Older patients are at increased risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) due to polypharmacy. Cardiovascular and central nervous system (CNS) drugs are commonly implicated in serious DDIs.
This study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with potential ‘severe’ cardiovascular and CNS DDIs among older (≥ 70 years) community-dwellers.
This was a prospective cohort study using linked data from a national pharmacy claims database and waves 1 and 2 of The Irish LongituDinal study on Ageing (TILDA). ‘Severe’ cardiovascular and CNS DDIs were identified using the British National Formulary 77 and Stockley’s Drug Interactions. The prevalence of ‘severe’ DDIs (any DDI vs. none) was calculated. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between sociodemographic, functional ability, and medication-related factors and the risk of DDI exposure between waves 1 and 2.
A total of 1466 patients were included [mean age (standard deviation) = 78 (5.5) years; female n = 795, 54.2%]. In total, 332 community-dwellers aged ≥ 70 years [22.65%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 20.58–24.86] were potentially exposed to at least one ‘severe’ cardiovascular or CNS DDI, with more than half (54.82%) of this cohort dispensed the same DDI for a prolonged time (≥ 3 consecutive claims). Aspirin-warfarin was the most frequently dispensed (co-prescribed) DDI (n = 34, 10.24%, 95% CI 7.39–14.00), followed by atorvastatin-clarithromycin (n = 19, 5.72%, 95% CI 3.64–8.81). Polypharmacy [≥ 10 vs. < 5 drugs, odds ratio (OR) 13.40, 95% CI 8.22–21.85] and depression (depressed vs. not, OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.34–3.34) were significantly associated with these DDIs, after multivariable adjustment.
‘Severe’ cardiovascular and CNS DDIs are prevalent in older community-dwellers in Ireland, and those with polypharmacy and depression are at a significantly increased risk.
|We present a novel, evidence-based methodology to identify ‘severe’ drug-drug interactions (DDIs) that may result in adverse health outcomes.|
|In our study, approximately one-quarter of older (≥ 70 years) participants were potentially exposed to at least one ‘severe’ cardiovascular or central nervous system DDI. Polypharmacy and depression were significantly associated with potential exposure to these DDIs.|
|Older adults dispensed warfarin, escitalopram, atorvastatin, furosemide, or clarithromycin had the highest burden of potential exposure to multiple DDIs examined. These older patients should be the focus of medication review/optimisation interventions.|
Ageing populations lead to an increased burden of chronic diseases and rising polypharmacy (five or more regular medicines prescribed) associated with an increased risk of medication-related harm amongst older people [1,2,3]. In Ireland, the proportion of adults aged ≥ 65 years with polypharmacy increased from 17.8% to 60.4% between 1997 and 2012 . Studies in Europe, the USA, and New Zealand, all report similar trends, with the prevalence of polypharmacy in older people increasing over time . Although polypharmacy may be required to manage some patients’ morbidity, the use of multiple medications increases an individual’s risk of potential adverse effects of medicines, including drug-drug interactions (DDIs) [2, 5]. A DDI is said to occur when the effect of one drug is altered by the use of another drug . DDIs are an example of an avoidable cause of patient harm, and older patients are particularly vulnerable to potential DDIs due to age-related physiological changes in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters [7, 8]. Cardiovascular and central nervous system (CNS) drugs are reported to be commonly implicated in potentially serious DDIs .
The prevalence of potential DDIs in older populations has been shown to vary widely across different settings, ranging from 1.5% to 47.4% in population-based studies . A study of 1601 older outpatients from six European countries found that 46% of patients had at least one potential DDI, and almost 10% of these interactions were classified as combinations that should be avoided . Another study, including 287,074 Australian veterans, found that 1.5% of patients were dispensed potentially hazardous DDIs . The large variation in the prevalence of DDIs is due in part to the range of methods used to define a DDI, the classification of DDIs (i.e. potential, clinically significant, etc.), and the databases and information sources used [7, 13]. Some studies have used lists of all potentially clinically relevant DDIs [14, 15], whereas others have used interaction databases relevant to their specific country [16,17,18], DDI software [12, 19], or have applied explicit measures of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) such as Beers criteria, which only measures a limited number of specific DDIs . In order to be able to measure and compare rates of DDIs accurately, studies need to reach consensus on measures of DDIs that are clinically significant and relevant to practice.
Investigating factors associated with DDIs in older populations will help inform healthcare professionals in clinical practice and will identify older people at risk of medication-related harm. A number of studies have reported increasing age, multimorbidity, and polypharmacy as potential risk factors for DDIs [9, 18, 21, 22]. Other age-related factors may also contribute to this risk, including sociodemographic factors (e.g. gender and ethnicity), clinical and treatment factors, prescriber factors, and healthcare system factors [7, 20]. However, further research is required to understand the relationship between these factors and the risk of DDIs. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with potential ‘severe’ cardiovascular and CNS DDIs in a cohort of community-dwelling older adults aged ≥ 70 years in Ireland.
The STrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were used in the reporting of this study .
This was a prospective population-based cohort study using data from a national pharmacy claims database, the Health Service Executive–Primary Care Reimbursement Service (HSE-PCRS) General Medical Services (GMS) scheme, linked to waves 1 and 2 of The Irish LongituDinal study on Ageing (TILDA). TILDA is a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling individuals aged ≥ 50 years in Ireland. Wave 1 (October 2009–February 2011) and wave 2 (April 2012–January 2013) data were collected using computer-aided personal interviews, self-completed questionnaires, and nurse-led health assessments measuring participants’ health, economic, and social circumstances (N = 8175 participants aged ≥ 50 years). The sampling framework is described in detail elsewhere .
The HSE-PCRS GMS scheme provides free health services, including subsidised medications, to eligible persons in Ireland (~ 40% of the population) . Automatic entitlement for those aged ≥ 70 years occurred between July 2001 and December 2008; however, in January 2009, means testing was introduced, but with a higher income threshold than that required for the population < 70 years. As of 2013, 90% of men and 94% of women in the general population aged ≥ 70 years were eligible, representing a unique population-based resource . Within the HSE-PCRS GMS pharmacy claims database, prescriptions are coded using the World Health Organization (WHO) Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system, and prescriber information, defined daily doses, strength, quantity, and the method and unit of administration of each drug dispensed are all available. TILDA participants with GMS eligibility were asked to provide consent to link their pharmacy claims data to study data. Pharmacy claims data were extracted for TILDA participants aged ≥ 70 years with GMS eligibility for the period between wave 1 and wave 2 interview dates. To be included in this study, participants were required to have at least two medicines (distinct ATC codes) on any pharmacy claim during the time period. Ethical approval for TILDA was granted by the Faculty of Health Sciences Ethics Committee, Trinity College Dublin.
Identification of Potential DDIs
Two pharmaceutical references commonly used in current practice, the British National Formulary (BNF) and Stockley’s Drug Interactions [6, 26], were used to identify DDIs that could potentially cause an adverse event for the cardiovascular system and CNS. These two physiological systems were considered as they have been shown to have the highest prevalence of potential DDIs in older people . A list of all the cardiovascular and CNS drugs within chapters 2 and 4, respectively, of the BNF 77 was developed by consensus between two pharmacists (JH and VR) (see the electronic supplementary material, Supplementary file 1). ‘Severe’ cardiovascular and CNS DDIs were identified using the BNF 77 and cross-referenced with Stockley’s Drug Interactions (online database). ‘Severe’ cardiovascular and CNS DDIs were DDIs classified as being both ‘severe’ (i.e. the result may be a life-threatening event or have a permanent detrimental effect) per the BNF 77 and also as being ‘a life-threatening or contraindicated combination’ (red warning) or ‘dosage adjustment or close monitoring is needed’ (orange warning) per Stockley’s. All other DDIs were excluded (Fig. 1). A similar method of identifying DDIs by comparing internationally recognised criteria has been used in previous research . The final list of ‘severe’ cardiovascular and CNS DDIs contained details of the cardiovascular and CNS drug names, corresponding ATC codes, and the interacting drugs and their ATC codes (Supplementary file 2). Using this list, medication dispensing data for all TILDA participants aged ≥ 70 years with GMS eligibility for the period between wave 1 and wave 2 interview dates were examined for potential ‘severe’ cardiovascular and CNS DDIs.
Factors Associated with Potentially ‘Severe’ DDIs
A number of factors associated with DDIs were identified from previous studies and included the following: (1) sociodemographic-related factors; (2) functional ability-related factors (geriatric syndromes); and (3) medication-related factors [9, 18, 20,21,22, 27, 28]. Sociodemographic factors included age and gender, marital status (currently married/cohabiting vs. not), education, and smoking status. Education was stratified into primary/none, secondary, and third/higher level education. Smoking status was stratified as never smoked, past smoker, and current smoker. Functional ability-related factors (geriatric syndromes) included the number of chronic conditions, frailty, depression, and poor delayed recall . Number of chronic conditions was determined using participant’s self-reported doctor-diagnosed chronic diseases (categorised as 0, 1, 2, or ≥ 3) from TILDA data. Frailty was measured using a frailty index adapted to the TILDA cohort, which classifies participants as robust, pre-frail, or frail [29, 30]. Depression was defined as scoring 16 or greater on the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) . Delayed recall (none vs. poor), based on participants being presented with ten words during the interview and being later asked to recall as many as possible, was defined as poor where participants recalled three or fewer words. Medication-related risk factors included polypharmacy [14, 28], which was defined as the number of regular medicines at ATC level 3 dispensed in at least 3 consecutive months, per participant during the study period. It was stratified into three levels: no polypharmacy (0–4 drugs), polypharmacy (5–9 drugs), and excessive polypharmacy (≥ 10 drugs) .
Prevalence of ‘Severe’ DDIs
The frequency and prevalence of ‘severe’ DDIs (any DDI vs. none) was calculated for TILDA participants aged ≥ 70 years with GMS eligibility for the period between wave 1 and wave 2. 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for DDI prevalence, estimated using the Agresti-Coull method, are presented. Two different dispensing patterns were used to define DDIs: (1) drug combinations dispensed on the same day (same date of claim, i.e. co-prescribed); and (2) drug combinations dispensed within 7 days of each other (± 7 days of date of claim). The number of acute DDIs (DDI occurred for a period of less than three consecutive prescription claims) and chronic DDIs (same DDI continued for three or more consecutive prescription claims) were also calculated per number of TILDA participants . The drug combinations involved in the most frequently reported DDIs per dispensing pattern (co-prescribed, ± 7 days of date of claim, acute/chronic) and the potential effect and action required per the BNF 77 and Stockley’s are presented. The drugs that were most frequently implicated in the ‘severe’ DDIs examined in this study were also identified, and the proportion of participants who experienced DDIs with these drugs was calculated per individual drug combination.
Factors Associated with ‘Severe’ DDIs
Baseline risk factors from wave 1 of TILDA were used to predict an individual’s risk of exposure to a ‘severe’ cardiovascular and/or CNS DDI. Descriptive statistics including means [standard deviation (SD)], medians [inter-quartile range (IQR)], and proportions were calculated for all factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the association between the factors identified in wave 1 interviews and the risk of any DDI during the time period between wave 1 and wave 2 of TILDA (approximately 2 years). Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs are presented. Multivariable negative binomial regression was also used to investigate the association between the factors and the number of DDIs experienced by participants during the time period between wave 1 and wave 2 of TILDA. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% CIs are presented. The data were analysed using SAS version v9.4 statistical package and Stata version 14.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).
We identified n = 1506 TILDA participants aged ≥ 70 years with GMS eligibility. In total, following exclusion of ineligible participants, n = 1466 participants aged ≥ 70 years were included in this cohort study. The mean age was 78 years (SD = 5.53), and n = 849 (57.91%) were aged ≥ 75 years. The majority of participants were female (n = 795, 54.23%) and married (n = 805, 54.91%). On average each participant had 23 (median = 25, IQR 17–30) claims over the period between wave 1 and wave 2.
Prevalence of ‘Severe’ DDIs per Number of TILDA Participants
DDIs: Medications Co-prescribed (Same Claim Date)
The overall prevalence of co-prescribed ‘severe’ cardiovascular and CNS DDIs in the cohort of 1466 participants was 22.65% (95% CI 20.58–24.86) (n = 332); 222 participants (15.14%) had one DDI co-prescribed, 67 (4.57%) had two or more DDIs co-prescribed, and 43 (2.93%) had three or more DDIs co-prescribed. Of the cohort exposed to one or more ‘severe’ DDIs, this included 176 (87.6%) ‘orange’ co-prescribed DDIs and 25 (12.4%) ‘red’ co-prescribed DDIs. Table 1 describes the prevalence and interaction effect for the top ten most frequently dispensed (co-prescribed) ‘severe’ DDIs per participant. Aspirin-warfarin was the most frequently dispensed DDI per participant (n = 34, 10.24%), followed by atorvastatin-clarithromycin (n = 19, 5.72%) and aspirin-nicorandil (n = 15, 4.52%).
DDIs: Medications Dispensed Within 7 Days of Each Other
The overall prevalence of DDIs in the cohort per medications dispensed within 7 days of each other was 25.92% (95% CI 23.74–28.23) (n = 380); 242 participants (16.51%) had one DDI, 75 (5.12%) had two or more DDIs, and 63 (4.30%) had three or more DDIs. Among the cohort exposed to one or more ‘severe’ DDIs involving medications dispensed within 7 days of each other, this included 189 (86.3%)‘orange’ DDIs and 30 (13.7%)‘red’ DDIs. The ten most frequently dispensed ‘severe’ DDIs involving medications dispensed within 7 days of each other per participant were similar to the drug combinations for co-prescribed DDIs, but also included the medications furosemide, pravastatin, and lercanidipine, each potentially interacting with clarithromycin (Table 2).
Acute and Chronic DDIs: Medications Co-prescribed (Same Claim Date)
Of the 332 participants co-prescribed a DDI, 182 participants (54.82%) were dispensed the same DDI for three or more consecutive claims (chronic DDI), while 150 participants (45.18%) were dispensed the same DDI for fewer than three consecutive claims (acute DDIs). Aspirin-warfarin was again the most frequently dispensed co-prescribed chronic (n = 14, 7.69%) and acute (n = 20, 13.33%) DDI per participant. The prevalence of all ‘severe’ cardiovascular and CNS chronic DDIs dispensed (co-prescribed) is presented in Supplementary Table S1.
Acute and Chronic DDIs: Medications Dispensed Within 7 Days of Each Other
Of the 380 participants dispensed DDIs involving medications dispensed within 7 days of each other, 181 participants (47.63%) were dispensed the same DDI for three or more consecutive claims (chronic DDI), while 199 participants (52.37%) were dispensed the same DDI for fewer than three consecutive claims (acute DDIs). Aspirin-warfarin was the most frequent chronic DDI involving medications dispensed within 7 days of each other (n = 13, 7.18%), while atorvastatin-clarithromycin was the most frequent acute DDI involving medications dispensed within 7 days of each other (n = 41, 20.60%). The prevalence of all ‘severe’ cardiovascular and CNS chronic DDIs dispensed within 7 days of each other is presented in Supplementary Table S2.
Drugs Most Frequently Involved in Potentially ‘Severe’ DDIs
Figure 2 presents the drugs most frequently implicated in ‘severe’ co-prescribed DDIs. In total, out of 332 participants potentially exposed to one of the ‘severe’ co-prescribed DDIs examined, warfarin was the drug most commonly implicated, where 75 TILDA participants (22.59%) dispensed warfarin were found to have been dispensed a total of five interacting drugs, the most frequent being aspirin (10.2%). This was closely followed by escitalopram (n = 67, 20.18%) and atorvastatin (n = 66, 19.88%) (Fig. 2). Figure 3 presents the drugs most frequently implicated in ‘severe’ DDIs involving drugs dispensed within 7 days of each other. There were 380 TILDA participants potentially exposed to one of the ‘severe’ DDIs examined, and clarithromycin was found to be the drug most commonly implicated, where 128 TILDA participants (33.7%) dispensed clarithromycin were found to have been dispensed eight interacting drugs within 7 days of clarithromycin. This was closely followed by warfarin (n = 107, 28.2%), atorvastatin (n = 94, 24.7%), and furosemide (n = 78, 20.5%) (Fig. 3).
Factors Associated with DDI
Table 3 presents the association between participant sociodemographic, functional ability (geriatric syndrome), and medication-related factors associated with the risk of any potential ‘severe’ cardiovascular or CNS DDI. In the unadjusted analysis, older age, being a past or current smoker, having three or more chronic conditions, being classified as pre-frail or frail, having depression, poor delayed recall, and polypharmacy were all significantly associated with being potentially exposed to a ‘severe’ DDI. Participants with third level education were less likely to be exposed to one of these ‘severe’ DDIs. In the adjusted analysis, participants with polypharmacy (5–9 medications, OR 4.81, 95% CI 3.16–7.33; ≥ 10 medications, OR 13.40, 95% CI 8.22–21.85), compared to those in receipt of fewer than five medications, and those with depression (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.34–3.34) were significantly more likely to be exposed to a ‘severe’ cardiovascular and/or CNS DDI, after adjusting for sociodemographic, functional ability (geriatric syndrome), and medication-related factors. Of the 119 study participants with a self-reported depression diagnosis, 56 (47%) were dispensed antidepressants (N06A) during the study observation period. Including those dispensed multiple antidepressants, most (n = 37) received a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), few (n = 12) received a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA), and n = 21 received either a non-selective monoamine oxidase inhibitor (N06AF04) or other antidepressant (N06AX). Among those dispensed any antidepressant, 50% (n = 28) were potentially exposed to a DDI, and 46% (n = 13) of these TILDA participants were dispensed a DDI that involved the drug escitalopram.
In multivariable negative binomial regression, the number of DDIs also significantly increased for participants with polypharmacy (5–9 medications, IRR 4.79, 95% CI 3.18–7.22; ≥ 10 medications, IRR 11.78, 95% CI 7.48–18.55), compared with those in receipt of fewer than five medications, and also for those with depression versus without depression (IRR 1.45, 95% CI 1.05–2.01) after adjusting for sociodemographic, functional ability (geriatric syndrome), and medication-related factors (Table 3).
In a representative population-based study of ageing in Ireland, we found that almost a quarter (22.65%) of community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 70 years were potentially exposed to at least one ‘severe’ cardiovascular or CNS DDI, with more than half (54.82%) of this cohort found to have been dispensed the same DDI for a prolonged period of time (≥ 3 consecutive claims). The majority were potentially exposed to ‘orange’ co-prescribed DDIs, requiring dosage adjustment or close monitoring; however, we found that potential exposure to ‘red’ contraindicated DDIs was greater where medications were dispensed within 7 days of each other. Polypharmacy and depression were significantly associated with potential exposure to these DDIs.
Compared with previous population-based studies [19, 27], we report a higher prevalence of community-dwelling older adults potentially exposed to aspirin-warfarin and amiodarone-warfarin DDIs. These findings are potentially concerning, especially since the increased bleeding risk associated with these DDIs is well-established in the literature [34, 35]. Indeed, with the advent of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), it is important to consider the consequent decline in warfarin use in current clinical practice in Ireland . However, it should be noted that previous studies have reported the combined use of NOACs and antiplatelet drugs  and NOACs and amiodarone  to similarly be associated with an increased risk of major bleeding. In addition, it should also be noted that warfarin may be the most suitable anticoagulant for some patients (e.g. an atrial fibrillation patient with a mechanical heart valve or mitral stenosis) . Previous research has highlighted that the older patient is at increased risk of drug-induced QT prolongation, which may contribute to serious adverse outcomes, including torsade de pointes [40, 41]. Our study reports a relatively high prevalence of older community-dwelling adults potentially exposed to DDIs associated with QT prolongation, including the contraindicated DDI escitalopram-domperidone. These drug combinations may confer serious risks to the older patient and should, therefore, be avoided. Our study also reveals some important insights at the individual drug level, including that the frequency of older adults co-prescribed a ‘severe’ DDI was highest for those prescribed the anticoagulant warfarin, while the antidepressant escitalopram was the second most frequently implicated drug in ‘severe’ co-prescribed DDIs. Anticoagulants and antidepressants are commonly used in the older population, and have been highlighted as a high-risk drug category for drug interactions in the older patient .
This study identified a slightly higher prevalence of older persons potentially exposed to a DDI involving medicines dispensed within 7 days of each other compared to medicines co-prescribed. One possible explanation for the difference observed here could be that these medicines were prescribed by different prescribers. Tamblyn et al.  have shown that an older patient’s risk of receiving an inappropriate drug combination is directly related to the number of prescribers. In addition, a recent study conducted in a primary care setting in Sweden found that DDIs were more likely to occur as a result of prescriptions from multiple prescribers . Among the medications dispensed within 7 days of each other, atorvastatin-clarithromycin was the most prevalent DDI, with almost one in ten TILDA participants ≥ 70 years potentially exposed. The adverse effects of this pharmacokinetic interaction are well-reported in the literature . Moreover, at the individual drug level, for one third of older adults with any ‘severe’ cardiovascular or CNS DDI involving drugs dispensed within 7 days of each other, the macrolide antibiotic clarithromycin was most commonly implicated. Given the high prevalence of statin use among Ireland’s older population , prescribers and pharmacists caring for these patients need to be aware of such interactions and intervene if appropriate.
The findings from this study also highlight that after adjusting for a wide range of sociodemographic and functional ability-related (geriatric syndrome) factors associated with DDIs in older community-dwelling adults, polypharmacy was significantly associated with DDIs. Previous studies have also reported an association between polypharmacy and DDIs, which persists over time [3, 7, 12, 14]. Moreover, while previous research has reported an association between depression and polypharmacy , to our knowledge, this is the first study to identify a positive association between depression and potential DDI exposure in the older population. This may be due to treatment-resistant depression, requiring multiple or older, more toxic antidepressants to manage symptoms . However, other confounding factors contributing to this association cannot be excluded, and further research is therefore needed to validate our findings. Nonetheless, this is important information for healthcare professionals caring for older patients with cardiovascular disease, especially since antidepressants are frequently prescribed in this population .
Strengths and Limitations
To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the prevalence and factors associated with potential DDIs in older community-dwelling adults in Ireland. Previous studies have reported DDI prevalence rates to vary considerably in this population due to the disparate methods used to identify and classify a DDI [7, 13]. To address this, we have developed a comprehensive, robust, and reproducible methodology that researchers in other countries can use—this will allow for direct comparison of DDI prevalence estimates between countries. This study used data from a prospective longitudinal cohort study and includes participants who are representative of the general population aged ≥ 70 years in Ireland. This study does have some limitations to consider. Firstly, we only examined cardiovascular and CNS DDIs, and while these have been shown to be the most commonly implicated drug groups involving potentially serious DDIs , other drug groups may also be important here (e.g. musculoskeletal and gastrointestinal drugs). In addition, as we only included DDIs with a ‘severe’ severity rating per the BNF 77, DDIs which contained no severity rating (e.g. opioids and gabapentin) were not included. Moreover, we do not know if some DDIs were prescribed intentionally—for example, aspirin-warfarin following acute coronary syndrome in patients with a pre-existing indication for anticoagulation, typically for no longer than 12 months and with regular monitoring and patient follow-up being undertaken . Further, in the case of acute prescriptions, such as antibiotics, we do not know if the patient was advised by their pharmacist to hold potentially interacting drugs until completion of the antibiotic course. Some medications (e.g. hepatitis C and HIV medications) are not reimbursed under the GMS community drug scheme, and therefore our study does not capture the prevalence of DDIs involving these drugs. In addition, over-the-counter (OTC) products, including pain killers such as ibuprofen, are not routinely captured in pharmacy claims data, and the prevalence of DDIs may be underestimated—although this may not be a significant factor since GMS patients can get a prescription for an OTC item if the co-payment price is less and the drug is eligible for reimbursement. The data used in the present study were limited to older community-dwellers in Ireland; hence, the results reported may not be generalisable to other EU/developed nations. This study investigated a range of factors associated with DDIs, but there may be other relevant factors (e.g. prescribing habits and healthcare utilisation [16, 42]) associated with these DDIs. We only included those with a valid medical card, and this smaller sample size may have contributed to under-powered associations. Finally, our study used pharmacy refill claims data, and therefore assumes that all medicines dispensed for a patient were taken.
Our study findings suggest that greater attention is warranted for older adults prescribed warfarin, escitalopram, atorvastatin, furosemide, and clarithromycin. These drugs were found to be commonly implicated in potential exposure to multiple ‘severe’ cardiovascular and/or CNS DDIs, many of which may have resulted in adverse health outcomes. In addition, our findings indicate that older adults with depression are at greater risk of potential exposure to cardiovascular and/or CNS DDIs, and prescribers and pharmacists should be mindful of these potential DDIs. In practice, DDI software is commonly employed when prescribing and dispensing medication for patients. However, this technology often has varying sensitivity and specificity , which results in multiple alerts, and consequently ‘alert fatigue’ . Previous studies have reported the use of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) has a positive impact on reducing the rate of potentially important DDIs [50, 51].
Future research should extend the present study’s methodology to examine ‘severe’ DDIs involving all physiological systems. Further research is needed to determine and validate the health outcomes/clinical consequences associated with these DDIs in this population to identify the more clinically significant DDIs. Validated tools such as the anticholinergic drug burden index have been applied to this same cohort [52, 53] and may provide some utility for this purpose. To facilitate improved comparability of DDI prevalence rates across studies/countries, future research could use the present study’s methodology to determine and compare the rate of ‘severe’ cardiovascular and CNS DDIs in older community-dwellers. Research is also needed on methods and approaches to reduce DDIs in older populations. Older people with multimorbidity frequently have multiple care providers and often experience inappropriate polypharmacy. Polypharmacy has consistently been shown to be associated with DDIs, PIP, medication adherence problems, increased drug costs, and adverse drug events. A combination of computerised decision support systems, integrated medical record systems, and multidisciplinary approaches to prescribing may facilitate medication reviews and deprescribing, thereby reducing the risk of DDIs. A recent study that examined the effect of community pharmacist medication review on the quality of drug prescribing in elderly patients in Slovenia found that pharmacist-GP collaboration significantly improved prescribing quality and reduced potentially contraindicated DDIs by 42% . A similar multidisciplinary initiative could be explored in Ireland.
In 2017, the third WHO global patient safety challenge was introduced that aims to reduce severe avoidable medication-related harm by 50% globally in the next 5 years . The DDIs identified by this study have the potential to result in avoidable medication-related harm if not appropriately managed. With increased longevity, the prevalence of these DDIs, and the potential for adverse outcomes, is likely to increase. Older aged adults should be the focus of medication review/optimisation interventions to identify DDIs that have the potential to result in adverse outcomes.
Khezrian M, McNeil CJ, Murray AD, Myint PK. An overview of prevalence, determinants and health outcomes of polypharmacy. Therapeutic Adv Drug Saf. 2020;11:2042098620933741.
Maher RL, Hanlon J, Hajjar ER. Clinical consequences of polypharmacy in elderly. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014;13:57–65.
Wastesson JW, Morin L, Tan EC, Johnell K. An update on the clinical consequences of polypharmacy in older adults: a narrative review. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2018;17:1185–96.
Moriarty F, Hardy C, Bennett K, Smith SM, Fahey T. Trends and interaction of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing in primary care over 15 years in Ireland: a repeated cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e008656.
Duerden M, Avery T, Payne R. Polypharmacy and medicines optimisation. Making it safe and sound London: The King’s Fund. 2013.
Preston CL. Stockley's drug interactions: a source book of interactions, their mechanisms, clinical importance and management: pharmaceutical Press. 2019.
Mallet L, Spinewine A, Huang A. The challenge of managing drug interactions in elderly people. The Lancet. 2007;370:185–91.
Delafuente JC. Understanding and preventing drug interactions in elderly patients. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;48:133–43.
Guthrie B, Makubate B, Hernandez-Santiago V, Dreischulte T. The rising tide of polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions: population database analysis 1995–2010. BMC Med. 2015;13:74.
Gnjidic D, Johnell K. Clinical implications from drug–drug and drug–disease interactions in older people. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2013;40:320–5.
Björkman IK, Fastbom J, Schmidt IK, Bernsten CB, Group PCotEiER. Drug—Drug Interactions in the Elderly. Ann Pharmacotherapy 2002;36:1675–81.
Roughead EE, Kalisch LM, Barratt JD, Gilbert AL. Prevalence of potentially hazardous drug interactions amongst Australian veterans. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;70:252–7.
Hines LE, Murphy JE. Potentially harmful drug–drug interactions in the elderly: a review. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2011;9:364–77.
Johnell K, Klarin I. The relationship between number of drugs and potential drug-drug interactions in the elderly. Drug Saf. 2007;30:911–8.
Becker ML, Visser LE, van Gelder T, Hofman A, Stricker BHC. Increasing exposure to drug-drug interactions between 1992 and 2005 in people aged≥ 55 years. Drugs Aging. 2008;25:145–52.
Andersson ML, Bottiger Y, Kockum H, Eiermann B. High prevalence of drug-drug interactions in primary health care is caused by prescriptions from other healthcare units. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018;122:512–6.
Nobili A, Pasina L, Tettamanti M, Lucca U, Riva E, Marzona I, Monesi L, Cucchiani R, Bortolotti A, Fortino I. Potentially severe drug interactions in elderly outpatients: results of an observational study of an administrative prescription database. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2009;34:377–86.
Lopez-Picazo JJ, Ruiz JC, Sanchez JF, Ariza A, Aguilera B, Lazaro D, Sanz GR. Prevalence and typology of potential drug interactions occurring in primary care patients. Eur J Gen Pract. 2010;16:92–9.
Santos TRA, Silveira EA, Pereira LV, Provin MP, Lima DM, Amaral RG. Potential drug–drug interactions in older adults: a population-based study. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017;17:2336–46.
Hanlon JT, Perera S, Newman AB, Thorpe JM, Donohue JM, Simonsick EM, Shorr RI, Bauer DC, Marcum ZA. Potential drug-drug and drug-disease interactions in well-functioning community-dwelling older adults. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2017;42:228–33.
Nikolic B, Jankovic S, Stojanov O, Popovic J. Prevalence and predictors of potential drug-drug interactions. Open Med. 2014;9:348–56.
Sánchez-Fidalgo S, Guzmán-Ramos MI, Galván-Banqueri M, Bernabeu-Wittel M, Santos-Ramos B. Prevalence of drug interactions in elderly patients with multimorbidity in primary care. Int J Clin Pharm. 2017;39:343–53.
Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:573–7.
Donoghue OA, McGarrigle CA, Foley M, Fagan A, Meaney J, Kenny RA. Cohort profile update: the Irish longitudinal study on ageing (TILDA). Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47:1398–498.
Sinnott S-J, Bennett K, Cahir C. Pharmacoepidemiology resources in Ireland—an introduction to pharmacy claims data. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;73:1449–55.
Joint Formulary Committee. BNF 77 (British National Formulary) 2019: Pharmaceutical Press. 2019.
Obreli-Neto PR, Nobili A, de Oliveira BA, Guidoni CM, de Lyra Júnior DP, Pilger D, Duzanski J, Tettamanti M, Cruciol-Souza JM, Gaeti WP. Adverse drug reactions caused by drug–drug interactions in elderly outpatients: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;68:1667–76.
Jazbar J, Locatelli I, Horvat N, Kos M. Clinically relevant potential drug–drug interactions among outpatients: a nationwide database study. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018;14:572–80.
Roe L, Normand C, Wren M-A, Browne J, O’Halloran AM. The impact of frailty on healthcare utilisation in Ireland: evidence from the Irish longitudinal study on ageing. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17:203.
Theou O, O’Connell MD, King-Kallimanis BL, O’Halloran AM, Rockwood K, Kenny RA. Measuring frailty using self-report and test-based health measures. Age Ageing. 2015;44:471–7.
Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401.
Herr M, Robine JM, Pinot J, Arvieu JJ, Ankri J. Polypharmacy and frailty: prevalence, relationship, and impact on mortality in a French sample of 2350 old people. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015;24:637–46.
Tobi H, Faber A, Van Den Berg PB, Drane JW, de Jong‐van den Berg LT. Studying co‐medication patterns: the impact of definitions. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007;16:405–11.
Schaefer JK, Li Y, Gu X, Souphis NM, Haymart B, Kline-Rogers E, Almany SL, Kaatz S, Kozlowski JH, Krol GD. Association of adding aspirin to warfarin therapy without an apparent indication with bleeding and other adverse events. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179:533–41.
Lam J, Gomes T, Juurlink DN, Mamdani MM, Pullenayegum EM, Kearon C, Spencer FA, Paterson M, Zheng H, Holbrook AM. Hospitalization for hemorrhage among warfarin recipients prescribed amiodarone. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112:420–3.
Smith A, Barry M. Oral anticoagulants-utilisation and expenditure under the community drugs schemes. Ir Med J. 2020;113:71.
Zhang Y, Souverein PC, Gardarsdottir H, van den Ham HA, Maitland‐van der Zee AH, de Boer A. Risk of major bleeding among users of direct oral anticoagulants combined with interacting drugs: a population‐based nested case–control study. British journal of clinical pharmacology 2020;86:1150–64.
Chang S-H, Chou I-J, Yeh Y-H, Chiou M-J, Wen M-S, Kuo C-T, See L-C, Kuo C-F. Association between use of non–vitamin K oral anticoagulants with and without concurrent medications and risk of major bleeding in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. JAMA. 2017;318:1250–9.
Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, Castella M, Diener H-C, Heidbuchel H, Hendriks J, Hindricks G, Manolis AS, Oldgren J, Popescu BA, Schotten U, Van Putte B, Vardas P, Group ESD. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J 2016;37:2893–962.
Rochester MP, Kane AM, Linnebur SA, Fixen DR. Evaluating the risk of QTc prolongation associated with antidepressant use in older adults: a review of the evidence. Therapeutic Adv Drug Saf. 2018;9:297–308.
Jolly K, Gammage MD, Cheng KK, Bradburn P, Banting MV, Langman MJ. Sudden death in patients receiving drugs tending to prolong the QT interval. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;68:743–51.
Tamblyn RM, Mcleod PJ, Abrahamowicz M, Laprise R. Do too many cooks spoil the broth? Multiple physician involvement in medical management of elderly patients and potentially inappropriate drug combinations. Can Med Assoc J. 1996;154:1177.
Patel AM, Shariff S, Bailey DG, Juurlink DN, Gandhi S, Mamdani M, Gomes T, Fleet J, Hwang YJ, Garg AX. Statin toxicity from macrolide antibiotic coprescription: a population-based cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:869–76.
Byrne P, Cullinan J, Murphy C, Smith SM. Cross-sectional analysis of the prevalence and predictors of statin utilisation in Ireland with a focus on primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. BMJ Open 2018;2018:8.
Yuruyen M, Yavuzer H, Demirdag F, Kara Z, Cengiz M, Yavuzer S, Doventas A, Erdincler DS, Beger T. Is depression a predictive factor for polypharmacy in elderly? Bull Clin Psychopharmacol. 2016;26:374–81.
Newman BM. Treatment-resistant depression in the elderly: diagnostic and treatment approaches. Curr Geriatrics Rep. 2016;5:241–7.
Czarny MJ, Arthurs E, Coffie D-F, Smith C, Steele RJ, Ziegelstein RC, Thombs BD. Prevalence of antidepressant prescription or use in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e27671.
Kheshti R, Aalipour M, Namazi S. A comparison of five common drug–drug interaction software programs regarding accuracy and comprehensiveness. J Res Pharm Pract. 2016;5:257.
Sutton RT, Pincock D, Baumgart DC, Sadowski DC, Fedorak RN, Kroeker KI. An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digital Med. 2020;3:1–10.
Humphries TL, Carroll N, Chester EA, Magid D, Rocho B. Evaluation of an electronic critical drug interaction program coupled with active pharmacist intervention. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41:1979–85.
Andersson ML, Bottiger Y, Lindh JD, Wettermark B, Eiermann B. Impact of the drug-drug interaction database SFINX on prevalence of potentially serious drug-drug interactions in primary health care. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;69:565–71.
Byrne CJ, Walsh C, Cahir C, Bennett K. Impact of drug burden index on adverse health outcomes in Irish community-dwelling older people: a cohort study. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19:1–10.
Byrne CJ, Walsh C, Cahir C, Ryan C, Williams DJ, Bennett K. Anticholinergic and sedative drug burden in community-dwelling older people: a national database study. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e022500.
Stuhec M, Gorenc K, Zelko E. Evaluation of a collaborative care approach between general practitioners and clinical pharmacists in primary care community settings in elderly patients on polypharmacy in Slovenia: a cohort retrospective study reveals positive evidence for implementation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:1–9.
The World Health Organization. WHO Global Patient Safety Challenge: Medication Without Harm. 2017.
We would like to acknowledge the HSE-PCRS, which gave permission for linkage (as consent in place) of pharmacy claims data to the TILDA database. We also wish to acknowledge Professor David Williams (Beaumont Hospital/RCSI) for his expertise on refining the list of DDIs used for this study.
Open Access funding provided by the IReL Consortium.
All authors were involved in the concept and design of the study. JH and VR developed the list of DDIs. JH, KB, and CC undertook the analysis and interpretation of the data. JH led on the write-up of the manuscript, and all authors reviewed and provided feedback on this. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
None to declare.
This study was funded by the HRB Applied Partnership and Research Leader Awards (APA-17-015, RL-15-1579).
Availability of data
The data that support the findings of this study are available from TILDA and the HSE-PCRS, but restrictions apply to the availability of these datasets, which were used under licence for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Researchers interested in using TILDA data may access the anonymised dataset for free from the following sites: Irish Social Science Data Archive (ISSDA) at University College Dublin http://www.ucd.ie/issda/data/tilda/ and Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) at the University of Michigan http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/34315.
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM_SupplementaryFile1: Table with list of all drugs included from chapters 2 (cardiovascular) and 4 (CNS) of the BNF 77 (DOCX 51 kb)
ESM_SupplementaryFile3: Prevalence of all ‘severe’ cardiovascular and CNS chronic DDIs (i) co-prescribed and (ii) dispensed within 7 days of each other (DOCX 22 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Hughes, J.E., Russo, V., Walsh, C. et al. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Older Community-Dwelling Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study. Drugs Aging 38, 1025–1037 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-021-00898-8