Abstract
Organ and stem cell transplantation has been one of the greatest advances in modern medicine, and is the primary treatment modality for many end-stage diseases. As our population ages, so do the transplant recipients, and with that comes many new challenges. Respiratory viruses have been a large contributor to the mortality and morbidity of solid organ transplant (SOT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. Respiratory viruses are generally a long-term complication of transplantation and primarily acquired in the community. With the emergence of molecular methods, newer respiratory viruses are being detected. Respiratory viruses appear to cause severe disease in the older transplant population. Influenza vaccine remains the mainstay of prevention in transplant recipients, although immunogenicity of current vaccines is suboptimal. Limited therapies are available for other respiratory viruses. The next decade will likely bring newer antivirals and vaccines to the forefront. Our goal is to provide the most up to date knowledge of respiratory viral infections in our aging transplant population.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Given new molecular identification techniques, a greater number of respiratory viruses are being identified. |
The older transplant patient has a greater risk of lower respiratory disease from respiratory viruses. |
Therapies are limited for the majority of viruses, and prevention is key. |
1 Introduction
For many patients with severe and life-threatening conditions such as end-stage organ disease and hematological malignancy, transplantation is a life-saving modality. The shift towards a growing aging population has had a direct impact on this field. During the 1980s, the number of people between the ages of 75 and 79 increased by 28.8%, and those over the age of 85 years increased by 52.4% [1]. Not only has the life expectancy in older individuals increased, but their general health has also improved [1, 2].
The direct impact of the aging population has been seen in the transplant population. The average age of patients on the kidney transplant waiting list has increased. Just within the past decade, we have seen the doubling of registrants aged 50–69 years old. Those aged 70 years or older have also increased more than 5-fold. This is in stark contrast to the declining number of patients younger than the age of 50 who are on the waiting list [3]. This trend is not only seen in kidney transplantation; Su et al. reported the mean age of liver transplant registrants increased from 51.2 to 55.7 years, and the proportion of registrants aged 60 years or older increased from 19 to 41% [4]. Graft survival data in older individuals, as reported by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), has also shown that 5-year graft survival is similar in transplant recipients above age 60 years when compared to those aged less than 60 years [1].
Respiratory viral infections (RVIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. With the increasing numbers of elderly patients being transplanted, this review will highlight the knowledge about transplant [both solid organ transplant (SOT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT)] recipients infected with respiratory viruses and make note when there is a specific impact on the aging transplant patient.
2 Epidemiology
The prevalence of RVIs in any given season depends on a combination of factors: the method of exposure, types of circulating viruses, virulence of the virus, and the detection methods used. The majority of respiratory virus transmission occurs via direct contact or air droplets. The incubation periods range between 1 and 10 days; however, for other viruses, such as bocavirus, the incubation period is still unknown [5, 6]. One study noted the incidence of RVIs in the SOT population as 0.91 episodes/patient/year [7]. Drieghe et al. evaluated the epidemiology of respiratory viruses in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens from patients with lower respiratory tract disease in a group of immunocompromised adults and found that coronavirus was the most common pathogen found (13.4%), followed by rhinovirus (5.2%), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (4.5%), and bocavirus (3.7%) [8]. In general, studies of RVI incidence in the transplant population show that older individuals have a similar incidence of RVI acquisition compared to the younger population. Within the SOT group, lung transplant recipients appear to have the greatest frequency of RVI and of developing lower airway disease. A prospective study in 93 lung transplant recipients from 2003–2006 showed that progression of RVI to involve the lower respiratory tract occurred in 6.2% of the cohort [9]. This may be due to the direct contact of the allograft with the environment, immune dysregulation within the allograft, and potentially a greater degree of immunosuppression after lung transplantation compared to other organ transplant types [10]. Some studies have found a time-dependent association of RVIs with acute rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) in the lung transplant population [9, 11, 12]. Fisher et al. found that the risk of CLAD increased ~ 5-fold in the 3 months following an RVI episode [12]. Similarly, a case–control study noted that acute rejection or a ≥ 20% decline in the forced expiratory volume occurred in 33.3% of patients with RVI [9].
More specific studies focusing on the epidemiology of community respiratory viruses in allogeneic HSCT patients have shown that rhinovirus and coronaviruses are common, followed by adenovirus and RSV [13, 14]. The fatality rate from viral pneumonia has been reported to be anywhere between 12 and 43% amongst the HSCT population [15,16,17,18,19]. Risk factors for lower respiratory disease in HSCT recipients include older age (greater than 65 years), severe neutropenia, severe lymphopenia, myeloablative conditioning, the presence of graft versus host disease (GVHD) and cytomegalovirus seropositivity [13, 20, 21].
3 Clinical Presentation
Clinical presentation is similar among all RVIs; rhinitis, pharyngitis, malaise, coryza, and cough are common symptoms [7, 13]. The presence of fever is variable and occurs in 13.5–85%, depending on the specific RVI, and cannot be used as a reliable marker [7, 22,23,24,25,26]. Chest radiograph findings in lower respiratory tract infection are nonspecific and can include interstitial disease, consolidation, or small pulmonary nodules [27]. In cases of lower respiratory infection, bacterial superinfection is important to consider.
Respiratory virus positivity in respiratory specimens is generally up to 14 days in most series; however, virus can remain positive for several months despite resolution of symptoms [13, 23, 28]. In one study, corticosteroid dosages greater than 1 mg/kg daily were shown to prolong influenza virus positivity compared to persons treated with lower doses (15 vs 9 days) [17]. The clinical relevance of prolonged shedding is unknown. However, it is seen even with the use of antivirals against influenza and could contribute to the increased risk of resistant viruses [23, 29].
4 Laboratory Diagnosis
All patients with suspected RVI should have a nasopharyngeal swab, wash, or aspirate for diagnosis. BAL specimens can also be used for detection. Viral culture has historically been used, although it can take up to 10 days, leading to delays in diagnosis. In addition, culture methods are not available for all respiratory viruses. Direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) can provide results in a few hours, but reagents are available for only a limited number of viruses, such as influenza A and B; parainfluenza 1, 2, and 3; RSV and adenovirus [6, 30]. DFA also requires the presence of epithelial cells for higher sensitivity and requires technical expertise to interpret results [31]. Sensitivity of DFA has ranged from 23 to 80% [31, 32]. Rapid antigen detection assays are primarily used for influenza and RSV diagnosis. However, the new gold standard in testing is now multiplex nucleic acid testing (NAT) because of the ability to detect a diverse number of respiratory viruses, with results being available within 12–24 h. Sensitivity of multiplex NAT assays ranges from 72 to 100%, with best sensitivity seen for influenza and lower sensitivities for adenovirus and parainfluenza [33,34,35].
5 Specific Respiratory Viruses
5.1 Influenza
Influenza virus is a negative-sense, single-stranded RNA orthomyxovirus that circulates primarily in the winter months. The predominant circulating seasonal strains are A/H1N1, influenza A/H3N2, and influenza B [29]. Influenza virus undergoes antigenic drift (small mutations in the genome that lead to changes primarily in hemagglutinin) and shift (larger mutations). Since antibody responses are primarily directed against hemagglutinin, changes in this protein decrease the protective effects of antibodies [36].
In the elderly and transplant communities, influenza is known to cause significant morbidity, mortality, and economic burden [37,38,39,40]. The elderly and immunosuppressed are considered to be at high risk for influenza infection and account for the majority of all influenza-related deaths. Using national surveillance data from the USA, Thompson et al. showed that the population aged 85 years or older has a 16-fold greater mortality from influenza compared with persons aged 65–69 years [41]. Vilchez et al. studied a cohort of organ transplant recipients with seasonal influenza and showed that the incidence of influenza was 41.8, 2.8, and 4.3 cases per 1000 person years in lung, liver, and kidney transplant recipients, respectively [42]. A subsequent large multicenter study of SOT recipients with the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza strain showed that 16% of patients required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) [24]. Delayed antiviral treatment begun ≥ 48 h after symptom onset and history of diabetes were both associated with an increased risk of ICU admission. The median age of adults in this cohort was 47 years (range 18–95); however, older age was not associated with negative outcomes. A similar European study of 2009 pandemic influenza in the HSCT population included 286 patients—222 allogeneic and 64 autologous transplant recipients [43]. Almost one-third of patients (32.5%) developed lower respiratory tract disease, including pneumonia in almost half of patients over age 60 years; age and lymphopenia were significant risk factors for severe disease. Investigators also reported a 6.3% mortality rate for A/H1N1 infection or its complications.
The presentation of influenza in transplant patients can be nonspecific, especially in elderly recipients. Classic symptoms of influenza-like illness (ILI) may be absent in both the elderly and transplant community. ILI criteria are not validated for use in the transplant community; one study showed that the positive predictive value for the definition of ILI in transplant recipients was only 50% and resulted in the overuse of antivirals and missed diagnoses of other respiratory viruses [44].
Lower respiratory tract infections including bacterial superinfection occur in up to one-third of transplant patients with influenza. Other complications seen in transplant recipients are allograft dysfunction, acute rejection, myocarditis, myositis, increased rates of obliterative bronchiolitis in lung transplant recipients, prolonged shedding of influenza virus, and emergence of antiviral resistance [12, 29, 30, 42, 45, 46].
The mainstay of antiviral therapy for influenza in transplant recipients is neuraminidase inhibitors such as oseltamivir, zanamivir, and peramivir [47] (Table 1). Neuraminidase inhibitors prevent the cleavage of sialic acid residues, which are the point of attachment for influenza virions [48]. The standard dosage of oseltamivir in adults is 75 mg twice daily and requires dose adjustment for diminished renal function as well as in pediatric populations. Double-dose oseltamivir has been used in critically ill transplant recipients, although recent evidence in the immune competent population indicates that higher doses have no additional benefit [49, 50]. The typical duration of treatment is 5 days; however, longer durations have been suggested by some experts if symptoms are ongoing. Transplant recipients are known to have prolonged influenza viral shedding; however, expert opinion suggests that antivirals should not be used for asymptomatic patients. Repeated nasopharyngeal sampling may be used to make decisions regarding infection control.
Influenza A/H1N1 viruses, and some influenza A/H5N1 and influenza B viruses, have been able to develop resistance to oseltamivir [51, 52]. Options to treat oseltamivir-resistant viruses include zanamivir and peramivir. Zanamivir is an inhaled medication with a recommended dosage of 10 mg, or two puffs, twice daily for 5 days. Intravenous zanamivir is also available and can be used in critically ill patients in whom oseltamivir resistance is suspected or proven [53,54,55]. A newer neuraminidase inhibitor, peramivir, is Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved and has been compared to oseltamivir in a multicenter clinical trial. In this study, patients treated with peramivir had a greater viral load reduction than those given oseltamivir; however, efficacy and tolerability were similar [56, 57]. Peramivir is also an option for influenza virus resistant to oseltamivir and has been used in cases of oseltamivir resistance in transplant recipients [58].
Although antivirals should be started as early in the illness as possible, they may remain effective even after 48 h of symptoms and can be used at any point during the illness [59, 60]. Oseltamivir chemoprophylaxis has been studied in a randomized trial of transplant recipients and was not found to be effective, likely because of overall low rates of influenza infection [61]. However, chemoprophylaxis can be considered in special settings such as for transplant recipients during an influenza outbreak. Long-term prophylaxis may lead to resistance and should be avoided.
Treatment with M2 inhibitors, such as amantadine, is generally not used in transplant recipients because of widespread resistance, the association with prolonged shedding of virus and increased adverse effects [6, 30]. DAS181, a sialidase fusion protein inhibitor, developed primarily for parainfluenza virus (PIV), also has been shown to have promise in influenza infection [62,63,64]. Other investigational compounds for influenza include an RNA polymerase inhibitor, favipiravir, and monoclonal antibodies directed against epitopes of the conserved M2 protein [65,66,67].
5.1.1 Influenza Vaccine
Inactivated influenza vaccine is widely recommended to prevent infection in transplant candidates, recipients, close contacts, and healthcare workers [68]. In recent years, trivalent formulations have been available containing two A and one B strain; however, given the frequent co-circulation of a second B strain, quadrivalent vaccines have been developed [69,70,71]. Immunogenicity of influenza vaccine depends on the type of transplant population studied, immunosuppression, and time from transplant. Lung transplant recipients generally have lower immunogenicity than other organ transplant types. Higher doses of mycophenolate mofetil have been shown to inhibit influenza vaccine immunogenicity. Vaccine immunogenicity is lowest in the first 6 months after SOT. Guidelines generally suggest to immunize patients starting at 3 months post-transplant; however, starting as early as 1 month post-transplant has also been suggested [72]. Early post-transplant vaccination may be immunogenic and should especially be considered in pandemics or outbreak situations. For HSCT recipients, influenza vaccine has poor immunogenicity in the first 4–6 months post-transplant, so many centers will delay vaccination until this time. Various types of inactivated influenza vaccines are available: unadjuvanted vaccines, adjuvanted vaccines, and high-dose vaccines. Seroconversion and seroprotection rates from the non-adjuvanted standard dose vaccine range 15–90% in transplant recipients [73,74,75,76,77]. Factors influencing the variability include type of transplant, time from transplant, and immunosuppression as well as the presence of GVHD in allogeneic HSCT. One study investigated the use of a novel high-dose intradermal (ID) and showed the use of mycophenolate mofetil was inversely associated with vaccine response in a dose-dependent manner [78]. Contrary to in the general population, age has not traditionally been a factor that has impacted standard influenza vaccine response in transplant recipients, potentially because the impact of immunosuppressive medication supersedes the impact of age. Various strategies to improve influenza vaccine response have been studied in the transplant population. Administering two doses of vaccine in the same season appears to have marginal benefit in SOT recipients and no significant benefit in allogeneic HSCT [73, 79]. An MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine is also available and has shown promise in the population ≥ 65 years of age [80]. MF59 is an oil-in-water emulsion that works by locally attracting inflammatory cells to the site of injection [81]. A randomized trial of MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine in kidney transplants showed that this vaccine had similar immunogenicity to unadjuvanted vaccine. In this study, persons aged ≥ 65 years had significantly diminished vaccine immunogenicity; after this group was excluded from the analysis, a subgroup analysis of patients aged 18–65 years showed that the adjuvanted vaccine performed better than standard vaccine [82]. In adult allogeneic HSCT patients, another randomized control trial using MF59, done by Natori et al., also found that adjuvanted vaccine demonstrated similar immunogenicity to non-adjuvanted vaccine [83]. A high-dose vaccine containing four times the antigen of standard dose vaccine is also authorized for persons aged ≥ 65 years. This vaccine has shown improved immunogenicity in a cohort of HSCT transplant recipients as well as pediatric organ transplant recipients [84, 85]. Trials of high-dose vaccine in adult SOT recipients are underway.
5.2 Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)
RSV is also a leading cause of RVI and can cause severe disease in transplant recipients. In HSCT recipients, the incidence of lower respiratory infection can be up to 55% and mortality up to 33% [14]. Risk factors for progression of infection to the lower respiratory tract include degree of immunosuppression, presence of neutropenia, lymphopenia, and GVHD [6, 86]. Waghmare et al. [86] showed that older age was not associated with RSV mortality in multivariate analysis. In the SOT group, lung transplant recipients are at the greatest risk of lower respiratory tract disease. RSV infection along with other community acquired RVIs is a risk for acute rejection and CLAD in lung transplant recipients [12, 87].
Ribavirin has been the mainstay in treatment for RSV infections and can be given in the aerosolized, oral, and intravenous formulations. A survey done of RSV treatment in 13 US organ transplant centers showed that ribavirin was used at all centers for lung transplant recipients with lower respiratory tract RSV infection [88]. Practice for RSV upper or lower tract infection in non-lung recipients was variable. The nebulized form of ribavirin is given via a small particle aerosol generator (SPAG) unit at dosages of 2 g every 8 h or one dose of 6 g over 18 h. Aerosolized ribavirin is teratogenic and requires a negative pressure room. A small randomized study in HSCT patients with RSV showed a decrease in viral load over time, but no effect on development of pneumonia [89]. Subsequently, retrospective reviews of HSCT recipients infected with RSV demonstrated that ribavirin therapy reduced risk of lower respiratory tract infection and RSV-associated mortality [86, 90]. Oral ribavirin has also been used in small case series of HSCT recipients. Gorcea et al. treated 23 RSV-positive patients with oral ribavirin for a median of 10 days and noted only one RSV-related death [91]. Intravenous immunoglobulin and palivizumab have not been shown to have benefit in the HSCT setting [92]. An immunodeficiency scoring index to determine risk-based ribavirin therapy for HSCT recipients has been suggested [21, 93]. In lung transplant recipients, both aerosolized and oral ribavirin have been used. Burrows et al. reported 56 episodes of RSV in lung transplant recipients treated with an intravenous ribavirin loading (33 mg/kg) dose followed by oral ribavirin (20 mg/kg/day) for a median of 8 days [94]. Although there were no untreated controls, bronchiolitis obliterans developed in 2.6% of patients and anemia worsened in half the patients [94]. A smaller study of 21 lung transplant recipients showed no significant difference in clinical outcomes between those who received oral versus aerosolized ribavirin [95]. More aggressive protocols have been used and include aerosolized ribavirin, methylprednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulin and palivizumab [96]. On the contrary, good outcomes with observation alone have also been seen in lung transplant patients with RSV [97]. Therefore, there is no consensus on whether to treat lung transplant recipients with RSV upper tract infection [88]. Taken together, the data with ribavirin involve retrospective case series, many of which have limited sample sizes and/or are inadequately powered to show differences in therapies. There may also be reporting bias in the literature. Therefore, no firm conclusion can be drawn regarding the effectiveness of ribavirin in treatment of RSV. Newer therapies are under development for RSV. These include an inhaled small interfering RNA (siRNA) that was shown to prevent bronchiolitis obliterans in a randomized trial of lung transplant recipients with RSV [98]. Fusion inhibitors such as GS-5806 and monoclonal antibodies directed against the fusion protein of RSV have shown promise in early trials and may form future therapies in transplant recipients [99]. Multiple RSV vaccine candidates are under development, and these have potential to be studied in transplant populations [100].
5.3 Parainfluenza Virus
PIVs are single-stranded, enveloped RNA viruses of the Paramyoviridae family. PIV comprises a group of four serotypes. Serotypes 1 and 2 tend to occur sporadically in fall and winter months in mild environments. Type 3 occurs all year and is the most common type to cause outbreaks among HSCT and organ transplant recipients [101]. Type 4 is less common, and its epidemiology is under study [29].
Similar to the other respiratory viruses, PIV is associated with severe lower respiratory tract infection in transplant patients. In one study of 200 leukemia and HSCT patients with PIV, mortality for lower respiratory tract infection was 17% [102]. There was a trend to greater PIV pneumonia in those ≥ 65 years (p = 0.06) compared to younger patients. A systematic review found that GVHD was a risk factor for the acquisition of PIV infection and lower respiratory infection [103]. Lymphopenia, neutropenia, and steroid use also predicted lower respiratory infection with PIV.
Currently, supportive care is the mainstay in treatment for PIV infection. A few studies have shown that ribavirin is not beneficial in the therapy of PIV in HSCT patients [102, 104]. The experience with ribavirin for PIV infections in organ transplant recipients is limited [105, 106]. Similar to influenza, PIV also binds to sialic acid on host epithelial cells. DAS181, an inhaled sialidase fusion protein inhibitor, has shown promising results for the treatment of PIV in immunocompromised patients [107]. Waghmare et al. used DAS181 to treat PIV disease in four pediatric patients who were immunocompromised. All patients tolerated the drug well, and improvement in both viral loads and symptoms after initiation of therapy was observed [108]. DAS181 may be an option to treat PIV in transplant recipients in the future.
5.4 Adenovirus
Adenovirus produces a wide array of clinical symptoms in transplant patients. It is a non-enveloped, double-stranded DNA virus with 52 immunologically unique serotypes that are then further classified into subgroups A through F [109]. Adenovirus can establish lifelong asymptomatic infection in lymphoid tissue, and it has been suggested that adenovirus disease may occur because of reactivation of latent infection rather than de novo infection. For de novo infection, the incubation period ranges from 2 days to 2 weeks depending on serotype. In the transplant population, the incidence rates range between 3 and 29% in HSCT recipients and between 5 and 10% in SOT recipients [30]. The clinical presentation is nonspecific and includes upper respiratory tract symptoms, conjunctivitis, fever, enteritis, hepatitis, and encephalitis. Mortality rates related to adenovirus pneumonia and hepatitis can be up to 75% [110]. In one prospective study of SOT recipients, adenovirus was found in 7.2% of patients throughout the first year post-transplant. In this study, older age was not a factor in development of viremia. The majority of patients were asymptomatic, and though some had respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms, none of the patients had adenovirus-directed therapy and no serious sequelae were observed [111]. In kidney transplant recipients, adenovirus may cause pyelonephritis [110, 112]. In lung transplant recipients, adenovirus is associated with graft loss, death, or progression to obliterative bronchiolitis.
Diagnosis can be made by serology, NAT, culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), in situ hybridization, and immunochemistry.
There is no established therapy for adenovirus, although small case series of disseminated adenovirus in SOT recipients have documented successful treatment with the use of cidofovir and adjunctive intravenous immunoglobulin [113, 114]. Reduction of immunosuppression appears to be an important intervention in organ transplant recipients with disseminated disease [115]. In allogeneic HSCT recipients, hemorrhagic cystitis from adenovirus has been shown to improve with intravesicular instillation of cidofovir [116]. Brincidofovir remains an investigational compound with in vitro activity against DNA viruses, including adenovirus, with some case series documenting successful outcomes [117]. Adenovirus-specific T cells are emerging therapies in the future [118].
5.5 Coronaviruses
Due to historically limited diagnostic testing specific to human coronavirus (hCoV), the incidence in transplant recipients has likely been underestimated. However, with the development of NAT, strains such as OC43, 229E, HKU1, NL63, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) have been seen to affect transplant patients [6]. As with other respiratory viruses, symptoms are non-specific and include fever, myalgia, cough and dyspnea. Characteristic laboratory markers include lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase. Viral pneumonitis may be evident on chest radiograph.
In 2003, a new coronavirus that caused SARS emerged [119]. Common presenting symptoms included fever, chills, headache, malaise, nonproductive cough, and dyspnea [120, 121]. Lower respiratory tract infection was common, and mortality was approximately 15–20% [122]. Lymphopenia, elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels, and elevated creatinine kinase levels were seen in patients afflicted with SARS [120, 121]. Advanced age was a risk factor for an adverse outcome from SARS (odds ratio 1.8 per decade of life) [121]. SARS was distinctly linked to exposure in the healthcare setting. A liver transplant patient who developed SARS was likely exposed at an outpatient podiatry appointment 5 days prior to his presentation [123]. The patient was treated with intravenous ribavirin, ceftriaxone, and azithromycin, but succumbed to his illness.
MERS-CoV is a relatively new coronavirus that was identified in June 2012 and has had a mortality rate up to 40% in immunocompetent persons [124] (http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/mers-cov/en/) [125,126,127]. There have been two microbiologically documented MERS-CoV cases reported in renal transplant recipients [128]. Both patients presented with fatigue and dyspnea as well as fever in one case. One patient was treated with ribavirin and pegylated interferon, but succumbed to disease. The other patient only received supportive care and recovered.
There is no specific targeted therapy for hCoV. Ribavirin has been used as above in the treatment for SARS. Observational studies of intravenous ribavirin treatment for SARS indicated improvement in the majority of patients, although patients had significant toxicity, including hemolysis in 76% of patients [120, 129, 130]. Interferon-alpha was also used as a potential immunomodulatory therapy for SARS, with limited effectiveness [131,132,133]. Adjunctive corticosteroids showed some benefit in a randomized trial with regard to reducing mortality [131].
5.6 Human Metapneumovirus
Human metapneumovirus (hMPV) is a relatively newer paramyxovirus, closely related to RSV, which can cause both upper and severe lower respiratory tract infection after transplantation [134]. Englund et al. documented the association between hMPV, respiratory failure, and a septic shock-like presentation, with death from acute respiratory failure occurring in HSCT recipients [135]. Progression to lower respiratory tract can occur in up to 60% of HSCT recipients, especially those with lymphopenia and systemic corticosteroids [136]. Older age was not identified as a risk factor for progression in this study. In lung transplant recipients, infections with hMPV have been associated with graft dysfunction [137].
Treatment consists of supportive care and reduction in immunosuppression. The use of ribavirin has also been studied, although the effectiveness is difficult to assess because of lack of controls [134, 138].
5.7 Other Respiratory Viruses
Rhinovirus A, B, and C circulate year-round and are a common cause of upper respiratory tract infection in transplant recipients in various studies. The significance of rhinovirus is currently unclear, although it may be found as a coinfection in many patients. Some reports suggest that lower respiratory tract infection with rhinovirus can occur in HSCT recipients and has a mortality of up to 41% [139, 140]. Seo et al. showed that 30% of patients with lower respiratory infection from rhinovirus were > 60 years of age [139]. Greater viral loads of rhinovirus tend to correlate with symptoms [141]. Prolonged shedding can occur.
KI and WU polyomaviruses have also recently been discovered and are reported predominantly in the pediatric HSCT population. One study in kidney transplant patients found KI in 14.3, 3.9, and 4.1% of respiratory, plasma, and urine specimens, respectively [142]. Similarly, WU was found in 9.1 and 5.3% of respiratory and plasma specimens, respectively. The clinical consequences of these infections have yet to be defined.
Bocaviruses are parvoviruses that are also noted in several studies of respiratory virus infections in transplant recipients. However, no significant clinical consequences have been reported. Management of these viruses in transplant recipients consists of close observation and supportive therapy [143, 144].
6 Prevention
Nosocomial infections associated with community respiratory viruses can lead to devastating disease in immunocompromised patients. Prevention of transmission includes general infection control measures such as single-room isolation and droplet precautions [145]. Screening and restricting visitors with respiratory symptoms and asking symptomatic hospital staff to avoid immunocompromised patients are precautions that should be adhered to. For more virulent viruses such as pandemic influenza strains, newer coronaviruses with high mortality, fit test N95 masks and negative pressure isolation might be required. If an outbreak occurs on a transplant unit, hospitals may want to consider a temporary hold on performing new transplants, discharging patients who are admitted for investigation or elective procedures, daily screening of staff for symptoms of respiratory illness, sending ill staff home promptly, and minimizing outpatient appointments and procedures. For influenza infections, during an outbreak on a transplant ward, inpatients should be offered chemoprophylaxis if available. Close contacts of transplant patients should be vaccinated.
7 Summary
Due to advances in treatment for end-stage organ diseases and hematologic malignancy, transplantation is being offered to older individuals. Respiratory viruses continue to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the transplant community. Using molecular diagnostics, a wider array of viruses can be detected although specific therapies are not available for most RVIs. Specific data on respiratory viruses in older transplant recipients are lacking. However, large cohort studies show that many respiratory viruses appear to cause severe disease in those with advanced age. Influenza is important to prevent in the older transplant patient, and vaccination is the key to prevention. Standard inactivated influenza vaccines have poor immunogenicity, especially in older transplant patients, and newer vaccination strategies are needed. RSV can cause severe lower respiratory disease, and controversy exists over the effectiveness of different formulations of ribavirin. For other RVIs, supportive care is the primary management. Given the important clinical consequences in the older transplant population, it is important to develop new antivirals and vaccines to prevent morbidity and mortality.
References
Ponticelli C. Should renal transplantation be offered to older patients? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000;15(3):315–7.
Neri F, Furian L, Cavallin F, Ravaioli M, Silvestre C, Donato P, et al. How does age affect the outcome of kidney transplantation in elderly recipients? Clin Transplant. 2017. doi:10.1111/ctr.13036.
Rao PS, Merion RM, Ashby VB, Port FK, Wolfe RA, Kayler LK. Renal transplantation in elderly patients older than 70 years of age: results from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Transplantation. 2007;83(8):1069–74.
Su F, Yu L, Berry K, Liou IW, Landis CS, Rayhill SC, et al. Aging of liver transplant registrants and recipients: trends and impact on waitlist outcomes, post-transplantation outcomes, and transplant-related survival benefit. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(2):441–53 e6 (quiz e16).
Guido M, Tumolo MR, Verri T, Romano A, Serio F, De Giorgi M, et al. Human bocavirus: current knowledge and future challenges. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(39):8684–97.
Kumar D, Humar A. Respiratory viral infections in transplant and oncology patients. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2010;24(2):395–412.
Lopez-Medrano F, Aguado JM, Lizasoain M, Folgueira D, Juan RS, Diaz-Pedroche C, et al. Clinical implications of respiratory virus infections in solid organ transplant recipients: a prospective study. Transplantation. 2007;84(7):851–6.
Drieghe S, Ryckaert I, Beuselinck K, Lagrou K, Padalko E. Epidemiology of respiratory viruses in bronchoalveolar lavage samples in a tertiary hospital. J Clin Virol. 2014;59(3):208–11.
Kumar D, Husain S, Chen MH, Moussa G, Himsworth D, Manuel O, et al. A prospective molecular surveillance study evaluating the clinical impact of community-acquired respiratory viruses in lung transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2010;89(8):1028–33.
Ison MG, Hayden FG. Viral infections in immunocompromised patients: what’s new with respiratory viruses? Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2002;15(4):355–67.
Kumar D, Erdman D, Keshavjee S, Peret T, Tellier R, Hadjiliadis D, et al. Clinical impact of community-acquired respiratory viruses on bronchiolitis obliterans after lung transplant. Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transpl Surg. 2005;5(8):2031–6.
Fisher CE, Preiksaitis CM, Lease ED, Edelman J, Kirby KA, Leisenring WM, et al. Symptomatic respiratory virus infection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2016;62(3):313–9.
Peck AJ, Englund JA, Kuypers J, Guthrie KA, Corey L, Morrow R, et al. Respiratory virus infection among hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: evidence for asymptomatic parainfluenza virus infection. Blood. 2007;110(5):1681–8.
Shah DP, Ghantoji SS, Mulanovich VE, Ariza-Heredia EJ, Chemaly RF. Management of respiratory viral infections in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Am J Blood Res. 2012;2(4):203–18.
Schuster MG, Cleveland AA, Dubberke ER, Kauffman CA, Avery RK, Husain S, et al. Infections in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: results from the Organ Transplant Infection Project, a multicenter, prospective, cohort study. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4(2):ofx050.
Chemaly RF, Ghosh S, Bodey GP, Rohatgi N, Safdar A, Keating MJ, et al. Respiratory viral infections in adults with hematologic malignancies and human stem cell transplantation recipients: a retrospective study at a major cancer center. Medicine (Baltimore). 2006;85(5):278–87.
Nichols WG, Guthrie KA, Corey L, Boeckh M. Influenza infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: risk factors, mortality, and the effect of antiviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(9):1300–6.
Nichols WG, Gooley T, Boeckh M. Community-acquired respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza virus infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center experience. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2001;7(Suppl):11S–5S.
Harrington RD, Hooton TM, Hackman RC, Storch GA, Osborne B, Gleaves CA, et al. An outbreak of respiratory syncytial virus in a bone marrow transplant center. J Infect Dis. 1992;165(6):987–93.
Schiffer JT, Kirby K, Sandmaier B, Storb R, Corey L, Boeckh M. Timing and severity of community acquired respiratory virus infections after myeloablative versus non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica. 2009;94(8):1101–8.
Shah DP, Ghantoji SS, Ariza-Heredia EJ, Shah JN, El Taoum KK, Shah PK, et al. Immunodeficiency scoring index to predict poor outcomes in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients with RSV infections. Blood. 2014;123(21):3263–8.
Soccal PM, Aubert JD, Bridevaux PO, Garbino J, Thomas Y, Rochat T, et al. Upper and lower respiratory tract viral infections and acute graft rejection in lung transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51(2):163–70.
de Lima CR, Mirandolli TB, Carneiro LC, Tusset C, Romer CM, Andreolla HF, et al. Prolonged respiratory viral shedding in transplant patients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2014;16(1):165–9.
Kumar D, Michaels MG, Morris MI, Green M, Avery RK, Liu C, et al. Outcomes from pandemic influenza A H1N1 infection in recipients of solid-organ transplants: a multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(8):521–6.
Scheuerman O, Barkai G, Mandelboim M, Mishali H, Chodick G, Levy I. Human metapneumovirus (hMPV) infection in immunocompromised children. J Clin Virol. 2016;83:12–6.
Salvatore M, Satlin MJ, Jacobs SE, Jenkins SG, Schuetz AN, Moss RB, et al. DAS181 for treatment of parainfluenza virus infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients at a single center. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22(5):965–70.
Ariza-Heredia EJ, Fishman JE, Cleary T, Smith L, Razonable RR, Abbo L. Clinical and radiological features of respiratory syncytial virus in solid organ transplant recipients: a single-center experience. Transpl Infect Dis. 2012;14(1):64–71.
Ryoo SM, Kim WY, Sohn CH, Seo DW, Oh BJ, Lee JH, et al. Factors promoting the prolonged shedding of the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza virus in patients treated with oseltamivir for 5 days. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2013;7(5):833–7.
Manuel O, Estabrook M, Practice ASTIDCo. RNA respiratory viruses in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013;13(Suppl 4):212–9.
Ison MG. Respiratory viral infections in transplant recipients. Antivir Ther. 2007;12(4 Pt B):627–38.
Casiano-Colon AE, Hulbert BB, Mayer TK, Walsh EE, Falsey AR. Lack of sensitivity of rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus infection in adults. J Clin Virol. 2003;28(2):169–74.
Syrmis MW, Whiley DM, Thomas M, Mackay IM, Williamson J, Siebert DJ, et al. A sensitive, specific, and cost-effective multiplex reverse transcriptase-PCR assay for the detection of seven common respiratory viruses in respiratory samples. J Mol Diagn. 2004;6(2):125–31.
Mahony JB. Detection of respiratory viruses by molecular methods. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21(4):716–47.
McAdam AJ, Riley AM. Developments in tissue culture detection of respiratory viruses. Clin Lab Med. 2009;29(4):623–34.
Mahony J, Chong S, Merante F, Yaghoubian S, Sinha T, Lisle C, et al. Development of a respiratory virus panel test for detection of twenty human respiratory viruses by use of multiplex PCR and a fluid microbead-based assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(9):2965–70.
Castrucci MR. Factors affecting immune responses to the influenza vaccine. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017;15:1–10. doi:10.1080/21645515.2017.1338547
Matias G, Taylor RJ, Haguinet F, Schuck-Paim C, Lustig RL, Fleming DM. Modelling estimates of age-specific influenza-related hospitalisation and mortality in the United Kingdom. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:481.
Cromer D, van Hoek AJ, Jit M, Edmunds WJ, Fleming D, Miller E. The burden of influenza in England by age and clinical risk group: a statistical analysis to inform vaccine policy. J Infect. 2014;68(4):363–71.
Lo MS, Lee GM, Gunawardane N, Burchett SK, Lachenauer CS, Lehmann LE. The impact of RSV, adenovirus, influenza, and parainfluenza infection in pediatric patients receiving stem cell transplant, solid organ transplant, or cancer chemotherapy. Pediatr Transplant. 2013;17(2):133–43.
Mauskopf J, Klesse M, Lee S, Herrera-Taracena G. The burden of influenza complications in different high-risk groups: a targeted literature review. J Med Econ. 2013;16(2):264–77.
Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, Brammer L, Cox N, Anderson LJ, et al. Mortality associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United States. JAMA. 2003;289(2):179–86.
Vilchez RA, McCurry K, Dauber J, Lacono A, Griffith B, Fung J, et al. Influenza virus infection in adult solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transpl Surg. 2002;2(3):287–91.
Ljungman P, de la Camara R, Perez-Bercoff L, Abecasis M, Nieto Campuzano JB, Cannata-Ortiz MJ, et al. Outcome of pandemic H1N1 infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Haematologica. 2011;96(8):1231–5.
Claus JA, Hodowanec AC, Singh K. Poor positive predictive value of influenza-like illness criteria in adult transplant patients: a case for multiplex respiratory virus PCR testing. Clin Transplant. 2015;29(10):938–43.
L’Huillier AG, Abed Y, Petty TJ, Cordey S, Thomas Y, Bouhy X, et al. E119D neuraminidase mutation conferring pan-resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors in an A(H1N1)pdm09 isolate from a stem-cell transplant recipient. J Infect Dis. 2015;212(11):1726–34.
Eshaghi A, Shalhoub S, Rosenfeld P, Li A, Higgins RR, Stogios PJ, et al. Multiple influenza A (H3N2) mutations conferring resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors in a bone marrow transplant recipient. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(12):7188–97.
Mc Mahon A, Martin-Loeches I. The pharmacological management of severe influenza infection—’existing and emerging therapies’. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2017;10(1):81–95.
Moscona A. Neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(13):1363–73.
Noel ZR, Bastin ML, Montgomery AA, Flannery AH. Comparison of high-dose versus standard dose oseltamivir in critically ill patients with influenza. J Intensive Care Med. 2016.
Dixit R, Khandaker G, Hay P, McPhie K, Taylor J, Rashid H, et al. A randomized study of standard versus double dose oseltamivir for treating influenza in the community. Antivir Ther. 2015;20(7):689–98.
Wester A, Shetty AK. Peramivir injection in the treatment of acute influenza: a review of the literature. Infect Drug Resist. 2016;9:201–14.
Marty FM, Vidal-Puigserver J, Clark C, Gupta SK, Merino E, Garot D, et al. Intravenous zanamivir or oral oseltamivir for hospitalised patients with influenza: an international, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5(2):135–46.
Wijaya L, Chua YY, Cui L, Chan K, Tan BH. Intravenous zanamivir in critically ill patients due to pandemic 2009 (H1N1) influenza A virus. Singap Med J. 2011;52(7):481–5.
Dulek DE, Williams JV, Creech CB, Schulert AK, Frangoul HA, Domm J, et al. Use of intravenous zanamivir after development of oseltamivir resistance in a critically ill immunosuppressed child infected with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(11):1493–6.
Gaur AH, Bagga B, Barman S, Hayden R, Lamptey A, Hoffman JM, et al. Intravenous zanamivir for oseltamivir-resistant 2009 H1N1 influenza. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(1):88–9.
de Jong MD, Ison MG, Monto AS, Metev H, Clark C, O’Neil B, et al. Evaluation of intravenous peramivir for treatment of influenza in hospitalized patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(12):e172–85.
Ison MG, Hui DS, Clezy K, O’Neil BJ, Flynt A, Collis PJ, et al. A clinical trial of intravenous peramivir compared with oral oseltamivir for the treatment of seasonal influenza in hospitalized adults. Antivir Ther. 2013;18(5):651–61.
Campbell AP, Jacob ST, Kuypers J, Wald A, Englund JA, Corey L, et al. Respiratory failure caused by 2009 novel influenza A/H1N1 in a hematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipient: detection of extrapulmonary H1N1 RNA and use of intravenous peramivir. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(9):619–20.
Louie JK, Yang S, Acosta M, Yen C, Samuel MC, Schechter R, et al. Treatment with neuraminidase inhibitors for critically ill patients with influenza A (H1N1)pdm09. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2012;55(9):1198–204.
Yu H, Feng Z, Uyeki TM, Liao Q, Zhou L, Feng L, et al. Risk factors for severe illness with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus infection in China. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(4):457–65.
Ison MG, Szakaly P, Shapira MY, Krivan G, Nist A, Dutkowski R. Efficacy and safety of oral oseltamivir for influenza prophylaxis in transplant recipients. Antivir Therapy. 2012;17(6):955–64.
Guzman-Suarez BB, Buckley MW, Gilmore ET, Vocca E, Moss R, Marty FM, et al. Clinical potential of DAS181 for treatment of parainfluenza-3 infections in transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2012;14(4):427–33.
Chan RW, Chan MC, Wong AC, Karamanska R, Dell A, Haslam SM, et al. DAS181 inhibits H5N1 influenza virus infection of human lung tissues. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(9):3935–41.
Drozd DR, Limaye AP, Moss RB, Sanders RL, Hansen C, Edelman JD, et al. DAS181 treatment of severe parainfluenza type 3 pneumonia in a lung transplant recipient. Transpl Infect Dis. 2013;15(1):E28–32.
Furuta Y, Gowen BB, Takahashi K, Shiraki K, Smee DF, Barnard DL. Favipiravir (T-705), a novel viral RNA polymerase inhibitor. Antivir Res. 2013;100(2):446–54.
Paules CI, Lakdawala S, McAuliffe JM, Paskel M, Vogel L, Kallewaard NL, et al. An HA stem antibody MEDI8852 prevents and controls disease and limits transmission of pandemic influenza viruses. J Infect Dis. 2017;216(3):356–65.
Marjuki H, Mishin VP, Chai N, Tan MW, Newton EM, Tegeris J, et al. Human monoclonal antibody 81.39a effectively neutralizes emerging influenza A viruses of group 1 and 2 hemagglutinins. J Virol. 2016;90(23):10446–58.
Danziger-Isakov L, Kumar D, Practice ASTIDCo. Vaccination in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transpl Surg. 2013;13(Suppl 4):311–7.
Haugh M, Gresset-Bourgeois V, Macabeo B, Woods A, Samson SI. A trivalent, inactivated influenza vaccine (Vaxigrip(R)): summary of almost 50 years of experience and more than 1.8 billion doses distributed in over 120 countries. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017;16(6):545–64.
Choi WS, Noh JY, Song JY, Cheong HJ, Wie SH, Lee JS, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a cell culture-derived inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (NBP607-QIV): a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, phase III clinical trial in adults and elderly subjects. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017; 13(7):1653–660.
Treanor JT, Albano FR, Sawlwin DC, Graves Jones A, Airey J, Formica N, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine compared with two trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines containing alternate B strains in adults: a phase 3, randomized noninferiority study. Vaccine. 2017;35(15):1856–64.
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Transplant Work G. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(Suppl 3):S1–155.
Cordero E, Roca-Oporto C, Bulnes-Ramos A, Aydillo T, Gavalda J, Moreno A, et al. Two doses of inactivated influenza vaccine improve immune response in solid organ transplant recipients: results of TRANSGRIPE 1-2, a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2017;64(7):829–38.
Scharpe J, Evenepoel P, Maes B, Bammens B, Claes K, Osterhaus AD, et al. Influenza vaccination is efficacious and safe in renal transplant recipients. Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transpl Surg. 2008;8(2):332–7.
Birdwell KA, Ikizler MR, Sannella EC, Wang L, Byrne DW, Ikizler TA, et al. Decreased antibody response to influenza vaccination in kidney transplant recipients: a prospective cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis Off J Natl Kidney Found. 2009;54(1):112–21.
Manuel O, Pascual M, Hoschler K, Giulieri S, Alves D, Ellefsen K, et al. Humoral response to the influenza A H1N1/09 monovalent AS03-adjuvanted vaccine in immunocompromised patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(2):248–56.
Blumberg EA, Albano C, Pruett T, Isaacs R, Fitzpatrick J, Bergin J, et al. The immunogenicity of influenza virus vaccine in solid organ transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22(2):295–302.
Baluch A, Humar A, Eurich D, Egli A, Liacini A, Hoschler K, et al. Randomized controlled trial of high-dose intradermal versus standard-dose intramuscular influenza vaccine in organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transpl Surg. 2013;13(4):1026–33.
Karras NA, Weeres M, Sessions W, Xu X, Defor T, Young JA, et al. A randomized trial of one versus two doses of influenza vaccine after allogeneic transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19(1):109–16.
Domnich A, Arata L, Amicizia D, Puig-Barbera J, Gasparini R, Panatto D. Effectiveness of MF59-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine. 2017;35(4):513–20.
Martin JT. Development of an adjuvant to enhance the immune response to influenza vaccine in the elderly. Biologicals. 1997;25(2):209–13.
Kumar D, Campbell P, Hoschler K, Hidalgo L, Al-Dabbagh M, Wilson L, et al. Randomized controlled trial of adjuvanted versus nonadjuvanted influenza vaccine in kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2016;100(3):662–9.
Natori Y, Humar A, Lipton J, Kim DD, Ashton P, Hoschler K, et al. A pilot randomized trial of adjuvanted influenza vaccine in adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017.
Halasa NB, Savani BN, Asokan I, Kassim A, Simons R, Summers C, et al. Randomized double-blind study of the safety and immunogenicity of standard-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine versus high-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22(3):528–35.
GiaQuinta S, Michaels MG, McCullers JA, Wang L, Fonnesbeck C, O’Shea A, et al. Randomized, double-blind comparison of standard-dose vs. high-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in pediatric solid organ transplant patients. Pediatr Transplant. 2015;19(2):219–28.
Waghmare A, Campbell AP, Xie H, Seo S, Kuypers J, Leisenring W, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory disease in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: viral RNA detection in blood, antiviral treatment, and clinical outcomes. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57(12):1731–41.
Peghin M, Hirsch HH, Len O, Codina G, Berastegui C, Saez B, et al. Epidemiology and immediate indirect effects of respiratory viruses in lung transplant recipients: a 5-year prospective study. Am J Transplant. 2017;17(5):1304–12.
Beaird OE, Freifeld A, Ison MG, Lawrence SJ, Theodoropoulos N, Clark NM, et al. Current practices for treatment of respiratory syncytial virus and other non-influenza respiratory viruses in high-risk patient populations: a survey of institutions in the Midwestern Respiratory Virus Collaborative. Transpl Infect Dis Off J Transplant Soc. 2016;18(2):210–5.
Boeckh M, Englund J, Li Y, Miller C, Cross A, Fernandez H, et al. Randomized controlled multicenter trial of aerosolized ribavirin for respiratory syncytial virus upper respiratory tract infection in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(2):245–9.
Shah DP, Ghantoji SS, Shah JN, El Taoum KK, Jiang Y, Popat U, et al. Impact of aerosolized ribavirin on mortality in 280 allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients with respiratory syncytial virus infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68(8):1872–80.
Gorcea CM, Tholouli E, Turner A, Saif M, Davies E, Battersby E, Dignan FL. Effective use of oral ribavirin for respiratory syncytial viral infections in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. J Hosp Infect. 2017;95(2):214–217
Seo S, Campbell AP, Xie H, Chien JW, Leisenring WM, Englund JA, et al. Outcome of respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract disease in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients receiving aerosolized ribavirin: significance of stem cell source and oxygen requirement. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19(4):589–96.
Pinana JL, Hernandez-Boluda JC, Calabuig M, Ballester I, Marin M, Madrid S, et al. A risk-adapted approach to treating respiratory syncytial virus and human parainfluenza virus in allogeneic stem cell transplantation recipients with oral ribavirin therapy: a pilot study. Transpl Infect Dis. 2017.19(4).
Burrows FS, Carlos LM, Benzimra M, Marriott DJ, Havryk AP, Plit ML, et al. Oral ribavirin for respiratory syncytial virus infection after lung transplantation: efficacy and cost-efficiency. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(7):958–62.
Li L, Avery R, Budev M, Mossad S, Danziger-Isakov L. Oral versus inhaled ribavirin therapy for respiratory syncytial virus infection after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012;31(8):839–44.
Liu V, Dhillon GS, Weill D. A multi-drug regimen for respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza virus infections in adult lung and heart-lung transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2010;12(1):38–44.
Uckay I, Gasche-Soccal PM, Kaiser L, Stern R, Mazza-Stalder J, Aubert JD, et al. Low incidence of severe respiratory syncytial virus infections in lung transplant recipients despite the absence of specific therapy. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29(3):299–305.
Gottlieb J, Zamora MR, Hodges T, Musk AW, Sommerwerk U, Dilling D, et al. ALN-RSV01 for prevention of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after respiratory syncytial virus infection in lung transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35(2):213–21.
DeVincenzo JP, Whitley RJ, Mackman RL, Scaglioni-Weinlich C, Harrison L, Farrell E, et al. Oral GS-5806 activity in a respiratory syncytial virus challenge study. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(8):711–22.
Higgins D, Trujillo C, Keech C. Advances in RSV vaccine research and development—a global agenda. Vaccine. 2016;34(26):2870–5.
Helantera I, Anttila VJ, Loginov R, Lempinen M. Parainfluenza 3 infections early after kidney or simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2017;17(3):809–12.
Chemaly RF, Hanmod SS, Rathod DB, Ghantoji SS, Jiang Y, Doshi A, et al. The characteristics and outcomes of parainfluenza virus infections in 200 patients with leukemia or recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2012;119(12):2738–45 (quiz 969).
Shah DP, Shah PK, Azzi JM, Chemaly RF. Parainfluenza virus infections in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients and hematologic malignancy patients: a systematic review. Cancer Lett. 2016;370(2):358–64.
Ustun C, Slaby J, Shanley RM, Vydra J, Smith AR, Wagner JE, et al. Human parainfluenza virus infection after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: risk factors, management, mortality, and changes over time. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18(10):1580–8.
Elizaga J, Olavarria E, Apperley J, Goldman J, Ward K. Parainfluenza virus 3 infection after stem cell transplant: relevance to outcome of rapid diagnosis and ribavirin treatment. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32(3):413–8.
McCurdy LH, Milstone A, Dummer S. Clinical features and outcomes of paramyxoviral infection in lung transplant recipients treated with ribavirin. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2003;22(7):745–53.
Zenilman JM, Fuchs EJ, Hendrix CW, Radebaugh C, Jurao R, Nayak SU, et al. Phase 1 clinical trials of DAS181, an inhaled sialidase, in healthy adults. Antivir Res. 2015;123:114–9.
Waghmare A, Wagner T, Andrews R, Smith S, Kuypers J, Boeckh M, et al. Successful treatment of parainfluenza virus respiratory tract infection with DAS181 in 4 immunocompromised children. J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc. 2015;4(2):114–8.
Ison MG. Adenovirus infections in transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43(3):331–9.
Florescu DF, Hoffman JA, Practice ASTIDCo. Adenovirus in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transpl Surg. 2013;13(Suppl 4):206–11.
Humar A, Kumar D, Mazzulli T, Razonable RR, Moussa G, Paya CV, et al. A surveillance study of adenovirus infection in adult solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2005;5(10):2555–9.
Varma MC, Kushner YB, Ko DS, Kawai T, Martins PN, Kaur P, et al. Early onset adenovirus infection after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(3):623–7.
Doan ML, Mallory GB, Kaplan SL, Dishop MK, Schecter MG, McKenzie ED, et al. Treatment of adenovirus pneumonia with cidofovir in pediatric lung transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007;26(9):883–9.
Saquib R, Melton LB, Chandrakantan A, Rice KM, Spak CW, Saad RD, et al. Disseminated adenovirus infection in renal transplant recipients: the role of cidofovir and intravenous immunoglobulin. Transpl Infect Dis Off J Transplant Soc. 2010;12(1):77–83.
Bruminhent J, Athas DM, Hess BD, Flomenberg P. Disseminated adenovirus disease in heart transplant recipient presenting with conjunctivitis. Transpl Infect Dis Off J Transplant Soc. 2015;17(1):125–8.
Sakurada M, Kondo T, Umeda M, Kawabata H, Yamashita K, Takaori-Kondo A. Successful treatment with intravesical cidofovir for virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a case report and a review of the literature. J Infect Chemother Off J Jpn Soc Chemother. 2016;22(7):495–500.
Florescu DF, Pergam SA, Neely MN, Qiu F, Johnston C, Way S, et al. Safety and efficacy of CMX001 as salvage therapy for severe adenovirus infections in immunocompromised patients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant J Am Soc Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18(5):731–8.
Papadopoulou A, Gerdemann U, Katari UL, Tzannou I, Liu H, Martinez C, et al. Activity of broad-spectrum T cells as treatment for AdV, EBV, CMV, BKV, and HHV6 infections after HSCT. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(242):242ra83.
Drosten C, Gunther S, Preiser W, van der Werf S, Brodt HR, Becker S, et al. Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(20):1967–76.
Poutanen SM, Low DE, Henry B, Finkelstein S, Rose D, Green K, et al. Identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Canada. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(20):1995–2005.
Lee N, Hui D, Wu A, Chan P, Cameron P, Joynt GM, et al. A major outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(20):1986–94.
Tan EL, Ooi EE, Lin CY, Tan HC, Ling AE, Lim B, et al. Inhibition of SARS coronavirus infection in vitro with clinically approved antiviral drugs. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10(4):581–6.
Kumar D, Tellier R, Draker R, Levy G, Humar A. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in a liver transplant recipient and guidelines for donor SARS screening. Am J Transplant. 2003;3(8):977–81.
Zaki AM, van Boheemen S, Bestebroer TM, Osterhaus AD, Fouchier RA. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(19):1814–20.
Al Ghamdi M, Alghamdi KM, Ghandoora Y, Alzahrani A, Salah F, Alsulami A, et al. Treatment outcomes for patients with Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS CoV) infection at a coronavirus referral center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:174.
Nam HS, Park JW, Ki M, Yeon MY, Kim J, Kim SW. High fatality rates and associated factors in two hospital outbreaks of MERS in Daejeon, the Republic of Korea. Int J Infect Dis. 2017;58:37–42.
Maslow JN. Vaccine development for emerging virulent infectious diseases. Vaccine. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.02.015.
AlGhamdi M, Mushtaq F, Awn N, Shalhoub S. MERS CoV infection in two renal transplant recipients: case report. Am J Transplant. 2015;15(4):1101–4.
Tsang KW, Ho PL, Ooi GC, Yee WK, Wang T, Chan-Yeung M, et al. A cluster of cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(20):1977–85.
Booth CM, Matukas LM, Tomlinson GA, Rachlis AR, Rose DB, Dwosh HA, et al. Clinical features and short-term outcomes of 144 patients with SARS in the greater Toronto area. JAMA. 2003;289(21):2801–9.
Zhao Z, Zhang F, Xu M, Huang K, Zhong W, Cai W, et al. Description and clinical treatment of an early outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Guangzhou, PR China. J Med Microbiol. 2003;52(Pt 8):715–20.
Loutfy MR, Blatt LM, Siminovitch KA, Ward S, Wolff B, Lho H, et al. Interferon alfacon-1 plus corticosteroids in severe acute respiratory syndrome: a preliminary study. JAMA. 2003;290(24):3222–8.
Al-Tawfiq JA, Momattin H, Dib J, Memish ZA. Ribavirin and interferon therapy in patients infected with the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: an observational study. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;20:42–6.
Hopkins P, McNeil K, Kermeen F, Musk M, McQueen E, Mackay I, et al. Human metapneumovirus in lung transplant recipients and comparison to respiratory syncytial virus. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(8):876–81.
Englund JA, Boeckh M, Kuypers J, Nichols WG, Hackman RC, Morrow RA, et al. Brief communication: fatal human metapneumovirus infection in stem-cell transplant recipients. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(5):344–9.
Seo S, Gooley TA, Kuypers JM, Stednick Z, Jerome KR, Englund JA, et al. Human Metapneumovirus infections following hematopoietic cell transplantation: factors associated with disease progression. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(2):178–85.
Weinberg A, Lyu DM, Li S, Marquesen J, Zamora MR. Incidence and morbidity of human metapneumovirus and other community-acquired respiratory viruses in lung transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2010;12(4):330–5.
Niggli F, Huber LC, Benden C, Schuurmans MM. Human metapneumovirus in lung transplant recipients: characteristics and outcomes. Infect Dis (Lond). 2016;48(11–12):852–6.
Seo S, Waghmare A, Scott EM, Xie H, Kuypers JM, Hackman RC, et al. Human rhinovirus detection in the lower respiratory tract of hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: association with mortality. Haematologica. 2017;102(6):1120–30.
Jacobs SE, Soave R, Shore TB, Satlin MJ, Schuetz AN, Magro C, et al. Human rhinovirus infections of the lower respiratory tract in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis Off J Transplant Soc. 2013;15(5):474–86.
Ambrosioni J, Bridevaux PO, Aubert JD, Soccal P, Wagner G, Kaiser L. Role of rhinovirus load in the upper respiratory tract and severity of symptoms in lung transplant recipients. J Clin Virol Off Publ Pan Am Soc Clin Virol. 2015;64:1–5.
Csoma E, Meszaros B, Asztalos L, Gergely L. WU and KI polyomaviruses in respiratory, blood and urine samples from renal transplant patients. J Clin Virol Off Publ Pan Am Soc Clin Virol. 2015;64:28–33.
Garbino J, Soccal PM, Aubert JD, Rochat T, Meylan P, Thomas Y, et al. Respiratory viruses in bronchoalveolar lavage: a hospital-based cohort study in adults. Thorax. 2009;64(5):399–404.
Vu DL, Bridevaux PO, Aubert JD, Soccal PM, Kaiser L. Respiratory viruses in lung transplant recipients: a critical review and pooled analysis of clinical studies. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(5):1071–8.
Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson M, Chiarello L. Health Care Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. 2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings. Am J Infect Control. 2007;35(10 Suppl 2):S65–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
DK has received research Grants from Roche and GSK, and honoraria from Sanofi. NL has no disclosures.
Funding
No funding was used or received for the preparation of this review article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Law, N., Kumar, D. Post-transplant Viral Respiratory Infections in the Older Patient: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Drugs Aging 34, 743–754 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-017-0491-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-017-0491-5