Abstract
Acne is a common, chronic inflammatory condition affecting millions of people worldwide, with significant negative impact on quality of life and mental health. Acne is characterized by comedones, inflammatory papules, pustules, and nodulocystic lesions, with long-lasting sequelae including scarring and dyspigmentation, the latter of which is more common in skin of color. The four main pillars of acne pathophysiology include alteration of sebum production and concentration, hyperkeratinization of the follicular unit, Cutibacterium acnes strains, and an inflammatory immune response. Newer research has provided greater insight into these pathophysiologic categories. This greater understanding of acne pathogenesis has led to numerous new and emerging treatment modalities. These modalities include combinations of existing treatments, repurposing of existing agents historically used for other conditions, new topical treatments, novel antibiotics, topical and oral probiotics, and various procedural devices. This article will provide an overview of emerging treatments of acne and their link to our current and improved understanding of acne pathogenesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Current treatments for acne include topical and oral antibiotics, retinoids, anti-inflammatory treatments, and hormonal medications, as well as various procedural therapies |
Updated knowledge of the interplay between numerous pathophysiologic pathways of acne has allowed for the development of novel therapeutic targets and for the repurposing of existing topical and systemic treatments |
Future acne treatments largely focus on reducing inflammation by targeting cytokine pathways known to be upregulated in acne, while novel energy-based devices focus on the target of sebaceous glands |
1 Introduction
1.1 Epidemiology
Acne vulgaris is one of the most encountered dermatologic conditions by dermatologists worldwide [1]. Although the true prevalence is difficult to approximate, it is estimated to affect about 9% of the population [1,2,3]. In the US alone, 5 million physician visits are attributed to acne annually, costing > 2 billion dollars [4]. Cumulative prevalence approaches 100% in adolescence and decreases with age, affecting up to 64% of individuals aged 20–29 years and 43% of individuals aged 30–39 years, respectively [5, 6]. Age, oily skin, family history, and obesity are all risk factors for developing acne [1]. While well-powered studies comparing acne in various racial and ethnic groups are lacking, acne is regarded as very common across global populations [6].
1.2 Clinical Presentation
Acne is classified morphologically, including comedonal, inflammatory, nodulocystic, and mixed phenotypes with varying severity [7]. Acne can affect the face, chest, and back, or a combination of these areas. Scarring and pigmentary changes are frequent, with post-inflammatory dyspigmentation and keloidal scarring being more common in skin of color.
1.3 Quality of Life
Acne may profoundly impair quality of life by limiting self-esteem and self-confidence, placing individuals at a significantly increased risk for developing psychiatric conditions such as depression and anxiety [8, 9]. Acne is associated with increased risk of self-injury and suicide attempts, highlighting the concerning and significant connection between acne and mental health [9, 10]. The widespread presence of acne along with its effects on quality of life underscore the importance of having a broad spectrum of treatment options targeting its various pathogenetic factors.
2 Acne Pathophysiology
Acne pathophysiology is multifactorial: sebum alteration, aberrant follicular keratinization, and Cutibacterium acnes combine to cause microcomedones, ultimately leading to inflammation and acne [11, 12]. Recent advances in the study of acne have identified nuances in these contributing factors, including hormones and neuropeptides, sebum production, the microbiome, and innate and adaptive immunity.
2.1 Hormones and Neuropeptides
Androgens stimulate sebocyte proliferation, augment the formation of intracellular lipid droplets and triglyceride formation, and induce hyperkeratinization of the follicular infrainfundibulum [13]. While androgens certainly influence acne, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) is the principal hormonal driver of acne [12]. IGF-1 downregulates nuclear transcription factor Forkhead Box protein O1 (FoxO1), ultimately increasing lipogenesis and androgen receptor transduction as FoxO1 normally suppresses both [12, 14, 15]. IGF-1 additionally promotes a pro-inflammatory sebum higher in monounsaturated fats, induces androgen synthesis, and increases the availability of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) in the skin [16]. Diets comprised of high-glycemic index foods, dairy, and whey protein contribute to acne through stimulation of IGF-1, while omega-3-fatty acids and low-glycemic load diets are protective as they downregulate IGF-1 [17].
Neuropeptides are biologically active molecules found in neurons, and numerous are implicated in acne pathogenesis, including corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), substance P (SP) and the proopiomelanocortin (POMC) system [13]. CRH is part of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and is strongly expressed in acne-prone skin, supporting a mechanism for stress-induced acne [18]. CRH also induces lipid synthesis in sebocytes and interacts with androgenetic signaling pathways involved in acne pathogenesis [13]. SP is upregulated by stress and is overexpressed in the nerves surrounding sebaceous glands of individuals with acne [11, 13]. SP leads to expansion of sebaceous glands and promotes upregulation of numerous inflammatory factors [13, 19]. SP also stimulates the expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated γ (PPAR-γ), upregulating lipid production by sebaceous glands [12, 13, 20]. The POMC system, which includes α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) and β-endorphin, may also be implicated in acne [12, 13]. α-MSH triggers sebocytes to differentiate and produce lipid but also decreases inflammation by IL-8 secretion from sebocytes, so the overall effect on acne pathogenesis requires further study [12, 13]. β-Endorphin's role is unclear, as it both prevents sebocyte proliferation and induces lipid generation [13].
2.2 Sebum and Sebocytes
The pilosebaceous unit is a dynamic cutaneous adnexal structure, interacting with hormones and immune pathways in addition to producing sebum [13]. Androgens stimulate sebocytes to proliferate and induce differentiation and lipid synthesis via mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1, and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways [12, 13]. Sebocytes also have receptors for IGF-1, SP, CRH, and leptin, suggesting links between these systems; the presence of a leptin receptor supports a link with diet as leptin is secreted from adipocytes to signal satiety [11]. Both sebum overproduction and altered concentration contribute to acne by disturbing follicular barrier function and inducing comedo formation, C. acnes overgrowth, and inflammation [12, 13]. Studies suggest that de-saturation of fatty acids in sebum—increasing the ratio of monounsaturated to saturated fatty acids—is proinflammatory and may promote acne [13, 21]. Squalene, a lipid specific to sebum, undergoes peroxidation when exposed to ultraviolet (UV) radiation and leads to comedo formation and inflammation via stimulation of lipoxygenase and IL-6 production [22]. Squalene may also inhibit reactive oxygen species formation in macrophages, decreasing their ability to kill C. acnes [23]. Free fatty acids and cholesterol in sebum also activate PPAR pathways to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines [11, 22]. Individuals with acne also have less vitamin E in their sebum, decreasing antioxidant capability [13].
2.3 Hyperkeratinization
Excessive keratinization is one of the most important events that leads to comedo formation [13]. Increased expansion of keratinocytes with less desquamation leads to a keratin plug, putting pressure on the follicle and causing rupture [12, 13]. The drivers of hyperkeratosis have not been fully elucidated but numerous factors are contributory. Cutibacterium acnes activates the release of interleukin (IL) 1α, which induces hyperkeratinization in vitro [15]. Hyperproliferative keratins (keratin 1, 16, and 17) and filaggrin are increasingly expressed in the infundibulum of acne lesions, leading to abnormal keratinization patterns [21]. Change in sebum quality, such as increase in squalene, and monounsaturated fatty acids can induce changes in keratinization as well [13, 15]. Finally, androgens may also bring about hyperkeratosis, supported by the fact that keratinocytes in the infundibulum have an increased ability to metabolize androgens [12].
2.4 Cutibacterium acnes and the Microbiome
Cutibacterium acnes, formerly known as Propionibacterium acnes, is a commensal bacterium that is the most common bacteria in sebaceous skin [24]. Cutibacterium acnes is important for skin homeostasis as it prevents colonization with worrisome pathogens and helps the skin maintain a normal pH [25]. However, in some instances it may act opportunistically [25]. Previously, it was thought that overgrowth of C. acnes led to acne, but new data show the amount of C. acnes on the skin is similar between acne patients and controls [24]. Newer hypotheses postulate that loss of microbial balance between the C. acnes subtypes leads to acne [24]. Certain subtypes, particularly phylotype IA1, are pro-inflammatory, while less acnegenic phylotypes are associated with anti-inflammatory cytokine production [16].
Cutibacterium acnes stimulates inflammation via innate (Toll-like receptors, or TLRs) and adaptive immunity (IL-17A and IFN-γ secretion from CD4+ T cells) and promotes production of matrix metalloproteinases that contribute to scarring [11, 16]. Cutibacterium acnes also forms biofilms, which create a pro-inflammatory sebum concentration via increased lipase activity and promote resistance to treatment with antimicrobial agents [16, 25].
Increasing evidence also supports an interplay between the skin and gut microbiomes, although the exact mechanisms have not been fully elucidated [26]. The gut microbiome may directly affect the skin microbiome via transport of gut microbes and metabolic products to the skin via the bloodstream [27]. Studies have demonstrated decreased diversity of the gut microbiome in acne patients, including an increase in Bacteroidetes, akin to that seen in those who consume a Western diet [28]. Gut microbiota also influence cell expansion and metabolism via the mTOR signaling pathway, which is implicated in acne, suggesting a further link between gut dysbiosis and acne inflammation [27, 29].
2.5 Innate and Adaptive Immunity
Both the innate and adaptive immune systems are involved in acne pathogenesis. Cutibacterium acnes activates TLR-2 and TLR-4 on sebocytes and keratinocytes, leading to the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-8, and IL-12 from monocytes [21, 30]. Cutibacterium acnes additionally activates the Nod-like receptor 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome in monocytic cells, which leads to increased release of pro-inflammatory IL-1β [31]. TLR-2, TLR-4, and these pro-inflammatory cytokines are all expressed in higher levels in acne lesions [31]. Acne additionally involves adaptive immunity. Early acne lesions contain large amounts of CD4+ T-helper cells; C. acnes induces T-cell proliferation and leads to accumulation of T-cells specific for C. acnes [32]. Cutibacterium acnes can also cause these specific T-cells to secrete both IFN-γ and IL-17A, leading to a both a Th17 and Th1/Th17 host response [31, 32]. The numerous pathways capable of inducing acne inflammation constitute several potential therapeutic targets.
3 Current Treatments
3.1 Hormonal Medications
As mediators of sebocyte differentiation and sebum production, androgens, including testosterone and DHT, are major targets for acne treatment. Oral contraceptives (OCPs) target ovarian production of androgens and can thus treat hormonal acne in women, particularly those who report perimenstrual flaring of their acne or have associated polycystic ovarian syndrome. The major formulations of OCPs include combined oral contraceptives (COCs), which contain both estrogen and progestins as well as progestin-only pills (POPs). At 6 months of treatment, COCs have been shown to be as effective as systemic antibiotics in reducing acne lesions [33]. POPs have not been studied in acne. Contraindications include a history of thromboembolism, migraine with aura, or smoking in those 35 years or older (due to an increased risk of thromboembolic events) [7, 34].
Spironolactone is a non-selective aldosterone receptor antagonist with moderate activity against androgen receptors, thereby reducing testosterone and DHT levels. It is a longstanding treatment for hormonal acne with proven safety and tolerability that can be used alone or in conjunction with OCPs [35,36,37]. Adverse effects include menstrual irregularity, breast tenderness, hyperkalemia in those with renal disease, and teratogenicity.
Clascoterone is a recently FDA-approved topical androgen receptor antagonist which competes with DHT to decrease inflammatory cytokine and sebum production. In randomized clinical trials (RCTs), it has demonstrated favorable efficacy with limited side effects including localized irritation [38]. A small percentage of patients may develop reversible adrenal suppression, but the clinical relevance of this finding requires further elucidation [39, 40].
3.2 Sebum Production and Hyperkeratinization
Topical and systemic retinoids are vitamin A derivatives which bind retinoid X and/or retinoic acid (RAR) receptors to suppress sebum production, hyperkeratinization, and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. This ultimately leads to increased keratinocyte turnover, comedolytic properties, normalization of desquamation at the follicular infundibulum, and decreased inflammation. They also help treat post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH), a common sequela of acne in skin of color [41]. The four FDA-approved topical retinoids are adapalene, tretinoin, tazarotene, and trifarotene (a new selective RAR-γ topical which is useful in treating facial and truncal acne) [42]. Micronized formulations can help reduce cutaneous irritation and erythema resulting from increased transepidermal water loss [43]. Cutaneous irritation and mild photosensitization are common.
Isotretinoin is the only FDA-approved oral retinoid for treating severe, nodulocystic, and/or recalcitrant acne, especially in those with scarring. In addition, isotretinoin is the only acne medication which is thought to target all four major pillars of acne pathogenesis: sebum production, hyperkeratinization, C. acnes concentration, and inflammation. Importantly, it may also induce remission of acne after an appropriate cumulative dose is achieved. Common adverse effects include mucocutaneous dryness and irritation, elevated serum triglycerides and liver enzymes (these should be monitored before treatment initiation and at peak dose), and severe teratogenicity requiring monthly pregnancy testing and extensive counseling about contraception [44,45,46].
3.3 Antibacterial Treatments
Topical antibiotics for the treatment of acne include benzoyl peroxide (BP), clindamycin, erythromycin, dapsone, and minocycline. These agents reduce the concentration of C. acnes, have anti-inflammatory properties, and can be combined with topical retinoids for increased efficacy. BP releases free radicals, which break down keratin and cause peroxidation of C. acnes without leading to antimicrobial resistance unlike monotherapy with other antibiotics [47]. Common first-line combination therapies include BP with clindamycin or erythromycin. Clindamycin is preferred because of resistance rates of C. acnes to erythromycin [48, 49]. Topical dapsone is a newer second-line agent which can also be used as initial therapy in skin of color, women with inflammatory acne, and/or those with sensitive skin, allergies, or other contraindications [50,51,52]. Another newer agent, topical minocycline, has been shown to have excellent efficacy in treating inflammatory acne [53]. Lastly, sodium sulfacetamide, sulfur, salicylic acid, and azelaic acid are other topical agents with antimicrobial properties which may be useful in treating acne. Salicylic acid and azelaic acid have the added benefit of improving PIH [54]. Adverse effects associated with topical antibiotics include localized irritation.
Oral antibiotics are another cornerstone of acne treatment; tetracyclines are the most utilized, consisting of doxycycline, minocycline, and the newer agent sarecycline. They inhibit the 30S subunit of bacterial ribosomes and have potent anti-inflammatory properties, as evidenced by the sustained efficacy of submicrobial dosing in treating acne [55]. Penicillins, sulfonamides, and macrolides are used less commonly. Adverse effects of oral antibiotics include gastrointestinal upset and, particularly with tetracyclines, photosensitivity and teratogenicity.
3.4 Procedures
Several laser and energy-based light devices have been studied in acne management. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been shown to be effective in a limited number of studies in treating inflammatory acne via destruction of pilosebaceous units and decreasing C. acnes concentration [56,57,58]. Light-emitting diode (LED) red and blue light therapies are effective in treating inflammatory acne either alone or in combination with each other [59,60,61,62]. Intense pulsed light (IPL) can improve inflammatory acne and reduce the size and number of sebaceous glands [61, 63, 64]. IPL treats inflammatory acne by killing C. acnes, downregulating tumor necrosis alpha (TNF-α), and upregulating transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) [65, 66]. Additionally, pulsed-dye laser (PDL) therapy may also be effective in treating inflammatory acne and has been posited to have a longer-lasting therapeutic effect than IPL [66, 67]. Most lasers require multiple sessions and have similar side effect profiles including localized pain, irritation, bruising, and dyspigmentation. The 1450-nm diode laser, which incorporates a dynamic cooling device, has demonstrated moderate efficacy in the treatment of inflammatory acne and excessive sebum production [68,69,70]. Various delivery methods have been studied: stacked-pulse delivery may be slightly more efficacious, but caution should be used in Fitzpatrick types IV–VI because of increased risk of hyperpigmentation [68]. Dual regimen treatment (lower fluence directly to inflammatory lesions followed by a micropulsed moving mode administered to the whole face) may be more effective than typical high fluency stamping, is less painful, and may be less likely to cause hyperpigmentation [69].
AviClearTM is a 1726-nm wavelength laser which was recently cleared by the FDA for the treatment of mild-to-severe acne [71]. It selectively targets the sebaceous glands and implements contact cooling, thereby reducing laser-related side effects [72]. Unreleased manufacturer-reported results demonstrate current and future breakout episodes are shorter, less intense, and more infrequent with sustained improvement following three 30-min treatment sessions in all skin types [71]. The 1726-nm Accure Laser System and a combined vacuum and broadband light device named TheraClear® have also been recently approved by the FDA [73, 74].
Also recently approved by the FDA, topical gold nanoparticle-enhanced selective photothermolysis of sebaceous follicles shows promising results for acne [75,76,77]. Three weekly facial treatments with topically applied gold microparticles and diode laser pulses led to significant and sustained improvement in inflammatory acne [78]. Similarly, patients who received three treatments with a photopneumatic device preceded by topical gold nanoparticle application found significant improvement in mixed acne [79]. Indeed, topical application of gold salt (auranofin) itself downregulated the NLRP3 inflammasome in a mouse model, suggesting an anti-acne effect [80].
Several superficial to medium depth peels have been studied for acne as well as resultant PIH and scarring, including glycolic acid, salicylic acid, azelaic acid, pyruvic acid, mandelic acid, phytic acid, and Jessner’s solution. There is no robust evidence for the superiority of one over the others, as shown in a recent meta-analysis and multiple split-face studies comparing peel regimens. Side effects of chemical peels usually involve post-procedure erythema, dyspigmentation, and risk of infection. Prior to using chemical peels, patient-specific factors should be considered, including the risk of significant irritation and impaired healing depending on the patient’s medical status, the risk of dyspigmentation in skin of color, recent treatments and procedures, and the lack of safety data in pregnant women. For skin of color individuals, medium depth peels should be avoided due to risk of dyspigmentation.
Non-ablative fractionated radiofrequency microneedling (FRFM) is useful in treating active acne and scarring [81, 82]. Combining FRFM with isotretinoin is particularly effective in treating inflammatory acne and reducing scarring [83]. In fact, combinations of isotretinoin with other energy-based devices including PDL and ablative fractional lasers are effective treatments for active inflammatory acne as well [84]. Lastly, microneedling devices may be implemented in the transdermal delivery of topical retinoids and salicylic acid and for improving scarring [85].
4 Future Prospects for Targeting Inflammation in Acne
4.1 Topical Treatments
4.1.1 New Formulations and Combinations of Existing Topical Acne Treatments
Several new topical treatments for acne are currently under investigation: this includes new formulations (including microencapsulation of ingredients for improved penetration into the pilosebaceous unit and retinoid lotions), classes, and combinations of longstanding treatments (such as combined BP and retinoids that are more effective and well tolerated than individual components) [86, 87]. The combination of newer topicals and older systemic agents holds promise for increased efficacy, as evidenced by a study on combined topical trifarotene and oral doxycycline [88]. There are numerous novel agents which are currently under investigation for the treatment of acne (Table 1) [87].
4.1.2 Topical Synthetic Cannabinoids
Topical synthetic cannabinoids are reported to treat inflammatory acne by suppressing sebum production, reducing C. acnes concentration, and inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) [89,90,91,92]. One human trial utilizing a 3% cannabis seed extract cream found reduction in skin sebum production and erythema without significant side effects [93]. A current study is evaluating the efficacy of a topical synthetic cannabinoid in treating acne with promising early results [94].
4.1.3 Topical Tranexamic Acid
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an anti-fibrinolytic synthetic derivative of the amino acid lysine which inhibits the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin to reduce blood loss [95]. Topical TXA treats melasma by inhibiting UV driven melanocyte activation and reducing plasmin-mediated arachidonic acid and MSH release [96, 97]. Topical TXA has been previously shown to improve acne-induced post-inflammatory erythema, and more recently a split-face RCT of mild-to moderate acne treated with topical TXA 10% serum demonstrated a significant reduction in papulopustular lesions through immunomodulatory mechanisms requiring further study [98, 99].
4.1.4 Topical Meclizine Gel
Meclizine dihydrochloride, an H1 histamine antagonist typically taken orally for motion sickness, has recently showed promising results for acne [100]. Meclizine reduced the in vitro production of IL-8 and IL-1β by C. acnes-stimulated human keratinocytes and monocytes and decreased IL-1β, TNF-α, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor production in ex vivo human skin [100]. Meclizine 2% gel reduced acne severity by 20.1% in 60 patients [100].
4.1.5 Topical Antimicrobial Peptides and Bacteriophages
Designed antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are synthetic analogs of naturally occurring AMPs which comprise part of the innate immune response to new pathogens [101]. In vitro and mouse models have demonstrated that specially designed AMPs can neutralize C. acnes [94, 95]. An additional future benefit of AMPs is that they could be engineered to address multi-drug-resistant strains of C. acnes [101]. A study combining isotretinoin with topical granulysin-derived AMP (GDP-20) for mild-to-moderate mixed acne showed improved results with combination therapy versus isotretinoin alone [102]. A novel topical cationic peptide analog of indolicidin that has bactericidal properties (CLS001/MBI 226, or Omiganan) has finished two RCTs but results are not yet reported [87]. An exogenous, non-synthetically derived AMP produced by Bacillus brevis named tyrothricin has also demonstrated potential in inflammatory acne [103]. Lastly, bacteriophages causing lysis of surrounding bacteria have been isolated and formulated into a cream that decreases C. acnes concentration in vitro; more human studies are needed [104, 105].
4.1.6 Topical Surfactin-Oleogel
Surfactin is a surfactant with emulsifying and antimicrobial properties that can destroy the cell wall and membrane of C. acnes [106, 107]. In a mouse model, surfactin-oleogel (surfactin mixed with grapeseed oil) reduced C. acnes concentration and attenuated oxidative stress via inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines, nitric oxide, and nuclear factor-κ B-mediated pathways [108]. Moreover, the gel decreased cholesterol and free fatty acids synthesis and increased triglycerides and linoleic acid content [108].
4.1.7 Topical Nitric Oxide and Derivatives
Nitric oxide (NO) is a vasodilator with antimicrobial and immunomodulatory properties [109,110,111]. NO-releasing nanoparticles have significant bactericidal activity against C. acnes and suppress release of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8 in human cells [111]. A phase II RCT using NO 4% gel (SB204) found significant reduction in acne lesions without prominent adverse effects [112]. Additionally, a NO-generating serum significantly reduced acne lesions in 30 racially/ethnically diverse patients [113]. Relatedly, a spray containing a strain of the ammonia-oxidizing bacteria Nitrosomonas eutropha, a NO-producing bacterial strain designed to repopulate the skin flora with anti-inflammatory bacteria, has been shown to reduce inflammatory acne [87]. Reported side effects included headache, dysmenorrhea, nasopharyngitis, and a dose-dependent decrease in blood pressure.
4.1.8 Topical Probiotics
It is hypothesized that overgrowth of pathogenic C. acnes phylotypes can be prevented by bolstering normal skin flora via topical probiotics [114]. Proposed mechanisms for this effect include increased production of antimicrobial proteins by non-pathogenic bacteria, reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and direct inhibition of C. acnes growth [115,116,117,118,119]. One study of a lotion containing enterocins from Enterococcus faecalis SL-5 reported significant improvement in inflammatory acne [120]. Another study of a lotion containing a 5% extract of Lactobacillus plantarum found it was effective in reducing acne lesion size and erythema [121].
4.1.9 Topical Ivermectin
Approved for the treatment of head lice and rosacea, topical ivermectin 1% cream could also potentially treat acne via inhibition of lipopolysaccharide-mediated inflammation caused by C. acnes [122]. Ivermectin may also be beneficial as acne patients may have an increased concentration of Demodex organisms on their skin [123]. A small case series showed that topical ivermectin 1% cream improved inflammatory acne, but a study comparing it to combined BP and adapalene gel showed less effectiveness [87, 124].
4.2 Systemic Treatments
4.2.1 New Antibiotics and Related Treatments
A novel peptide-aminoglycoside molecule named Pentobra has been shown in vitro to have more robust bactericidal activity against C. acnes than tobramycin [125]. Zolav (p-carboethoxy-tristyrylbenzene derivative) is part of a new class of antibiotics that target the bacterial mechanosensitive ion channels of large conductance [126]. It has been shown to inhibit the growth of C. acnes in in vitro and in vivo mouse models of acne [127]. Multiple vaccines against C. acnes have been studied in mice; while anti-serum from vaccinated mice decreases human sebocyte cytotoxicity and IL-8 production, vaccines have not been shown to influence the concentration or growth of C. acnes [128,129,130].
4.2.2 Oral Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors
Phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors prevent the breakdown of cyclic adenosine monophosphate, thereby reducing inflammation via modulation of numerous cytokines. Case reports have demonstrated efficacy of apremilast, a PDE-4 inhibitor approved for psoriasis, in treating synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome refractory to biologics as well as recalcitrant isotretinoin-induced acne fulminans [131, 132]. No current studies exist for treating acne.
4.2.3 Oral Probiotics
The literature on the potential role of oral probiotics in treating acne is evolving [114]. Oral probiotics increase levels of anti-inflammatory IL-10 in acne patients [133]. A study comparing an oral probiotic, oral minocycline, and combination therapy reported significant improvement of acne lesions in all three groups after 1 month with combination therapy possessing the greatest efficacy [134]. A recent RCT comparing adapalene and BP with or without concomitant intake of an oral probiotic in mild-to-moderate acne found greater improvement in the probiotic group, albeit not statistically significant [135]. Consumption of lactoferrin-enriched fermented milk can also reduce acne lesions [136]. Lastly, an RCT of 114 patients taking a symbiotic dietary supplement containing multiple probiotic strains and a botanical extract found significant improvement in acne lesions and C. acnes concentration [137].
4.2.4 Biologics
In small case reports, biologic agents have been studied in severe manifestations of acne. TNF-α inhibitors like adalimumab and etanercept are considered effective treatments for severe acne conglobata and acne fulminans [138, 139]. Moreover, the IL-17 inhibitor secukinumab and the IL-23 inhibitor risankizumab have been shown to be effective treatments for recalcitrant SAPHO syndrome [140, 141]. Indeed, the IL-17/Th17 pathway has been shown to be active in acne lesions [31]. However, CJM112, a fully human IL‐17A inhibitor which targets a different epitope than secukinumab, was not superior to placebo in treating inflammatory acne in a recent RCT [142]. Lastly, anti-IL-1β inhibitor gevokizumab (XOMA 052) has completed an RCT without reported results [87].
4.3 Procedures
4.3.1 Negatively Charged Air Ions
Existing in the atmosphere, negative air ions (NAIs) are electrically charged molecules which enrich the surrounding oxygen, reduce free radicals, and reduce inflammation via unclear mechanisms [143]. A study of twice weekly treatments with a NAI facial device for 3–4 weeks in three patients showed improvement of inflammatory acne without significant adverse effects [143].
4.3.2 Combined Systemic and Procedural Treatments
The combination of systemic and procedural acne treatments has also shown synergy. An RCT showed that oral minocycline 100 mg daily combined with 3-monthly IPL treatments led to significant and persistent reduction in inflammatory lesions and post-inflammatory erythema as compared to minocycline monotherapy [144]. Similar findings have been reported with the combination of 420 nm IPL and isotretinoin compared to isotretinoin monotherapy [145]. Delicate pulsed light (DPL) is a safer, more specific subtype of IPL with a narrower therapeutic spectrum of 500 to 600 nm [146]. The combination of DPL with low-dose isotretinoin provided greater efficacy in lesion reduction when compared to isotretinoin monotherapy [147].
5 Conclusion
As knowledge of acne pathogenesis expands, novel approaches for targeting inflammation are rapidly emerging in the form of topical, systemic, procedural, and combination therapies. New or modified medications within familiar classes, the repurposing of drugs used to treat other inflammatory conditions, and the development of novel treatment modalities may all be efficacious in treating acne. Some of these treatments have the added benefit of decreasing and treating acne sequelae, including atrophic scarring and dyspigmentation. The diverse mechanisms of action include direct bactericidal activity against C. acnes, inhibition of pro-inflammatory factor release, reduction of oxidative stress, activation of the immune system, and modulation of the microbiome. With growing concerns over antimicrobial resistance and with certain individuals unable to tolerate well-established therapies, additional treatment options that are safe and effective in all skin types and colors are needed.
References
Heng AHS, Chew FT. Systematic review of the epidemiology of acne vulgaris. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):5754. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62715-3.
Knutsen-Larson S, Dawson AL, Dunnick CA, Dellavalle RP. Acne vulgaris: pathogenesis, treatment, and needs assessment. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30(1):99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2011.09.001.
Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2163–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2.
Bickers DR, Lim HW, Margolis D, et al. The burden of skin diseases: 2004. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55(3):490–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2006.05.048.
Stathakis V, Kilkenny M, Marks R. Descriptive epidemiology of acne vulgaris in the community. Australas J Dermatol. 1997;38(3):115–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-0960.1997.tb01126.x.
Bhate K, Williams HC. Epidemiology of acne vulgaris: Epidemiology of acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168(3):474–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.12149.
Eichenfield LF, Krakowski AC, Piggott C, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric acne. Pediatrics. 2013;131(Suppl 3):S163-186. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-0490B.
Samuels DV, Rosenthal R, Lin R, Chaudhari S, Natsuaki MN. Acne vulgaris and risk of depression and anxiety: a meta-analytic review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(2):532–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2020.02.040.
Özyay Eroğlu F, Aktepe E, Erturan İ. The evaluation of psychiatric comorbidity, self-injurious behavior, suicide probability, and other associated psychiatric factors (lonileness, self-esteem, life satisfaction) in adolescents with acne: a clinical pilot study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;18(3):916–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12708.
Purvis D, Robinson E, Merry S, Watson P. Acne, anxiety, depression and suicide in teenagers: a cross-sectional survey of New Zealand secondary school students. J Paediatr Child Health. 2006;42(12):793–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2006.00979.x.
Dréno B. What is new in the pathophysiology of acne, an overview. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31:8–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.14374.
Cong TX, Hao D, Wen X, Li XH, He G, Jiang X. From pathogenesis of acne vulgaris to anti-acne agents. Arch Dermatol Res. 2019;311(5):337–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-019-01908-x.
Kurokawa I, Danby FW, Ju Q, et al. New developments in our understanding of acne pathogenesis and treatment. Exp Dermatol. 2009;18(10):821–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0625.2009.00890.x.
Melnik BC. FoxO1 - the key for the pathogenesis and therapy of acne? JDDG J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2010;8(2):105–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1610-0387.2010.07344.x.
Hazarika N. Acne vulgaris: new evidence in pathogenesis and future modalities of treatment. J Dermatol Treat. 2021;32(3):277–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2019.1654075.
Tan JKL, Bhate K. A global perspective on the epidemiology of acne. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.13462.
Baldwin H, Tan J. Effects of diet on acne and its response to treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021;22(1):55–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-020-00542-y.
Ganceviciene R, Graziene V, Fimmel S, Zouboulis CC. Involvement of the corticotropin-releasing hormone system in the pathogenesis of acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol. 2009;160(2):345–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08959.x.
Toyoda M, Nakamura M, Morohashi M. Neuropeptides and sebaceous glands. Eur J Dermatol EJD. 2002;12(5):422–7.
Makrantonaki E, Zouboulis CC. Testosterone metabolism to 5?-dihydrotestosterone and synthesis of sebaceous lipids is regulated by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ligand linoleic acid in human sebocytes. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156(3):428–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07671.x.
Kurokawa I, Nakase K. Recent advances in understanding and managing acne. F1000Research. 2020;9:792. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.25588.1.
Zouboulis CC, Jourdan E, Picardo M. Acne is an inflammatory disease and alterations of sebum composition initiate acne lesions. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28(5):527–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.12298.
Do TH, Ma F, Andrade PR, et al. TREM2 macrophages induced by human lipids drive inflammation in acne lesions. Sci Immunol. 2022;7(73):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.abo2787.
Rozas M, de Hart RA, Fabrega MJ, et al. From dysbiosis to healthy skin: major contributions of Cutibacterium acnes to skin homeostasis. Microorganisms. 2021;9(3):628–45. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9030628.
Dréno B, Pécastaings S, Corvec S, Veraldi S, Khammari A, Roques C. Cutibacterium acnes (Propionibacterium acnes ) and acne vulgaris: a brief look at the latest updates. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32:5–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15043.
Dréno B, Dagnelie MA, Khammari A, Corvec S. The skin microbiome: a new actor in inflammatory acne. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020;21(S1):18–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-020-00531-1.
Lee, Byun, Kim. Potential role of the microbiome in acne: a comprehensive review. J Clin Med. 2019;8(7):987–1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8070987.
Deng Y, Wang H, Zhou J, Mou Y, Wang G, Xiong X. Patients with acne vulgaris have a distinct gut microbiota in comparison with healthy controls. Acta Derm Venereol. 2018;98(8):783–90. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-2968.
Monfrecola G, Lembo S, Caiazzo G, et al. Mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) expression is increased in acne patients’ skin. Exp Dermatol. 2016;25(2):153–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.12885.
Kim J, Ochoa MT, Krutzik SR, et al. Activation of toll-like receptor 2 in acne triggers inflammatory cytokine responses. J Immunol. 2002;169(3):1535–41. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.169.3.1535.
Kelhälä HL, Palatsi R, Fyhrquist N, et al. IL-17/Th17 pathway is activated in acne lesions. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(8): e105238. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105238.
Kistowska M, Meier B, Proust T, et al. Propionibacterium acnes promotes Th17 and Th17/Th1 responses in acne patients. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(1):110–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2014.290.
Koo EB, Petersen TD, Kimball AB. Meta-analysis comparing efficacy of antibiotics versus oral contraceptives in acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(3):450–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2014.03.051.
Zaenglein AL, Pathy AL, Schlosser BJ, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(5):945-973.e33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.12.037.
Muhlemann M, Carter G, Cream J, Wise P. Oral spironolactone: an effective treatment for acne vulgaris in women. Br J Dermatol. 1986;115(2):227–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1986.tb05722.x.
Grandhi R, Alikhan A. Spironolactone for the treatment of acne: a 4-year retrospective study. Dermatol Basel Switz. 2017;233(2–3):141–4. https://doi.org/10.1159/000471799.
Isvy-Joubert A, Nguyen JM, Gaultier A, et al. Adult female acne treated with spironolactone: a retrospective data review of 70 cases. Eur J Dermatol EJD. 2017;27(4):393–8. https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2017.3062.
Hebert A, Thiboutot D, Stein Gold L, et al. Efficacy and safety of topical clascoterone cream, 1%, for treatment in patients with facial acne: two phase 3 randomized clinical trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(6):621–30. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.0465.
Mazzetti A, Moro L, Gerloni M, Cartwright M. Pharmacokinetic profile, safety, and tolerability of clascoterone (cortexolone 17-alpha propionate, cb-03-01) topical cream, 1% in subjects with acne vulgaris: an open-label phase 2a study. J Drugs Dermatol JDD. 2019;18(6):563–8.
Barbieri JS. A new class of topical acne treatment addressing the hormonal pathogenesis of acne. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(6):619–20. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.0464.
Callender VD, Baldwin H, Cook-Bolden FE, Alexis AF, Stein Gold L, Guenin E. Effects of topical retinoids on acne and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation in patients with skin of color: a clinical review and implications for practice. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022;23(1):69–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-021-00643-2.
Tan J, Thiboutot D, Popp G, et al. Randomized phase 3 evaluation of trifarotene 50 μg/g cream treatment of moderate facial and truncal acne. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(6):1691–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.02.044.
Lucky AW, Sugarman J. Comparison of micronized tretinoin gel 0.05% and tretinoin gel microsphere 0.1% in young adolescents with acne: a post hoc analysis of efficacy and tolerability data. Cutis. 2011;87(6):305–10.
Hansen TJ, Lucking S, Miller JJ, Kirby JS, Thiboutot DM, Zaenglein AL. Standardized laboratory monitoring with use of isotretinoin in acne. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75(2):323–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2016.03.019.
Barbieri JS, Shin DB, Wang S, Margolis DJ, Takeshita J. The clinical utility of laboratory monitoring during isotretinoin therapy for acne and changes to monitoring practices over time. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(1):72–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.06.025.
Xia E, Han J, Faletsky A, et al. Isotretinoin laboratory monitoring in acne treatment: a delphi consensus study. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158(8):942–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.2044.
Leyden JJ, Wortzman M, Baldwin EK. Antibiotic-resistant Propionibacterium acnes suppressed by a benzoyl peroxide cleanser 6%. Cutis. 2008;82(6):417–21.
Lookingbill DP, Chalker DK, Lindholm JS, et al. Treatment of acne with a combination clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide gel compared with clindamycin gel, benzoyl peroxide gel and vehicle gel: combined results of two double-blind investigations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37(4):590–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0190-9622(97)70177-4.
Zhang N, Yuan R, Xin KZ, Lu Z, Ma Y. Antimicrobial susceptibility, biotypes and phylotypes of clinical cutibacterium (formerly propionibacterium) acnes strains isolated from acne patients: an observational study. Dermatol Ther. 2019;9(4):735–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-019-00320-7.
Lynde CW, Andriessen A. Cohort study on the treatment with dapsone 5% gel of mild to moderate inflammatory acne of the face in women. Skinmed. 2014;12(1):15–21.
Alexis AF, Burgess C, Callender VD, et al. The efficacy and safety of topical dapsone gel, 5% for the treatment of acne vulgaris in adult females with skin of color. J Drugs Dermatol JDD. 2016;15(2):197–204.
Piette WW, Taylor S, Pariser D, Jarratt M, Sheth P, Wilson D. Hematologic safety of dapsone gel, 5%, for topical treatment of acne vulgaris. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(12):1564–70. https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2008.518.
Gold LS, Dhawan S, Weiss J, Draelos ZD, Ellman H, Stuart IA. A novel topical minocycline foam for the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris: Results of 2 randomized, double-blind, phase 3 studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(1):168–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2018.08.020.
Davis EC, Callender VD. Postinflammatory Hyperpigmentation. J Clin Aesthetic Dermatol. 2010;3(7):20–31.
Moore A, Ling M, Bucko A, Manna V, Rueda MJ. Efficacy and safety of subantimicrobial dose, modified-release doxycycline 40 mg versus doxycycline 100 mg versus placebo for the treatment of inflammatory lesions in moderate and severe acne: a randomized, double-blinded Controlled Study. J Drugs Dermatol JDD. 2015;14(6):581–6.
Posadzki P, Car J. Light therapies for acne. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154(5):597–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.0110.
Tang X, Li C, Ge S, Chen Z, Lu L. Efficacy of photodynamic therapy for the treatment of inflammatory acne vulgaris: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19(1):10–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13197.
Mavranezouli I, Daly CH, Welton NJ, et al. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of topical pharmacological, oral pharmacological, physical and combined treatments for acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol. 2022;187(5):639–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.21739.
Papageorgiou P, Katsambas A, Chu A. Phototherapy with blue (415 nm) and red (660 nm) light in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol. 2000;142(5):973–8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03481.x.
Lim W, Lee S, Kim I, et al. The anti-inflammatory mechanism of 635 nm light-emitting-diode irradiation compared with existing COX inhibitors. Lasers Surg Med. 2007;39(7):614–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20533.
Sami NA, Attia AT, Badawi AM. Phototherapy in the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Drugs Dermatol JDD. 2008;7(7):627–32.
Li J, Li J, Zhang L, et al. Comparison of red light and blue light therapies for mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris: a randomized controlled clinical study. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2022;38(5):459–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12769.
Chang SE, Ahn SJ, Rhee DY, et al. Treatment of facial acne papules and pustules in Korean patients using an intense pulsed light device equipped with a 530- to 750-nm filter. Dermatol Surg Off Publ Am Soc Dermatol Surg Al. 2007;33(6):676–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33142.x.
Barakat MT, Moftah NH, El Khayyat MAM, Abdelhakim ZA. Significant reduction of inflammation and sebaceous glands size in acne vulgaris lesions after intense pulsed light treatment. Dermatol Ther. 2017;30:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.12418.
Taylor M, Porter R, Gonzalez M. Intense pulsed light may improve inflammatory acne through TNF-α down-regulation. J Cosmet Laser Ther Off Publ Eur Soc Laser Dermatol. 2014;16(2):96–103. https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2013.864198.
Choi YS, Suh HS, Yoon MY, Min SU, Lee DH, Suh DH. Intense pulsed light vs pulsed-dye laser in the treatment of facial acne: a randomized split-face trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol JEADV. 2010;24(7):773–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03525.x.
Seaton ED, Charakida A, Mouser PE, Grace I, Clement RM, Chu AC. Pulsed-dye laser treatment for inflammatory acne vulgaris: randomised controlled trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2003;362(9393):1347–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14629-6.
Uebelhoer NS, Bogle MA, Dover JS, Arndt KA, Rohrer TE. Comparison of stacked pulses versus double-pass treatments of facial acne with a 1,450-nm laser. Dermatol Surg Off Publ Am Soc Dermatol Surg Al. 2007;33(5):552–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33113.x.
Kwon HH, Choi SC, Jung JY, Bae YI, Park GH. Comparison of novel dual mode vs conventional single pass of a 1450-nm diode laser in the treatment of acne vulgaris for Korean patients: A 20-week prospective, randomized, split-face study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018;17(6):1063–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12788.
de Vries FMC, Meulendijks AM, Driessen RJB, van Dooren AA, Tjin EPM, van de Kerkhof PCM. The efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological therapies for the treatment of acne vulgaris: A systematic review and best-evidence synthesis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol JEADV. 2018;32(7):1195–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.14881.
Cutera. AviClear. Cutera Aesthetic Solutions. Published 2023. Accessed January 14, 2023. https://www.cutera.com/solutions/aviclear/
Scopelliti MG, Kothare A, Karavitis M. A novel 1726-nm laser system for safe and effective treatment of acne vulgaris. Lasers Med Sci. 2022;37(9):3639–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03645-6.
Kaitlyn Bader AE. FDA Clears Accure Laser System for Acne Treatment. 2022;44. Accessed January 14, 2023. https://www.dermatologytimes.com/view/fda-clears-accure-laser-system-for-acne-treatment
Brunk, D. Laser and light devices for acne treatment continue to advance. Published 2022. Accessed January 14, 2023. https://www.mdedge.com/dermatology/article/259752/acne/laser-and-light-devices-acne-treatment-continue-advance
Paithankar DY, Sakamoto FH, Farinelli WA, et al. Acne treatment based on selective photothermolysis of sebaceous follicles with topically delivered light-absorbing gold microparticles. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(7):1727–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2015.89.
Park KY, Han HS, Hong JY, Seo SJ, Lee SJ. Gold nanoshell-mediated photothermal therapy for acne vulgaris. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.13189.
Artounian K, Bundogji N, Hoss E, Boen M. Applications of gold and silver nanoparticles in the treatment of acne vulgaris: a systematic review. J Drugs Dermatol JDD. 2021;20(6):666–70. https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.2021.5762.
Fuchs CSK, Bay C, Adatto M, Lomholt H, Haedersdal M. Acne treatment with light absorbing gold microparticles and optical pulses: an open-label european multi-centered study in moderate to moderately severe acne vulgaris patients. Lasers Surg Med. 2019;51(8):686–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23099.
Suh DH, Park TJ, Jeong JY, et al. Photothermal therapy using gold nanoparticles for acne in Asian patients: a preliminary study. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34(3):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.14918.
Yang G, Lee SJ, Kang HC, et al. Repurposing auranofin, an anti-rheumatic gold compound, to treat acne vulgaris by targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome. Biomol Ther. 2020;28(5):437–42. https://doi.org/10.4062/biomolther.2020.004.
Lee SJ, Goo JW, Shin J, et al. Use of fractionated microneedle radiofrequency for the treatment of inflammatory acne vulgaris in 18 korean patients. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(3):400–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02267.x.
Kim ST, Lee KH, Sim HJ, Suh KS, Jang MS. Treatment of acne vulgaris with fractional radiofrequency microneedling. J Dermatol. 2014;41(7):586–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.12471.
Kim J, Lee YI, Kim J, Jung JY, Lee WJ, Lee JH. Safety of combined fractional microneedle radiofrequency and CO2 as an early intervention for inflammatory acne and scarring treated with concomitant isotretinoin. Dermatol Surg. 2020;46(10):e71–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000002364.
Kim J, Jongudomsombat T, Lee YI, et al. Combined use of energy-based interventions with low-dose isotretinoin for the treatment of inflammatory acne: An retrospective cohort analysis. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21(10):4383–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15171.
Yang D, Chen M, Sun Y, et al. Microneedle-mediated transdermal drug delivery for treating diverse skin diseases. Acta Biomater. 2021;121:119–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.004.
Del Rosso J, Gold L, Draelos Z, Raoof T, Hooper D, Stuart I. A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a combination of 3% minocycline and 0.3% adapalene topical foam formulation for the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne. SKIN J Cutan Med. 2020;4: s90. https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.4.supp.90.
Drake L, Reyes-Hadsall S, Barbieri JS, Mostaghimi A. New developments in topical acne therapy. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022;23(2):125–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-021-00666-9.
Del Rosso JQ, Johnson SM, Schlesinger T, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of trifarotene plus doxycycline for severe acne vulgaris. J Clin Aesthetic Dermatol. 2022;15(7):E53–9.
Oláh A, Tóth BI, Borbíró I, et al. Cannabidiol exerts sebostatic and antiinflammatory effects on human sebocytes. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(9):3713–24. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI64628.
Jin S, Lee MY. The ameliorative effect of hemp seed hexane extracts on the Propionibacterium acnes-induced inflammation and lipogenesis in sebocytes. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8): e0202933. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202933.
Peyravian N, Deo S, Daunert S, Jimenez JJ. The anti-inflammatory effects of cannabidiol (CBD) on acne. J Inflamm Res. 2022;15:2795–801. https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S355489.
Jiang Z, Jin S, Fan X, et al. Cannabidiol inhibits inflammation induced by cutibacterium acnes-derived extracellular vesicles via activation of CB2 receptor in keratinocytes. J Inflamm Res. 2022;15:4573–83. https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S374692.
Ali A, Akhtar N. The safety and efficacy of 3% Cannabis seeds extract cream for reduction of human cheek skin sebum and erythema content. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2015;28(4):1389–95.
BiotechDispatch. Botanix progresses development plan for BTX 1503. biotechdispatch.com.au. Published 2020. Accessed December 14, 2022. https://biotechdispatch.com.au/news/botanix-progresses-development-plan-for-btx-1503
Cai J, Ribkoff J, Olson S, et al. The many roles of tranexamic acid: an overview of the clinical indications for TXA in medical and surgical patients. Eur J Haematol. 2020;104(2):79–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.13348.
Tse TW, Hui E. Tranexamic acid: an important adjuvant in the treatment of melasma. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2013;12(1):57–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12026.
Ebrahimi B, Naeini FF. Topical tranexamic acid as a promising treatment for melasma. J Res Med Sci Off J Isfahan Univ Med Sci. 2014;19(8):753–7.
Jakhar D, Kaur I. Topical 5% tranexamic acid for acne-related postinflammatory erythema. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(6):e187–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.074.
Charoenwattanayothin A, Saiwichai T, Chaichalotornkul S. Adjunctive treatment for acne vulgaris by tranexamic acid. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21(10):4515–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.14972.
Grange PA, Ollagnier G, Beauvais Remigereau L, et al. A new topical candidate in acne treatment: characterization of the meclozine hydrochloride as an anti-inflammatory compound from in vitro to a preliminary clinical study. Biomedicines. 2022;10(5):931–51. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10050931.
Woodburn KW, Jaynes J, Clemens LE. Designed antimicrobial peptides for topical treatment of antibiotic resistant acne vulgaris. Antibiotics. 2020;9(1):23–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9010023.
Ma Z, Kochergin N, Olisova O, Snarskaya E. Topical antimicrobial peptides in combined treatment of acne patients. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21(4):1533–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.14300.
Richter C, Trojahn C, Hillmann K, et al. Reduction of inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions with topical tyrothricin 0.1% in the treatment of mild to severe acne papulopustulosa: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2016;29(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000439439.
Brown TL, Petrovski S, Dyson ZA, Seviour R, Tucci J. The formulation of bacteriophage in a semi solid preparation for control of propionibacterium acnes growth. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3): e0151184. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151184.
Castillo DE, Nanda S, Keri JE. Propionibacterium (Cutibacterium) acnes bacteriophage therapy in acne: current evidence and future perspectives. Dermatol Ther. 2019;9(1):19–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-018-0275-9.
Shan M, Meng F, Zhou L, et al. Surfactin inhibits the growth of Propionibacterium acnes by destroying the cell wall and membrane. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2021;73(6):684–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.13576.
Chen X, Lu Y, Shan M, Zhao H, Lu Z, Lu Y. A mini-review: mechanism of antimicrobial action and application of surfactin. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022;38(8):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-022-03323-3.
Shan M, Meng F, Tang C, Zhou L, Lu Z, Lu Y. Surfactin-oleogel with therapeutic potential for inflammatory acne vulgaris induced by Propionibacterium acnes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022;106(2):549–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11719-8.
Fang FC. Perspectives series: host/pathogen interactions. Mechanisms of nitric oxide-related antimicrobial activity. J Clin Invest. 1997;99(12):2818–25. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI119473.
Wink DA, Hines HB, Cheng RYS, et al. Nitric oxide and redox mechanisms in the immune response. J Leukoc Biol. 2011;89(6):873–91. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.1010550.
Qin M, Landriscina A, Rosen JM, et al. Nitric oxide-releasing nanoparticles prevent propionibacterium acnes-induced inflammation by both clearing the organism and inhibiting microbial stimulation of the innate immune response. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(11):2723–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2015.277.
Baldwin H, Blanco D, McKeever C, et al. Results of a phase 2 efficacy and safety study with sb204, an investigational topical nitric oxide-releasing drug for the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Clin Aesthetic Dermatol. 2016;9(8):12–8.
Chernoff G. The utilization of a nitric oxide generating serum in the treatment of active acne and acne scarred patients. Int J Pharm Anal Acta. 2020;3(1):011–4.
Goodarzi A, Mozafarpoor S, Bodaghabadi M, Mohamadi M. The potential of probiotics for treating acne vulgaris: a review of literature on acne and microbiota. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(3):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.13279.
Bowe WP, Filip JC, DiRienzo JM, Volgina A, Margolis DJ. Inhibition of propionibacterium acnes by bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances (BLIS) produced by Streptococcus salivarius. J Drugs Dermatol JDD. 2006;5(9):868–70.
Oh S, Kim SH, Ko Y, et al. Effect of bacteriocin produced by Lactococcus sp HY 449 on skin-inflammatory bacteria. Food Chem Toxicol Int J Publ Br Ind Biol Res Assoc. 2006;44(4):552–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2005.08.030.
Cosseau C, Devine DA, Dullaghan E, et al. The commensal Streptococcus salivarius K12 downregulates the innate immune responses of human epithelial cells and promotes host-microbe homeostasis. Infect Immun. 2008;76(9):4163–75. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00188-08.
Gueniche A, Benyacoub J, Philippe D, et al. Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-2116 (ST11) inhibits substance P-induced skin inflammation and accelerates skin barrier function recovery in vitro. Eur J Dermatol EJD. 2010;20(6):731–7. https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2010.1108.
Wang Y, Kuo S, Shu M, et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis in the human skin microbiome mediates fermentation to inhibit the growth of Propionibacterium acnes: implications of probiotics in acne vulgaris. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(1):411–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5394-8.
Kang BS, Seo JG, Lee GS, et al. Antimicrobial activity of enterocins from Enterococcus faecalis SL-5 against Propionibacterium acnes, the causative agent in acne vulgaris, and its therapeutic effect. J Microbiol Seoul Korea. 2009;47(1):101–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-008-0179-y.
Muizzuddin N, Maher W, Sullivan M, Schnittger S, Mammone T. Physiological effect of a probiotic on skin. J Cosmet Sci. 2012;63(6):385–95.
Martin RJ, Robertson AP, Choudhary S. Ivermectin: an anthelmintic, an insecticide, and much more. Trends Parasitol. 2021;37(1):48–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2020.10.005.
Akçınar UG, Ünal E, Doğruman AF. Demodex spp. as a possible aetiopathogenic factor of acne and relation with acne severity and type. Adv Dermatol Allergol Dermatol Alergol. 2018;35(2):174–81. https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2018.75239.
Barańska-Rybak W, Kowalska-Olędzka E. New indications for topical ivermectin 1% cream: a case series study. Adv Dermatol Allergol Dermatol Alergol. 2019;36(1):58–62. https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2019.82825.
Schmidt NW, Agak GW, Deshayes S, et al. Pentobra: a potent antibiotic with multiple layers of selective antimicrobial mechanisms against propionibacterium acnes. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(6):1581–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2015.40.
Iscla I, Wray R, Blount P, et al. A new antibiotic with potent activity targets MscL. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2015;68(7):453–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/ja.2015.4.
Dinant A, Boulos RA. Zolav®: a new antibiotic for the treatment of acne. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016;10:1235–42. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S106462.
Nakatsuji T, Liu YT, Huang CP, Gallo RL, Huang CM. Vaccination targeting a surface sialidase of P. acnes: implication for new treatment of acne vulgaris. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(2): e1551. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001551.
Yen T, Yuan CY, Huang CM. Current status of acne vaccines. Expert Rev Dermatol. 2010;5(5):561–6. https://doi.org/10.1586/edm.10.42.
Wang Y, Hata TR, Tong YL, et al. The anti-inflammatory activities of propionibacterium acnes CAMP factor-targeted acne vaccines. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138(11):2355–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2018.05.032.
Adamo S, Nilsson J, Krebs A, et al. Successful treatment of SAPHO syndrome with apremilast. Br J Dermatol. 2018;179(4):959–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.16071.
Sánchez-Velázquez A, Falkenhain-López D, Arroyo-Andrés J, Montero-Menárguez J, García-Donoso C, Postigo-Llorente C. Apremilast: A novel adjuvant treatment for refractory isotretinoin-induced acne fulminans. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35(8):1–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.15637.
Rahmayani T, Putra IB, Jusuf NK. The effect of oral probiotic on the interleukin-10 serum levels of acne vulgaris. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(19):3249–52. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.718.
Jung GW, Tse JE, Guiha I, Rao J. Prospective, randomized, open-label trial comparing the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of an acne treatment regimen with and without a probiotic supplement and minocycline in subjects with mild to moderate acne. J Cutan Med Surg. 2013;17(2):114–22. https://doi.org/10.2310/7750.2012.12026.
Rocha MAD da. The Efficacy of an Oral Probiotic Associated With a Fixed Combination of Benzoyl Peroxide and Adapalene in the Treatment of Acne: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. clinicaltrials.gov; 2022. Accessed December 14, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NC** T05216289
Kim J, Ko Y, Park YK, Kim NI, Ha WK, Cho Y. Dietary effect of lactoferrin-enriched fermented milk on skin surface lipid and clinical improvement of acne vulgaris. Nutr Burbank Los Angel Cty Calif. 2010;26(9):902–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2010.05.011.
Rinaldi F, Marotta L, Mascolo A, et al. Facial acne: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on the clinical efficacy of a symbiotic dietary supplement. Dermatol Ther. 2022;12(2):577–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-021-00664-z.
Sand FL, Thomsen SF. Adalimumab for the treatment of refractory acne conglobata. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(11):1306–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6678.
Yiu ZZN, Madan V, Griffiths CEM. Acne conglobata and adalimumab: use of tumour necrosis factor-α antagonists in treatment-resistant acne conglobata, and review of the literature. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2015;40(4):383–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.12540.
Flora A, Holland R, Smith A, Frew JW. Rapid and sustained remission of synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome with IL-23p19 antagonist (risankizumab). JAAD Case Rep. 2021;14:33–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdcr.2021.05.029.
Wang G, Zhuo N, Li J. Off-label use of secukinumab: a potential therapeutic option for SAPHO syndrome. J Rheumatol. 2022;49(6):656. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.211155.
Thiboutot DM, Craft N, Rissmann R, et al. Anti-IL-17A blockade did not significantly reduce inflammatory lesions in a placebo-controlled pilot study in adult patients with moderate to severe acne. J Dermatol Treat. 2022;2138691:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2022.2138691.
Han HS, Jeong GJ, Lee HW, Shim JH, Seo SJ, Park KY. Innovative use of negative air ions as an alternative therapy for acne vulgaris: a report of three cases. Ann Dermatol. 2022;34(3):216–20. https://doi.org/10.5021/ad.2022.34.3.216.
Qu H, Wang Y, Yang F, Wang G, Gao L, Li K. A randomized, controlled trial of intense pulsed light in combination with minocycline hydrochloride for the treatment of inflammatory acne vulgaris. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21(8):3386–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15046.
Li Y, Zhu J, Zhang Y, Liu X, Ye J. Isotretinoin plus 420 nm intense pulsed light versus isotretinoin alone for the treatment of acne vulgaris: a randomized, controlled study of efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction in Chinese subjects. Lasers Med Sci. 2021;36(3):657–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03113-z.
Chung H, Dai T, Sharma SK, Huang YY, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR. The nuts and bolts of low-level laser (light) therapy. Ann Biomed Eng. 2012;40(2):516–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0454-7.
Li Y, Xia J, Zhu Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of low-level light therapy by delicate pulsed light combined with low-dose oral isotretinoin for the treatment of acne vulgaris: a randomized split-face study. Lasers Med Sci. 2022;37(8):3221–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03606-z.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
Open access funding provided by SCELC, Statewide California Electronic Library Consortium. No sources of funding were used to prepare this manuscript.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed to the concept and planning of the work described and drafting and/or critical revision of the manuscript. All authors approved the final submitted version of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Elbuluk has served as a consultant to Galderma. Dr. Cruz and Dr. Vecerek have no conflicts of interest.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cruz, S., Vecerek, N. & Elbuluk, N. Targeting Inflammation in Acne: Current Treatments and Future Prospects. Am J Clin Dermatol 24, 681–694 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-023-00789-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-023-00789-1