Skip to main content
Log in

A Descriptive Analysis of Adverse Event Reports from the Quebec Cannabis Registry

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Published data on the safety of natural medical cannabis (MC) when used in the real-world clinical practice setting are lacking. This study aimed to describe adverse events (AEs) reported across three years following MC initiation.

Methods

The Quebec Cannabis Registry (QCR) was a prospective registry of adults enrolled through participating physicians when they initiated MC between May 2015 and October 2018. Follow-up ended at MC discontinuation, loss to follow-up, three years, or end of data collection (May 2019). Data were collected at baseline and at follow-up visits every three months for the first two years, then once in the third year. Physicians filled adverse event (AE) reports, which were coded using MedDRA® preferred terms (PTs), and descriptive analyses were conducted.

Results

A total of 2991 patients were enrolled (mean age 50.9 years, 50.2% females). During follow-up, 108 patients (3.6%) experienced moderate or severe AEs, yielding 111 AE reports (three patients had two reports) and 214 AEs (average 1.9 AEs per report). Mild AEs were recorded as a reason for MC discontinuation for nine patients, but no AE reports were available. The most common PTs for ingested MC (62 reports) were dizziness (12.9%), nausea (11.3%), somnolence (9.7%), and vomiting (8.1%), and for inhaled MC (23 reports), headache (13.0%) was the most common. The most frequent PTs associated with tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-dominant MC (25 reports) were dizziness and somnolence (12.0% each); for cannabidiol (CBD)-dominant MC (20 reports), vomiting (20.0%) was most common; and dizziness (17.2%), nausea (13.8%), somnolence (10.3%), and headache (8.6%) were the most frequent for balanced MC (58 reports).

Conclusion

No new safety concerns were identified relative to the published literature, although notable differences in AE profile between modes of administration and cannabinoid content ratios should be considered by health professionals. Further work identifying and managing risk factors for AEs is warranted to maintain a favorable benefit-risk balance for MC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chandiok K, Marathe S, Rooney M, et al. Cannabis and its therapeutic value in the ageing population: attitudes of health-care providers. Austral J Age. 2021;40(3):261–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.12846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Costantino RC, Felten N, Todd M, et al. A survey of hospice professionals regarding medical cannabis practices. J Palliat Med. 2019;22(10):1208–12. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2018.0535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Karanges EA, Suraev A, Elias N, et al. Knowledge and attitudes of Australian general practitioners towards medicinal cannabis: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7): e022101. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ziemianski D, Capler R, Tekanoff R, et al. Cannabis in medicine: a national educational needs assessment among Canadian physicians. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0335-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hallinan CM, Gunn JM, Bonomo YA. Implementation of medicinal cannabis in Australia: innovation or upheaval? Perspectives from physicians as key informants, a qualitative analysis. BMJ Open. 2021;11(10): e054044. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054044.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sajdeya R, Shavers A, Jean-Jacques J, et al. Practice patterns and training needs among physicians certifying patients for medical marijuana in Florida. J Prim Care Community Health. 2021;12:21501327211042790. https://doi.org/10.1177/21501327211042790.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. MacCallum CA, Lo LA, Boivin M. “Is medical cannabis safe for my patients?” A practical review of cannabis safety considerations. Eur J Intern Med. 2021;89:10–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2021.05.002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. MacCallum CA, Russo EB. Practical considerations in medical cannabis administration and dosing. Eur J Intern Med. 2018;49:12–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2018.01.004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gottschling S, Ayonrinde O, Bhaskar A, et al. Safety considerations in cannabinoid-based medicine. Int J Gen Med. 2020;13:1317–33. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.S275049.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hindley G, Beck K, Borgan F, et al. Psychiatric symptoms caused by cannabis constituents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(4):344–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30074-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Iffland K, Grotenhermen F. An update on safety and side effects of cannabidiol: a review of clinical data and relevant animal studies. Cannab Cannab Res. 2017;2(1):139–54. https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2016.0034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Whiting PF, Wolff RF, Deshpande S, et al. Cannabinoids for medical use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2015;313(24):2456–73. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.6358.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Winstock AR, Barratt MJ. Synthetic cannabis: a comparison of patterns of use and effect profile with natural cannabis in a large global sample. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;131(1):106–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.12.011.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ergisi M, Erridge S, Harris M, et al. An updated analysis of clinical outcome measures across patients from the UK Medical Cannabis Registry. Cannab Cannab Res. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2021.0145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cahill SP, Lunn SE, Diaz P, et al. Evaluation of patient reported safety and efficacy of cannabis from a survey of medical cannabis patients in Canada. Front Public Health. 2021;9: 626853. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.626853.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bar-Lev Schleider L, Mechoulam R, Sikorin I, et al. Adherence, safety, and effectiveness of medical cannabis and epidemiological characteristics of the patient population: a prospective study. Front Med. 2022;9: 827849. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.827849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Crescioli G, Lombardi N, Bettiol A, et al. Adverse events following cannabis for medical use in Tuscany: an analysis of the Italian Phytovigilance database. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;86(1):106–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14140.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Banerjee R, Erridge S, Salazar O, et al. Real world evidence in Medical Cannabis Research. Therap Innov Regul Sci. 2022;56(1):8–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-021-00346-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bialas P, Fitzcharles MA, Klose P, et al. Long-term observational studies with cannabis-based medicines for chronic non-cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety. Eur J Pain (London, England). 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1957

  20. Safakish R, Ko G, Salimpour V, et al. Medical Cannabis for the management of pain and quality of life in chronic pain patients: a prospective observational study. Pain Med. 2020;21(11):3073–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaa163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sagy I, Bar-Lev Schleider L, Abu-Shakra M, et al. Safety and efficacy of medical cannabis in fibromyalgia. J Clin Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8060807.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bar-Sela G, Vorobeichik M, Drawsheh S, et al. The medical necessity for medicinal cannabis: prospective, observational study evaluating the treatment in cancer patients on supportive or palliative care. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med eCAM. 2013;2013: 510392. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/510392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Devinsky O, Marmanillo A, Hamlin T, et al. Observational study of medical marijuana as a treatment for treatment-resistant epilepsies. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2022;9(4):497–505. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51537.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-medication/cannabis/information-medical-practitioners/information-health-care-professionals-cannabis-cannabinoids.html. Accessed 24 July 2023.

  25. Quebec Medical College. Guidelines concerning the prescription of dried cannabis for medical purposes. Quebec: Quebec Medical College, 2014

  26. Vigano A, Moride Y, Hachem Y, Canac-Marquis M, Gamaoun R, Kalaba M, Martel MO, Perez J, Néron A, Beaulieu P, Desroches J. The Quebec Cannabis Registry: investigating the safety and effectiveness of medical cannabis. Cannab Cannab Res. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2022.0041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Health Canada. Information for Health Care Practitioners—Cannabis (marihuana, marijuana) and the cannabinoids. In: Canada H, ed. Internet: Health Canada, 2018.

  28. College of Family Physicians of Canada. Authorizing dried cannabis for chronic pain or anxiety: preliminary guidance from the College of Family Physicians of Canada. Mississauga: College of Family Physicians of Canada, 2014.

  29. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. What is a serious adverse event? In: FDA Website. FDA. 2016. https://www.fda.gov/safety/reporting-serious-problems-fda/what-serious-adverse-event. Accessed 03 Aug 2022.

  30. Brown EG, Wood L, Wood S. The medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA). Drug Saf. 1999;20(2):109–17. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-199920020-00002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Aviram J, Lewitus GM, Vysotski Y, et al. Sex differences in medical cannabis-related adverse effects. Pain. 2022;163(5):975–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002463.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cooper ZD, Craft RM. Sex-dependent effects of cannabis and cannabinoids: a translational perspective. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;43(1):34–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2017.140.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Abuhasira R, Schleider LB-L, Mechoulam R, et al. Epidemiological characteristics, safety and efficacy of medical cannabis in the elderly. Eur J Internal Med. 2018;49:44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2018.01.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bar-Lev Schleider L, Mechoulam R, Saban N, et al. Real life experience of medical cannabis treatment in autism: analysis of safety and efficacy. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):200. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37570-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bar-Lev Schleider L, Mechoulam R, Lederman V, et al. Prospective analysis of safety and efficacy of medical cannabis in large unselected population of patients with cancer. Eur J Intern Med. 2018;49:37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2018.01.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bennici A, Mannucci C, Calapai F, et al. Safety of medical cannabis in neuropathic chronic pain management. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26206257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zolotov Y, Eshet L, Morag O. Preliminary assessment of medical cannabis consumption by cancer survivors. Complement Ther Med. 2021;56: 102592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Naftali T, Bar-Lev Schleider L, Sklerovsky Benjaminov F, et al. Medical cannabis for inflammatory bowel disease: real-life experience of mode of consumption and assessment of side-effects. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;31(11):1376–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/meg.0000000000001565[publishedOnlineFirst:2019/10/01].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ware MA, Wang T, Shapiro S, et al. Cannabis for the management of pain: assessment of safety study (COMPASS). J Pain. 2015;16(12):1233–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2015.07.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Olsson F, Erridge S, Tait J, Holvey C, et al. An observational study of safety and clinical outcome measures across patient groups in the United Kingdom Medical Cannabis Registry. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2023;16(3):257–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2023.2183841.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Sturgeon JA, Hah JM, Sharifzadeh Y, et al. Predictors of daily pain medication use in individuals with recurrent back pain. Int J Behav Med. 2018;25(2):252–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-017-9686-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Perron BE, Bohnert K, Perone AK, et al. Use of prescription pain medications among medical cannabis patients: comparisons of pain levels, functioning, and patterns of alcohol and other drug use. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2015;76(3):406–13. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2015.76.406.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Blamey R, Jolly K, Greenfield S, et al. Patterns of analgesic use, pain and self-efficacy: a cross-sectional study of patients attending a hospital rheumatology clinic. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10(1):137. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-137.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Isacson D, Bingefors K. Epidemiology of analgesic use: a gender perspective. Eur J Anaesthesiol EJA. 2002;19:5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lucas CJ, Galettis P, Schneider J. The pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of cannabinoids. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84(11):2477–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13710.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yola Moride.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the Canadian Consortium for the Investigation of Cannabinoids, the Collège des Médecins du Québec (CMQ) and unrestricted grants from several licensed cannabis producers (Bedrocan, Mettrum and Tweed; these three companies merged during the study conduct into one company called Canopy Growth Corporation) and nowadays Spectrum Therapeutics is the medical division of Canopy Growth Corporation). Funding for data analysis was received from the Alan Edwards Pain Management Unit of the McGill University Health Centre. Cedars Cancer Foundation and Rossy Cancer Network supported the Medical Cannabis Program in Oncology of the McGill University Health Center, which provided most data on oncology patients to the Quebec Cannabis Registry (QCR). No funding agency had input into the design and conduct of the QCR, although the CMQ was present at development meetings.

Competing interests

YM, AMC, and GC are employees of YolaRX Consultants, which provides consulting services to the pharmaceutical industry and cannabis manufacturers on topics unrelated to this research. MW and MK were  employees of Canopy Growth Corporation (MW: 2018–2022 and MK: 2019–2023). AN is a consultant on request in medical cannabis-related pharmacological assessments and needs for injured workers (Bureau d'évaluation médicale). AV was a member of the Clinical Advisory Board for Tilray, Canopy Growth Corporation, Syqe and EmpowerPharm. Until March 2020, AV was the Research Director of Santé Cannabis, Montreal, Canada. MM, PB, RG, and YH have no competing interest.

Availability of data and material

No additional data available.

Code availability

There is no code available.

Authors contributions

AV, PB, and MW, contributed to the registry design. YM designed the safety analysis and AMC did the data analysis. All authors contributed to the manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

The project was initially approved by the central research ethics committee of the Ministry of Health and Social Services (CCER) of Quebec, which monitored the project for the private clinics and the participating institutions of the health and social services network. On 03 May 2019, the McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board took over the role of the CCER for the QCR.

Consent to participate

All participants provided informed consent to participate in the registry. Information is anonymous and only aggregate data are reported.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hachem, Y., Moride, Y., Castilloux, AM. et al. A Descriptive Analysis of Adverse Event Reports from the Quebec Cannabis Registry. Drug Saf 47, 161–171 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-023-01379-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-023-01379-0

Navigation