Skip to main content
Log in

Evolving Type 2 diabetes management focuses on clinical outcomes

  • Practical Issues and Updates
  • Published:
Drugs & Therapy Perspectives Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus, defined by hyperglycaemia, is very common and carries long-term cardiovascular (CV) and renal risks. Management has evolved to consider CV and renal outcomes rather than hyperglycaemia alone. New sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 and glucagon-like peptide type 1 receptor agonists significantly improve CV and renal outcomes, providing excellent therapy options. However, metformin, an old, affordable and effective oral medication is still a first-line treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Umpierrez GE, Klonoff DC. Diabetes technology update: use of insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring in the hospital. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(8):1579–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cosentino F, Grant PJ, Aboyans V, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J. 2019;41(2):255–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jacob S, Krentz AJ, Deanfield J, et al. Evolution of type 2 diabetes management from a glucocentric approach to cardio-renal risk reduction: the new paradigm of care. Drugs. 2021;81(12):1373–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davies MJ, D’Alessio DA, Fradkin J, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2018;41(12):2669–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(10):1376–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. White JR. A brief history of the development of diabetes medications. Diabetes Spectr. 2014;27(2):82–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB. Medical management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia. 2009;52(1):17–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet. 1998;352(9131):854–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stratton IM, Cull CA, Adler AI, et al. Additive effects of glycaemia and blood pressure exposure on risk of complications in type 2 diabetes: a prospective observational study (UKPDS 75). Diabetologia. 2006;49(8):1761–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(1):140–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ACCORD Study Group, Gerstein HC, Miller ME, et al. Long-term effects of intensive glucose lowering on cardiovascular outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(9):818–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2117–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Packer M. Worsening heart failure during the use of DPP-4 inhibitors: pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical risks, and potential influence of concomitant antidiabetic medications. JACC Heart Fail. 2018;6(6):445–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomson SC, Vallon V. Renal effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter inhibitors. Am J Cardiol. 2019;124:S28-35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamazaki T, Mimura I, Tanaka T, et al. Treatment of diabetic kidney disease: current and future. Diabetes Metab J. 2021;45(1):11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aziz KMA. Diabetic foot ulcer risk with diabetic kidney disease and renal failure among 10,680 patients. Sci Med J. 2021;3(4):345–54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Perkovic V, Jardine MJ, Neal B. Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(24):2295–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Heerspink HJL, Stefánsson BV, Correa-Rotter R, et al. Dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(15):1436–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Turchin A, Hosomura N, Zhang H, et al. Predictors and consequences of declining insulin therapy by individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2020;37(5):814–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Connie Kang.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The preparation of this review was not supported by any external funding.

Authorship and conflict of interest

C. Fenton, a contracted employee of Adis International Ltd/Springer Nature, and C. Kang, a salaried employee of Adis International Ltd/Springer Nature, declare no relevant conflicts of interest. All authors contributed to the review and are responsible for the article content.

Ethics approval, Consent to participate, Consent for publication, Availability of data and material, Code availability

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fenton, C., Kang, C. Evolving Type 2 diabetes management focuses on clinical outcomes. Drugs Ther Perspect 38, 165–170 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40267-022-00903-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40267-022-00903-z

Navigation