Estimating the Prevalence of Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy in a Large In-Hospital Database in Japan

Abstract

Introduction

Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM)—a debilitating, fatal disease resulting from the deposition of transthyretin (TTR) amyloid fibrils—can be hereditary due to mutations in the TTR gene (ATTRm) or wild type (ATTRwt). The global prevalence of ATTR-CM is largely unknown, although likely underestimated, with no formal epidemiological prevalence studies in Japan. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of ATTR-CM in a large in-hospital database in Japan.

Methods

This was a retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study which utilized data from all adult patients (aged ≥ 20 years) in the hospital-based Japan Medical Data Vision (MDV) database from January 2010 to September 2018 to estimate the number of currently diagnosed ATTR-CM patients and describe their demographic and clinical characteristics and diagnostic modalities. ATTR-CM patients (ATTRwt and ATTRm) were identified using a range of diagnosis codes that were applied to create broad and narrow definitions of the disease.

Results

Over the 9 years of this study, there were 3255 (155.8 per million adult patients in the MDV database) to 3992 (191.1 per million) diagnoses of ATTRwt and 67 (3.2 per million) to 106 (5.1 per million) diagnoses of ATTRm in the MDV database (based on the narrow and broad definitions, respectively). There were 444 (21.2 per million) diagnoses of amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. Considering only those patients who were also diagnosed with heart failure, there were 1468 (70.3 per million) to 1798 (86.1 per million) diagnoses of ATTRwt and 50 (2.4 per million) to 61 (2.9 per million) diagnoses of ATTRm. Most ATTRwt patients (~ 90%) did not have a record of endomyocardial or abdominal wall biopsy, or of scintigram.

Conclusion

This retrospective study provides an estimate of the number of patients diagnosed with ATTR-CM in a large in-hospital database in Japan over a period of 9 years. Improving awareness of disease prevalence may improve diagnosis and treatment.

Funding

Pfizer.

Introduction

Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is a debilitating, fatal disease resulting from the deposition of transthyretin amyloid fibrils, primarily in the heart [1]. ATTR-CM can be hereditary, due to mutations in the transthyretin (TTR) gene (ATTRm), or wild type (ATTRwt) [2, 3]. The prevalence of ATTR-CM is largely unknown, with current estimates likely understating the actual prevalence as a consequence of phenotypic variability, nonspecific symptoms, a historical lack of an effective treatment, and limited awareness of the disease. For example, symptoms associated with ATTR-CM may also be observed in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction or hypertensive heart disease, leading to misdiagnosis.

ATTR-CM is most common in older (> 60 years of age) males [1] and, despite having the highest proportion of older people in the world and a high prevalence of heart failure [5], there have not been any formal epidemiological studies investigating the prevalence of ATTR-CM in Japan. Published estimates of the prevalence of ATTRwt in Japan are limited by the lack of consensus on the definition and characterization of this disease, and show a broad range. For example, 34 of 100 Japanese patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome were shown to have wild-type transthyretin deposition in one study [6], while a nationwide survey identified 51 ATTRwt patients across 2300 clinical departments in Japan [7]. Another study of 9508 patients who underwent endomyocardial biopsy between 2010 and 2013 in Japan found that 403 had a diagnosis of “amyloidosis,” although not specifically ATTR-CM [8].

This study aimed to utilize the hospital-based Japan Medical Data Vision (MDV) database to estimate the prevalence of patients diagnosed with ATTR-CM in a large in-hospital database in Japan over a period of 9 years.

Methods

Study Design

This was a retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study that utilized anonymized data from all adult patients in the Japan MDV database. The MDV database is a hospital-based database containing inpatient and outpatient hospital data, demographics, diagnoses, patient encounters and medical practices, medications, laboratory tests, and costs. As of September 2018, the database covers around 25 million accumulated patients of all ages (the total population of Japan is 126 million [9]) from over 370 hospitals distributed throughout Japan that are capable of treating advanced-stage patients, including (but not limited to) acute care facilities. All hospitals in the MDV database have ≥ 20 beds. All patient data are anonymized with no personal data, so informed consent was not required. This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

The primary objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of ATTR-CM in a large in-hospital database in Japan based on the number of diagnosed patients in the MDV database over a period of 9 years. Secondary objectives were to describe the demographic and clinical disposition of patients diagnosed with ATTR-CM, characterize the diagnostic modalities used for patients with ATTR-CM, and describe the prevalence of other subtypes of cardiac amyloidosis (specifically, amyloid light-chain [AL] amyloidosis).

Data Analysis

All patients with ≥ 1 record in the MDV database between January 2010 and September 2018 who were ≥ 20 years of age at the time of their ATTR-CM diagnosis or their first record in the MDV database were included in this analysis. ATTR-CM and comorbidities were identified using diagnosis codes (International Classification of Diseases [ICD], 10th revision) and disease names coded according to Japanese claims codes available in the MDV database. Cases of ATTR-CM were identified using both a broad definition (using a wider range of diagnosis codes which may only be suggestive of ATTR-CM) and a narrow definition. The two definitions were used in order to identify a range of prevalences, allowing us to make some allowance for misdiagnosis or misrecording (see Table S1 in the Electronic supplementary material, ESM, for a list of all diagnosis codes). Patients were first selected based on the presence of ≥ 1 diagnosis code for ATTR-CM, and were grouped into those with any diagnosis code(s) under the broad definition and into a subset of those who only had diagnosis codes associated with the narrow definition (Fig. 1). These patients were then separated into the ATTRwt patients who did not have a diagnosis code for neuropathy and did not have a diagnosis code for AL amyloidosis or multiple myeloma, and the ATTRm patients who had a diagnosis code for neuropathy and did not have a diagnosis code for AL amyloidosis or multiple myeloma. Patients with a diagnosis of AL amyloidosis were also recorded. Demographics, including medical history and hospital data, were recorded for each patient. Prevalence was estimated for each year and over the whole period, and was expressed as the number of cases per 1 million adult patients in the MDV database (per million). Diagnosis codes and demographics for the subgroup of patients also diagnosed with heart failure were also assessed. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the cases are expressed as means and standard deviations (SDs) for continuous variables and as counts and percentages for categorical variables.

Fig. 1

Selection steps for patients with ATTRwt and ATTRm under the broad and narrow definitions. AL amyloid light-chain, ATTR-CM transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy, ATTRm hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis, ATTRwt wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy, MDV Medical Data Vision

Results

Prevalence of ATTR-CM and Subtypes of Cardiac Amyloidosis

The total number of patient records in the MDV database between January 2010 and September 2018 was 25,333,955, of whom 20,894,625 were aged ≥ 20 years (Fig. 1). Of these, the majority (69.5%) were outpatients only, while 30.4% had ≥ 1 inpatient visit and 4.4% had ≥ 1 inpatient visit only (no outpatient visit). The mean (SD) age of all patients in the database was 57.7 (18.9) years and 46.3% were male. The majority of patients in the database (59.3%) were from hospitals of an intermediate size (200–499 beds), while 29.6% were from hospitals with ≥ 500 beds and 11.1% were from hospitals with ≤ 199 beds.

Over the whole period (January 2010 to September 2018), there were 3992 diagnoses of ATTRwt and 106 diagnoses of ATTRm using the broad definition of ATTR-CM. Using the narrow definition of ATTR-CM, there were 3255 diagnoses of ATTRwt and 67 diagnoses of ATTRm (Fig. 1, Table 1). There were 444 diagnoses of AL amyloidosis.

Table 1 Prevalence of ATTR-CM and subtypes of cardiac amyloidosis

The most common diagnosis code for patients with ATTRwt was “amyloidosis,” representing over half of the diagnosed patients, followed by “cardiac amyloidosis” and “secondary amyloidosis.” The most common diagnosis code for patients with ATTRm was “familial amyloidosis,” followed by “cardiac amyloidosis” and “amyloidosis” (Table 1). The number of sites and number of patients in the MDV database increased each year. From 2013, the prevalence of ATTRwt and ATTRm as recorded in the database increased each year, as did the number of sites in the database (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Annual prevalences of a ATTRwt, b ATTRm, c ATTRwt with heart failure, and d ATTRm with heart failure per million adult patients in the MDV database. 2018 prevalence data covers the period from Jan 2010 to Sep 2018. ATTRm hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis, ATTRwt wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy, HF heart failure

A total of 1,538,693 patients in the database had a diagnosis of heart failure (Fig. 1). Considering only patients who were also diagnosed with heart failure, there were 1798 (86.1 per million) diagnoses of ATTRwt and 61 (2.9 per million) diagnoses of ATTRm using the broad definition of ATTR-CM. Using the narrow definition of ATTR-CM, there were 1468 (70.3 per million) diagnoses of ATTRwt and 50 (2.4 per million) diagnoses of ATTRm (Table 2). There were 308 (14.7 per million) diagnoses of AL amyloidosis.

Table 2 Prevalence of ATTR-CM and subtypes of cardiac amyloidosis in patients diagnosed with heart failure

Demographic Characteristics of Patients with Cardiac Amyloidosis

Under the broad definition, and over the whole period, greater than half (53.7%) of the ATTRwt patients were female (Table 3), while the majority of both the ATTRm patients (61.3%; Table 4) and the AL amyloidosis patients (59.2%; Table 5) were male. ATTRm patients tended to be younger (mean [SD] age, 63.7 [15.2] years) than ATTRwt (68.1 [14.2] years) and AL amyloidosis (68.8 [11.1]) patients. The proportion of the patients aged ≥ 80 years was higher for the ATTRwt patients (23.0%) than for the ATTRm (9.4%) or AL amyloidosis (16.9%) patients. The proportion of patients with ATTRwt tended to increase with age (76.9% of the ATTRwt patients were aged ≥ 60 years), and this trend was observed for every ATTR-CM diagnosis code.

Table 3 Demographic characteristics of the ATTRwt patients (broad definition)

Table 4 Demographic characteristics of ATTRm patients (broad definition)

Table 5 Demographic characteristics of AL amyloidosis patients

AL amyloidosis patients were more likely to have ≥ 1 hospital visit (84.2%) than ATTRwt (62.6%) or ATTRm (63.2%) patients. AL amyloidosis patients were also more likely to have their claims data from a larger hospital than ATTRm patients who were, in turn, more likely have their claims data from a larger hospital than ATTRwt patients. However, each group was more likely to be from a larger hospital than the 20,894,625 patients in the whole MDV database, 11.1% of whom were from a hospital with ≤ 199 beds, 59.3% were from a 200- to 499-bed hospital, and 29.6% were from a ≥ 500-bed hospital. Compared with patients in the whole MDV database, each group was also more likely to have died in the hospital (2.7%, 12.8%, 8.5%, and 22.5% for the whole MDV database, ATTRwt, ATTRm, and AL amyloidosis, respectively) and more likely to be from a university hospital (5.9%, 12.8%, 16.0%, and 9.7% for the whole MDV database, ATTRwt, ATTRm, and AL amyloidosis, respectively).

Considering only those patients with a diagnosis of heart failure, demographic characteristics were largely similar to those of all ATTR-CM patients (Table 6). There remained a relatively high proportion of female ATTRwt patients (44.8%, compared with 53.7% of all ATTRwt patients). However, ATTRwt patients with heart failure were more likely to have had ≥ 1 inpatient visit (82.3% compared with 62.6%) or to have died in hospital (21.1% compared with 12.8%).

Table 6 Demographic characteristics of ATTR-CM and subtypes of cardiac amyloidosis patients diagnosed with heart failure (whole period)

Diagnostic Modalities in Patients with ATTR-CM (Broad Definition)

The large majority of patients diagnosed with ATTR-CM did not have a record of a tissue biopsy or a scintigram with sodium pyrophosphate. The greater proportion of those who did were inpatients (Table 7). Approximately 9% of all ATTRwt patients (both inpatients and outpatients) had an endomyocardial biopsy or abdominal wall biopsy at any time. Digestive tract biopsy was more common (1011 patients, 25.3%), but it was rare for patients with a digestive tract biopsy to also have an endomyocardial biopsy (59 patients) or abdominal wall biopsy (65 patients), which would be required to optimally confirm a diagnosis of ATTRwt.

Table 7 Diagnostic modalities for ATTR-CM and subtypes of cardiac amyloidosis in inpatients and outpatients (whole period)

Diagnostic modalities were largely similar in the subgroup of patients diagnosed with heart failure, with digestive tract biopsy and scintigram with sodium pyrophosphate slightly more common (Table 8).

Table 8 Diagnostic modalities for ATTR-CM and subtypes of cardiac amyloidosis patients diagnosed with heart failure (whole period)

Considering only diagnostic modalities within 8 weeks of diagnosis in all patients, 121 (3.0%) ATTRwt patients had an endomyocardial biopsy, 41 (1.0%) had an abdominal wall biopsy, and 407 (10.2%) had a digestive tract biopsy, while 14 (0.4%) had a scintigram. Among the patients with a digestive tract biopsy, endomyocardial biopsy (21 of 407 patients) and abdominal wall biopsy (17 of 407 patients) were rare.

Discussion

This retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study utilized a large database of over 25 million patients from over 370 Japanese hospitals to estimate the prevalence of patients diagnosed with ATTR-CM in a large in-hospital database in Japan. The use of broad and narrow definitions for ATTR-CM led to a range of estimates of the number of ATTRwt patients in the MDV database over the 9 years of this analysis of between 3255 (155.8 per million) and 3992 (191.1 per million). ATTRm was less common, with between 67 (3.2 per 1 million) and 106 (5.1 per million) patients in the MDV database. Among patients who were also diagnosed with heart failure, who were potentially more likely to represent symptomatic ATTR-CM, there were between 1468 (70.3 per million) and 1798 (86.1 per million) diagnoses of ATTRwt, and between 50 (2.4 per million) and 61 (2.9 per million) diagnoses of ATTRm. The prevalence of ATTR-CM in the MDV database was shown to increase over the duration of this study at the same time that the size of the database itself increased. This increase may most likely be related to an increase in awareness of the disease, including the recruitment processes for clinical trials in Japan that test new treatments for ATTR-CM.

Prior estimates of the prevalence of ATTRwt in Japan have identified as few as 51 total patients in over 2300 clinical departments in Japan [7]. This prior estimate was based on a questionnaire sent to clinical departments. The patients were identified in a limited number of institutes (ten in total), which led the authors to conclude that ATTRwt was underdiagnosed in Japan [7]. This study provides a significantly larger estimate over a 9-year period, but this is based on codes in a claims database which were not validated against the actual patient diagnosis, limiting the interpretation of these results. This limitation, together with the fact that many patients are likely undiagnosed and that the MDV database does not cover the entire population of Japan, prevents the calculation of the true prevalence of ATTR-CM in Japan and limits this analysis to an estimate.

Studies in other countries have reported the incidence of ATTRwt to be 16% in patients with severe aortic stenosis who were undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement [4], and 5% in patients with presumed hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [10]. In terms of individual patients identified, the Transthyretin Amyloidosis Outcomes Survey (THAOS) registered approximately 189 patients with ATTRwt in the United States [11] and 125 in continental Western Europe [12], while the United Kingdom National Amyloidosis Center enrolled 711 patients with ATTRwt between 2000 and 2017 [13]. While there are significant differences between a large observational study and the enrollment of patients in a prospective registry, it is possible that the higher prevalence of ATTR-CM in Japan identified in this study is an overestimate.

There were notable demographic and clinical differences between the patients with ATTRwt identified in this study and past descriptions of this population. For example, only 1.5% of the ATTRwt patients had undergone a carpal tunnel release procedure, despite carpel tunnel syndrome representing an early symptom in approximately one-third of patients in prior studies [6, 11, 14, 15]. More notable was the lower than expected proportions of ATTR-CM patients who were also diagnosed with heart failure or who were male. ATTR-CM is strongly associated with heart failure, but less than 50% of the ATTRwt patients also had heart failure. Similarly, ATTRwt has been typically understood to occur predominately in males [11, 15,16,17], but over 50% of the patients were female in this study. When only ATTRwt patients diagnosed with heart failure were considered, the proportion of females remained relatively high (44.8%).

ATTRwt is likely underdiagnosed, particularly in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, with one study reporting an ATTRwt incidence of 13% in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction [18]. The MDV database does not record cases of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction as a unique diagnosis code, coding these patients as heart failure, and it does not record echocardiographic assessments. As a consequence, underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients may not be captured in the database, which may have contributed to the lower than expected incidence of heart failure in patients with ATTR-CM this study. It has also been shown that a preserved ejection fraction is more common in female than in male heart failure patients [19,20,21], which may contribute to the higher than expected proportion of female patients identified.

It was notable that the majority of patients in the MDV database did not have a record of a tissue biopsy, suggesting that the diagnosis was made on the basis of clinical criteria. Clinical signs associated with ATTRwt can include evidence of heart failure, increased left ventricular wall thickness, reduced myocardial strain, and a history of carpel tunnel syndrome, but diagnosis is confirmed by demonstrating the presence of transthyretin amyloid in the heart [22, 23]. The number of tissue biopsies may be underestimated as tests conducted at other sites (which are not a part of the database) are not included in the record, although it is not known if this scenario is common. While digestive tract biopsies were much more common than endomyocardial biopsy or abdominal wall biopsy, endomyocardial biopsy would typically be necessary for a formal histological diagnosis [23]. Very few patients had a digestive tract biopsy and an endomyocardial biopsy, particularly within 8 weeks of diagnosis, suggesting that the majority of the digestive tract biopsies may have been an artefact unrelated to the diagnosis of ATTR-CM. This was not unexpected, as digestive tract biopsy is a common test in Japan. Nevertheless, the fact that over 400 ATTRwt patients had a digestive tract biopsy within 8 weeks of diagnosis could be a significant finding as it implies that it may be an underestimated diagnostic modality in Japan. However, since only a small proportion (~ 9%) of the ATTRwt patients had an endomyocardial biopsy or abdominal wall biopsy at some point (and even fewer within 8 weeks of diagnosis [~ 4%]), there is the possibility that this study overestimates the prevalence. The immunostaining of tissue biopsy to identify transthyretin can be associated with a false positive rate, depending on the methodology used [7, 14], so this may also contribute to an overestimation. At the same time, this study does not capture patients who were misdiagnosed or were undiagnosed due to less severe disease, and may therefore underestimate the prevalence.

As a retrospective study of data from a secondary source, this analysis may be limited by errors, omissions, or variations in the source records. This was not a longitudinal study, patients were not followed over time, and patient outcomes and mortality rates could not be assessed. This limitation means that patients’ prognoses and outcomes could not be assessed. The MDV database is limited to hospitals with ≥ 20 beds and, as such, does not include smaller clinics.

Conclusion

This retrospective study revealed that in the MDV database in Japan over the 9 years of this analysis, between 3255 and 3992 patients were diagnosed with ATTRwt, and between 67 and 106 patients were diagnosed with ATTRm. Limited to patients who were also diagnosed with heart failure, there were between 1468 and 1798 diagnoses of ATTRwt and between 50 and 61 diagnoses of ATTRm. As awareness of the disease grows, it is likely that more patients will be diagnosed, and further studies on the true prevalence of ATTR-CM should be undertaken in the future. Greater awareness of the disease, together with the emergence of new treatments, may also improve diagnosis and treatment outcomes.