains of Y. enterocolitica and to compare the antimicrobial susceptibility of planktonic versus biofilm-forming bacteria.
Y. enterocolitica strains were collected from stool and blood cultures collected from β-thalassaemic children, with gastroenteritis and/or septicemia. The isolated bacterial strains were grouped by biotyping and serotyping and the antimicrobial susceptibility of the planktonic forms was investigated by MIC determination. Biofilm formation was detected by the use of silicone disks and for the biofilm forming strains the minimum inhibitory concentration for bacterial regrowth (MICBR) of 11 clinically important antimicrobials was determined. The presence of the waaE, a gene reported to be related with biofilm formation was investigated in all the strains.
All of 60 strains were positive for biofilm production by the use of silicone disks. The great majority of the biofilm forms were resistant to all the antimicrobials. In antimicrobial concentrations far higher than the CLSI breakpoints, bacterial regrowth from the biofilms was still possible. None of the strains bore the waaE gene.
These results, indicate that biofilm formation by Y. enterocolitica might be an inherent feature. The presence of biofilms increased dramatically the MICBR in all antimicrobials. The way in which biofilms could contribute to Y. enterocolitica pathogenicity in humans is a matter needing further investigation.
- 2.Kechagia N, Nicolaou C, Ioannidou V, Kourti E, Ioannidis A, Legakis NJ, et al. Detection of chromosomal and plasmid-encoded virulence determinants in Yersinia enterocolitica and other Yersinia spp. isolated from food animals in Greece. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;118(3):326–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Cornelis GR, Boland A, Boyd AP, Geuijen C, Iriarte M, Neyt C, et al. The virulence plasmid of Yersinia, an antihost genome. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev MMBR. 1998;62(4):1315–52.Google Scholar
- 24.Wauters G, Kandolo K, Janssens M. Revised biogrouping scheme of Yersinia enterocolitica. Contributions Microbiol Immunol. 1987;9:14–21.Google Scholar
- 25.Kyriazi Z, Chatzipanagiotou S, Trikka-Graphakos E, Legakis NJ, Tassios PT. Serotype, biotype and genomic DNA XbaI restriction fragment analysis of Yersinia enterocolitica, isolated from infected beta-thalassemic and nonthalassemic children in Greece. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;6(3):157–8.Google Scholar
- 27.CLSI. M100-S23: performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty third informational supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute, 950 West Valley Road, Suite 2500, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087, USA. 2013.Google Scholar
- 28.CLSI. M07-A9: methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard, 9th edn. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute, 950 West Valley Road, Suite 2500, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087, USA. 2013.Google Scholar