These preliminary results appear to suggest that subclinical RV dysfunction is present in sAS patients with mild degrees of PH, which is clinically critical considering that PH is not only an independent predictor of late TAVI mortality [6], but also increases operative mortality while reducing long-term survival [7]. Furthermore, subclinical RV dysfunction has been identified as an adverse predictor of clinical outcomes in PH patients [8].
The prevalence of severe pulmonary hypertension in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis has been reported as high as 29% using invasive hemodynamic monitoring prior to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) [9]. Recent data from Barbash et al., showed that pulmonary hypertension was a frequent co-morbidity found in patients with severe aortic stenosis referred for TAVR. In addition, these investigators found that significantly elevated pulmonary artery pressures at baseline was a poor prognostic factor when performing preprocedural assessment of the patients [10]. The prevalence of PH in our case series (56%) was higher than previously published by these authors.
Musa and collaborators have recently explored the impact of TAVI and SAVR upon RV function in patients with sAS using cardiovascular magnetic resonance [11]. Interestingly, they found that TAVI had no adverse impact on RV function and volume. Unfortunately, we lack post-TAVI echocardiographic information for most of patients included in our study. Nevertheless, further studies are encouraged to determine whether or not TAVI has any adverse beneficial impact upon right ventricular echocardiographic parameters.
Even though there have been some variations in terms of what is expected as normal with regards to longitudinal measures of RV systolic function, our laboratory has consistently shown the linear relationship between these measures and RV fractional area change. In prior reported studies, a TAPSE >2 cm and a TD TDI s’ >12 cm/s correlated with a RV fractional area change >55% [12, 13].
Some limitations need to be acknowledged in our study. First, this is a retrospective case series study; however, the main goal was met. Second, there was only a small number of patients included for analysis. Third, the original database missed important data, such as strain imaging and invasive hemodynamic information. Furthermore, based on the pre-specified exclusion criteria no assumptions can be made on how atrial fibrillation or rhythm abnormalities, mitral annular calcification, mitral valve stenosis, or prior valvular replacement surgery could affect the reliability of our study findings.