Skip to main content
Log in

Modified Total Interpretive Structural Modeling of Marketing Flexibility Factors for Indian Telecommunications Service Providers

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aimed to develop modified total interpretive structural modeling (M-TISM) for marketing flexibility factors in the context of the Indian telecommunications sector. The study uses grounded theory methodology to identify factors for marketing flexibility and uses a modified total interpretative structural model (TISM) to establish hierarchical linkages among factors. MaxQDA software was used for data coding and analysis. The modified TISM model developed shows metrics used in the telecom industry to assess marketing's performance, namely average revenue per user (ARPU), and customer acquisition, as lagging factors. Conversely, availability of access networks, customer contextual usage patterns, and marketing intelligence functions are leading factors. The study is relevant for both practitioners and academia and has significant implications. For practitioners, the structural linkages identified will help enhance marketing program effectiveness and drive the critical metrics for an industry like average revenue per user (ARPU) and customer acquisitions. The study may help telecom practitioners in saving money, time, and efforts to infuse flexibility in their marketing function. Academia and researchers can take reference from methodologies used in this study for exploring factors of interest and developing hierarchical linkages among them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adebanjo, D. (2009). Understanding demand management challenges in intermediary food trading: A case study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(3), 224–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alpkan, L., Yilmaz, C., & Kaya, N. (2007). Market orientation and planning flexibility in SMEs: Performance implications and an empirical investigation. International Small Business Journal, 25(2), 152–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aranda, D. A. (2003). Service operations strategy, flexibility and performance in engineering consulting firms. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 23(11), 1401–1421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariga, K., & Ohkusa, Y. (1998). Price flexibility in Japan, 1970–1992: A study of price formation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16(5), 639–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashkenas, R. (2000). Management: How to loosen organizational boundaries. Journal of Business Strategy, 21(2), 11–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atasoy, H. (2013). The effects of broadband internet expansion on labor market outcomes. ILR Review, 66(2), 315–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, L. (1967). Systems Approach to Marketing. Harvard Business Review, 45(3), 105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, A., & Parker, R. P. (2018). Innovation and technology diffusion in competitive supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 265(3), 1102–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biazzo, S. (2009). Flexibility, structuration, and simultaneity in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(3), 336–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishwas, S. K., & Sushil. (2020). Environmental uncertainty, leadership and organisation culture as predictors of strategic knowledge management and flexibility. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 11(4), 393–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, B. (1999). National culture and labour-market flexibility. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(4), 592–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boreham, P., Lafferty, G., Roan, A., & Whitehouse, G. (1996). Training, careers and numerical flexibility: Equity implications in hospitality and retailing. Journal of Industrial Relations, 38(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourreau, M., & Doğan, P. (2004). Service-based vs. facility-based competition in local access networks. Information Economics and Policy, 16(2), 287–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brien, R. H., & Stafford, J. E. (1968). Marketing information systems : A new dimension for marketing research. Journal of Marketing, 32, 19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, B. J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Strategies for Qualitative Data Analysis Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). CA: Sage Publications Inc, Los Angeles.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research : Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrocher, N., & Zirulia, L. (2009). Me and you and everyone we know : An empirical analysis of local network effects in mobile communications. Telecommunications Policy, 33(1–2), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2008.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibb, S., & Simkin, L. (1997). A program for implementing market segmentation. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 12(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858629710157931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppink, D. J. (1978). Planning for strategic flexibility. Long Range Planning, 11(4), 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayezi, S., Zutshi, A., & O’Loughlin, A. (2017). Understanding and development of supply chain agility and flexibility: A structured literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(4), 379–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg, S., & Sushil., (2021). Determinants of deglobalization: A hierarchical model to explore their interrelations as a conduit to policy. Journal of Policy Modeling, 43(2), 433–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geetha, M., & Abitha Kumari, J. (2012). Analysis of churn behavior of consumers in Indian telecom sector. Journal of Indian Business Research, 4, 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554191211206780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo, A., Rycx, F., Vinci, C. P., Pieroni, L., & Pompei, F. (2008). Labour market flexibility and innovation: Geographical and technological determinants. International Journal of Manpower, 29(3), 216–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (1978). Advances in the methodology of grounded theory: Theoretical sensitivity. University of California.

  • Gould, B. (1998). Business flexibility and employee co-operation. The Antidote, 3(8), 19–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurău, C. (2009). Marketing flexibility in the context of the service-dominant logic. The Marketing Review, 9(3), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1362/146934709X467758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henten, A., Samarajiva, R., & Melody, W. (2003). Designing next generation telecom regulation: ICT convergence or multi-sector utility? Info, 5(1), 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hua, S., Chatterjee, S. R., & Kang-kang, Y. (2009). Access flexibility, trust and performance in achieving competitiveness: An empirical study of Chinese suppliers and distributors. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 2(1), 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huster, M. (2005). Marketing intelligence: A first mover advantage. Competitive Intelligence Magazine, 8(2), 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • https://dot.gov.in/telecom-glance

  • https://www.trai.gov.in/release-publication/reports/performance-reports

  • Javalgi, R. R. G., Whipple, T. W., Ghosh, A. K., & Young, R. B. (2005). Market orientation, strategic flexibility, and performance: Implications for services providers. Journal of Services Marketing, 19(4), 212–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandil, M. (2000). Demand shift across US industries and the stabilizing function of nominal wage and price flexibility. Applied Economics, 32(4), 441–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, T., & Rossotto, C. M. (2012). Broadband Strategies Handbook. Washington D.C: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Larso, D., Doolen, T., & Hacker, M. (2009). Development of a manufacturing flexibility hierarchy through factor and cluster analysis: The role of new product type on US electronic manufacturer performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(4), 417–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. J., & Erickson, L. G. (1969). Marketing functions and marketing systems: A synthesis. Journal of Marketing, 33(3), 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mhaibes, H. A. (2018). An analytical study of the strategic flexibility variation as a function of the dynamic capabilities based on supply Chain management (Case Study: The General Petroleum Products Distribution Company in Baghdad). International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 7(5), 667–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mckinsey Quarterly. (2017). How to create an agile organization. 1–16. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/mckinsey-quarterly-2017-number-1-overview-and-full-issue.

  • Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24(9), 934–948. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.24.9.934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, S. K., Momaya, K., & Sushil. (2009). Technological competitiveness of telecommunication industry in India: Glimpse of reality, opportunities and challenges. Global J. Bus. Excellence, 2(1), 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meena, A., Dhir, S., & Sushil. (2020). An analysis of growth-accelerating factors for the Indian automotive industry using modified TISM. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2019-0047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasim, S., & Sushil. (2011). Revisiting organizational change: Exploring the paradox of managing continuity and change. Journal of Change Management, 11(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2010.538854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Digital Communications Policy-2018, 1 (2018) (testimony of Department of Telecommunications). http://www.dot.gov.in/relatedlinks/draft-national-digital-communications-policy-2018

  • Nitin Soni. (2018, November 20). Industry ARPU seen Recovering in 2019. Economic Times.

  • Nour, S., Sumita, U., & Yoshii, J. (2015). Development of enhanced marketing flexibility by optimally allocating sales campaign days for maximizing total expected sales. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(1), 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palanisamy, R. (2005). Strategic information systems planning model for building flexibility and success. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 105(1), 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandit, N. R. (1996). The creation of theory : A recent application of the grounded theory method. The Qualitative Report, 2(4), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, P., Romm, T., & Hill, C. (1998). Consumer satisfaction as a process: A qualitative, retrospective longitudinal study of overseas students in Australia. Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 16(1), 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W., & Cameron, K. S. (2001). Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 697–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polas, M. R. H., & Raju, V. (2021). Technology and Entrepreneurial Marketing Decisions During COVID-19. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22(2), 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, U. C., & Suri, R. K. (2011). Modeling of continuity and change forces in private higher technical education using total interpretive structural modeling (TISM). Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 12(3–4), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03396605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primrose, P. L. (1996). Do companies need to measure their production flexibility? International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 16(6), 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R., Dhir, S., & Sushil. (2020). Technology management for innovation in organizations: an argumentation-based modified TISM approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2020-0019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajaram, B., & Yadagiri, M. (2018). The changing pattern of telecom sector in India. International Journal of Management Studies, 5, 85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, Z., & Inbal, B. (1999). Skill flexibility among schoolteachers: Operationalization and organizational implications. Journal of Educational Administration, 37(4), 345–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, J. (1998). Promotion and marketing communications in the information marketplace. Library Review, 47(8), 383–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, A. M., & Pérez, M. P. (2003). Flexibility in new product development: A survey of practices and its relationship with the product’s technological complexity. Technovation, 23(2), 139–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J., & De Grip, A. (2004). Training, task flexibility and the employability of low-skilled workers. International Journal of Manpower, 25(1), 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sehgal, V., Sagar, M., & Shankar, R. (2016). Modelling of key success factors for mobile virtual network operators in Indian telecommunication market. Global Business Review, 17(6), 1314–1338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150916660395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sezen, B., & Yilmaz, C. (2007). Relative effects of dependence and trust on flexibility, information exchange, and solidarity in marketing channels. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 22(1), 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalender, K. (2017). Marketing flexibility measurement scale: Conceptualization, development and nomological validation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 25(7), 618–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalender, K., & Singh, N. (2015). Marketing flexibility: Significance and implications for automobile industry. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(3), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-015-0097-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalender, K., Singh, N., & Sushil. (2017). AUTOFLEX: Marketing flexibility measurement scale for automobile companies. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 25(1), 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, M. K., Sushil., & Jain, P. K. (2010). Revisiting flexibility in organizations. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 11(3), 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A., Medudula, M. K., & Patro, S. (2015). Marketing flexibility interaction matrix and consumer clusters preference criteria in telecommunication sector. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(3), 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J. N., Sisodia, R. S., & Sharma, A. (2000). The antecedents and consequences of customer-centric marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 55–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, S. K., Sushil., & Sharma, M. K. (2019). Managerial paradox toward flexibility: Emergent views using thematic analysis of literature. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20(4), 349–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N. (2010). A conceptual framework for flexible marketing system. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 11(4), 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N. (2011, December). Flexmark: scale for testing flexibility in the marketing system. In 11th Global Conference on Flexible Systems Management, IIM Kozhikode (pp. 09–12).

  • Singh, N., & Shalender, K. (2014). Success of tata nano through marketing flexibility : ASAP – LAP matrices and linkages approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 15(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-014-0062-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhal, Prashant, Holger Forst, Gaeron McClure, Amit Sachdeva, Bart van Droogenbroek, Adrian Baschnonga, S. M. (2015). Global telecommunications study: navigating the road to 2020. ey-global-telecommunications-study-navigating-the-road-to-2020.pdf

  • Sivasankari, S. V., Sagar, M., & Agrawal, D. (2009). Spectrum auctioning and licensing in telecom industry. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(3), 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, A. K., & Sushil. (2013). Modeling strategic performance factors for effective strategy execution. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(6), 554–582. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-11-2012-0121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2000). SAP-LAP models of inquiry. Management Decision, 38(5), 347–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2005). A flexible strategy framework for managing continuity and change. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, 1(1), 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2012). Multiple perspectives of flexible systems management. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2012a). Interpreting the interpretive structural model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(2), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40171-012-0008-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2012b). Flowing stream strategy: Managing confluence of continuity and change. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 2(1), 26–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2012c). Making flowing stream strategy work. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-012-0003-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2015). Strategic flexibility: The evolving paradigm of strategic management. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(2), 113–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2017). Modified ISM / TISM process with simultaneous transitivity checks for reducing direct pair comparisons. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 18(4), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-017-0167-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2018). How to check correctness of total interpretive structural models ? Annals of Operations Research, 270(1–2), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2312-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, G. N. D. (2021). A business-model approach on strategic flexibility of firms in a shifting value chain: The case of coffee processors in Amadeo and Silang, Cavite, Philippines. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22(1), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). The new era of mixed methods [Editorial]. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upton, D. M. (1994). The management of manufacturing flexibility. California Management Review, 36(2), 72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdú-Jover, A. J., Lloréns-Montes, F. J., & García-Morales, V. J. (2004). The concept of fit in services flexibility research: An empirical approach. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 15(5), 499–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volberda, H. W. (1996). Towards the flexibl form Volberda. Organization Science, 7(4), 359–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volberda, H. W. (1997). Building flexible organizations for fast-moving markets. Long Range Planning, 30(2), 169–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(96)00110-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warfield, J. N. (1974). Developing interconnection matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transactions on Syatems, 4(1), 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasuja, S., Sagar, M., & Sushil. (2012). Cognitive bias in salespersons in specialty drug selling of pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing, 6(4), 310–335. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506121211283217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. M. (2002). Measuring supply chain agility in the virtual organization. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 32(7), 577–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D., & Dixon, S. R. (2007). The benefits of imperfect diagnostic automation : A synthesis of the literature. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8(8), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220500370105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woollam, C. (2003). Flexibility at any price? Challenging a costly convention on leases. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 6(1), 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anshul Yadav.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received to conduct this study.

Conflict of interest

Authors have no conflicting and competing interests that are directly or indirectly related to this work submitted for publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

See Tables 7 and 8.

Table 7 Interview guide for In-depth interviews
Table 8 Working Details for Development of TISM for Developing Marketing Flexibility for Indian Telecom Service Providers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yadav, A., Sagar, M. Modified Total Interpretive Structural Modeling of Marketing Flexibility Factors for Indian Telecommunications Service Providers. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 22, 307–330 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-021-00278-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-021-00278-6

Keywords

Navigation