Skip to main content
Log in

Using Powerlifting Athletes to Determine Strength Adaptations Across Ages in Males and Females: A Longitudinal Growth Modelling Approach

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Several retrospective studies of strength sport athletes have reported strength adaptations over months to years; however, such adaptations are not linear.

Methods

We explored changes in strength over time in a large, retrospective sample of powerlifting (PL) athletes. Specifically, we examined the rate and magnitude of strength adaptation based on age category and weight class for PL competition total, and the squat, bench press, and deadlift, respectively. Mixed effects growth modelling was performed for each operationalised performance outcome (squat, bench press, deadlift, and total) as the dependent variables, with outcomes presented on both the raw, untransformed time scale and on the common logarithmic scale. Additionally, the fitted values were rescaled as a percentage.

Results

Collectively, the greatest strength gains were in the earliest phase of PL participation (~ 7.5–12.5% increase in the first year, and up to an ~ 20% increase after 10 years). Females tended to display faster progression, possibly because of lower baseline strength. Additionally, female Masters 3 and 4 athletes (> 59 years) still displayed ~ 2.5–5.0% strength improvement, but a slight strength loss was observed in Masters 4 (> 69 years) males (~ 0.35%/year).

Conclusion

Although directly applicable to PL, these findings provide population-level support for the role of consistent and continued strength training to improve strength across the age span and, importantly, to mitigate, or at least largely attenuate age-related declines in strength compared to established general population norms. This information should be used to encourage participation in strength sports, resistance training more generally, and to support future public health messaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Though, notably, partial pooling effects enable the estimation of effects for even those with missing data in mixed effects models (Gelman and Hill, 2006).

  2. Note, although for the visualisations shown in the results, we utilise the weight categories as reference values for extracting predicted values from the models, bodyweight was included in the models as a continuous time-varying covariate. The bodyweight recorded on the day of the competition was used, and as such, this allowed for it to vary within participants over time such that we could interpret the general effect of bodyweight. We assumed it to be an exogenous time-varying covariate, however, being only associated with past values of itself and not the outcome per se.

References

  1. Brill PA, Macera CA, Davis DR, Blair SN, Gordon N. Muscular strength and physical function. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;2:412–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ruiz JR, Sui X, Lobelo F, Morrow JR, Jackson AW, Sjostrom M, et al. Association between muscular strength and mortality in men: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2008;337:439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ortega FBSK, Tynelius P, Rasmussen F. Muscular strength in male adolescents and premature death: cohort study of one million participants. BMJ. 2012;345: e7279.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kemmler W, vonStengel S, Schoene D, Kohl M. Changes of maximum leg strength indices during adulthood a cross-sectional study with non-athletic men aged 19–91. Frontiers Physiol. 2018;9:1524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rantanen T, Masaki K, Foley D, Izmirlian G, White L, Guralnik JM. Grip strength changes over 27yr in Japanese–American men. J Appl Physiol. 1998;85(6):2047–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Frontera WR, Hughes VA, Fielding RA, Fiatarone MA, Evans WJ, Roubenoff R. Aging of skeletal muscle: a 12-year longitudinal study. J Appl Physiol. 2000;88:1321–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goodpaster BH, Park SW, Harris TB, Kritchevsky SB, Nevitt M, Schwartz AV, et al. The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: the health, aging and body composition study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61:1059–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McKendry J, Breen L, Shad BJ, Greig CA. Muscle morphology and performance in master athletes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ageing Res Rev. 2018;45:62–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Steele J, Fisher JP, Giessing J, Androulakis-Korakakis P, Wolf M, Kroeske B, et al. Long-term time-course of strength adaptation to minimal dose resistance training through retrospective longitudinal growth modeling. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2022.2070592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Latella C, Teo W-P, Spathis J, D. VDH. Long-term strength adaptation: a 15-year analysis of powerlifting athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2020;34(9):2412–8.

  12. Latella C, Owen PJ, Davies T, Spathis J, Mallard A, van den Hoek D. Long-term adaptations in the squat, bench press, and deadlift: assessing strength gain in powerlifting athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022;54(5):841–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Latella C, van den Hoek D, Teo W-P. Factors affecting powerlifting performance: an analysis of age- and weight-based determinants of relative strength. Int Journal of Perform Anal Sport. 2018;18(4):532–44.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shaw MP, Andersen V, Saeterbakken AH, Pulsen G, Samnoy LE, Solsatd TEJ. Contemporary training practices of norwegian powerlifters. J Strength Cond Res. 2022;36(9):2544–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pearson J, Spathis JG, van den Hoek DJ, Owen PJ, Weakley J, Latella C. Effect of competition frequency on strength performance of powerlifting athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2020;34(5):1213–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller JD, Ventresca HC, Bracken LE. Rate of performance change in american female weightlifters over ten years of competition. Int J Exerc Sci. 2018;11(6):290–307.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gelman A, Hill J. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models (analytical methods for social research). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790942.

  18. Amrhein V, Trafimow D, Greenland S. Inferential statistics as descriptive statistics: there is no replication crisis if we don’t expect replication. Am Stat. 2019;73:262–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McShane BBGD, Gelman A, Robert C, Tackett JL. Abandon statistical significance. Am Stat. 2019;73:235–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Amrhein V, Greenland S, McShane B. Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature. 2019;567(7748):305–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lüdecke D, Ben-Shachar MS, Patil I, Waggoner P, Makowski D. Performance: an R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. J Open Source Software. 2021;6(60):3139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. Linear mixed-effects models: basic concepts and examples. Springer, Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0318-1_1.

  23. Wilkinson GN, Rogers C. Symbolic description of factorial models for analysis of variance. J Appl Stat. 1973;22(3):392–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67(1):1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nelder JA, Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J. 1965;7(4):308–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ludecke D. _sjPlot: data visualization for statistics in social science_. R package version 2.8.4. 2020 [cited; Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sjPlot

  27. Gelman A. Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Stat Med. 2008;27:2865–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lüdecke D. ggeffects: tidy data frames of marginal effects from regression models. J Open Source Softw. 2018;3(26):772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lumley T, Diehr P, Emerson S, Chen L. The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:151–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schmidt AF, Finan C. Linear regression and the normality assumption. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;98:146–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schielzeth H, Dingemanse NJ, Nakagawa S, Westneat DF, Allegue H, Teplitsky C, et al. Robustness of linear mixed-effects models to violations of distributional assumptions. Methods Ecol Evol. 2020;11(9):1141–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Knief E, Forstmeier W. Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils. Behavior Res Methods. 2021;53:2576–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jacqmin-Gadda H, Sibillot S, Proust C, Molina JM, Thiebaut R. Robustness of the linear mixed model to misspecified error distribution. Comp Stat Data Anal. 2007;51:5142–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Alvar BA. Applications of the dose-response for muscular strength development: a review of meta-analytic efficacy and reliability for designing training prescription. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(4):950–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fiatarone MA, O’Neill EFO, Ryan ND, Clements KM, Solares GR, Nelson ME, et al. Exercise training and nutritional supplementation for physical frailty in very elderly people. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1769–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Häkkinen K, Kraemer WJ, Pakarinen A, Triplett-McBride T, McBride JM, Häkkinen A, et al. Effects of heavy resistance/power training on maximal strength, muscle morphology, and hormonal response patterns in 60–75-year-old men and women. Can J Appl Physiol. 2002;27:213–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. de Vreede PL, Van Meeteren NL, Samson MM, Wittink HM, Duursma SA, Verhaar HJ. The effect of functional tasks exercise and resistance exercise on health-related quality of life and physical activity. A randomised controlled trial. Gerontology. 2007;53:12–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zanuso S, Sieverdes JC, Smith N, Carraro A, Bergamin M. The effect of a strength training program on affect, mood, anxiety, and strength performance in older individuals. Int J Sport Psychol. 2012;43:53–6.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Silva RB, Eslick GD, Duque G. Exercise for falls and fracture prevention in long term care facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14:685–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Huebner MAH, Garinther A, Meltzer, DE. How heavy lifting lightens our lives: content analysis of perceived outcomes of masters weightlifting. Front Sports Act Living 2022;4.

  41. Dahab KSMT. Strength training in children and adolescents. Sports Health. 2009;1(3):223–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Grosicki GJ, Zepeda CS, Sundberg CW. Single muscle fibre contractile function with ageing. J Physiol. 2022.

  43. Sun F, Norman IJ, While AE. Physical activity in older people: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:449.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Unhjem R, Nygård M, van den Hoven LT, Sidhu SK, Hoff J, Wang E. Lifelong strength training mitigates the age-related decline in efferent drive. J Appl Physiol. 2016;121(2):415–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ethgen O, Beaudart C, Buckinx F, Bruyère O, Reginster JY. The future prevalence of sarcopenia in Europe: a claim for public health action. Calcified Tissue Int. 2017;100:229–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Moreland JD, Richardson JA, Goldsmith CH, Clase CM. Muscle weakness and falls in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatric Soc. 2004;52(7):1121–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. McGrath RP, Kraemer WJ, Snih SA, Peterson MD. Handgrip strength in health and aging adults. Sports Med (Auckl NZ). 2018;48:1993–2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Pinedo-Villanueva R, Westbury LD, Syddall HE, Sanchez-Santos MT, Dennison EM, Robinson SM, et al. Health care costs associated with muscle weakness: a UK population-based estimate. Calcified Tissue Int. 2019;104:137–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kittilsen HT, Goleva-Fjellet S, Freberg BI, Nicolaisen I, Stoa EM, Bratland-Sanda S, et al. Responses to maximal strength training in different age and gender groups. Front Physiol. 2021.

  50. Roth SM, Ivey FM, Martel GF, Lemmer JT, Hurlbut DE, Siegel EL, et al. Muscle size responses to strength training in young and older men and women. J Am Geriatric Soc. 2001;49(11):1428–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. O’Hagan FT, Sale DG, MacDougall JD, Garner SH. Response to resistance training in young women and men. Int J Sports Med. 1995;16(5):314–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Calatayud JL-BR, Nunez-Cortes R, Yang L, del Pozo Cruz B, ANdersen LL. Trends in adherence to the muscle-strengthening activity guidelines in the US over a 20-year span. Gen Hos Psychiat. 2023;84:89–95.

  53. Latella CVD, Teo W-P. Factors affecting powerlifting performance: an analysis of age- and weight-based determinants of relative strength. Int Journal of Perform Anal Sport. 2018;18(4):532–44.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Latella C, van den Hoek D, Mallard A, Spathis J. Not just a pandemic possibility: The push toward remote data collection can complement existing big data sets in sport science. J Appl Physiol. In Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Latella.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The authors did not receive any funding for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The authors declare that there are no competing interests related to work presented within this article.

Data Availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included within the article or are provided in the supplementary files.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Latella, C., van den Hoek, D., Wolf, M. et al. Using Powerlifting Athletes to Determine Strength Adaptations Across Ages in Males and Females: A Longitudinal Growth Modelling Approach. Sports Med 54, 753–774 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01962-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01962-6

Navigation