Skip to main content
Log in

Cardiovascular Benefits of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients Living with Obesity or Overweight: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Commentary to this article was published on 15 May 2024

Abstract

Background

GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have emerged as an effective therapeutic class for weight loss. However, the efficacy of these agents in reducing cardiovascular endpoints among patients living with obesity or overweight is unclear.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing GLP-1 RAs versus placebo in patients with obesity or overweight. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases. A random-effects model was used to calculate risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

A total of 13 RCTs were included, with 30,512 patients. Compared with placebo, GLP-1 RAs reduced systolic blood pressure (MD − 4.76 mmHg; 95% CI − 6.03, − 3.50; p < 0.001; I2 = 100%) and diastolic blood pressure (MD − 1.41 mmHg; 95% CI − 2.64, − 0.17; p = 0.03; I2 = 100%). GLP-1 RA significantly reduced the occurrence of myocardial infarction (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.61, 0.85; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%). There were no significant differences between groups in unstable angina (UA; RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.65, 1.07; p = 0.16; I2 = 0%), stroke (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.74, 1.12; p = 0.38; I2 = 0%), atrial fibrillation (AF; RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.17, 1.43; p = 0.19; I2 = 22%), and deep vein thrombosis (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.06, 1.40; p = 0.13; I2 = 0%).

Conclusions

In patients living with obesity or overweight, GLP-1 RA reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure and the occurrence of myocardial infarction, with a neutral effect on the occurrence of UA, stroke, AF, and deep vein thrombosis.

Registration

PROSPERO identifier number CRD42023475226.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elagizi A, Kachur S, Carbone S, et al. A review of obesity, physical activity, and cardiovascular disease. Curr Obes Rep. 2020;9(4):571–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-020-00403-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tong Y, Xu S, Huang L, et al. Obesity and insulin resistance: pathophysiology and treatment. Drug Discov Today. 2022;27(3):822–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2021.11.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blüher M. Obesity: global epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019;15(5):288–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-019-0176-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(10):e146. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Safaei M, Sundararajan EA, Driss M, et al. A systematic literature review on obesity: understanding the causes & consequences of obesity and reviewing various machine learning approaches used to predict obesity. Comput Biol Med. 2021;136: 104754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bergmann NC, Davies MJ, Lingvay I, et al. Semaglutide for the treatment of overweight and obesity: a review. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023;25(1):18–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14863.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin X, Li H. Obesity: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and therapeutics. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;6(12): 706978. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.706978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Powell-Wiley TM, Poirier P, Burke LE, et al. American Heart Association Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; and Stroke Council. Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143(21):e984–1010. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000973.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Maselli DB, Camilleri M. Effects of GLP-1 and its analogs on gastric physiology in diabetes mellitus and obesity. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1307:171–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2020_496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kadouh H, et al. GLP-1 analog modulates appetite, taste preference, gut hormones, and regional body fat stores in adults with obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(5):1552–63. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgz140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cornell S. A review of GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes: a focus on the mechanism of action of once-weekly agents. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020;45 Supp 1(Suppl 1):17–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.13230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pi-Sunyer X, Astrup A, Fujioka K, et al. SCALE Obesity and Prediabetes NN8022-1839 Study Group A randomized, controlled trial of 3.0 mg of liraglutide in weight management. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(1):11–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1411892.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mantovani A, Petracca G, Beatrice G, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Metabolites. 2021;11(2):73. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11020073.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J. 2021;372: n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med J. 2019;366:14898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, et al. Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(10):991–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, et al. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Updated October 2013. The GRADE Working Group, 2013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.AE.

  18. Review Manager (RevMan)[Computer Program]. Version 5.1. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Center, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. https://training.cochrane.org/online-learning/core-software/revman.

  19. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4 (updated August 2023). Cochrane, 2023. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.

  21. Astrup A, Rössner S, Van Gaal L, et al. Effects of liraglutide in the treatment of obesity: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet. 2009;374(9701):1606–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61375-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim SH, Abbasi F, Lamendola C, et al. Benefits of liraglutide treatment in overweight and obese older individuals with prediabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(10):3276–82. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-0354.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Wadden TA, Hollander P, Klein S, et al. Weight maintenance and additional weight loss with liraglutide after low-calorie-diet-induced weight loss: the SCALE Maintenance randomized study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013;37(11):1443–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2013.120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Blackman A, Foster GD, Zammit G, et al. Effect of liraglutide 3.0 mg in individuals with obesity and moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea: the SCALE sleep apnea randomized clinical trial. Int J Obes (Lond). 2016;40(8):1310–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2016.52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. O’Neil PM, Birkenfeld AL, McGowan B, et al. Efficacy and safety of semaglutide compared with liraglutide and placebo for weight loss in patients with obesity: a randomised, double-blind, placebo and active controlled, dose-ranging, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2018;392(10148):637–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31773-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, et al. STEP 1 Study Group. Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(11):989–1002. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2032183.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wadden TA, Bailey TS, Billings LK, et al. STEP 3 Investigators. Effect of subcutaneous semaglutide vs placebo as an adjunct to intensive behavioral therapy on body weight in adults with overweight or obesity: the STEP 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;325(14):1403–13. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.1831.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rubino D, Abrahamsson N, Davies M, et al. STEP 4 Investigators. Effect of continued weekly subcutaneous semaglutide vs placebo on weight loss maintenance in adults with overweight or obesity: the STEP 4 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;325(14):1414–25. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.3224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rubino DM, Greenway FL, Khalid U, et al. STEP 8 Investigators. Effect of weekly subcutaneous semaglutide vs daily liraglutide on body weight in adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes: the STEP 8 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;327(2):138–50. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.23619.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Knop FK, Aroda VR, do Vale RD, et al. OASIS 1 Investigators. Oral semaglutide 50 mg taken once per day in adults with overweight or obesity (OASIS 1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023;402(10403):705–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01185-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jastreboff AM, Aronne LJ, Ahmad NN, et al. SURMOUNT-1 Investigators. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(3):205–16. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2206038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lincoff AM, Brown-Frandsen K, Colhoun HM, et al. SELECT Trial Investigators Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in obesity without diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(24):2221–32. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2307563.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Monney M, et al. GLP-1 receptor agonists effect on cognitive function in patients with and without type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2023;49(5):101470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2023.101470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Guo X, et al. The antiobesity effect and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonist in overweight/obese patients without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hormone and metabolic research. Hormone Metab Res. 2022;54(7):458–71. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1844-1176.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu Y, et al. The weight-loss effect of GLP-1RAs glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in non-diabetic individuals with overweight or obesity: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2023;118(3):614–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.04.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Alkhezi OS, et al. Comparative effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for the management of obesity in adults without diabetes: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Obesity Rev. 2023;24(3):e13543. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13543.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. DeMarco VG, Aroor AR, Sowers JR. The pathophysiology of hypertension in patients with obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10:364–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2014.44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Seravalle G, Grassi G. Obesity and hypertension. Pharmacol Res. 2017;122:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2017.05.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sivertsen J, Rosenmeier J, Holst JJ, et al. The effect of glucagon-like peptide 1 on cardiovascular risk. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012;9(4):209–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2011.211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Goud A, et al. GLP-1 Agonists and blood pressure: a review of the evidence. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2016;18(2):16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-015-0621-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ussher JR, Drucker DJ. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists: cardiovascular benefits and mechanisms of action. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023;20(7):463–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-023-00849-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Artham SM, Lavie CJ, Milani RV, et al. Obesity and hypertension, heart failure, and coronary heart disease-risk factor, paradox, and recommendations for weight loss. Ochsner J. 2009 Fall;9(3):124–32.

  43. Jaacks LM, Vandevijvere S, Pan A, et al. The obesity transition: stages of the global epidemic. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7:231–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30026-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Preda A, Carbone F, Tirandi A, et al. Obesity phenotypes and cardiovascular risk: from pathophysiology to clinical management. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2023;24:901–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-023-09813-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Gadde KM, et al. Obesity: pathophysiology and management. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(1):69–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Rahimi K, Bidel Z, Nazarzadeh M, et al. Pharmacological blood pressure lowering for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease across different levels of blood pressure: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis. Lancet. 2021;397:1625–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00590-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Marx N, Husain M, Lehrke M, et al. GLP-1 Receptor agonists for the reduction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. Circulation. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059595.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Ma X, Liu Z, Ilyas I, et al. GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs): cardiovascular actions and therapeutic potential. Int J Biol Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.59965.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Garg V, Verma S, Connelly K. Mechanistic insights regarding the role of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1 agonist drugs on cardiovascular disease in diabetes. Prog Cardiovasc. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2019.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Heuvelman VD, Van Raalte DH, Smits MM. Cardiovascular effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists: from mechanistic studies in humans to clinical outcomes. Cardiovasc. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvz323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yao H, Zhang A, Li D, et al. Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Br Med J. 2024;29(384): e076410. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-076410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sun F, Wu S, Wang J, et al. Effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on lipid profiles among type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clin Ther. 2015;37(1):225-241.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.11.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ansari HUH, Qazi SU, Sajid F, et al. Efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on body weight and cardiometabolic parameters in individuals with obesity and without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocr Pract. 2024;30(2):160–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eprac.2023.11.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Chavda VP, Ajabiya J, Teli D, et al. Tirzepatide, a new era of dual-targeted treatment for diabetes and obesity: a mini-review. Molecules. 2022;27(13):4315. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27134315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Forzano I, Varzideh F, Avvisato R, et al. Tirzepatide: a systematic update. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(23):14631. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232314631.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gustavo de Oliveira Almeida.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received to conduct the analysis described in the manuscript nor to assist in the preparation of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

Gustavo de Oliveira Almeida, Thiago Faraco Nienkötter, Caroline Cristine Almeida Balieiro, Eric Pasqualotto, Júlia Braga Cintra, Henrique Champs Porfírio Carvalho, Ana Laura Soares Silva, Edmundo Damiani Bertoli, Bárbara Silvestre Minucci, Julia Camargo Kabariti, and Camila Mota Guida declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to the contents of this manuscript.

Authors’ Contributions

GOA, TFN, CCAB, JBC, HCPC, ALSS, EDB, JCK, and BSM participated in the literature search, data curation, data analysis, and drafting of the original manuscript. GO and CG participated in content guidance and critical revision of the paper for important intellectual content. CG and EP supervised the work and revised the article critically. The manuscript has not been previously published in its entirety or in part in any language, and all authors have read and approved its submission.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 2269 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Oliveira Almeida, G., Nienkötter, T.F., Balieiro, C.C.A. et al. Cardiovascular Benefits of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients Living with Obesity or Overweight: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-024-00647-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-024-00647-3

Navigation