Advertisement

First principles study on structural and magnetic properties of small and pure carbon clusters (C n , n = 2 - 12)

  • Mahdi Afshar
  • Mahboobeh Babaei
  • Amir Hossein Kordbacheh
Open Access
Research

Abstract

We have demonstrated the structural and magnetic properties of small carbon clusters (C n ,n = 2 - 12) in the framework of collinear approximation using density functional theory. The calculations were performed for amorphous, linear, and ring carbon clusters using full-potential local-orbital (FPLO) method. We have obtained stable structures, total energies, total magnetic moments, and HOMO-LUMO energy gap of these clusters. We have found that the amorphous carbon clusters with minimum energy are not magnetic clusters whereas their less-stable isomers with special configurations are ferromagnetic objects. Two robust magnetic moments were found for C5 carbon ring (6µB) and for pentagonal pyramid C6 structure (4µB).

Keywords

Carbon cluster Density functional theory Nanomagnetism 

Introduction

The intriguing possibility of magnetism and structural properties of carbon clusters has triggered great research interests due to their potential applications in molecular magnetism and spin functional nanodevices. Especially, nanodiamond particles can be used as a potential candidate to increase wear resistance and microhardness, and decrease the coefficients of friction and corrosion in composite functional layers such as hard disks and magnetic heads[1]. In addition, nanoscale magnetic sensors have been developed on the bases of nanodiamonds including nitrogen-vacancy impurities[2]. It has been found that carbon atoms can be magnetized around a vacancy defect in graphene[3] and also those carbon atoms located at the edges of a graphene nanoribbon[4, 5]. As a consequence, one can examine a magnetic feature for carbon clusters with some especial configurations. Therefore, it is prime important to know the magnetic properties of carbon structures and to know in which structure the carbon clusters are magnetized.

In the present work, our interest is concerned with the theoretical density functional theory (DFT) calculations to investigate the structures, electronic, and especially the magnetic properties of pure and neutral small carbon clusters. In this context, many experimental and theoretical studies have been conducted on the pure carbon clusters[6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. Raghavachari and Binkley, using spin-unrestricted version of Hartree-Fock method, have obtained the structures and energies of small carbon clusters (C n , n = 2 - 10) and revealed an odd-even pattern in the cluster geometries and that the odd-numbered clusters prefer linear structure and the even-numbered clusters prefer irregular cyclic structure[13]. Xu and co-workers have studied a number of annular carbon structures (C n , n = 3 - 31) and linear carbon clusters (C n , n = 2 - 12). They have found electronic properties of these carbon clusters such as total energies, energy gaps between highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO), and bond lengths at the level of DFT/B3LYP/6-31G approach[14, 15]. Zhang and co-workers have optimized the structure of C n clusters (n = 2 - 30) and have calculated binding energy for these clusters using the genetic algorithm associated with simulated annealing method[16]. The electronic properties and relative energies of carbon clusters with 2n atoms (2 ≤ n ≤ 16) for stable isomers including chains, rings, cages, and graphitic (plate and bowl) structures have been found by R.O. Jones[17]. Also, López-Urías and co-workers, using single-band Hubbard model and pseudo-potential approach implemented in the SIESTA package, have studied the electronic and magnetic properties of s p2 carbon isomers C n (n = 10,12,14)[18]. They have found a triplet state for some studied isomers in which this state strongly depends on the cluster geometry[18]. It has to be taken into account that carbon atoms are hybridized together in the form of sp, s p2, and s p3. Therefore, one can examine that there are many stable isomers for a typical pure carbon cluster including n atoms. To the best of our knowledge, there is no systematic study on magnetic and structural properties of all isomers of carbon clusters even for small structures.

In this paper we made an exhaustive search in carbon isomers to find out magnetic and stable objects with amorphous structure. In addition, the binding energies, HOMO-LUMO energy gaps and magnetic properties of sp, s p2, and s p3 carbon clusters (C n , n = 2 - 12) were studied. These properties were investigated for carbon clusters in the form of amorphous wire and ring structures using full-potential local-orbital method which is developed on the basis of linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) method. In Section 'Computational method,’ the numerical approach is discussed. Section 'Results and discussion’ presents the structural properties of different carbon isomers, calculated magnetic moments, binding energies, etc. Finally, the paper is summarized in Section 'Conclusions.’

Computational method

All magnetic calculations were performed using density functional theory[19] implemented within a self-consistent full-potential local-orbital basis band structure method, FPLO.9 package[20]. In this scheme, the scalar relativistic calculations were implemented within a spherical average on the spin-orbit interaction, using four-component Kohn-Sham-Dirac equation[21]. The generalized gradient approximation of (GGA) Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof 96 was used for the exchange-correlation potential[22]. The valence basis set of carbon consisted of 1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p, and 3d states so that for the sake of completeness, carbon core electrons and its polarization states were considered as valence electrons. For each size of studied clusters, several initial configurations were considered. In order to optimize atomic geometries, the position of all carbon atoms was fully relaxed. In the optimization process, the total energy and force converged to 0.001 meV and 0.001 eV/Å, respectively. The binding energy per atom (Eb) for all studied clusters was determined as Eb = (nE s  - Et)/n, where n is the size of the cluster (number of carbon atoms), Es is the energy of the single carbon atom and Et is the total energy of the relaxed cluster.

Results and discussion

In order to obtain stable carbon clusters, all amorphous structures were taken with most possible symmetry as initial configurations. However, it has to be pointed out that after relaxation process, most of the selected structures were unstable and deformed. The relaxed isomers and related point group symmetries of amorphous carbon clusters are illustrated in Figure1. The relaxed carbon rings and their related point groups are shown in Figure2. Table1 shows the total energies of the lowest amorphous, linear, and ring structures. In Figure3, we have indicated the calculated binding energies, related HOMO-LUMO gaps, and second difference energies for linear, ring, and amorphous structures with minimum energy.
Figure 1

The relaxed amorphous carbon clusters ( C n ,n= 2 - 12) and their related point group symmetries. The isomers with constant n are ordered with increasing energy. The corresponding magnetic moments (M s ) of magnetic carbon clusters are also presented. The magnetic moments are in Bohr magnetons. The magic icosahedron structure (12b) is not a stable isomer at ambient pressure and it relaxes to (12a) structure.

Figure 2

The relaxed ring carbon clusters ( C n ,n= 2 - 12) and their related point group symmetries. The corresponding magnetic moments (M s ) of magnetic carbon rings are also presented. The magnetic moments are in Bohr magnetons.

Table 1

The total energies of lowest amorphous, linear, and ring structures

 

Amorphous

Linear

Ring

C2

-

-2,064.6157

-

C3

-

-3,101.6398 a

-3,101.6398 b

C4

-4,135.9885

-4,136.4412 a

-4,135.9885 b

C5

-5,169.8423 b

-5,173.2075 a

-5,168.9118

C6

-6,204.1416

-6,208.2140 b

-6,208.5764 a

C7

-7,244.0570 b

-7244.7196 a

-7,243.7094

C8

-8,279.4919

-8,279.8854 a

-8,279.6294 b

C9

-9,313.6903

-9,316.2462 a

-9,315.3016 b

C10

-10,347.5800

-10,351.5172 b

-1,0354.1995 a

C11

-11,382.8994

-11,387.7825 b

-11,388.7931 a

C12

-12,417.3442

-12,423.1274 b

-12,423.6741 a

All values are in electron volt units. With constant n, letters a and b have denoted the first and second minimum energies for carbon structures, respectively.

Figure 3

Binding energies, second difference energies, and HOMO-LUMO gaps. The binding energies (top panel), the second difference energies Δ2E(n) (middle panel), and the HOMO-LUMO gaps ΔH-L (bottom panel) are shown for most stable (lowest amorphous, linear, and ring) structure of carbon clusters found with minimum energy. All values are presented in electron volts.

At first, the calculations were performed for carbon dimer. The optimized bond length is 1.316 Å, and its magnetic moment was obtained 2 μB. The calculated C-C bond length at the DFT (GGA) level is larger than that in experimental value (1.243 Å) by about five percent[23]. Our calculated GGA bond length for C2 dimer can be compared to the calculated bond length (1.315 Å) done by Congie Zhang[16].

For C3 cluster, we considered linear and triangular structures. Linear isomer with D h symmetry was found to be the most stable structure whose magnetic moment is zero. Triangular structure (D3h) with magnetic moment 2 μB lies 564 meV higher in total energy compared to its linear isomer. The calculated bond length for triangular structure is 1.377 Å, which is in agreement with the calculated bond length done by Martin and co-workers[24]. The calculated C-C bond length of the C3 linear cluster is 1.304 Å, where it can be compared to the experimental value of 1.297 Å, determined by Hinkle et al.[25] and calculated bond length (1.305 Å) done by Hutter and co-workers[26].

We have studied square and tetrahedron structures for C4 cluster but after relaxation due to Jahn-Teller effect, they distorted to Figure1 (4a) and (4b) structures, respectively. The most stable structure is a rhombic structure (Figure1 (4a)) with D2h point group symmetry and zero magnetic moment. The Figure1 (4b) structure with C2v symmetry is a ferromagnetic object with magnetic moment 2 μB lying 807 meV higher in total energy compared to rhombic isomer (Figure1 (4a)). For the C5 cluster, we examined two different initial configurations: triangular bipyramid and squared pyramid. It is found that both isomers were deformed to the same structure after relaxation (see (5a) in Figure1). The symmetry of C5 structure is D3h, and it was found to be a nonmagnetic object.

We have investigated three different geometries for C6. A distorted trigonal prismatic (Figure1 (6a), C2v) was found to be the most stable structure and nonmagnetic cluster. The next two isomers are a pentagonal pyramid (6b, C5v) and a distorted octahedron (6c, C2v), which lie at 614 and 1041 meV higher than the structure with minimum energy whose magnetic moments are 4 and 2 μB, respectively. Our findings show that the pentagonal pyramid structure has the largest magnetic moment among the tridimensional carbon structures investigated in this work. For C7, we obtained two structures: hexagonal prism and plane-like structure. Our calculations have indicated that the planar C2v isomer is the most stable structure with 4,386 meV energy below the hexagonal prism with C6v point group symmetry. We have also studied five structures for C8 cluster. Our calculations indicated that Figure1 (8a) with D4d symmetry is the most stable structure, and the planar D2h isomer in Figure1 (8b) with energy difference of 2,016 meV lies higher than the D4d isomer. The next isomer with C2v symmetry lies 2330 meV higher compare to D4d structure. The Figure1 (8d) structure has a cubic form with O h symmetry and energy difference of 3950 meV higher than Figure1 (8a) structure. The most nonstable isomer (Figure1 (8e)) has also C2v symmetry with 5.011 eV higher with respect to the most stable structure.

For C9 cluster, two initial structures (capped tetragonal prism and tricapped trigonal prism) were deformed to Figure1 (9a) and (9b) structures. The square pyramid structure was also stable (Figure1 (9c), C4v). The Figure1 (9a) cluster with C2v symmetry was found as the structure with minimum energy. The Figure1 (9b) structure also with C2v symmetry lies 4,489 meV higher in energy and square pyramid in Figure1 (9c) is less stable with energy difference of 5,959 meV higher than the Figure1 (9a) cluster. In the case of C10 cluster, we have studied three structures, but only the square dipyramid structure Figure1 (10c) retained its initial geometric configuration. However, this structure is the most nonstable isomer in comparison to the other studied C10 clusters and lies 11,070 meV higher in energy with respect to the minimum energy structure (Figure1 (10a), C s ). The (10b) carbon cluster in Figure1 with C s symmetry and energy difference of 502 meV lies higher than Figure1 (10a) structure. For C11, two stable structures were investigated. It was found that both relaxed configurations have amorphous feature with no symmetry. The most stable Figure1 (11a) carbon structure lies below Figure1 (11b) structure with energy difference of 715 meV. The last tridimensional cluster studied in this work is C12. The initial structure for C12 was chosen as an icosahedron with I h symmetry. The total energy calculated for structure Figure1 (12b) was -12,384.260 eV, whereas after relaxation the initial structure was totally deformed (see (12a) structure in Figure1). This structure has C s symmetry and its total energy is -12,417.34 eV. However, we have found that the icosahedral C12 cluster is a magnetic object and its calculated magnetic moment is 2 μB whereas it is not a stable structure at room temperature and ambient pressure.

We have also studied the magnetic properties of ring and linear carbon clusters in which they are isoelectronics to the considered amorphous structures. It has to be pointed out that our calculated magnetic moments for even-numbered linear clusters are 2 μB and for odd-numbered linear structures have vanished. Li and co-workers have also shown the same magnetic pattern for finite-sized carbon wires[27]. It can be seen in Figure2 that the magnetic properties of ring structures are completely dependent on the size and structure of the clusters. It has to be pointed out that C3 (D3h) with triangular structure, C5 ring with pentagonal structure (D5h), and C7, C9, and C12 with C2v symmetry are magnetic rings. Among the studied carbon clusters with n ≤ 12, the C5 ring has the largest magnetic moment (6 μB). According to the data in Table1, it can be argued that the carbon rings of C6, C10, C11, and C12 are more stable than their linear isomers with 362 meV, 2682 meV, 1011 meV and 547 meV lower in total energy, respectively. Martin and co-workers have found that the carbon linear structures with n ≤ 10 are more stable than their ring isomers[28, 29]. Their findings are in contradiction with our results, since we have found that the ring structures of C6 and C10 are more stable than their linear structures. We have also found that the C5 with D 3h symmetry and C7 with C2v symmetry are more stable than the isoelectronic ring structures (see Table1).

The behavior of binding energies (Eb), second difference energies Δ2E(n), and HOMO-LUMO gaps for the all studied carbon structures are depicted in Figure3. It can be seen that the binding energies per carbon atom are increased with the increasing size of the cluster. For the amorphous carbon structures, it can be seen that there is a gradual increase in the binding energy in the range of n = 3 - 6 and n = 7 - 12 for tridimensional (amorphous) structure with minimum energy (see Figure3). It has to be pointed out that also with increasing the number of carbon atoms in the clusters, the binding energies are merged to 6.5 eV. This value is very close to the binding energy of carbon macromolecules[16]. A better way to show the relative stability of a cluster is the second differences in energy Δ2E(n) defined by Δ2E(n) = E(n + 1) + E(n - 1) - 2E(n), where E(n) is the total energy of C n clusters. It was shown in the middle panel of Figure3 that the C3, C7, and C11 amorphous structures are more stable than their neighbors. The same argument can be concluded for C6 and C10 ring structures (see the middle panel of Figure3). The Δ2E(n) for linear structures shows a systematic behavior whereas for amorphous and rings structures it behaves very irregular. It is obvious from Δ2E(n) in Figure3 that the odd-numbered linear carbon structures are more stable than the even-numbered linear carbon structures. We have also investigated the behavior of HOMO-LUMO energy gaps (ΔH-L) for the studied structures (see Figure3). It can be pointed out that the HOMO-LUMO gap can give a criterion for chemical reactivity of a typical cluster, in which a larger HOMO-LUMO gap means less reactivity. In Figure3 it can be seen that HOMO-LUMO gaps of the odd-numbered linear structures are larger than the even-numbered linear clusters. On the other hand, the behavior of HOMO-LUMO gaps for amorphous and rings clusters is completely irregular compared to their linear isomers. We have found that the C6 carbon cluster with C5v point group symmetry is the less reactive cluster compared to the other studied amorphous carbon clusters. We have also clarified that C10 carbon ring is less reactive object compared to the other studied carbon rings. It can be seen in Figure3 that the Δ2E(n) and ΔH-L have the same pattern for linear carbon structures, whereas this behavior cannot be seen for amorphous and linear structures.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have studied the structures and magnetic properties of small carbon clusters (C n , n = 2 - 12) using density functional theory method with generalized gradient approximation. The stable geometrical carbon structures are obtained after relaxation calculations. Then we have investigated the most stable structures, magnetic moments, binding energies, the second differences of energy, and the related HOMO-LUMO energy gaps. Furthermore, we have found that the magnetizations of amorphous and ring structures are completely dependent on the cluster size and configuration of the carbon atoms in the cluster. We have also shown that the lowest amorphous carbon structures with minimum energy when formed in a tridimensional structure have no net magnetic moments. According to our results for small and amorphous carbon clusters, we may expect a nonmagnetic feature for larger carbon clusters formed at room temperature and ambient pressure. Finally, we have shown that some less stable carbon isomers are magnetic in which one can imagine that they are initial building blocks for magnetic nanodiamonds at high pressure.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the computing facilities of High Performance Computational Laboratory at the Department of Physics, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST). The financial support of the research division at IUST is gratefully acknowledged.

Supplementary material

40094_2014_136_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (420 kb)
Authors’ original file for figure 1
40094_2014_136_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (223 kb)
Authors’ original file for figure 2
40094_2014_136_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (173 kb)
Authors’ original file for figure 3
40094_2014_136_MOESM4_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 4
40094_2014_136_MOESM5_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 5
40094_2014_136_MOESM6_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 6
40094_2014_136_MOESM7_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 7
40094_2014_136_MOESM8_ESM.eps (2.1 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 8
40094_2014_136_MOESM9_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 9
40094_2014_136_MOESM10_ESM.eps (1.9 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 10
40094_2014_136_MOESM11_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 11
40094_2014_136_MOESM12_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 12
40094_2014_136_MOESM13_ESM.eps (2.1 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 13
40094_2014_136_MOESM14_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 14
40094_2014_136_MOESM15_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 15
40094_2014_136_MOESM16_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 16
40094_2014_136_MOESM17_ESM.eps (2.1 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 17
40094_2014_136_MOESM18_ESM.eps (2.1 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 18
40094_2014_136_MOESM19_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 19
40094_2014_136_MOESM20_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 20
40094_2014_136_MOESM21_ESM.eps (2.1 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 21
40094_2014_136_MOESM22_ESM.eps (2.1 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 22
40094_2014_136_MOESM23_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 23
40094_2014_136_MOESM24_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 24
40094_2014_136_MOESM25_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 25
40094_2014_136_MOESM26_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 26
40094_2014_136_MOESM27_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 27
40094_2014_136_MOESM28_ESM.eps (1.8 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 28
40094_2014_136_MOESM29_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 29
40094_2014_136_MOESM30_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 30
40094_2014_136_MOESM31_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 31
40094_2014_136_MOESM32_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 32
40094_2014_136_MOESM33_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 33
40094_2014_136_MOESM34_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 34
40094_2014_136_MOESM35_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 35
40094_2014_136_MOESM36_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 36
40094_2014_136_MOESM37_ESM.eps (2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 37
40094_2014_136_MOESM38_ESM.eps (57 kb)
Authors’ original file for figure 38

References

  1. 1.
    Kurmashev VI, Timoshkov YV, Orehovskaja TI, Timoshkov VY: Nanodiamonds in magnetic recording system technologies. Phys. Solid State 2004,46(4):696. 10.1134/1.1711454CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maze JR, Stanwix PL, Hodges JS, Hong S, Taylor JM, Cappellaro P, Jiang L, Gurudev Dutt MT, Togan E, Zibrov AS, Yacoby A, Walsworth RL, Lukin MD: Nanoscale magnetic sensing with an individual electronic spin in diamond. Nature 2008, 455: 644. 10.1038/nature07279CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lehtinen PO, Foster AS, Ma Y, Krasheninnikov AV, Nieminen RM: Irradiation-induced magnetism in graphite: a density functional study. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93: 187202.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Son Y-W, Cohen ML, Louie SG: Energy gaps in graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett 2006, 97: 216803.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jung J, Pereg-Barnea T, MacDonald AH: Theory of interedge superexchange in zigzag edge magnetism. Phys. Rev. Lett 2009, 102: 227205.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weltner W, Van Zee RJ: Carbon molecules, ions, and clusters. Chem. Rev 1989, 89: 1713. 10.1021/cr00098a005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Handschuh H, Ganteför G, Kessler B, Bechthold PS, Eberhardt W: Stable configurations of carbon clusters: chains, rings, and fullerenes. Phys. Rev. Lett 1995, 74: 1095. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1095CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jalbout AF, Fenandez S, Chen H: Part I. High level ab initio approximations of the atomization energies of Cn ( n = 2 – 6) neutral carbon clusters. J. Mol. Struct 2002, 584: 143. 10.1016/S0166-1280(02)00013-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Belau L, Wheeler SE, Ticknor BW, Ahmed M, Leone SR, Allen WD, Schaefer I I I HF, Duncan MA: Ionization thresholds of small carbon clusters: tunable VUV experiments and theory. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129: 10229. 10.1021/ja072526qCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Orden A, Saykally RJ: Small carbon clusters: spectroscopy, structure, and energetics. Chem. Rev 1998, 98: 2313. 10.1021/cr970086nCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kroto HW: The stability of the fullerenes Cn, with n = 24, 28, 32, 36, 50, 60 and 70. Nature 1987, 329: 529. 10.1038/329529a0CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ohno M, Zakrzewski VG, Ortiz JV, von Niessen W: Theoretical study of the valence ionization energies and electron affinities of linear C2n + 1 ( n = 1 – 6) clusters. J. Chem. Phys 1997, 106: 3258. 10.1063/1.473064CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raghavachari K, Binkley JS: Structure, stability, and fragmentation of small carbon clusters. J. Chem. Phys 1987, 87: 2191. 10.1063/1.453145CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xu S-H, Zhang M-Y, Zhao Y-Y, Chen B-G, Zhang J, Sun C-C: Stability and properties of planar carbon clusters. Chem. Phys. Lett 2006, 421: 444. 10.1016/j.cplett.2006.01.038CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu S-H, Cui Y, Wang C: New insight into the stability and property of linear carbon clusters. J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 2009, 895: 30. 10.1016/j.theochem.2008.10.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang C, Xu X, Wu H, Zhang Q: Geometry optimization of Cn (n = 2 – 30) with genetic algorithm. Chem. Phys. Lett 2002, 364: 213. 10.1016/S0009-2614(02)01338-6CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jones RO: Density functional study of carbon clusters, C2n (2 ≤ n ≤ 16). I. Structure and bonding in the neutral clusters. J. Chem. Phys 1999, 110: 5189. 10.1063/1.478414CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    López-Urías F, Cruz-Silva E, Muñoz-Sandoval E, Terrones M, Terrones H: Magnetic properties of individual carbon clusters, clusters inside fullerenes and graphitic nanoribbons. J. Mater. Chem 2008, 18: 1535. 10.1039/b716752kCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hohenberg P, Kohn W: Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev 1964, 136: 864. 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    FPLO-9; improved version of the original FPLO code by K. Koepernik and H Eschrig Phys, Rev. B 1999, 59: 1743. http://www.FPLO.de 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1743
  21. 21.
    Eschrig H, Richter M, Opahle I: Relativistic solid state calculations. In P Schwerdtfeger (ed.) Relativistic Electronic Structure Theory - Part, II: Applications. Amsterdam, 2004: Elsevier;Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M: Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett 1996, 77: 3865. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huber KP, Herzberg G: Molecular spectra and molecular structure, IV, constants of diatomic molecules, pp. xiii + 716. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1979.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Martin JML, François JP, Gijbels R: A critical comparison of MINDO/3, MNDO, AM1, and PM3 for a model problem: carbon clusters C2-C10. An ad hoc reparametrization of MNDO well suited for the accurate prediction of their spectroscopic constants. J. Comput. Chem 1991, 12: 52. 10.1002/jcc.540120107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hinkle KW, Keady JJ, Bernath PF: Detection of C3 in the circumstellar of IRC+10216. Sci. New Ser 1988,241(4871):1319.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hutter J, Lüthi HP, Diederich F: Structures and vibrational frequencies of the carbon molecules, C2-C18 calculated by density functional theory. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1994, 116: 750. 10.1021/ja00081a041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li ZY, Sheng W, Ning ZY, Zhang ZH, Yang ZQ, Guo H: Magnetism and spin-polarized transport in carbon atomic wires. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80: 115429.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Martin JML, François JP, Gijbels RJ: Ab initio study of the infrared spectra of linear Cn clusters (n = 6 – 9). Chem. Phys 1990, 93: 8850. 10.1063/1.459224ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Martin JML, El-Yazal J, François JP: Structure and relative energetics of C2n + 1 ( n = 2 – 7) carbon clusters using coupled cluster and hybrid density functional methods. Chem. Phys. Lett 1996, 252: 9. 10.1016/S0009-2614(96)00180-7CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Afshar et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mahdi Afshar
    • 1
  • Mahboobeh Babaei
    • 1
  • Amir Hossein Kordbacheh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsIran University of Science and TechnologyNarmakTehranIran

Personalised recommendations