Abstract
A theoretical technical feasibility investigation aiming to decrease the rate of greenhouse emissions per unit of generated power from fossil fuel plants is presented. To that end, the FGSIG/GT (fuel glycerol integrated gasifier/gas turbine) concept is applied. High-ash coal and raw glycerol—that last deriving from renewable fuel (biodiesel) production—are mixed to form a slurry, which is pumped into the gasifier. The gas stream emerging from that reactor is cleaned by cyclones and filters to decrease the concentration of suspended solids in the stream as well as its granulometry. Before combustion, the fuel gas temperature is decreased to values below the dew points of alkaline compounds in it, thus significantly reducing their concentrations in the gas stream, therefore allowing its injection into commercial gas turbines. Energy recovering is accomplished by two Rankine cycles. The exergetic efficiency is chosen as an objective function to optimize the gasification process. The results reveal a diverging aspect of the RG/solid-fuel ratio influence on the gasification efficiency when comparing with the obtained in previous works where biomasses were fed to the FGSIG/GT process. Due to that highly pressurized process, the whole power generation is optimized resulting in first law efficiencies around 45%, which is noticeable having in mind the relatively low heating values of the presently considered fuels. Additionally, it is important to stress that the objective of this investigation is not just to decrease the overall CO2 emitted per unit of power output from a station consuming fossil fuel and shift, at least part of that, to one derived from a renewable source.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Abbreviations
- CE:
-
Chemical contribution to the exergetic efficiency
- CGE:
-
Cold gas efficiency
- DSC:
-
Dry solid content of a slurry
- EE:
-
Exergetic efficiency
- FGSIG/GT:
-
Fuel glycerol slurry integrated gasifier/gas turbine power generation process
- HAC:
-
High-ash coal
- RG:
-
Raw glycerol
- TE:
-
Thermal contribution to the exergetic efficiency
- Z:
-
Vertical coordinate inside the gasifier, where Z = 0 is the base of gas distributor surface
References
Kurose, R., Ikeda, M., Makino, H.: Combustion characteristics of high ash coal in a pulverized coal combustion. Fuel 80, 1147–1455 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00020-5
de Souza-Santos, M.L.: Lima EHS (2015) introductory study on fuel-slurry integrated gasifier/gas turbine (FSIG/GT) alternative for power generation applied to high-ash or low-grade coal. Fuel 143, 275–284 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.11.060.AccessedonJanuary18
Brazilian Ministry of Mines and Energy 2019 report. https://www.gov.br/mme/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/arquivos/auditorias/2019/arquivos-1/relatoriogestaomme-2019.pdf. Accessed on October 14, 2021.
Oil, Natural Gas and Biofuels Statistical Yearbook 2021, https://www.gov.br/anp/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/anuario-estatistico/oil-natural-gas-and-biofuels-statistical-yearbook-2021. Accessed on January 18, 2022.
Pachauri, N., He, B.: Value-added utilization of crude glycerol from biodiesel production: a survey of current research activities. In: ASABE meeting presentation, 066223, Portland, Oregon 9–12 July 2006 (2000)
Leoneti, A.B., Aragão-Leoneti, V., DeOliveira, S.V.W.B.: Glycerol as a by-product of biodiesel production in Brazil: alternatives for the use of unrefined glycerol. Renewab Energy 45, 138–145 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.02.032
de Souza-Santos, M.L.: Proposals for power generation based on processes consuming biomass-glycerol slurries. Energy 120(1), 959–974 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.005
de Souza-Santos, M.L., Camara, M.A.: Theoretical study on the effect of glycerol fraction in slurries with biomass consumed by a power generation process. Energy Fuels (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b02996
Cadavez, C., de Souza-Santos, M.L.: Efficiency of a power generation alternative regarding the composition of feeding biomass-glycerol slurry. Theoret Assess Energy 214, 2022 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118967
Raza, M., Inayat, A., Abu-Jdayil, B.: Crude glycerol as a potential feedstock for future energy via thermochemical conversion processes: a review. Sustainability 13, 12813 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212813
Rodrigues, A., Bordado, J.C., Galhano dos Santos, R.: Upgrading the glycerol from biodiesel production as a source of energy carriers and chemicals—a technological review for three chemical pathways. Energies 10(11), 1817 (2017)
Bohon, M.D., Metzger, B.A., Linak, W.P., King, C.J., Roberts, W.L: Glycerol combustion and emissions. In: Proceedings of the Combustion Institute (2010).
Mills, D.: Pneumatic Conveying Design Guide, 3rd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/C2014-0-02678-0
Vimalchand, P., Peng, W.W., Liu, G.P., Peng, W.W., Liu, G.: High pressure feeder and method of operating to feed granular or fine materials US20110146153A1 (2011). 17 Jul 2011. https://www.google.com/patents/US20110146153. Accessed 31 May 31 2021
Anthony, E.J.: Fluidized bed combustion of alternative solid fuels; status, successes and problems of the technology. PECS 21(3), 239–268 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1285(95)00005-3
Breault, R.W.: Gasification processes old and new: a basic review of the major technologies. Energies 3, 216–240 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3390/en3020216
Laugwitz, A., Grabner, M., Meyer, B.: Availability analysis of integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plants. In: Power Plant Life Management and Performance Improvement, Woodhead Publishing Limited (2011). https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857093806.1.110.
de Souza-Santos, M.L.: Solid Fuels Combustion and Gasification: Modeling, Simulation, and Equipment Operation, 2nd edn. New York, CRC Press (2010)
de Souza-Santos, M.L.: Modelling and simulation of fluidized-bed boilers and gasifiers for carbonaceous solids. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom (1987)
de Souza-Santos, M.L.: Comprehensive modelling and simulation of fluidized-bed boilers and gasifiers. Fuel 68(1507–1521), 2022 (1989)
de Souza-Santos, M.L.: Comprehensive simulator (CSFMB) applied to circulating fluidized bed boilers and gasifiers. Open Chem. Eng. J. 2, 106–118 (2008)
de Souza-Santos, M.L.: CSFB applied to fluidized-bed gasification of special fuels. Fuel 88(826–833), 2022 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2008.10.035.AccessedonJanuary18
Krzywanski, J., Zylka, A., Czakiert, T., Kulicki, K., Jankowska, S., Nowak, W.: A 1.5D model of a complex geometry laboratory scale fluidized bed CLC equipment. Powder Technol. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.09.041
Zylka, A., Krzywanski, J., Czakiert, T., Idziak, K., Sosnowski, M., De Souza-Santos, M.L., Sztekler, K., Nowak, W.: Modeling of the chemical looping combustion of hard coal and biomass using ilmenite as the oxygen carrier. Energies (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/en13205394.AccessedOctober19
de Souza-Santos, M.L.: Application of comprehensive simulation of fluidized-bed reactors to the pressurized gasification of biomass. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. 16, 376–383 (1994)
de Souza-Santos, M.L., Chavez, J.V.: Preliminary studies on advanced power generation based on combined cycle using a single high-pressure fluidized bed boiler and consuming sugar-cane bagasse. Fuel 95, 221–225 (2012)
de Souza-Santos, M.L., Chavez, J.V.: Development of studies on advanced power generation based on combined cycle using a single high-pressure fluidized bed boiler and consuming sugar cane bagasse. Energy Fuels 26, 1952–1963 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef2019935
deSouza-Santos, M.L., Chavez, J.V.: Second round on advanced power generation based on combined cycle using a single high-pressure fluidized bed boiler and consuming biomass. Open Chem. Eng. J. 6, 41–47 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2174/1874123101206010041
de Souza-Santos, M.L., Ceribeli, K.: Technical evaluation of a power generation process consuming municipal solid waste. Fuel 108, 578–585 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.12.037
de Souza-Santos, M.L., Beninca, W.A.: New strategy of fuel-slurry integrated gasifier/gas turbine (FSIG/GT) alternative for power generation applied to biomass. Energy & Fuel 28(4), 2697–2707 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef500317a
de Souza-Santos, M.L., Bernal, A.F.B., Rodriguez-Torres, A.F.: New developments on fuel-slurry integrated gasifier/gas turbine (FSIG/GT) alternative for power generation applied to biomass; configuration requiring no steam for gasification. Energy & Fuels 29(6), 3879–3889 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00775
de Souza-Santos, M.L.: Very high-pressure fuel-slurry integrated gasifier/gas turbine (FSIG/GT) power generation applied to biomass. Energy Fuels 29, 8066–8073 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02093
Mantovani, H.B., de Souza-Santos, M.L.: Theoretical analysis of power generation applying supercritical steam and high-pressure combustion chamber consuming biomass slurry. Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-021-00432-x
de Souza-Santos, M.L.: A study on thermo-chemically recuperated power generation systems using natural gas. Fuel 76, 593–601 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(97)00059-8
Basu, P.: Combustion and Gasification in Fluidized Beds. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2006)
Bair, W.G., Tarman, P.B.: Slurry Pumping Techniques for Feeding high-Pressure Coal Gasification Reactors. Institute of Gas Technology, Chicago, IL (1977)
He, W., Park, C.S., Joseph, N.M.: A rheological study on the pumpability of co-mingled biomass and coal slurries. In: Proceedings of the Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, PCC - Proceedings. Jan., 2008. (2008)
He, W., Park, C.S., Norkeck, J.M.: Rheological study of comingled biomass and coal slurries with hydrothermal pretreatment. Energy Fuels 23(10), 4763–4767 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef9000852
GIW Industries, Inc: Centrifugal Slurry Pump Concentration Limit Testing Phase 1. The Florida Institute of Phosphate Research, Bartow, FL (2005)
Shijazhuang Minerals Equipment Co., Personal correspondence . Retrieved from sales33@cnmineralsequipment.com. Acessed 04 Aug 2020.
de Souza-Santos, M.L.: Theoretical models for rates of heterogeneous reactions during combustion and gasification of liquid fuels in fluidized beds. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering 35(2), 679–690 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-6632.20180352s20160495
Boyce, P.M.: Axial Flow Compressors. http://www.netl.doe.gov/File%20Library/Research/Coal/energy%20systems/turbines/handbook/2-0.pdf. Accessed on August 2015.
Bala-Litwiniak, A., Radomiak, H.: Possibility of the utilization of waste glycerol as an addition to wood pellets. Waste Biomass Valoriz 10, 2193–2199 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0260-7
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. Gas Turbines. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Global Website|MHI Selects "Best Innovation 2011" Awards (2011). Accessed June 2022
Larson, E.D., Williams, R.H., Leal, M.R.L.V.: A review of biomass integrated gasifier/gas turbine combined cycle technology and its application in sugarcane industries, with an analysis for Cuba. Energy Sustain. Dev. 5(1), 54–76 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0973-0826(09)60021-1
Manente, G., Lazzaretto, A.: Innovative biomass to power conversion systems based on cascaded supercritical CO 2 Brayton cycles. Biomass Bioenerg. 69, 155–168 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.07.016
Consonni, S., Larson, E.D.: Biomass-gasifier/aeroderivative gas turbine combined cycles: part A – technologies and performance modeling. J. Eng. Gas Turbine Power 118(3), 507–515 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2816677
Consonni, S., Larson, E.D.: Biomass-gasifier/aeroderivative gas turbine combined cycles: Part B – performance calculations and economic assessment. J. Eng. Gas Turbine Power 118(3), 516–525 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2816678
Department of Energy, Office of Fossil and Carbon Management, https://www.energy.gov/fecm/science-innovation/office-clean-coal-and-carbon-management/advanced-energy-systems/transformative. Accessed on August 30, 2022
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1
Important tables mentioned in the text are presented below (Tables 5, 6, 7).
Appendix 2
To provide a more complete view, the following figures illustrate a few aspects of the gasifier operation under those conditions. Those have been obtained by the application of CeSFaMB© software.
Figures 9 and 10 picture the temperature profiles in the bed and freeboard, respectively.
As expected at bubbling fluidized bed operations, the temperatures are uniform and relatively low, which allows for easier control as well many advantages when compared with other techniques [18, 35].
Figure 11 shows that complete cracking and coking of tar generated during the fuel pyrolysis near its feeding position (Z = 0.5 m) could be achieved. Thus, the produced gas would be free of Tar. Such prevents operational problems and maintenance costs to clean the produced gas.
Figure 12 allows observing the fast development and destruction of Tar near the fuel feeding position, which is far below the bed top. Therefore, well-designed equipment would allow sufficient bed height to complete those reactions before gas with Tar passes to the freeboard region; otherwise, the risk of jeopardizing the gas cleaning system increases. Additionally, the fuel feeding position is above the oxidation region, thus allowing the volatiles—rich in hydrogen, methane, and carbon monoxide—to survive and improve the quality of the produced gas.
Figure 13 shows other important heterogeneous reactions occurring in the emulsion. It becomes clear how fast fuel oxidation is when compared with gas–solid reactions. That also explains the surge of temperatures near the distributor (Z = 0), as shown in Fig. 9, as well as the fast decline of oxygen near that position (Fig. 14).
The concentration profiles of other important gas species throughout the gasifier interior are presented in Fig. 15.
Drying and evaporation of water entering with the slurry is paramount for hydrogen production (see reaction R.3 in Appendix 3). The rates of those reactions are also pictured in Fig. 9, while Fig. 16 illustrates the main homogeneous ones.
That figure demonstrates the key role played by the shift reaction (R.41 in Appendix 3) throughout the bed, which continues in the freeboard.
Appendix 3
A list of main reactions and processes considered by the simulator (CeSFaMB©) is presented below:
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dutra, A.O., de Souza-Santos, M.L. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from power generation through cofiring coal and raw glycerol: a theoretical feasibility study. Int J Energy Environ Eng 14, 905–920 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-022-00555-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-022-00555-9