Skip to main content
Log in

Application of a Self-Controlled Case Series Study to a Database Study in Children

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Post-marketing surveillance activities are particularly important for safety issues in children, the elderly, and patients with severe comorbidities since these populations are usually excluded from clinical trials. In addition, using electronic databases for monitoring of safety of marketed products has been of considerable interest.

Objectives

This study aimed to clarify the advantages and difficulties of the self-controlled case series method relative to cohort studies in pharmacoepidemiological studies in children, using an administrative database, and to explore the impact on results of handling the period eligible for analysis and recurrent events in different ways.

Methods

Datasets of only individuals who had the outcome of interest were derived from an anonymized hospital administrative database in Japan from April 2003 through August 2011. We calculated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and their 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the risks of diarrhea, bronchitis, and eczema related to palivizumab treatment in young children. The analysis included ‘first diagnosed’ events or ‘multiple’ events during an eligible period. An eligible period was defined in two ways: first-time inpatient periods of more than 3 continuous days (EPA); and a continuous period in cases where the interval between visits was below the 75th percentile of the interval between visits for patients with the same diagnosis (EPB).

Results

We extracted data for 70,771 patients and identified 641 who were exposed to palivizumab. The age-adjusted IRRs for diarrhea, bronchitis, and eczema were 3.0 (95 % CI 1.7–5.4), 10.3 (95 % CI 8.0–13.2), and 16.9 (95 % CI 12–23), respectively, in multiple events and the EPB eligible period. The IRRs varied greatly between the two eligible periods.

Conclusions

This method could be a useful tool in pharmacoepidemiological studies in children. Careful consideration in the handling of inpatient and outpatient periods, including sensitivity analyses, is necessary because this method is a within-individual comparison.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coloma PM, Schuemie MJ, Trifiro G, et al. Combining electronic healthcare databases in Europe to allow for large-scale drug safety monitoring: the EU-ADR project. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(1):1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Linder JA, Haas JS, Iyer A, et al. Secondary use of electronic health record data: spontaneous triggered adverse drug event reporting. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010;19(12):1211–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bello A, Hemmelgarn B, Manns B, Tonelli M, for Alberta Kidney Disease Network. Use of administrative databases for health-care planning in CKD. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfs163.

  4. Smoyer Tomic KE, Amato AA, Fernandes AW. Incidence and prevalence of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies among commercially insured, medicare supplemental insured, and medicaid enrolled populations: an administrative claims analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13(1):103.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith EG, Zhao S, Rosen AK. Using the patient safety indicators to detect potential safety events among US veterans with psychotic disorders: clinical and research implications. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012;24(4):321–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schoonen WM, Thomas SL, Somers EC, et al. Do selected drugs increase the risk of lupus? A matched case-control study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;70(4):588–96.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gibson JE, Hubbard RB, Smith CJ, Tata LJ, Britton JR, Fogarty AW. Use of self-controlled analytical techniques to assess the association between use of prescription medications and the risk of motor vehicle crashes. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169(6):761–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dore DD, Seeger JD, Arnold Chan K. Use of a claims-based active drug safety surveillance system to assess the risk of acute pancreatitis with exenatide or sitagliptin compared to metformin or glyburide. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25(4):1019–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW). National database guideline in Japan (in Japanese). Available: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/shingi/2r98520000016v8d-att/2r98520000016vcn.pdf. Accessed Aug 29 2013.

  10. Kimura S, Sato T, Ikeda S, Noda M, Nakayama T. Development of a database of health insurance claims: standardization of disease classifications and anonymous record linkage. J Epidemiol. 2010;20(5):413–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Akazawa M, Imai H, Igarashi A, Tsutani K. Potentially inappropriate medication use in elderly Japanese patients. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2010;8(2):146–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hashikata H, Harada KH, Kagimura T, Nakamura M, Koizumi A. Usefulness of a large automated health records database in pharmacoepidemiology. Environ Health Prev Med. 2011;16(5):313–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Douglas IJ, Smeeth L. Exposure to antipsychotics and risk of stroke: self controlled case series study. BMJ. 2008;337:a1227.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pratt NL, Roughead EE, Ramsay E, Salter A, Ryan P. Risk of hospitalization for stroke associated with antipsychotic use in the elderly: a self-controlled case series. Drugs Aging. 2010;27(11):885–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Whitaker HJ, Farrington CP, Spiessens B, Musonda P. Tutorial in biostatistics: the self-controlled case series method. Stat Med. 2006;25(10):1768–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. The IMpact-RSV study group. Palivizumab, a humanized respiratory syncytial virus monoclonal antibody, reduces hospitalization from respiratory syncytial virus infection in high-risk infants. Pediatrics. 1998;102(3 Pt 1):531–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Feltes TF, Cabalka AK, Meissner HC, et al. Palivizumab prophylaxis reduces hospitalization due to respiratory syncytial virus in young children with hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease. J Pediatr. 2003;143(4):532–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maclure M, Fireman B, Nelson JC, et al. When should case-only designs be used for safety monitoring of medical products? Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21(S1):50–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

This work was supported by a 2011 Research Grant from Pfizer Health Research Foundation (10-8-043) http://www.pfizer-zaidan.jp/. This report was co-authored by academic researchers and Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd (MDV). HU, SH, and KK have no conflicts of interest regarding MDV. Hanae Ueyama, Shiro Hinotsu, Shiro Tanaka, Hisashi Urushihara, Masaki Nakamura, Yuji Nakamura and Koji Kawakami have no conflicts of interest with any other organization related to the subject of this report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koji Kawakami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ueyama, H., Hinotsu, S., Tanaka, S. et al. Application of a Self-Controlled Case Series Study to a Database Study in Children. Drug Saf 37, 259–268 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0148-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0148-9

Keywords

Navigation