Abstract
Introduction
Ladder was a phase 2 trial that evaluated the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Serum and aqueous humor samples were collected to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ranibizumab delivered through the PDS.
Methods
Ladder was a multicenter, randomized, active treatment-controlled, phase 2 clinical trial. Patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n = 220) were randomized (3:3:3:2) to PDS 10 mg/ml, PDS 40 mg/ml, PDS 100 mg/ml, or monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg. Serum PK samples were collected in all arms and analyzed for ranibizumab concentration using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The main PK analyses were conducted in the PK-evaluable population (n = 68), which excluded patients who received fellow eye intravitreal treatment, supplemental ranibizumab treatment, or had previous treatment with bevacizumab in either eye within 9 months of randomization.
Results
In the PDS 10 mg/ml arm, median serum ranibizumab concentrations were below the serum trough concentration (Ctrough; 130 pg/ml) expected with monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg at all time points. In the PDS 40 mg/ml and 100 mg/ml arms, median serum ranibizumab concentrations were above the Ctrough expected with monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg (130 pg/ml) through month 3 and month 12 after implantation, respectively, and remained above the lower limit of quantification through month 15 and month 16 after implantation, respectively.
Conclusions
These PK data indicate that the implant in the PDS 100 mg/ml arm maintained ranibizumab concentrations within the range of monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg injections (130–2220 pg/ml) through month 12 after implantation.
Trial Registration
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02510794.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Why carry out this study? |
Ladder was a phase 2 trial that evaluated the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. |
The PDS is a drug delivery system that consists of a refillable ocular implant for the continuous delivery of a customized formulation of ranibizumab into the vitreous. |
During Ladder, serum and aqueous humor samples were collected to characterize the pharmacokinetics of ranibizumab delivered through the PDS. |
What was learned from this study? |
Concentrations achieved with PDS 100 mg/ml were within the same range as observed with monthly intravitreal ranibizumab dosing through month 12 following implantation, consistent with the comparable visual outcomes observed between the PDS 100 mg/ml and monthly intravitreal ranibizumab arms. |
Serum ranibizumab concentrations following treatment with the PDS decreased at a slower rate than was observed previously following intravitreal injection, resulting in steadier concentrations over time with PDS treatment. |
Introduction
Intravitreal anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A therapy is the standard of care for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) [1]. The anti-VEGF agent ranibizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody antigen-binding fragment that inhibits all isoforms of VEGF-A [1, 2]. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of ranibizumab intravitreal injections for the treatment of nAMD [3] have been well characterized.
After intravitreal injection, ranibizumab demonstrates a phenomenon referred to as “flip-flop kinetics” [3]. For most drug classes, the absorption rate exceeds the elimination rate; however, flip-flop kinetics describes the reverse scenario: kinetics in which the absorption rate is significantly slower than the systemic elimination rate [4]. For ranibizumab, absorption from the vitreous to the systemic circulation is significantly slower than the systemic elimination rate (ocular and systemic half-lives [t1/2] are observed to be ~ 9 days and 2 h, respectively) [3]. This results in a depot effect, where the vitreous acts as a depot that slowly releases ranibizumab into systemic circulation, where it is quickly eliminated [3]. Because the ocular clearance is the rate-limiting step, the serum PK profile directly reflects the ocular PK profile, with serum concentrations being an estimated 90,000 times lower than vitreous concentrations [3]. From dosing to 30 days after monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg injections, serum ranibizumab concentrations range from 0.069 to 2.9 ng/ml [3]. Population PK analysis of ranibizumab administered via intravitreal injection has found renal impairment status to have a statistically significant, but clinically insignificant, effect on systemic elimination of ranibizumab, with a patient’s creatinine clearance explaining 10.5% of interindividual variability in ranibizumab systemic clearance [3].
In clinical trials of ranibizumab in which patients received monthly intravitreal injections, the serum PK profile consisted of peaks and troughs, with highest concentrations soon after the bolus dose and lowest concentrations before the next dose [3]. Within clinical trials, maximal efficacy outcomes with anti-VEGF therapy appear to be achieved with consistent treatment at regular intervals [5,6,7,8]. In clinical practice, such outcomes have proven challenging to achieve because patients are, on average, treated less frequently [9,10,11,12,13,14,15], resulting in poorer vision outcomes compared with clinical trials [9,10,11, 13,14,15].
The Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) is a long-acting drug delivery system that consists of a permanent, indwelling refillable implant designed to provide continuous delivery of a customized formulation of ranibizumab into the vitreous [16] and maintain therapeutic drug concentrations in the vitreous for extended durations. The PDS implant can be refilled in the clinic using a specially designed refill-exchange needle [16]. The refill-exchange procedure ensures a near-total fluid exchange by simultaneously withdrawing the depleted drug remaining in the implant and injecting full-concentration drug. Based on in vitro characterization, a small percentage (~ 1–2.5%) of the reservoir volume of 20 µl is released through the release control element into the vitreous during the refill-exchange procedure. Ranibizumab release from the PDS implant into the vitreous is mediated by passive diffusion across a porous titanium release control element specifically designed for ranibizumab. In vitro studies have shown that ranibizumab release from the PDS implant is a function of concentration in the implant and decays exponentially over time, following Fick’s law (data on file). Long-term stability evaluation demonstrated that ranibizumab did not show a difference in VEGF-blocking activity after incubation at 37 °C in phosphate-buffered saline supplemented with sodium azide and polysorbate 20 for 6 months [17].
The completed phase 2 Ladder trial (NCT02510794) evaluated the efficacy, safety, and PK of the PDS in patients with nAMD [16, 18]. Patients were randomized to receive one of three doses of ranibizumab via the PDS or monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg [16, 18]. The primary endpoint was median time to first criteria-defined implant refill, which was 8.7, 13.0, and 15.8 months for all patients in the PDS 10 mg/ml, PDS 40 mg/ml, and PDS 100 mg/ml arms, respectively, as assessed at the end of the study [16, 18]. At months 6 and 12 after implant insertion, almost 80% and 60% of patients in the PDS 100 mg/ml arm, respectively, did not require refill-exchange procedures based on trial criteria [18].
Because the ranibizumab release rate from the implant is slow relative to both the ocular and systemic elimination rates [3], the serum PK profiles reflect the implant release. Preplanned PK analyses were conducted as part of the Ladder trial to characterize the PK profile of ranibizumab delivered through the PDS in patients with nAMD and are reported herein.
Methods
Study Design and Participants
Full details of the Ladder trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02510794) have been published [16, 18]. Briefly, Ladder was a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, active treatment-controlled, dose-ranging study of the PDS for nAMD conducted at 49 sites in the USA. The trial adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki [19] and was conducted in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonisation E6 Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice [20] and with applicable local, state, and federal laws. All trial sites received institutional review board approval before trial initiation, and all patients provided written informed consent before enrollment.
Patients were aged ≥ 50 years and had anti-VEGF-responsive nAMD in the study eye diagnosed within the 9 months before screening. Patients had to have received ≥ 2 injections, but not more than 9 injections, with any anti-VEGF agent in the study eye. The previous injections could have been any anti-VEGF agent; however, the final injection before initiation of study treatment was ranibizumab. Patients were not excluded if they had nAMD in the fellow eye and were permitted to receive ranibizumab treatment, or another anti-VEGF therapy if clinically indicated, in that eye throughout the trial. Fellow eye treatment was not recommended within 7 days of the study eye scheduled visit.
Patients were assigned randomly 3:3:3:2 to treatment with the PDS filled with ranibizumab 10 mg/ml, 40 mg/ml, or 100 mg/ml formulations or to treatment with monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg injections (Lucentis®; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA). The PK results described here do not include patients in the oral antithrombotic substudy, which included a separate trial population of 11 patients treated in the PDS 100 mg/ml arm.
For PDS patients, implant refills were performed on a pro re nata basis according to predefined criteria. Refill criteria for the PDS were assessed at each monthly visit [16].
Patients remained in the study until discontinuation or the decision was made to initiate rollover into the Portal trial, the open-label extension study for the PDS [18].
Serum PK Sampling and Analysis of Ranibizumab Concentrations
All Ladder sites and patients participated in serum PK sampling; there was no specific PK substudy. In the PDS arms, serum samples for PK analysis were collected at randomization; ≥ 60 min after implant insertion; 1, 7, and 14 days after implant insertion; at each monthly study visit; and 1 and 7 days after each refill. Optional aqueous humor samples were collected from patients in the PDS arms before or immediately after implant refill and at 7 days after refill. In the monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg injection arm, serum trough concentration (Ctrough) samples were taken pre dose at randomization; months 1, 3, 6, and 9; and the final study visit.
Serum ranibizumab concentrations in all patients and aqueous humor ranibizumab concentrations in PDS-treated patients were measured using two validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) described elsewhere [21], with lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 15 pg/ml for serum and 20,000 pg/ml for aqueous. The two assays were designed and optimized to have different quantitative ranges to better suit the range of ranibizumab concentrations expected to be found in those two compartments [22]. Briefly, serum samples were incubated overnight with a mouse monoclonal anti-ranibizumab–VEGF complex antibody (MARA) and biotinylated VEGF; MARA–ranibizumab–biotinylated VEGF complexes were then captured on streptavidin-coated plates; finally, complexes were detected enzymatically using a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antimouse antibody with colorimetric detection. For the aqueous samples, ELISA plates were coated with recombinant human VEGF, blocked with a bovine serum albumin buffer, and incubated with aqueous samples diluted to the assay minimum required dilution of 1/100 in sample diluent. After washing, plates were incubated for 2 h with a solution of F(ab')2 fragment goat antihuman immunoglobulin G F(ab')2 antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. After washing, tetramethylbenzidine peroxidase substrate was added to the plate to develop color.
Analyses were conducted in the full study population and in the PK-evaluable population. The purpose of the analysis within the PK-evaluable population was to characterize the PK of the PDS, and thus it excluded patients whose serum and aqueous samples would not solely reflect ranibizumab release from the PDS implant. The purpose of the analysis within the full study population was to describe ranibizumab exposure in all treated patients in the study. The PK-evaluable population consisted of patients in the PDS arms only and excluded patients who received intravitreal ranibizumab injections in the fellow eye during the Ladder trial, supplemental intravitreal ranibizumab injections, or previous intravitreal injections with bevacizumab in either eye within 9 months before randomization. Patients who received supplemental intravitreal ranibizumab injections during Ladder were not included in the PK-evaluable population. Patients with previous intravitreal injections of bevacizumab were excluded because the ranibizumab ELISA also detects bevacizumab [21]. Bevacizumab has a t1/2 for systemic elimination of around 19 days and therefore may remain detectable in the systemic circulation for months after the last injection [23]. Patients who received previous intravitreal aflibercept injections were not excluded from the PK-evaluable population.
Endpoints and Analyses
The prespecified endpoints for the PK analysis of the Ladder trial included the observed maximum concentration (Cmax) and selected postdose serum concentrations immediately after implantation and all subsequent refills, Ctrough before refills, and observed serum concentrations over time without refills in the PDS arms. Additional PK parameters, including area under the serum concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-inf; calculated using the linear-up, log-down trapezoidal rule), time to Cmax (Tmax), Ctrough, and t1/2, were estimated after implantation and at subsequent refills using standard noncompartmental analysis with Phoenix WinNonlin software, version 6.4 (Cetera, L.P., Princeton, NJ, USA). For mean serum concentration-time profiles, if more than one-third of values for a given arm and sampling time point were below the LLOQ, no value was reported. The geometric mean was used to summarize serum PK data when patients were grouped based on the same time since dosing, because it is reasonable to assume the data are log-normally distributed, as typical for PK data [24]. However, when summarizing data based on time on study, when patients were at different times relative to most recent refill, median was used to summarize serum PK data because a log-normal distribution can no longer be assumed.
A population PK model [3] was used to predict serum concentrations in the monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg group. The parameters for these model predictions were based on updated PK parameter estimates using data described previously [3] and additional data from the HARBOR clinical trial (NCT00891735). Model parameters were 3.3 l/d for typical systemic clearance, 3.27 l for typical apparent volume of the central compartment, and 0.104 d−1 for typical rate of vitreous elimination.
Results
Patient Populations
The full efficacy analysis population of the Ladder trial consisted of 220 patients, with 58, 62, 59, and 41 patients in the PDS 10 mg/ml, PDS 40 mg/ml, PDS 100 mg/ml, and monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg injection arms, respectively [16]. Baseline demographics for the full study population have been described [16].
A total of 68 (38%) patients in the PDS arms were eligible for the PK-evaluable population, with 16, 25, and 27 patients in the PDS 10 mg/ml, PDS 40 mg/ml, and PDS 100 mg/ml arms, respectively. The numbers of patients meeting each of the exclusion criteria for the PK-evaluable population are tabulated in Table S1. The most frequent reason for exclusion from the PK-evaluable population was receiving intravitreal ranibizumab in the fellow eye after first study treatment. Baseline demographics for the PK-evaluable population are shown in Table 1 and were generally consistent with the demographics for the full study population [16]. The distribution of renal impairment status was consistent with previous PK analyses of ranibizumab administered via intravitreal injection in patients with nAMD [3]. In the PK-evaluable population, the mean time on study was 21.7 (range 14.8–36.0) months.
Serum PK Profiles After Implant Insertion
Serum ranibizumab concentrations in the PK-evaluable population over time from implant insertion to first refill are shown in Fig. 1. Patient numbers decreased over time as patients received PDS refill-exchange procedures. In the PDS 100 mg/ml arm, serum ranibizumab concentration remained above the LLOQ through month 16. Geometric mean (coefficient of variation) serum concentrations in the PDS 100 mg/ml arm were 243 (146%), 160 (155%), 101 (137%), and 51 (108%) pg/ml at months 6, 9, 12, and 16, respectively. Through month 9, the geometric mean serum ranibizumab concentrations were within the range (130–2220 pg/ml) [3] expected with monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg injections, remaining above the expected Ctrough and below the expected Cmax. Serum ranibizumab concentrations following treatment with the PDS decreased at a slower rate than as observed previously following intravitreal injection, resulting in more steady concentrations over time with PDS treatment.
Serum pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles among PK-evaluable patients in the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) arms without refill. Patient numbers decreased over time as patients received refills. Vertical bars represent the geometric standard deviation. Y axis is shown on a logarithmic scale. aLowe J, et al. J Immunol Methods. 2018;461:44–52 [21]. bXu L, et al. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:1616–24 [3]. Figure generated based on the updated population PK analysis (including data from the HARBOR clinical trial [NCT00891735])
As expected, the serum ranibizumab concentrations were lower in the PDS 10 mg/ml and PDS 40 mg/ml arms but remained above the LLOQ at months 6 and 15, respectively. The geometric mean serum concentrations in the PDS 10 mg/ml arm remained below the expected Ctrough with monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg throughout the study; however, the geometric mean serum concentrations in the PDS 40 mg/ml arm were near the expected Ctrough for the first 6 months after implant insertion.
PK parameters (Cmax, AUC0–inf, Tmax, Ctrough, t1/2) after implantation and all treatment cycles are reported in Table 2.
Aqueous Humor Sample Correlation
Aqueous humor samples were collected from 6, 10, and 12 patients in the PK-evaluable population in the PDS 10 mg/ml, PDS 40 mg/ml, and PDS 100 mg/ml arms, respectively, before or immediately after refill and 7 days after refill. Aqueous humor ranibizumab concentrations in these samples correlated with mean serum ranibizumab concentrations in all three PDS arms (Fig. S1).
Serum PK Profiles After Refill-Exchange
In the PDS 100 mg/ml arm, the serum PK profile was consistent after implantation and multiple refills (Fig. 2). At 6 months after implantation or the first refill-exchange procedure, geometric mean (coefficient of variation) serum ranibizumab concentrations were 243 (146%) and 227 (32.7%) pg/ml, respectively. Serum PK profiles after refill-exchange procedures were also consistent with the profiles after implantation in the PDS 10 mg/ml and PDS 40 mg/ml arms (Fig. S2a and S2b).
Serum pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of PK-evaluable patients in the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) 100 mg/ml arm after implantation, first refill, and second refill. Vertical bars represent the geometric standard deviation. aLowe J, et al. J Immunol Methods. 2018;461:44–52 [21]
Serum PK Profiles in the Full Study Population over the Course of the Trial (Independent of When Refill Occurred)
In the full Ladder trial study population, ranibizumab serum concentrations in the PDS 100 mg/ml arm were within the range expected with the PK model of monthly intravitreal ranibizumab injections (Fig. 3). The PK model for monthly intravitreal ranibizumab injections was generally consistent with the observed Ctrough values in the monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg arm, with the model predicting slightly higher Ctrough values than observed. At month 9, the last consistent time point at which serum samples were collected in all monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg patients, median ranibizumab serum concentrations were 27.9, 110, 235, and 56.1 pg/ml for the PDS 10 mg/ml, PDS 40 mg/ml, PDS 100 mg/ml, and monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg arms, respectively.
Serum pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles though month 22 in the full study population, independent of refill time. Median (rather than geometric mean) is reported due to the variable timing of refill, and thus a log-normal distribution is not expected. aLowe J, et al. J Immunol Methods. 2018;461:44–52 [21]. bXu L, et al. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:1616–24 [3]. Figure generated based on the updated population PK analysis (including data from the HARBOR clinical trial [NCT00891735]). Ctrough serum trough concentration, PDS Port Delivery System with ranibizumab
Discussion
This PK-evaluable population of the phase 2 Ladder trial demonstrated that the serum concentrations of ranibizumab with PDS 100 mg/ml were within the range expected with monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg through at least month 9, remaining above the expected Ctrough and below the expected Cmax. In addition, PDS 100 mg/ml continued to release ranibizumab through at least month 16, after which time, the serum concentration approached the LLOQ. Additionally, within each PDS arm, the serum PK profiles of ranibizumab were consistent after initial implantation and multiple refills. The PK-evaluable population was thoughtfully defined to exclude patients with confounding factors for the serum PK measurements that impact assessment of the PDS implant release. Many of the patients in the full study population were not eligible for the PK-evaluable population.
Extensive serum sampling was employed in all patients, providing a robust data set (5790 samples) for characterization of the PDS serum PK profile for ranibizumab. The PK profile of the full study population independent of time to refill in combination with the clinical outcome data demonstrate that PDS 100 mg/ml was able to deliver ranibizumab at levels that resulted in efficacious ocular ranibizumab concentrations for an extended period of time. The serum concentrations with PDS 100 mg/ml were within the range predicted for monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg, the dose approved for the treatment of nAMD, based on data from previous clinical trials [5, 8]. PDS 100 mg/ml PK serum concentrations were also consistently higher than the Ctrough values observed in the Ladder monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg arm until month 9, when PK sampling stopped in this arm. These results support the durability of the treatment effects observed with the PDS in the Ladder trial. At the median first time to refill of 15.8 months in the PDS 100 mg/ml arm [18], ranibizumab was still being released from the PDS implant, as supported by the measurable serum ranibizumab concentrations at month 16 in this arm.
In clinical trials using intravitreal ranibizumab injections, there is variability in how frequently patients need treatment to maintain vision or anatomical outcomes [6, 7, 26]. This variability may be driven by a variety of patient and disease state factors, of which PK variability is only one component. Therefore, the ongoing ranibizumab concentrations needed to maintain clinical efficacy in an individual patient and in an individual eye likely vary. Although systemic suppression of VEGF was not measured in this study, the serum ranibizumab concentrations with the PDS were maintained below the Cmax for monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg injections, which have been shown to have a minimal impact on plasma-free VEGF levels [27]. Furthermore, serum ranibizumab concentrations with the PDS were below the concentrations (11,000–27,000 pg/ml) thought to be necessary to inhibit VEGF biological activity by half [3] and the Cmax for intravitreal ranibizumab 2.0 mg injections was the highest intravitreal dose of ranibizumab clinically demonstrated to be well tolerated [6, 26].
Aqueous humor PK concentrations for ranibizumab with the PDS were consistent with the serum PK concentrations and consistent with flip-flop kinetics. However, it should be noted that collection of aqueous humor samples was optional in the Ladder trial and not all sites or patients contributed samples; in addition, aqueous humor samples were collected at a limited number of time points (i.e., limited longitudinal data), and the samples that were collected were at different times across patients due to the variable timing of refill in each patient. Thus, the PK data from the aqueous humor are not as thorough as the presented serum data.
There are several considerations for the current study. The length of time on study, timing of refills, and number of refills each patient received were variable, resulting in more limited PK assessment at later time points and after more refills. Because patients who received supplemental intravitreal ranibizumab injections were excluded from the PK-evaluable population and lower ranibizumab concentrations could have been the reason these patients met the lack of clinical efficacy criteria to require supplemental intravitreal ranibizumab injections, the observed concentrations in the PK-evaluable population may be affected by a selection bias. Furthermore, characterization of ranibizumab release at later times in the lower-dose arms was limited by the assay sensitivity. Finally, additional analyses and future studies will continue to build our understanding of the relationship between drug concentrations and clinical response.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the PK profile of the PDS is consistent with the durability and clinical efficacy outcomes observed in the Ladder trial. PDS 100 mg/ml continuously releases ranibizumab through at least month 16, with serum PK profiles that are consistent after implantation and multiple refills. Furthermore, the serum concentrations with PDS 100 mg/ml are within the range of concentrations achieved with monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg injections through ≥ 10 months after implantation. The PK and clinical findings from the Ladder clinical trial [16, 18], and results from the pivotal phase 3 Archway trial (NCT03677934) [28], which studied the efficacy and safety of PDS 100 mg/ml with fixed refill-exchanges every 24 weeks, support that PDS 100 mg/ml permits the continuous delivery of a clinically effective levels of ranibizumab for extended periods of time.
References
Flaxel CJ, Adelman RA, Bailey ST, et al. Age-related macular degeneration Preferred Practice Pattern®. Ophthalmology. 2020;127:P1–65.
Ferrara N, Damico L, Shams N, Lowman H, Kim R. Development of ranibizumab, an anti–vascular endothelial growth factor antigen binding fragment, as therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2006;26:859–70.
Xu L, Lu T, Tuomi L, et al. Pharmacokinetics of ranibizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a population approach. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:1616–24.
Ritschel WA, Kearns GL. Handbook of Basic Pharmacokinetics… Including Clinical Applications. 7th ed. Washington, DC: American Pharmacists Association; 2009.
Brown DM, Kaiser PK, Michels M, et al. ANCHOR Study Group. Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1432–44.
Busbee BG, Ho AC, Brown DM, et al. HARBOR Study Group. Twelve-month efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg ranibizumab in patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:1046–56.
Martin DF, Maguire MG, Fine SL, et al. Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT) Research Group. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: two-year results. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:1388–98.
Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, et al. MARINA Study Group. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1419–31.
Cohen SY, Mimoun G, Oubraham H, et al. LUMIERE Study Group. Changes in visual acuity in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration treated with intravitreal ranibizumab in daily clinical practice: the LUMIERE study. Retina. 2013;33:474–81.
Ciulla TA, Hussain RM, Pollack JS, Williams DF. Visual acuity outcomes and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy intensity in neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients: a real-world analysis of 49 485 eyes. Ophthalmol Retina. 2020;4:19–30.
Kim LN, Mehta H, Barthelmes D, Nguyen V, Gillies MC. Metaanalysis of real-world outcomes of intravitreal ranibizumab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2016;36:1418–31.
Finger RP, Wiedemann P, Blumhagen F, Pohl K, Holz FG. Treatment patterns, visual acuity and quality-of-life outcomes of the WAVE study – a noninterventional study of ranibizumab treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in Germany. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91:540–6.
Holz FG, Tadayoni R, Beatty S, et al. Multi-country real-life experience of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for wet age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:220–6.
Ozturk M, Harris ML, Nguyen V, Barthelmes D, Gillies MC, Mehta H. Real-world visual outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration receiving aflibercept at fixed intervals as per UK licence. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;46:407–11.
Khanani AM, Skelly A, Bezlyak V, Griner R, Torres LR, Sagkriotis A. SIERRA-AMD: a retrospective, real-world evidence study of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration in the United States. Ophthalmol Retina. 2020;4:122–33.
Campochiaro PA, Marcus DM, Awh CC, et al. The Port Delivery System with ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results from the randomized phase 2 Ladder clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:1141–54.
Chang DP, Burra S, Day ES, et al. Long-term stability of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (a-VEGF) biologics under physiologically relevant conditions and its impact on the development of long-acting delivery systems. J Pharm Sci. 2021;110:860–70.
Khanani AM, Callanan D, Dreyer R, et al. Ladder Investigators. End-of-study results for the Ladder phase 2 trial of the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmol Retina. 2021;5:775–87.
World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki – ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/. Accessed 12 Nov 2018.
International Conference for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH harmonised tripartite guideline: guideline for good clinical practice E6(R1). http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/efficacy/efficacy-single/article/integrated-addendum-good-clinical-practice.html. Accessed 12 Nov 2018.
Lowe J, Wakshull E, Shek T, et al. Development and validation of a novel semi-homogenous clinical assay for quantitation of ranibizumab in human serum. J Immunol Methods. 2018;461:44–52.
Azadeh M, Gorovits B, Kamerud J, et al. Calibration curves in quantitative ligand binding assays: recommendations and best practices for preparation, design, and editing of calibration curves. AAPS J. 2017;20:22.
Avery RL, Castellarin AA, Steinle NC, et al. Systemic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravitreal aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab. Retina. 2017;37:1847–58.
Julious SA, Debarnot CA. Why are pharmacokinetic data summarized by arithmetic means? J Biopharm Stat. 2000;10:55–71.
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Guidance for Industry: pharmacokinetics in patients with impaired renal function — study design, data analysis, and impact on dosing and labeling. 2020. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/pharmacokinetics-patients-impaired-renal-function-study-design-data-analysis-and-impact-dosing-and. Accessed 7 Apr 2021.
Ho AC, Busbee BG, Regillo CD, et al. HARBOR Study Group. Twenty-four-month efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg ranibizumab in patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:2181–92.
Avery RL, Castellarin AA, Steinle NC, et al. Systemic pharmacokinetics following intravitreal injections of ranibizumab, bevacizumab or aflibercept in patients with neovascular AMD. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98:1636–41.
Holekamp NM, Campochiaro PA, Chang M, et al. Archway Investigators. Archway randomized phase 3 trial of the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2022;129:295–307.
Acknowledgements
Funding
Genentech, Inc., a member of the Roche Group (South San Francisco, CA, USA). The sponsor participated in the study design, conducting the study, and data collection, management, and interpretation; sponsored third-party writing assistance; and funded the journal’s Rapid Service Fees.
Medical Writing and Other Assistance
We thank Shweta Vadhavkar, MSc, and Serena Chikkala of Genentech, Inc. for data programming and assembly, and Steve Blotner for additional statistical support. Funding was provided by Genentech, Inc., a member of the Roche Group, for the study and third-party writing assistance, which was provided by Karlina J. Kauffman, PhD, of Envision Pharma Group.
Authorship
All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.
Author Contributions
Conception and design: Charles C. Wykoff, Peter A. Campochiaro, Dante J. Pieramici, Arshad M. Khanani, Shamika Gune, Mauricio Maia, Kågedal, Han Ting Ding, Katie F. Maass. Analysis and interpretation: Charles C. Wykoff, Peter A. Campochiaro, Dante J. Pieramici, Arshad M. Khanani, Shamika Gune, Mauricio Maia, Matts Kågedal, Han Ting Ding, Katie F. Maass. Data collection: Charles C. Wykoff, Peter A. Campochiaro, Dante J. Pieramici, Arshad M. Khanani, Shamika Gune, Mauricio Maia, Matts Kågedal, Han Ting Ding, Katie F. Maass. Obtained funding: Shamika Gune, Katie F. Maass. Overall responsibility: Charles C. Wykoff, Peter A. Campochiaro, Dante J. Pieramici, Arshad M. Khanani, Shamika Gune, Mauricio Maia, Matts Kågedal, Han Ting Ding, Katie F. Maass.
Prior Presentation
Portions of these data were presented at the 43rd Annual Macula Society Meeting, February 19–22, 2020, San Diego, CA, USA; Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting 2020, May 1–7, 2020, Virtual; American Society of Retina Specialists 2020 Annual Meeting, July 24–26, 2020, Virtual; the Retina Society 2020 VR Annual Meeting, Virtual; the 20th EURETINA Meeting, October 2–4, 2020, Virtual; the Asia–Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology 36th Congress, September 5–11, 2021; and Virtual American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2021 Meeting, October 17–21, 2021, Philadelphia, PA and Virtual.
Disclosures
Charles C. Wykoff declares that he is a consultant for AbbVie, Adverum, Aerie, Allergan, Annexon, Apellis, Arrowhead, Bausch + Lomb, Bayer, Chengdu Kanghong, Clearside, EyePoint, Genentech, Inc., Gyroscope, Iveric Bio, Janssen, Kato, Kodiak, NGM, Novartis, Ocular Therapeutix, ONL, Opthea, Palatin, Perfuse, PolyPhotonix, RecensMedical, Regeneron, Regenxbio, Roche, Surrozen, Takeda, Valo Health, and Vitranu. He has received grant support from Adverum, Aerie, Aldeyra, Alimera, Alkahest, Allergan, Amgen, Annexon, Apellis, AsclepiX, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chengdu Kanghong, Clearside, Gemini, Genentech, Inc., Graybug, Gyroscope, Ionis, Iveric Bio, Kodiak, Nanoscope, Neurotech, NGM, Novartis, Ocular Therapeutix, Opthea, Oxurion, RecensMedical, Regeneron, Regenxbio, Roche, and SamChunDang. He is an equity owner in ONL, PolyPhotonix, RecensMedical, and Visgenx. Peter A. Campochiaro declares that he has been a consultant or advisory board member for Aerpio, Allegro, AsclepiX, Ashvattha, Bausch + Lomb, Catawba Research, Celanese, Clearside, Exgenesisbio, Exonate, Genentech, Inc./Roche, Gyroscope, Merck, Perfuse, Regeneron, and Wave Life Sciences. He has received research support from Aerpio, Ashvattha, Genentech, Inc./Roche, Mallinckrodt, Oxford Biomedica, Regenxbio, and Sanofi Genzyme. He is an equity owner in Allegro and Grayburg. Dante J. Pieramici declares that he has been a consultant or advisory board member for Adverum, Gemini, Genentech, Inc., Iveric Bio, NGM, Regeneron, and Regenxbio. He has received financial support from Adverum, Apellis, Chengdu Kanghong, Genentech, Inc./Roche, Iveric Bio, Kodiak, Novartis, Ocular Therapeutix, Regeneron, and Unity Bio. He has received nonfinancial support from Genentech, Inc.; personal fees from Adverum, Gemini, and Genentech, Inc.; and research support from Adverum, Apellis, Chengdu Kanghong, Genentech, Inc./Roche, Iveric Bio, Kodiak, Novartis, Ocular Therapeutix, Regeneron, and Unity Bio. Arshad M. Khanani declares that he is a consultant for 4DMT, Adverum, Alcon, Allergan, Apellis, Broadwing Bio, Gemini, Genentech, Inc., Graybug, Gyroscope, Iveric Bio, Kato, Kodiak, Novartis, Oculis, Opthea, Oxurion, PolyPhotonix, RecensMedical, Regenxbio, and Surrozen. He has received research support from Adverum, Alkahest, Allegro, Allergan, Annexon, Gemini, Genentech, Inc., Gyroscope, Iveric Bio, Kodiak, NGM, Novartis, Opthea, Ophthotech, Oxurion, RecensMedical, and Regenxbio; has received lecture fees from Allergan, Genentech, Inc., and Novartis; and has equity in Aviceda, PolyPhotonix, RecensMedical, and Retrotope. Shamika Gune, Mauricio Maia, Matts Kågeda, Han Ting Ding, and Katie F. Maass declare that they are employees of Genentech, Inc.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
The trial adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki [19] and was conducted in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonisation E6 Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice [20] and with applicable local, state, and federal laws. All trial sites received institutional review board approval before trial initiation, and all patients provided written informed consent before enrollment.
Data Availability
For eligible studies, qualified researchers may request access to individual patient-level data through the clinical study data request platform. At the time of writing this request platform is Vivli (https://vivli.org/ourmember/roche/). For up-to-date details on Roche's Global Policy on the Sharing of Clinical Information and how to request access to related clinical study documents, see here: https://go.roche.com/data_sharing. Anonymized records for individual patients across > 1 data source external to Roche cannot, and should not, be linked due to a potential increase in risk of patient reidentification.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wykoff, C.C., Campochiaro, P.A., Pieramici, D.J. et al. Pharmacokinetics of the Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab in the Ladder Phase 2 Trial for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmol Ther 11, 1705–1717 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00532-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00532-9