Correction to: Ophthalmol Ther (2018) 7:157–165 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-018-0130-1

In the original publication, units were incorrectly published in the results section as micrograms (µg/mL). The correct units are nanograms (ng/mL). The updated results section and an updated version of Fig. 1 are below.

Aqueous Humor Analyte Pharmacokinetics

The NSAID aqueous humor Cmax of BromSite® BID was 1.7-, 2.2- and 3.7-fold higher than that of BromSite® QD, Prolensa®, and Ilevro®, respectively. The Cmax for Ilevro® occurred at 1 h and for the other three groups at 2 h (Fig. 1a). The Bromsite® BID group had the highest Cmax at 131 ng/mL, followed by Bromsite® QD (77 ng/mL) and Prolensa® (59 ng/mL), while Ilevro® group was much lower at 35 ng/mL. The Cmax in the Bromsite® BID group was statistically significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of Prolensa® and Ilevro®.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Concentration–time profile at each matrix. The standard error bars (upper only) are presented. a Aqueous humor concentration–time profile. b Iris ciliary body concentration–time profile. c Sclera concentration–time profile. d Choroid concentration–time profile. e Retina concentration–time profile