Skip to main content
Log in

Use of Furosemide and Chlorothiazide Combination Continuous Infusion in Furosemide-Refractory Patients in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Our objective was to describe the efficacy and safety of furosemide and chlorothiazide combination continuous infusion (FCCCI) in children in a pediatric intensive care unit (ICU), including postoperative cardiac patients.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study in a pediatric ICU within a tertiary care teaching hospital. Children aged < 18 years admitted from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2019 were included if they received a furosemide infusion for at least 6 h and then transitioned to FCCCI. Each patient acted as their own control.

Results

A total of 203 patients (107 [53%] postoperative cardiac) met the study inclusion criteria. The study population was 55% male and 74% Caucasian, with a median age of 4.9 months. Of the total patients, 143 (70.4%) required mechanical ventilation and 39 (19.2%) required dialysis. The median duration of furosemide and FCCCI was 24.6 h (interquartile range [IQR] 12.4–54) and 41 h (IQR 15–162), respectively. Urine output increased by 52% with FCCCI (mean increase of 2.2 mL/kg/h [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.8–2.5]; p < 0.01). The change to FCCCI led to a net negative daily fluid balance (mean difference − 301.9 mL/day [95% CI − 390.9 to − 212.9]; p < 0.01). FCCCI resulted in a greater requirement for potassium bolus supplementation (mean increase of 12.8 boluses [95% CI 8.5–17.2]; p < 0.01) and a small but statistically significant increase in serum creatinine (mean difference 0.1 mg/dL [95% CI 0.06–0.14]; p < 0.01) with a resultant decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (mean difference − 13.5 [95% CI 9.7–17.4]; p < 0.01). Of the furosemide-refractory patients, 78.9% were responsive to FCCCI. Younger patients and patients who underwent cardiothoracic surgery were more likely to be responsive. Nonresponders to FCCCI had slightly higher mortality (21 vs. 6.6%, p = 0.05).

Conclusions

FCCCI resulted in a significant improvement in diuresis with achievement of negative fluid balance in pediatric ICU patients. FCCCI is a reasonable approach to aggressive diuresis in the pediatric patient, particularly in patients with limited access. Serum potassium should be routinely monitored during such therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(2):165–228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sinitsky L, Walls D, Nadel S, et al. Fluid overload at 48 hours is associated with respiratory morbidity but not mortality in a general PICU: retrospective cohort study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16(3):205–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Malbrain ML, Marik PE, Witters I, et al. Fluid overload, de-resuscitation, and outcomes in critically ill or injured patients: a systematic review with suggestions for clinical practice. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014;46(5):361–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carpenter RJ, Kouyoumjian S, Moromisato DY, et al. Lower-dose, intravenous chlorothiazide is an effective adjunct diuretic to furosemide following pediatric cardiac surgery. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2020;25(1):31–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Jentzer JC, DeWald TA, Hernandez AF. Combination of loop diuretics with thiazide-type diuretics in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(19):1527–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Congenital Heart Surgery Public Reporting [Internet]. Chicago (IL): The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. 2021. https://publicreporting.sts.org/chsd-exp. Accessed 13 Mar 2021.

  7. McIntosh AM, Tong S, Deakyne SJ, et al. Validation of the vasoactive-inotropic score in pediatric sepsis. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18(8):750–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwartz GJ, Haycock GB, Edelmann CM Jr, et al. A simple estimate of glomerular filtration rate in children derived from body length and plasma creatinine. Pediatrics. 1976;58(2):259–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sutherland SM, Byrnes JJ, Kothari M, et al. AKI in hospitalized children: comparing the pRIFLE, AKIN, and KDIGO definitions. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10(4):554–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 2020 ASP Drug Pricing Files [Internet]. Baltimore (MD): Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 2020. https://www.cms.gov/medicare/medicare-part-b-drug-average-sales-price/2020-asp-drug-pricing-files. Accessed 13 Mar 2021.

  11. Klinge J, Scharf J, Hofbeck M, et al. Intermittent administration of furosemide versus continuous infusion in the postoperative management of children following open heart surgery. Intensive Care Med. 1997;23(6):693–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh N, Kissoon N, Bennett M, et al. Comparison of continuous versus intermittent furosemide administration in postoperative pediatric cardiac patients. Crit Care Med. 1992;20(1):17–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moffett BS, Tsang R, Kennedy C, et al. Efficacy of sequential nephron blockade with intravenous chlorothiazide to promote diuresis in cardiac intensive care infants. Cardiol Young. 2017;27(6):1104–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cies JJ, Moore WS, Chopra A, et al. Stability of furosemide and chlorothiazide stored in syringes. Am J Health Sys Pharm. 2015;72(24):2182–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas CA, Morris JL, Sinclair EA, et al. Implementation of a diuretic stewardship program in a pediatric cardiovascular intensive care unit to reduce medication expenditures. Am J Health Sys Pharm. 2015;72(12):1047–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Summer R. Record.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No external funding was used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

Summer Record, Aaron Harthan, and Sandeep Tripathi have no potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to the contents of this manuscript.

Ethics approval

University of Illinois College of Medicine institutional review board (IRB #1576231, 04/29/20)

Consent to participate

The need for informed consent was waived by the institutional review board.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Data are available upon request from the authors.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

Summer Record participated in researching previous literature, collecting data, analysis, methodology, and writing. Aaron Harthan participated in conceptualization, analysis, methodology, researching previous literature, reviewing, and editing. Sandeep Tripathi participated in project administration, conceptualization, analysis, methodology, supervision, writing, reviewing, and editing.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 107 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Record, S.R., Harthan, A.A. & Tripathi, S. Use of Furosemide and Chlorothiazide Combination Continuous Infusion in Furosemide-Refractory Patients in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Pediatr Drugs 23, 575–582 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-021-00472-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-021-00472-0

Navigation