Skip to main content
Log in

Incidence of Hematologic Toxicity in Older Adults Treated with Gemcitabine or a Gemcitabine-Containing Regimen in Routine Clinical Practice: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Older adults receiving cytotoxic agents may be more susceptible to hematologic toxicities because of progressive reduction in organ functions and multiple co-morbidities. Because older adults are under-represented in clinical trials, this retrospective study aims to evaluate hematologic toxicity of gemcitabine-based regimens in older patients compared with their younger counterparts in clinical practice.

Patients and Methods

A total of 494 patients routinely treated with gemcitabine, either alone or in combination with platinum-based drugs, in the Slotervaart Hospital or The Netherlands Cancer Institute between January 2003 and January 2013 were enrolled. Patient characteristics, underlying malignancy, treatment regimen, administered doses of gemcitabine, and laboratory values were retrospectively collected from electronic patient records. The relative dose intensity achieved in older patients and their younger counterparts was evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Incidence of hematologic toxicity in older adults (age ≥70 years) and their younger counterparts (age <70 years) was compared using the Fisher’s exact test. Predictors of experiencing Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity were evaluated using logistic regression.

Results

Patient characteristics and baseline laboratory values were equally distributed among the two age groups, except for the estimated glomerular filtration rate being significantly lower in the older patients. Reduction of the first administered dose of gemcitabine was significantly more frequently applied in the older patients (p = 0.03). However, no significant difference in the gemcitabine relative dose intensity over the median number of four treatment cycles was observed (65 % in the older patients group vs. 67 % in the younger control group). Incidence of severe hematologic toxicity (Grade ≥3) was not significantly higher in the older patients. A subset analysis of nadir blood counts showed a trend towards an increased incidence of Grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity for the older patients in the gemcitabine-cisplatin treatment group. Moreover, the relative risk for developing Grade 3 or 4 leukocytopenia in the older patients was increased fivefold (p = 0.007) for combination therapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. Blood transfusions were administered nearly twofold more frequently in the older patients, but this difference did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion

Treatment with gemcitabine or a gemcitabine-containing regimen appeared to be feasible and well tolerated in the older patients who were selected to receive chemotherapy. Overall, patients ≥70 years of age did not incur a higher incidence of severe or life-threatening hematologic toxicity nor did they undergo more frequent or larger dose adjustments. These data support additional treatment-specific prospective studies and clinical trials in older cancer patients to optimize treatment benefit and risk in this heterogeneous older patient population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, et al. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381(752–776):2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kusagaya H, Inui N, Karayama M, et al. Biweekly combination therapy with gemcitabine and carboplatin compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, phase-II study. Lung Cancer. 2012;77:550–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis JH, Kilgore ML, Goldman DP, et al. Participation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:1383–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Repetto L. Great risk of chemotherapy toxicity in elderly patients with cancer. J Support Oncol. 2003;1:18–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hurria A, Togawa K, Mohile SG, et al. Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3457–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP. Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. JAMA. 2004;291(22):2720–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Villella J, Chalas E. Optimising treatment of elderly patients with ovarian cancer: improving their enrollment in clinical trials. Drugs Aging. 2005;22(2):95–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. US Food and Drug Administration. Official label Gemzar (gemcitabine), NDA 020509 2011. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/020509s069lbl.pdf.

  9. US Food and Drugs Administration. Official label Paraplatin (carboplatin), NDA 020542 2004. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2004/20452scs001_paraplatin.lbl.pdf.

  10. US Food and Drugs Administration. Official label Platinol (cisplatin), NDA 018057 2011. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/018057s081lbl.pdf.

  11. Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Cavazzini C, et al. The frailty syndrome: a critical issue in geriatric oncology. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;46:127–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hurria A, Lichtman SM. Pharmacokinetics of chemotherapy in the older patient. Cancer Control. 2007;14:32–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Repetto L, Venturino A, Fratino L, et al. Geriatric oncology: a clinical approach to the older patient with cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:870–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Seufferlein T, Bachet JB, Van Cutsem E, Rougier P, ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: ESMO-ESDO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(Suppl 7):vii33–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tempero MA, Arnoletti JP, Behrman SW, Ben-Josef E, Benson AB 3rd, Casper ES, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2012: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012;10(6):703–13.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Goffin J, Coakley N, Lacchetti C, et al. First-line systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Toronto: Cancer Care Ontario, 2010. (Evidence based series report).

  17. Azzoli CG, Temin S, Aliff T, Baker S Jr, Brahmer J, Johnson DH, et al. 2011 focused update of 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update on chemotherapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(28):3825–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Peters S, Adjei AA, Gridelli C, Reck M, Kerr K, Felip E, et al. Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(Suppl 7):vii56–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. de Marinis F, Rossi A, Di Maio M, Ricciardi S, Gridelli C, Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology. Treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology (AIOT) clinical practice guidelines. Lung Cancer. 2011;73(1):1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Babjuk M, Oosterlinck W, Sylvester R, Kaasinen E, Bohle A, Palou-Redorta J, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol. 2008;54(2):303–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones GRD, Lim E. The national kidney foundation guideline on estimation of the glomerular filtration rate. Clin Biochem Rev. 2003;25:95–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hryniuk WM, Goodyear M. The calculation of received dose intensity. J Clin Oncol. 1990;8:1935–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Park JH, Lee SW, Kim HS, Kang SG, Ko YH, Kim ST, et al. Combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin as first line treatment in elderly patients or those unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;71(4):1033–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kurata T, Hirashima T, Iwamoto Y, Kawaguchi T, Ikeda N, Tsuboi M, et al. A phase I/II study of carboplatin plus gemcitabine for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group Trial (WJTOG) 2905. Lung Cancer. 2012;77(1):110–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Genestreti G, Giovannini N, Frizziero M, Maglie M, Sanna S, Cingarlini S, et al. Carboplatin and gemcitabine in first-line treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: data from a retrospective study. J Chemother. 2011;23(4):232–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuriyama H, Kawana K, Taniguchi R, Jono F, Sakai E, Ohubo H, et al. Single-agent gemcitabine in elderly patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58(106):270–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tibaldi C, Camerini A, D’Incecco A, Vasile E, Fabbri A, Amoroso D, et al. First-line chemotherapy with planned sequential administration of cisplatin/gemcitabine followed by docetaxel in elderly ‘unfrail’ patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase II study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012;138(12):2003–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Quoix E. Optimal pharmacotherapeutic strategies for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Drugs Aging. 2011;28(11):885–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Inal A, Kaplan MA, Kucukoner M, Urakci Z, Karakus A, Isikdogan A. Cisplatin-based therapy for the treatment of elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis of a single institution. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(5):1837–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Joerger M, Burgers JA, Baas P, Doodeman VD, Smits PH, Jansen RS, et al. Gene polymorphisms, pharmacokinetics, and hematological toxicity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving cisplatin/gemcitabine. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012;69(1):25–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. US Food and Drugs Administration. Official Label Halcion (triazolam), NDA 017892, 2008. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2008/017892s038lbl.pdf.

  32. Greenblatt DJ, Harmatz JS, Shapiro L, Engelhardt N, Gouthro TA, Shader RI. Sensitivity to triazolam in the elderly. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(24):1691–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. US Food and Drugs Administration. Official Label Subutex (buprenorphine), NDA 0202732, 2011. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/020732s006s007lbl.pdf.

  34. US Food and Drugs Administration. Official Label Pravachol (pravastatin), NDA 019898, 2001. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2001/19898s46lbl.pdf.

  35. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gridelli C, Rossi A, Di Maio M, Leo S, Filipazzi V, Favaretto AG. Rationale and design of MILES-3 and MILES-4 studies: two randomized phase 3 trials comparing single-agent chemotherapy versus cisplatin-based doublets in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2014;15(2):166–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pallis AG, Gridelli C. Is age a negative prognostic factor for the treatment of advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer? Cancer Treat Rev. 2010;36:436–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Balducci L, Extermann M. Management of cancer in the older person: a practical approach. Oncologist. 2000;5:224–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express gratitude to the following individuals who provided technical support and/or suggestions for evaluation of our study: Jeroen IJzerman, Harm van Tinteren, Vincent van der Noort, and Coen van Hasselt. No sources of funding were used to assist in the conduct of this study or the preparation of this article. Marie-Rose Crombag, Aurelia de Vries Schultink, Jan Schellens, Jos Beijnen, and Alwin Huitema declare no conflict of interest in connection with this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie-Rose B. S. Crombag.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crombag, MR.B.S., de Vries Schultink, A.H.M., Schellens, J.H.M. et al. Incidence of Hematologic Toxicity in Older Adults Treated with Gemcitabine or a Gemcitabine-Containing Regimen in Routine Clinical Practice: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Drugs Aging 31, 737–747 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-014-0207-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-014-0207-z

Keywords

Navigation