Retinal vein occlusion is commonly associated with hypercoagulable states, hypertension, open-angle glaucoma, diabetes mellitus and a history of cardiovascular disease [11, 12]. The treatment of ME secondary to RVO is mainly based on repeated injections of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections [13,14,15].
Here we report a case of retinal vein occlusion potentially associated with receiving the second dose of the mRNA-1237 vaccine, noting that our patient was currently receiving anticoagulant therapy for AF. Although a causal connection between the two events cannot be proven definitely, it should be noted that this was the first thrombotic episode experienced by our patient. Clinical assessment was not suggestive of alternative triggering causes for venous occlusion or underlying disease exhibiting thrombogenicity [16]. It was not possible to obtain a rivaroxaban-calibrated drug level, which is not performed routinely, but the patient claimed to adhere diligently to the prescribed therapeutic regimen.
Retinal vein occlusion has been reported earlier in a patient who received the BNT162b2 BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine [17] and has been declared an adverse event for mRNA vaccines on 37 occasions, as registered in the Global Database for Individual Case Safety Reports (VigiBase), an open-label databank provided by World Health Organization.
It has been well elucidated how vein thrombosis in unusual sites and thrombocytopenia may be adverse events associated with adenoviral vector vaccines [18]. Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia mediated by platelet-activating antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4) has been put forward to explain the pathogenesis of this condition [19]. These findings although anecdotal would provide an explanation of the possible—albeit extremely low−incidence associated with mRNA vaccines, namely PF4 antibodies can also occur after mRNA vaccination but are of minor clinical relevance in this group [20, 21].
In our case, we were not able to record a platelet count in the acute setting and, consequently, to determine the eventual timing of platelet nadir and recovery. However, a mild thrombocytopenia (i.e. 144 × 109/L) was observed 9 weeks after the vaccination. This finding is consistent with previous reports [22]. Additionally, differentiating between a vaccine-induced or coincidental thrombocytopenia in these patients can be challenging [22].
In conclusion, we report a case of retinal vein occlusion 48 hours after vaccination with the SARS-Cov-2 mRNA-1237 vaccine, but note that the relationship between these two events is unclear. In light of the global promotion of the third dose of mRNA-based vaccinations, further research is warranted to better document and understand the potential pathogenic link between retinal vascular events and vaccination. Finally, we speculate that patients with cardiovascular diseases (i.e. high-risk group) should be investigated in more detail before being vaccinated with SARS-Cov-2 vaccines.