Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evolving Medical-Legal Issues in Breast Imaging

  • Breast Imaging (H Ojeda-Fournier, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Radiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because breast imaging practice is associated with a high number of medical malpractice lawsuits, understanding basic medical-legal parameters becomes even more important as new technology and conditions of practice evolve. Incorporating new supplementary breast screening in strategizing a response to the importance of breast density, recognizing the purpose and ramifications of issuing diagnostic imaging reports, understanding the role of expert witnesses in assisting standard of care determinations and employing reasonable applications for off-label use of medical devices exemplify the relevance of integrating defensible practice patterns in a changing medical environment. This article addresses these issues and provides a contextual discussion so that physicians and facilities are educated in their selection of a wide variety of approaches that can be applied to clinical use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. MQSA Interim Rules. Federal Register. Washington, D.C > Government printing Office. December 21, 1993:58:67558-67572 [PL 102-539, 1992].

  2. Brenner RJ. Breast cancer and malpractice: a guide to the physician. Semin Breast Dis. 1998;1:3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  3. •• Brenner RJ. Medicolegal aspects of breast imaging. Radiol Clin No Am 1992; 30:277–86. Discussed basic elements of tort law for the radiologist.

  4. Brenner RJ. Medicolegal aspects of breast imaging: variable standards of care relating to different types of practices. Am J Roentgenol AJR. 1991;156:719–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Skettington v Bradley, 366 Mich 552, 115 NW2d 393 (Mich 1962).

  6. Youk JH, Sweon HM, Son EJ, et al. Automated volume breast density measurements in era of the BI-RADS fifth edition: a comparison with visual assessment. Am J Roentgenol AJR. 2016;206:1156–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Restatement (second) of Torts, Section 323(a).

  8. Brenner RJ. Medicolegal aspects of screening mammography. Am J Roentgenol AJR. 1989;153:53–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL, O’Shaughnessy KF, et al. Analysis of 172 subtle findings on prior normal mammograms in women with breast cancer detected at follow up screening. Radiology. 2003;226:494–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson ER, et al. ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bassett LW, Shayestehfar B, Hirbawi I. Obtaining previous mammogram for comparison; usefulness and costs. Am J Roentgenol AJR. 1994;163:1083–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brenner RJ. The expert witness: understanding the rationale. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007;4:612–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. • Partyka L, Lourenco AD, Mainier MP. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial experience Am J Roentgen 2014; 203:216–28. Validates the impact of 3D on the detection of architectural distortion, a difficult finding to recognize on 2D.

  15. • Brenner RJ. The pitfalls of rendering an expert opinion in breast malpractice cases by reviewing a CD-ROM J Am Col Radiol (Opinion) 2016; 13:424–5. The only guidance currently in print of the dangers of CD review of serial mammograms.

  16. • Aujerom P, Gavenoris S, Zhang Z. Clinical performance of synthesized two-dimensional mammography combined with tomosynthesis in large screening population. Radiology 2017; 283:70–77. Study validates the equivalency of synthetic 2D images to acquired 2D images.

  17. Chesebro AL, Winkler NS, Birdwell RC. Developing asymmetry at mammography: correlation with SU and MR imaging and histopathologic findings. Radiology. 2016;279:385–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vendantham S, Karellas A, Vijayalaghavan G, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: state of the art. Radiology. 2015;277:663–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Physician Insurers Association of America. Breast cancer study. Washington DC: Physicians Insurance Association of America; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 18001 (2010).

  21. Kopans DB, Feig SA. The Canadian breast screening study: a critical review. Am J Roentgenol AJR. 1993;161:755–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schaffer AU, Jena AB, Searburg SA. Rates and characteristics of paid malpractice claims among US physicians by specialty 1992–2004. JAMA Int Med. 2017;177:710–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Breast Imaging, Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego Health, 3855 Health Sciences Dr., #0846, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0846, USA

    R. James Brenner

Authors
  1. R. James Brenner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. James Brenner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

R James Brenner declares no potential conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

All reported studies/experiments with human or animal subjects performed by the authors have been previously published and complied with all applicable ethical standards (including the Helsinki declaration and its amendments, institutional/national research committee standards, and international/national/institutional guidelines).

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical collection on Breast Imaging.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brenner, R.J. Evolving Medical-Legal Issues in Breast Imaging. Curr Radiol Rep 6, 4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-018-0261-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-018-0261-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation