Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trauma Quality Improvement and Team Education: How Can We Better Optimize Our Training?

  • Trauma Surgery (N. Stassen, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Surgery Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The relationship between high quality healthcare and its impact on healthcare expenditures has led to a push towards higher-quality care while using fewer resources. Trauma in particular stands out, as both clinical skills and non-technical skills are emphasized in an effort to achieve the best outcomes. Education focused on improving teamwork and team communication is at the forefront of improving quality in trauma care.

Recent Findings

Within the past 15 years, the Trauma Quality Improvement (TQI) Program has utilized risk adjusted benchmarks to provide each enrolled center with accurate comparisons to the national average in a variety of quality-based patient outcomes. By using TQI Project data, facilities are able to determine specific outcome-driven metrics. More recently, simulation has become a safe and effective learning method to improve both teamwork and communication in the setting of a trauma resuscitation. Simulation continues to become more high-fidelity and trauma education in particular, has seen the adoption of perfused cadavers, virtual reality trainers, and hyper-realistic mannequins such as The Cut Suit®. In addition to simulation, trauma video review (TVR) has been used to evaluate both technical and non-technical skills of trauma resuscitations and more centers are beginning to start TVR programs as the value becomes clear.

Summary

Quality improvement and team education are synonymous, especially when focusing on trauma resuscitations. Both simulation and TVR have led to significant improvements in both technical and non-technical skills. Finally, the culture of TQI is also changing and by adopting Just Culture practices previously punitive conferences such as morbidity and mortality are becoming more educational for both the involved participants and for the observers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data used for this manuscript can be accessed via the list of references.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Hemilla MR, Jakubus JL. Trauma quality improvement. Crit Care Clin. 2017;33:193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. •Zetlen HL, LaGrone LN, Fioanini JE, Egoavil EH, Sproviero J, Rivera FV, Mock CN. Status of trauma quality improvement programs in the Americas: a survey of trauma care providers. J Surg Res. 2017;220:213–22. Provides a summary of national trends in regards to which trauma centers are participating in quality improvement programs and their outcomes.

  3. Juilliard CJ, Mock C, Goosen J, Joshipura M, Civil I. Establishing the evidence base for trauma quality improvement: a collaborative WHO-IATSIC review. World J Surg. 2009;33:1075–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Porter ME. What is the value in healthcare? N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2477–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yong PL, Olsen LA, McGinnis JM. Stakeholder perspectives on value. Value in health care: accounting for cost, quality, safety, outcomes, and innovation. In: Institute of Medicine (US) Roundtable on Value and Science Driven Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2010.

  6. Waljee JF, Birkmeyer NJ. Collaborative quality improvement in surgery. Hand Clin. 2014;30:335–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. American College of Surgeons. Quality programs. American College of Surgeons. http://www.facs.org/quality-programs. Accessed 3 Oct 2022.

  8. Hemmila MR, Nathens AB, Shafi S, et al. The Trauma Quality Improvement Program; pilot study and initial demonstration of feasibility. J Trauma. 2010;68(2):253–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gjeraa K, Moller TP, Ostergaard D. Efficacy of simulation-based trauma team training of non-technical skills. A systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58(7):775–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. ••Dumas RP, Cook C, Holena DN, Qi Y, Tabone N, Studwell SL, Miglani A, Vella MA. Roll the tape: implementing and harnessing the power of trauma video review. J Surg Educ. 2022;79(6):e248–56. Provides detailed information in regards to creating and maintaining a trauma video review program. Also describes a method of incorporating TVR into a formal resident education program.

  11. Bergs EAG, Rutten RLPA, Tadros T, Krijnen P, Schipper IB. Communication during trauma resuscitation: do we know what is happening? Injury. 2005;36:905–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. •O’Reilly GM, Mathew J, Roy N, Gupta A, Joshipura M, Sharma N, Mitra B, et al. A checklist for trauma quality improvement meetings: a process improvement study. Injury. 2019;50:1599–604. Describes important aspects of TQI programs and how meetings should be run in order to gain the most benefit from participating centers.

  13. Mock C, Juillard C, Brundage S, et al. Guidelines for trauma quality improvement programmes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Di Russo S, Holly C, Kamath R, Cuff S, Sullivan T, Scharf H, et al. Preparation and achievement of American College of Surgeons level I trauma verification raises hospital performance and improves patient outcomes. J Trauma. 2001;51(2):294–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Freeman C, Todd C, Camilleri-Ferrante C, et al. Quality improvement for patients with hip fracture: experience from a multi-site audit. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:239–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Gagneux E, Lombrail P, Vichard P. Trauma emergency unit: long-term evaluation of a quality assurance programme. Qual Health Care. 1998;7:12–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Welch SJ, Allen TL. Data-driven quality improvement in the emergency department at a level one trauma and tertiary care hospital. J Emerg Med. 2006;30:269–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thomas B, Falcone RE, Vasquez D, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma: program implementation, initial experience, and learning curve. J Trauma. 1997;42:384–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Civetta JM, Hudson-Civetta J, Ball S. Decreasing catheter-related infection and hospital costs by continuous quality improvement. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:1660–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Collin GR. Decreasing catheter colonization through the use of antiseptic-impregnated catheter: a continuous quality improvement project. Chest. 1999;115:1632–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mathews JJ, Supple K, Calistro A, et al. A burn center cost-reduction program. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1997;18:358–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Selfox HT, Khandwala F, Kirkpatrick AW, Santana MJ. Trauma center volume and quality improvement programs. J Trauma Acute Surg. 2012;72(4):962–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith RF, Frateschi L, Sloan EP, et al. The impact of volume on outcome in seriously injured trauma patients: two years’ experience of the Chicago Trauma System. J Trauma. 1990;30:1066–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Konvolinka CW, Copes WS, Sacco WJ. Institution and per-surgeon volume versus survival outcome in Pennsylvania’s trauma centers. Am J Surg. 1995;170:333–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cooper A, Hannan EL, Bessey PQ, Farrell LS, Cayte CG, Mottley L. An examination of the volume–mortality relationship for New York State trauma centers. J Trauma. 2000;48:16–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Clark DE, DeLorenzo MA, Lucas FL, Cushing BM. Initial presentation of older injured patients to high-volume hospitals is not associated with lower 30-day mortality in Medicare data. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1829–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sava J, Kennedy S, Jordan M, Wang D. Does volume matter? The effect of trauma surgeons’ caseload on mortality. J Trauma. 2003;54:829–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nathens AB, Jurkovich GJ, Maier RV, et al. Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes. JAMA. 2001;285:1164–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Marx WH, Simon R, O’Neill P, et al. The relationship between annual hospital volume of trauma patients and in-hospital mortality in New York State. J Trauma. 2011;71:339–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hannan EL. The relation between volume and outcome in health care. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1677–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Carmazine MN, Hemmila MR, Leonard JC, et al. Massive transfusion policies at trauma centers participating in the American College of Surgeons Quality Improvement Program. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(6):S48-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Byrne JP, Mason SA, Gomez D, et al. Timing of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in severe traumatic brain injury: a propensity matched cohort study. J Am Coll Surg. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.06.382.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hemilla MR, Cain-Nielsen AC, Jakubus JL, et al. Association of hospital participation in a regional trauma quality improvement collaborative with patient outcomes. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(8):747–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. MTQIP.org. Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program. http://mtqip.org/resources/data-resources/#daily-dictionary. Accessed 5 Oct 2022.

  35. Nishisaki A, Keren R, Nadkarni V. Does simulation improve patient safety? Self-efficacy, competence, operational performance, and patient safety. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007;25:225–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. National Patient Safety Foundation. A Just Culture tool. National Patient Safety Foundation; 2016. http://www.npsf.org/justculturetool. Accessed 5 Oct 2022.

  37. The Joint Commission. Sentinel Event alert, vol 60. The Joint Commission; 2018. p. 1–8.

  38. Barach P, Weinger M. Trauma team performance. In: Wilson WC, Grande CM, Hoyt DB, editors. Trauma: resuscitation, anesthesia, and emergency surgery. New York: Taylor and Francis; 2007. p. 101–13.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Yun S, Faraj S, Xiao Y, Sims HP. Team leadership and coordination in trauma resuscitation. In: Beyerlein MM, Johnson DA, Beyerlein ST, editors. Team-based organizing, vol. 9. Amsterdam: JAI Press, Inc.; 2003. p. 189–214.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Georgiou A, Lockey DJ. The performance and assessment of hospital trauma teams. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010;18:66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Wisborg T, Castren M, Lippert A, Valsson F, Wallin CJ. Training trauma teams in the Nordic countries: an overview and present status. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49:1004–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Manser T. Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:143–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kunzle B, Kolbe M, Grote G. Ensuring patient safety through effective leadership behavior: a literature review. Saf Sci. 2010;48:1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson M. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Berkenstadt H, Erez D, Munz Y, Simon D, Ziv A. Training and assessment of trauma management: the role of simulation-based medical education. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007;25:65–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Flin RH, O’Connor P, Crichton M. Safety at the sharp end: a guide to non-technical skills. Burlington: Ashgate; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cherry RA, Ali J. Current concepts in simulation-based trauma education. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2008;65:1186–93.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ostergaard D, Dieckmann P, Lippert A. Simulation and CRM. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011;25:239–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Gaba DM. The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:i2-10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Huffman EM, Anton NE, Athanasiadis DI, Ahmed R, Cooper D, Stefanadis D, Lee NK. Multidisciplinary simulation-based trauma team training with an emphasis on crisis resource management improves residents’ non-technical skills. Surgery. 2021;170(4):1083–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Fung L, Boet S, Bould MD, Qosa H, Perrier L, Tricco A, et al. Impact of crisis resource management simulation-based training for interprofessional and interdisciplinary teams: a systematic review. J Interprof Care. 2015;29:433–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Vrancken SM, Borger van der Burg BLS, Satk PW, et al. Development of a post-mortem human specimen flow model for advanced bleeding control training. Injury. 2022. http://creativecommons.org/licensces/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Accessed 5 Oct 2022.

  53. Chao E, Liveris A, Yusaf T, et al. Hyper-realistic advanced surgical skills package with Cut Suit simulator improves trainee surgeon confidence in operative trauma. Am Surg. 2022. http://mc.manuscriptcentral/com/americansurgeon. Accessed 5 Oct 2022.

  54. Colonna A, Robbins R, Stefanucci J, et al. Trauma bay virtual reality—a game changer for ATLS instruction and assessment. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022;93(3):353–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Steinemann S, Berg B, DiTullio A, Skinner A, Terada K, Anzelon K, et al. Assessing teamwork in the trauma bay: introduction of a modified “NOTECHS” scale for trauma. Am J Surg. 2012;203:69–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. ••Stevensen C, Bhangu A, Jung JJ, MacDonald A, Nolan B. The development and measurement properties of the trauma NOn-TECHnical skills (T-NOTECHS) scale: a scoping review. Am J Surg. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsurg.2022.05.027. Review of the T-NOTECHS score and validates it as a way to standardize trauma education and performance improvement.

  57. Williams KS, Pace C, Milia D, Juern J, Rubin J. Development of a video recording and review process for trauma resuscitation quality and education. West J Emerg Med. 2019;20(2):228–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Goldman LI, Maier WP, Rosemond GP, Saltzman SW, Cramer LM. Teaching surgical technique by the critical review of videotaped performance—the surgical instant replay. Surgery. 1969;66(1):237–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Goldman LI, McDonough MT, Rosemond GP. Stresses affecting surgical performance and learning. I. Correlation of heart rate, electrocardiogram, and operation simultaneously recorded on videotapes. J Surg Res. 1972;12(2):83–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Hoyt DB, Shackford SR, Fridland PH, Mackersie RC, Hansbrough JF, Wachtel TL, et al. Video recording trauma resuscitations: an effective teaching technique. J Trauma. 1988;28(4):435–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Vella MA, Dumas RP, Holena DN. Supporting the educational, research, and clinical care goals of the academic trauma center: video review for trauma resuscitation. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(3):257–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. •Dumas RP, Vella MA, Hatchimonji JS, Ma L, Maher Z, Holena DN. Trauma video review utilization: a survey of practice in the United States. Am J Surg. 2020;219(1):49–53. Survey of trauma centers that are utilizing TVR and how they are using it from quality improvement and education standpoints.

  63. Campbell S, Sosa JA, Rabinovici R, Frankel H. Do not roll the videotape: effects of the health insurance portability and accountability act and the law on trauma videotaping practices. Am J Surg. 2006;191(2):183–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Rogers SC, Dudley NC, McDonnell W, Scaife E, Morris S, Nelson D. Lights, camera, action… spotlight on trauma video review: an underutilized means of quality improvement and education. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010;26(11):803–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Davis L, Johnson L, Allen SR, Kim PK, Sims CA, Pascual JL, et al. Practitioner perceptions of trauma video review. J Trauma Nurs. 2013;20(3):150–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Mackenzie CF, Xiao Y, Hu FM, Seagull FJ, Fitzgerald M. Video as a tool for improving tracheal intubation tasks for emergency medical and trauma care. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50(4):436–42, 42.e1.

  67. DiGiacomo JC, Hoff WS, Rotondo MF, Martin K, Kauder DR, Anderson HL III, et al. Barrier precautions in trauma resuscitation: real-time analysis utilizing videotape review. Am J Emerg Med. 1997;15(1):34–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Dumas RP, Chreiman KM, Seamon MJ, Cannon JW, Reilly PM, Christie JD, et al. Benchmarking emergency department thoracotomy: using trauma video review to generate procedural norms. Injury. 2018;49(9):1687–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Fitzgerald M, Gocentas R, Dziukas L, Cameron P, Mackenzie C, Farrow N. Using video audit to improve trauma resuscitation—time for a new approach. Can J Surg. 2006;49(3):208–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Sakran JV, Finneman B, Maxwell C, Sonnad SS, Sarani B, Pascual J, et al. Trauma leadership: does perception drive reality? J Surg Educ. 2012;69(2):236–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Chreiman KM, Dumas RP, Seamon MJ, Kim PK, Reilly PM, Kaplan LJ, et al. The intraosseous have it: a prospective observational study of vascular access success rates in patients in extremis using video review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84(4):558–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Hoff WS, Reilly PM, Rotondo MF, DiGiacomo JC, Schwab CW. The importance of the command-physician in trauma resuscitation. J Trauma. 1997;43(5):772–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Hamilton NA, Kieninger AN, Woodhouse J, Freeman BD, Murray D, Klingensmith ME. Video review using a reliable evaluation metric improves team function in high-fidelity simulated trauma resuscitation. J Surg Educ. 2012;69(3):428–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Ritchie PD, Cameron PA. An evaluation of trauma team leader performance by video recording. Aust NZ J Surg. 1999;69(3):183–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Scherer LA, Chang MC, Meredith JW, Battistella FD. Videotape review leads to rapid and sustained learning. Am J Surg. 2003;185(6):516–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Prakash S, Bihari S, Laver R, Chandran G, Kerr L, Schuwirth L, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of video- versus recall-assisted reflection in simulation-based teaching on acquisition and retention of airway skills among trainees intubating critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(9):1265–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Capella J, Smith S, Philp A, Putnam T, Gilbert C, Fry W, et al. Teamwork training improves the clinical care of trauma patients. J Surg Educ. 2010;67(6):439–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Roberts NK, Williams RG, Schwind CJ, Sutyak JA, McDowell C, Griffen D, et al. The impact of brief team communication, leadership and team behavior training on ad hoc team performance in trauma care settings. Am J Surg. 2014;207(2):170–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Hughes KM, Benenson RS, Krichten AE, Clancy KD, Ryan JP, Hammond C. A crew resource management program tailored to trauma resuscitation improves team behavior and communication. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219(3):545–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Steinemann S, Berg B, Skinner A, DiTulio A, Anzelon K, Terada K, et al. In situ, multidisciplinary, simulation-based teamwork training improves early trauma care. J Surg Educ. 2011;68(6):472–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Knudson MM, Khaw L, Bullard MK, Dicker R, Cohen MJ, Staudenmayer K, et al. Trauma training in simulation: translating skills from SIM time to real time. J Trauma Inj Inf Crit Care. 2008;64(2):255–63.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Fernandez R, Rosenman ED, Olenick J, Misisco A, Brolliar SM, Chipman AK, et al. Simulation-based team leadership training improves team leadership during actual trauma resuscitations: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(1):73–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Petrosoniak A, Fan M, Hicks CM, White K, McGowan M, Campbell D, et al. Trauma Resuscitation Using in situ Simulation Team Training (TRUST) study: latent safety threat evaluation using framework analysis and video review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Jeffcott SA, Mackenzie CF. Measuring team performance in healthcare: review of research and implications for patient safety. J Crit Care. 2008;23(2):188–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Courtenay M, Nancarrow S, Dawson D. Interprofessional teamwork in the trauma setting: a scoping review. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11:57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Sugrue M, Seger M, Kerridge R, Sloane D, Deane S. A prospective study of the performance of the trauma team leader. J Trauma. 1995;38(1):79–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Rosenbaum L. Divided we fall. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(7):684–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Pucher PH, Aggarwal R, Batrick N, Jenkins M, Darzi A. Nontechnical skills performance and care processes in the management of the acute trauma patient. Surgery. 2014;155(5):902–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Briggs A, Raja AS, Joyce MF, Yule SJ, Jiang W, Lipsitz SR, et al. The role of nontechnical skills in simulated trauma resuscitation. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(4):732–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. ••Park C, Grant J, Dumas RP, Dultz L, Shoultz TH, Scott DJ, et al. Does simulation work? Monthly trauma simulation and procedural training are associated with decreased time to intervention. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020;88(2):242–8. Prospective, observational study that implemented a trauma simulation program in resident education and found that there was a decrease in time to intervention during trauma resuscitations.

Download references

Funding

No funding was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CF did the background research and wrote the manuscript. RP edited the manuscript prior to publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan P. Dumas.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

Non-applicable as this is a review article and no human or animal studies were included.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fitzgerald, C.A., Dumas, R.P. Trauma Quality Improvement and Team Education: How Can We Better Optimize Our Training?. Curr Surg Rep 11, 117–125 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40137-023-00351-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40137-023-00351-2

Keywords

Navigation