Abstract
Introduction
Povidone-iodine aqueous solution is an antiseptic commonly used in ophthalmology for treatment of the ocular surface. Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) is a well-known skin penetration enhancer that is scarcely utilized in ophthalmic drug formulations. We describe here a low-dose formulation of 0.25% PVP-I in a gel containing DMSO for the treatment of Demodex blepharitis.
Case Report
A 95-year-old female presented with chronic blepharitis involving both the anterior and posterior eyelid margins. The anterior eyelid margins demonstrated pathognomonic features consistent with Demodex infection, and this diagnosis was confirmed with microscopy. Previous traditional therapies had been ineffective at controlling her signs and symptoms.
Conclusion
The topical PVP-I/DMSO system was effective at treating the signs and symptoms of Demodex blepharitis. Further investigation of the novel agent is warranted.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Demodex is a well-recognized but often overlooked cause of chronic blepharitis and is implicated in ocular rosacea [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. It is described as a translucent, eight-legged arachnid, and is the most common ectoparasite found on the human skin. Although prevalent in asymptomatic patients, rates of infestation with Demodex increase with age, nearing 100% by 70 years old [8]. Infection in humans is brought about by two distinct species, Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis. The former is typically found in lash follicles and manifests as anterior blepharitis, while the latter—which is smaller in size—more commonly infects the sebaceous glands, causing posterior blepharitis, meibomian gland disease, and keratoconjunctivitis. Besides the identifiable signs of demodicosis, it has been reported that Demodex-infested patients may experience disturbing ocular surface symptoms which can be enumerated by ocular surface disease index scoring [9]. Both species of mite are capable of inducing inflammation in a variety of direct ways, including destruction of epithelial cells, claw-related trauma, and mechanical obstruction of glands [10]. Indirectly, Demodex spp. may serve as a vector transporting bacteria to deep eyelid structures and a stimulant to the host immune system. Also, reaction to the chitin exoskeleton has been implicated in granuloma and chronic chalazia formation [11, 12]. Successful treatment of Demodex mites has reportedly been achieved topically with tea tree oil and systemically with ivermectin or metronidazole [13,14,15,16].
Povidone-iodine (PVP-I) is a potent antiseptic that is commonly utilized in ophthalmology for ocular surface pretreatment prior to invasive surgical procedures [17,18,19]. It is lesser known, however, that PVP-I has historic utility in the treatment of camelid demodicosis [20]. We previously reported that a dilute PVP-I and DMSO system was useful in the treatment of rosacea blepharoconjunctivitis [21]. We report here the use of a dilute 0.25% povidone-iodine gel in a DMSO solvent gel for the treatment of a case of Demodex blepharitis.
Case Report
Informed consent was obtained from the patient prior to the publication of this case report. A 95-year-old pseudophakic female presented to our clinic complaining of a long-standing history of ocular pruritus, dry eye, irritation, and eyelid crusting, for which she used only artificial tears and lid compresses without improvement. Treatment with tea tree oil or steroid/antibiotic combination medicines was not attempted.
Slit lamp biomicroscopic examination revealed mild bilateral anterior eyelid erythema and multiple cylindrical collarettes found at the base of the upper and lower lid eyelashes (Fig. 1a). There was no lash breakage, madarosis, poliosis, or misdirection. Inspection of the posterior eyelid margins revealed mild meibomian inspissation with capping. Secretions were slightly thickened, but not turbid. There were no mucocutaneous or marginal telangiectasias. Conjunctival examination showed mild, diffuse injection, and corneal examination was positive for scattered inferior punctate corneal erosions and a decreased tear break-up time. A diagnosis of Demodex blepharitis was made. To confirm the diagnosis, epilation of the affected eyelashes was performed and examined with 25× microscopy according to published protocols [22]. Visual confirmation of Demodex was achieved.
The patient was then prescribed a proprietary formulation of a topical gel consisting of 0.25% PVP-I in a dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) vehicle prepared by a licensed compounding pharmacy. The treatment was administered twice daily and administered by rubbing the gel with the finger directly onto the lash line while the eye was closed. The instructions were specific: to keep the eye closed and apply the drug to the lash surface from the skin side. At the first follow-up visit, one week later, there were remarkable improvements in both patient signs and symptoms. Most prominently, the seven foci of cylindrical collarettes of the right eye and five on the left eye were no longer present (Fig. 1b). There was one remaining cylindrical dandruff focus on the left lower eyelid. A few punctate corneal erosions and a decreased TBUT remained, but the patient reported a remarkable improvement in ocular itching and irritation. At one month, the changes to the anterior eyelid were preserved, the corneal punctate erosions were no longer present, and the posterior eyelid meibum was less viscous. The patient endorsed facile utilization of the medicine with clear application instructions, and there were no reported adverse events.
Discussion
It is understood that Demodex infestation plays an etiologic role in chronic blepharitis. Although the scope of blepharitis includes anterior, posterior, and mixed phenotypes, only the presence of cylindrical dandruff is considered pathognomonic for Demodex infestation [23]. Other ocular manifestations of Demodex may include keratitis, marginal infiltrates, conjunctivitis, and blepharoconjunctivitis. Demodex is also isolated successfully from normal human subjects, and therefore a commensal role for the mite is plausible. The evidence supporting its importance in maintaining ocular ecology revolves around the ability of Demodex to control bacterial populations, impose its own bacterial microflora, and outcompete other mites [24]. The current preferred treatment agent for infection is tea tree oil or its active component, terpinen-4-ol. Both have demonstrated efficacy as a demodicidal agent in vivo and in vitro [13, 14, 25]. While these agents are useful, reports of local hypersensitivity reactions and persistent mite survival do exist [14, 26]. Other traditional mite therapies designed to trap or suffocate Demodex have been shown to be ineffective, perhaps due to the minimal aerobic requirements of the arachnid or the robust nature of its exoskeleton. In one report, Demodex was found to be resistant to both 75% alcohol and 10% PVP-I [14].
Our current understanding of Demodex and its relation to the human skin is evolving. Demodex has been implicated in not only chronic blepharitis but also other dermatological inflammatory conditions, including acne and rosacea. Patients with rosacea have been shown to have a higher density of Demodex infestation compared to controls [7, 27, 28]. Although there is no exact relationship of symptoms or manifestations of disease with the Demodex population, it is thought that factors such as age, genetics, immune status, and sebum content may play a role in disease expression. For instance, in those who harbor Demodex but show little inflammation, the deep, ensconced location of the mite within the eyelid may create a safe harbor from host innate immunity. An eventual inciting event, activating a delayed hypersensitivity cascade, may facilitate the development of inflammatory skin conditions such as rosacea. There is also a relationship between rosacea and the presence of Demodex mites carrying the bacteria Bacillus oleronius, a Gram-negative, nonmotile endospore-forming rod [29]. Studies have found that multiple antigenic proteins produced by the bacteria are particularly immunogenic and proinflammatory [28, 30]. Finally, Demodex may harbor other pathogenic bacteria such as Streptococcus and Staphylococcus spp., whose superantigens have also been implicated in rosacea [31].
We have reported the first successful treatment of mixed blepharitis secondary to Demodex with a dilute PVP-I/DMSO gel system. Similar success with a dilute PVP-I/DMSO agent in a case of rosacea blepharoconjunctivitis has been reported [21]. This is not surprising given the potential overlap between both conditions. The result is surprising given that more concentrated 10% PVP-I solutions reportedly failed to demonstrably eradicate Demodex during in vitro studies. To better understand this, there are certain advantages to our treatment that must be underscored. First, dilute PVP-I concentrations have a greater capacity to deliver free molecular iodine at infection sites [32]. This increased free molecular iodine is known to be the most antimicrobially active iodine species. We also may be seeing an anti-inflammatory effect of PVP-I, as the iodine is able to act as a reduction agent for superoxide generated in the host inflammatory cascade [33].
DMSO is a polar, aprotic solvent that has been employed as an inactive ingredient in several FDA-approved products. It has particular attributes that may enhance the efficacy of dilute PVP-I. Importantly, it is a skin penetration enhancer and exerts a concentration-dependent effect on cellular membranes. Modular dynamics simulations have shown that DMSO can partition the lipid bilayer, changing membrane fluidics, and at higher concentrations it can induce hydrophilic and hydrophobic water pores [34]. This pore formation is likely the means of enhancing the penetration of the dilute PVP-I.
In terms of potential mechanisms of action that are vital to the success of this treatment, it is likely that the PVP-I/DMSO system is able to reach the deep eyelid structures including the pilosebaceous units and the tarsal meibomian glands. As we have seen, it is in and around these structures that Demodex mites reside, often beyond the reach of conventional treatment agents that cannot penetrate into these locations. Once it has reached the target site, the strong solvating potential of the DMSO may have an effect on the permeability of the chitin exoskeleton, enhancing PVP-I penetration and contributing to the demodicidal effect.
The report of a single successful case is of course limited by the lack of confirmatory findings in additional cases, the lack of controls, and the lack of any study design intended to allow more rigorous evaluations of the therapy. Nonetheless, given our experience with PVP-I/DMSO systems in a variety of ocular and skin indications, we think that this promising initial report warrants additional study in expanded, controlled clinical trials.
References
Coston TO. Demodex folliculorum blepharitis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1967;65:361–92.
Fulk GW, Clifford C. A case report of demodicosis. J Am Optom Assoc. 1990;61:637–9.
English FP, Nutting WB. Demodicosis of ophthalmic concern. Am J Ophthalmol. 1981;91:362–72.
Kamoun B, Fourati M, Feki J, et al. Blepharitis due to Demodex: myth or reality? J Fr Ophtalmol. 1999;22:525–7.
Rodriguez AE, Ferrer C, Alio JL. Chronic blepharitis and Demodex. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2005;80:635–42.
Basta-Juzbasic A, Subic JS, Ljubojevic S. Demodex folliculorum in development of dermatitis rosaceiformis steroidica and rosacea-related diseases. Clin Dermatol. 2002;20:135–40.
Erbagci Z, Ozgoztasi O. The significance of Demodex folliculorum density in rosacea. Int J Dermatol. 1998;37:421–5.
Post CF, Juhlin E. Demodex folliculorum and blepharitis. Arch Dermatol. 1963;88:298–302.
Koo H, Kim TH, Kim KW, Wee SW, Chun YS, Kim JC. Ocular surface discomfort and Demodex: effect of tea tree oil eyelid scrub in Demodex blepharitis. J Korean Med Sci. 2012;27(12):1574–9.
Liu J, Sheha H, Tseng SC. Pathogenic role of Demodex mites in blepharitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;10:505–10.
Liang L, Ding X, Tseng SC. High prevalence of Demodex brevis infestation in chalazia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157:342–8.
English FP, Cohn D, Groeneveld ER. Demodectic mites and chalazion. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;100:482–3.
Gao YY, Di Pascuale MA, Elizondo A, Tseng SC. Clinical treatment of ocular demodecosis by lid scrub with tea tree oil. Cornea. 2007;26:136–43.
Gao YY, Di Pascuale MA, Li W, et al. In vitro and in vivo killing of ocular Demodex by tea tree oil. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1468–73.
Holzchuh FG, Hida RY, Moscovici BK, et al. Clinical treatment of ocular Demodex folliculorum by systemic ivermectin. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(6):1030–4.
Salem DA, El-Shazly A, Nabih N, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of oral ivermectin in comparison with ivermectin: metronidazole combined therapy in the treatment of ocular and skin lesions of Demodex folliculorum. Int J Infect Dis. 2013;17(5):343–7.
Speaker MG, Menikoff JA. Prophylaxis of endophthalmitis with topical povidone-iodine. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(12):1769–75.
Trinavarat A, Atchaneeyasakul LO, Nopmaneejumruslers C, Inson K. Reduction of endophthalmitis rate after cataract surgery with preoperative 5% povidone-iodine. Dermatology. 2006;212(Suppl 1):35–40.
Saedon H, Nosek J, Phillips J, Narendran N, Yang YC. Ocular surface effects of repeated application of povidone iodine in patients receiving frequent intravitreal injections. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2017;6:1–12.
Cebra C, Anderson D, Tibary A, Van Saun R, Johnson LW. Llama and alpaca care: medicine, surgery, reproduction, nutrition and herd health. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2014.
Pelletier JS, Stewart KP, Capriotti K, Capriotti JA. Rosacea blepharoconjunctivitis treated with a novel preparation of dilute povidone iodine and dimethylsulfoxide: a case report and review of the literature. Ophthalmol Ther. 2015;4(2):143–50.
Kheirkhah A, Blanco G, Casas V, Tseng SC. Fluorescein dye improves microscopic evaluation and counting of Demodex in blepharitis with cylindrical dandruff. Cornea. 2007;26:697–700.
Gao YY, Di Pascuale MA, Li W, et al. High prevalence of ocular Demodex in lashes with cylindrical dandruffs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:3089–94.
Nicholls SG, Oakley CL, Tan A, Vote BJ. Demodex species in human ocular disease: new clinicopathological aspects. Int Ophthalmol. 2017;37(1):303–12.
Cheng AM, Sheha H, Tseng SC. Recent advances on ocular Demodex infestation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015;26(4):295–300.
Larson D, Jacob SE. Tea tree oil. Dermatitis. 2012;23(1):48–9.
Forton F, Seys B. Density of Demodex folliculorum in rosacea: a case-control study using standardized skin-surface biopsy. Br J Dermatol. 1993;128:650–9.
Forton F, Germaux MA, Brasseur T, et al. Demodicosis and rosacea: epidemiology and significance in daily dermatologic practice. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;52:74–87.
Lacey N, Delaney S, Kavanagh K, Powell FC. Mite-related bacterial antigens stimulate inflammatory cells in rosacea. Br J Dermatol. 2007;157:474–81.
Li J, O’Reilly N, Sheha H, et al. Correlation between ocular Demodex infestation and serum immunoreactivity to Bacillus proteins in patients with facial rosacea. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:870–7.
Wolf R, Ophir J, Avigad J, et al. The hair follicle mites (Demodex spp.). Could they be vectors of pathogenic microorganisms? Acta Derm Venereol. 1988;68:535–7.
Berkelman RL, Holland BW, Anderson RL. Increased bactericidal activity of dilute preparations of povidone-iodine solutions. J Clin Microbiol. 1982;15(4):635–9.
Beukelman CJ, van den Berg AJ, Hoekstra MJ, Uhl R, Reimer K, Mueller S. Anti-inflammatory properties of a liposomal hydrogel with povidone-iodine (Repithel) for wound healing in vitro. Burns. 2008;34(6):845–55.
Notman R, Noro M, O’Malley B, Anwar J. Molecular basis for dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) action on lipid membranes. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128(43):13982–3.
Acknowledgements
This study and article processing charges were funded by Veloce BioPharma. All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship of this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given final approval of the version to be published. Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Disclosures
Jesse S. Pelletier is a founding member and employee of Veloce BioPharma. Jesse S. Pelletier also has a pending patent related to this work. Kara Capriotti is a founding member and employee of Veloce BioPharma. Kara Capriotti also has a pending patent related to this work. Kevin S. Stewart is a founding member and consultant to Veloce BioPharma. Kevin S. Stewart also has a pending patent related to this work. Joseph A. Capriotti is a founding member and employee of Veloce BioPharma. Joseph A. Capriotti also has a pending patent related to this work.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Informed consent was obtained from the patient prior to the publication of this study.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Enhanced content
To view enhanced content for this article go to http://www.medengine.com/Redeem/DB98F06055962F5F.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Pelletier, J.S., Capriotti, K., Stewart, K.S. et al. Demodex Blepharitis Treated with a Novel Dilute Povidone-Iodine and DMSO System: A Case Report. Ophthalmol Ther 6, 361–366 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-017-0097-3
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-017-0097-3