Skip to main content
Log in

Authors’ Response to Comment on “Lower Limb Muscle Size After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta‑analysis”

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Systematic Review to this article was published on 25 January 2021

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Zhang H, Chen C. Comment on “Lower limb muscle size after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review and meta‑analysis”. Sports Med. 2021.

  2. Dutaillis B, Maniar N, Opar DA, Hickey JT, Timmins RG. Lower limb muscle size after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2021;51:1209–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01419-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52(6):377–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Reeves BC DJ, Higgins JPT, Wells GA. Chapter 13. Including non-randomized studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.

  5. Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(11):1119–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295(6):676–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. von Hippel PT. The heterogeneity statistic I2 can be biased in small meta-analyses. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15(1):35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2010;1(2):97–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brasileiro JS, Pinto OMSF, Ãvila MA, Salvini TF. Functional and morphological changes in the quadriceps muscle induced by eccentric training after ACL reconstruction. Braz J Phys Ther. 2011;15(4):284–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedmann-Bette B, Profit F, Gwechenberger T, Weiberg N, Parstorfer M, Weber M-A, et al. Strength training effects on muscular regeneration after ACL reconstruction. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(6):1152–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerber JP, Marcus RL, Dibble LE, Greis PE, Burks RT, LaStayo PC. Effects of early progressive eccentric exercise on muscle structure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2007;89(3):559–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hughes L, Rosenblatt B, Haddad F, Gissane C, McCarthy D, Clarke T, et al. Comparing the effectiveness of blood flow restriction and traditional heavy load resistance training in the post-surgery rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients: a UK National Health Service randomised controlled trial. Sports Med. 2019;49(11):1787–805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kilgas MA, Lytle LLM, Drum SN, Elmer SJ. Exercise with blood flow restriction to improve quadriceps function long after ACL reconstruction. Int J Sports Med. 2019;40(10):650–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schoenfeld BJ, Grgic J, Ogborn D, Krieger JW. Strength and hypertrophy adaptations between low- vs. high-load resistance training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(12):3508–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn D, Krieger JW. Dose–response relationship between weekly resistance training volume and increases in muscle mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci. 2017;35(11):1073–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn DI, Vigotsky AD, Franchi MV, Krieger JW. Hypertrophic effects of concentric vs. eccentric muscle actions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(9):2599–608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lixandrão ME, Ugrinowitsch C, Berton R, Vechin FC, Conceição MS, Damas F, et al. Magnitude of muscle strength and mass adaptations between high-load resistance training versus low-load resistance training associated with blood-flow restriction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2018;48(2):361–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schoenfeld BJ, Grgic J, Krieger J. How many times per week should a muscle be trained to maximize muscle hypertrophy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the effects of resistance training frequency. J Sports Sci. 2019;37(11):1286–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Dutaillis.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this letter.

Conflict of interest

Benjamin Dutaillis, Nirav Maniar, David Opar, Jack Hickey and Ryan Timmins declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this letter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dutaillis, B., Maniar, N., Opar, D. et al. Authors’ Response to Comment on “Lower Limb Muscle Size After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta‑analysis”. Sports Med 52, 1207–1209 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01577-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01577-9

Navigation