Introduction

The majority of coronary artery anomalies (80%) are benign and asymptomatic [1]. The incidence of an anomalous left main coronary artery (LMCA) originating from the right coronary cusp is low (0.05%) [2] But if the artery takes an inter-arterial course between the aorta and the pulmonary artery, sudden death may take place by compression during vigorous exercise [3]. Standard management includes surgical reimplantation of the left main ostium. We report a case of LMCA with an anomalous origin from the right coronary cusp, surgical management strategy and invasive follow-up.

Case Report

A 56-year-old Caucasian lady presented to our Rapid Access Chest Pain clinic following 3 episodes of non-specific sharp central chest discomfort over the previous 6 weeks. She had occasional palpations, but no history of pre-syncope or collapse.

On Bruce protocol exercise treadmill test, there was no ST segment depression, but frequent ventricular ectopics at peak exercise. Transthoracic echocardiography showed severe hypokinesis of basal, inferior and inferoapical segments with mild reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (45%). Given the ventricular ectopics and unexpected reduction in ejection fraction, cardiac catheterization was undertaken which showed no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) at rest, but the LMCA had an anomalous origin arising from right coronary cusp (Fig. 1a–b). Subsequent cardiac computed tomography (CT) angiography (Fig. 2) showed this anomalous course was a high-risk type, running between the aortic root and pulmonary artery although it was not compressed at rest and maintained a circular cross-section. The LMCA then ran anteriorly in an unusual course to reach the interventricular groove about one-third of the way down, at which point it trifurcated into mid and distal left anterior descending (LAD), a small ectatic diagonal branch, and a proximal LAD that ran up the interventricular groove before turning to become the left circumflex (LCx). As this cardiac anatomy is considered high risk for life-threatening complications including sudden death, the patient was discussed by the heart team. The consensus was that surgery should be performed and that reimplantation of the anomalous LMCA was the best option.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Coronary angiogram at initial diagnosis: a anomalous left main coronary artery arising from the right coronary cusp and b normal right coronary artery

Fig. 2
figure 2

Cardiac computed tomography pre-cardiac surgery showing the anomalous (aberrant) left main coronary artery (LMCA) arising from the right coronary cusp. LAD left anterior descending, LCx left circumflex, RCA right coronary artery, RCC right coronary cusp

Surgery was performed with the proximal orifice of the left main stem reimplanted by conventional technique in the left coronary sinus in the normal position. However, due to the surgeon’s concerns that there remained the possibility for compression of the distal vessel, a left internal mammary artery (LIMA) was grafted to the LAD as a backup. Attempted closure of the chest was accompanied by ventricular fibrillation (VF) so the sternum was splinted open. The patient remained stable and on day 5, a saphenous vein graft (SVG) was performed to the first obtuse marginal then the sternum was closed. The patient made a good recovery and left ventricular ejection fraction remained unchanged.

Given the difficult post-operative course, a follow-up cardiac CT was arranged. The LIMA graft appeared atretic after just a few centimeters (Fig. 3a), but the SVG graft was patent with good run-off into the native LCx with retrograde filling of the LAD (Fig. 3b). The surgically reimplanted LMCA had ostial stenosis (Fig. 3c).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Cardiac computed tomography imaging following cardiac surgery a left internal mammary artery, b vein graft to circumflex obtuse marginal branch and c reimplanted left main coronary artery

CT findings were confirmed with invasive angiography (Figs. 4a–c). Pressure wire assessment of reimplanted LMCA ostium yielded no significant stenosis (fractional flow reserve 0.89), probably due to the good retrograde filling of the LAD from the SVG to LCx. She remains under yearly review with a low threshold for further revascularization should the SVG to LCx develop progressive stenosis.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Coronary angiogram following cardiac surgery a reimplanted left main coronary artery, b left internal mammary artery and c vein graft to circumflex obtuse marginal branch

Discussion

Anomalous LMCA with high-risk course is a rare, but important diagnosis. Accurate diagnosis can prevent the risk of sudden death and aid surgical planning. Most cases are unfortunately diagnosed post-mortem [4, 5].

This case demonstrates the difficulties in choosing the most appropriate surgical strategy. The initial operation was complicated by VF on closure of the chest despite the addition of an LIMA graft to the LAD. The surgeon remained concerned about the effect of competitive flow between reimplanted LMCA and the LIMA causing later occlusion of the graft. Potentially, the heart would be dependent on LIMA graft flow during occasions of LMCA compression such as vigorous exercise, but not at rest [6]. A vein graft was added to the first obtuse marginal branch of the LCx as it was the surgeon’s belief that vein grafts are more resistant to the effects of competitive flow than internal mammary artery grafts due to a reduction in flow-related contractility although it is acknowledged that firm evidence for this is lacking.

Coronary angiography remains the gold standard for the evaluation of CAD. However, in the case of coronary anomalies, further evaluation by Cardiac CT or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is recommended to determine the course of the anomaly and risk stratification [7].

Coronary artery bypass is considered as main surgical treatment option for reimplantation of high-risk anomalous coronary arteries [8]. Our case showed that a flexible surgical approach may be needed.

Conclusion

Anomalous origin coronary arteries should be worked up comprehensively and an aggressive treatment strategy adopted, especially if there is an inter-arterial course. Non-invasive and invasive modalities can assess the success of a complex surgical reimplantation strategy.