Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Geosynthetics-Reinforced Cushion on the Behavior of Partial Connected Piled Raft Foundation in Dry and Saturated Sandy Soil Using Shaking Table

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A partially connected piled raft foundation technique is utilized to protect the system of the building-piled-raft foundation against horizontal and vertical displacements. At the same time, the dynamic characteristics of the structure and load transfer mechanism will be affected by the geosynthetic reinforcement in the cushion layer separated between raft and piles. The seismic behavior of the partially connected piled raft foundation system under an earthquake in dry and saturated sand soil has not been thoroughly investigated. This study investigated the behavior of partially connected piled raft foundation with a cushion layer reinforced by geosynthetic materials in dry and saturated sand soil under seismic loading. To assess the response of the cushion layer to vertical and horizontal displacements of the raft foundation, four configurations of pile models were tested using shaking table. Also, the bending moments and strain variations in the geosynthetic-reinforced cushion layer subjected to earthquake loading have been investigated. The results of tests showed that using the geosynthetic materials in the cushion layer reduces the horizontal displacement for tested models with more than one connected pile in saturation state. For the partially connected piled raft foundation, reinforcement of the cushion layer by geogrid layers reduces the deformation and consequently increases the load-bearing capacity of foundation system. For the dry soil tests, the connected piles displayed high values of bending moment at the pile’s head due to the inertial and kinematic interactions. Also, the liquefaction of surface soil layer causes raising the bending moment values in the connected and disconnected piles regardless the reinforcement of cushion layer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bulatov HY, Kostyukova AY (2008) Technology of construction of foundations-"pile in the pipe". Mag Civ Eng 1:33–37

    Google Scholar 

  2. Karkush MO, Aljorany AN (2020) Analytical and numerical analysis of piled-raft foundation of storage tank. In: Construction in geotechnical engineering: Proceedings of IGC 2018. Springer, Singapore, pp 373–384

  3. Karkush MO, Ala NA (2019) Numerical evaluation of foundation of digester tank of sewage treatment plant. Civ Eng J 5(5):996–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alhassani AMJ, Aljorany AN (2019) Performance of piled raft foundation supported by either connected or unconnected piles. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering. IOP Publishing

  5. Jamiolkowski M, Ricceri G, Simonini P (2009) Safeguarding Venice from high tides: site characterization & geotechnical problems. In: Proceeding of 17th international conference of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, vol 4. IOS Press, pp 3209–3227

  6. Wong IH, Chang MF, Cao XD (2000) Raft foundations with disconnected settlement-reducing piles. In: Design applications of raft foundations. Thomas Telford Publishing

  7. Khalifa KR (2021) Parametric study of unconnected piled rafts in clayey soil using finite element method. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Technology, Iraq

  8. Xu R, Fatahi B (2018) Effects of pile group configuration on the seismic response of buildings considering soil-pile-structure interaction. In: GeoShanghai international conference. Springer

  9. Alkaby AD, Karkush MO (2022) Numerical modeling of screw piles performance under static and seismic loads in soft soils. In: Geotechnical engineering and sustainable construction: sustainable geotechnical engineering. Singapore: Springer Singapore, pp 291–303

  10. Karkush MO, Mohsin AH, Saleh HM, Noman BJ (2022) Numerical analysis of piles group surrounded by grouting under seismic load. In: Geotechnical engineering and sustainable construction: sustainable geotechnical engineering. Singapore: Springer Singapore, pp 379–389

  11. Bhattacharya S, Madabhushi SPG (2008) A critical review of methods for pile design in seismically liquefiable soils. Bull Earthq Eng 6(3):407–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ali AM, Karkush MO, Al-Jorany AN (2023) Numerical modeling of connected piled raft foundation under seismic loading in layered soils. J Mech Behav Mater 32(1):20220250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang L, Zhao M, Hu Y, Zhao H, Chen B (2012) Semi-analytical solutions for geosynthetic-reinforced and pile-supported embankment. Comput Geotech 44:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Al Ghanim AA (2019) Behavior of geogrid reinforced piled foundation under earthquake loading. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Al Nahrain, Iraq

  15. Xu R, Fatahi B (2018) Geosynthetic-reinforced cushioned piles with controlled rocking for seismic safeguarding. Geosynth Int 25(6):561–581. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.18.00018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kishida H (1963) Stress distribution by model piles in sand. Soils Found 4(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Giretti D (2010) Modelling of piled raft foundations in sand. Università degli Studi di Ferrara

  18. Fellenius BH, Altaee AA (1995) Critical depth: how it came into being and why it does not exist. Proc Inst Civ Eng-Geotech Eng 113(2):107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. ASTM D854 (2003) ASTM international. Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer

  20. ASTM D4253 (2003) ASTM international. Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table

  21. ASTM D4254 (2003) ASTM international. Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density

  22. ASTM D3080 (2003) ASTM international. Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions

Download references

Funding

The authors declare no funding received from third party.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdi Karkush.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest received from third party.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

AlSaadi, K.A., Almurshedi, A.D. & Karkush, M. Effect of Geosynthetics-Reinforced Cushion on the Behavior of Partial Connected Piled Raft Foundation in Dry and Saturated Sandy Soil Using Shaking Table. Indian Geotech J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-024-00890-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-024-00890-0

Keywords

Navigation