Introduction

During the last decades, silver metal nanoparticles (MNPs) have spurred a lot of interest due to their conductive, optical [1], catalytic [2], and more particularly biocidal properties [3, 4]. In fact, among noble metals, Ag MNPs possess the most efficient biocidal properties with a very broad bactericidal and fungicidal activity spectrum. This specificity makes them the best candidate for developing applications in emerging areas like medicine [5], and a good candidate for applications in the ecological constructions. The importance of green housing is growing every year as ecological materials reduce the construction life cycle energy used and therefore, the environmental impact of the building construction [6]. Straw bales appear to be an ecologically friendly choice for construction due to their low cost, good acoustic [7], and thermal insulation. Nevertheless, their durability and hygroscopic properties make them suitable environments for many harmful microorganisms that can cause many diseases including fungi like Stachybotrys atra that appear to be a more important threat than bacteria [8].

The present day solutions rely on chemical products like boric acid or biotol/ammonium chloride compounds that present some drawbacks [9]. All routes to produce Ag MNPs have their advantages, but there are some drawbacks such as cost, scalability, pollution, size, and size distribution. Presently, a lot of effort has been put into the development of “green synthesis” methods [10]. In fact, noble metal nanoparticles synthesis based on the utilization of fungi or plant extracts has spurred a lot of investigation over the world. This paper presents investigations on the antifungal properties of Ag MNPs synthesized by facile and cheap sol–gel synthesis used as a protective agent in houses built using eco-friendly materials.

Materials and methods

Synthesis of the silver metal nanoparticles

Ag MNPs were synthesized using non-hydrolytic sol–gel methods described elsewhere [1113]. Silver acetate (99 %, Aldrich) precursor along with benzylamine solvent was used for the synthesis of the nanoparticles. The resulted mixture was transferred into a stainless steel autoclave and was carefully sealed. Thereafter, the autoclave was taken out of the glovebox and heated in an oven at 200 °C for 48 h. The resulting suspensions were centrifuged and the precipitates were thoroughly washed with ethanol and subsequently dried in air at 70 °C.

Characterization of the nanoparticles

X-ray diffraction (XRD) data were collected using a Bruker D8 Discover instrument equipped with a LynxEye detector. Cu (kα1 = 1.54056 Å) radiation selected by a Ge (111) monochromator was used. The crystallite size was calculated from the XRD data using full profile Scherrer methods in TOPAS, with a fundamental parameters peak shape. A Pawley fit based on the lattice parameter for cubic silver was used. The thermal history of the silver nanoparticles was studied under air from room temperature to 800 °C using a Rheometric Scientific STA 1500 Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) instrument. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies were carried out on a probe corrected Titan G2 80–200 kV operating at 200 kV. The point to point resolutions in TEM and STEM modes are 2.4 and 0.9 Å. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was carried out on a Kratos Analytical Axis UltraDLD photoelectron spectrometer equipped with Al Kα X-ray source. Liquid broth conditions and agar plate preparation can be found in [9].

Liquid broth tests

Different concentrations ranging from 100 mg/L to 1 g/L of Ag NPs were crushed and dispersed into the liquid broth medium composed of maltose and Chloramphenicol. Then after Aspergillus spp. was added to the mixture. Continuous magnetic stirring was performed for 24 h, i.e., during the whole experiment to homogenize the solution of dispersed Ag MNPs.

Coating of the straw bales

Ethanol solutions containing different silver nanoparticle concentrations were prepared by dispersion of the Ag nanoparticles (10 and 40 mg/L) in pure ethanol. The dispersion was improved using a magnetic stirring for 2 days combined with stay in an ultrasonic bath at 35 °C for 30 min to disperse them homogeneously in the solution. The straw bales were dipped for 1 h into the ethanol solution after dispersion and then taken from the vessel for drying under air. The use of a magnetic stirrer enables homogeneous decoration of the straw with Ag MNPs. Then, the straw bale samples were placed into aggressive outdoor conditions for 18 days covered from direct rainfall and sunlight. The samples were then cut and printed into agar plates for 72 h under 32 °C for microorganism staining and identification.

Identification

For identification, the microorganisms were heat fixed on microscope slides. The fungal cells were stained using 5 % bengal red solution. To acquire better visualization, all of the fungal slides were stained three times. After drying of the slides, the identification was carried out via microscopy using online databases. To check whether bacteria were Gram-positive or Gram-negative, the bacteria were stained using Gram`s method as described by the manufacturer (Sigma–Aldrich).

Toxicity study

Different concentrations of nanoparticles were studied via MTT assay (M). Human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells [14] were seeded on day 0 at a density of 1000 per well in 96-well microtiter plates. On day 1, silver nanoparticle at different concentration was added. After 24 h incubation, the medium containing nanoparticles was removed from the plate to make sure that no nanoparticles remain in the solution and avoid overlap or hinder MTT assay. After 24 h, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) was added to each well (0.5 mg/mL; Sigma–Aldrich), and plates were maintained at 37 °C for 2 h. The medium was then discarded, and DMSO was added to each well to lyse the cells. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a multiwall spectrophotometer (Tecan, microplate reader). All MTT assay were repeated twice.

Discussion

The utilization of 482 mg of silver acetate precursor enabled the production of 296.7 mg of pure Ag MNPs giving an average reaction yield of 95.15 ± 5 % that was calculated with five syntheses. This shows that the reaction process is very efficient and economically interesting. Figure 1 shows a typical XRD pattern of the prepared Ag nanoparticles. It can be clearly seen from the XRD pattern that the Ag NPs are single phase nature and only exhibit the characteristic diffraction peaks of the Ag metal cubic structure (JCPDS File No 87-0720). No secondary phase of silver oxide structure was detected by XRD and the high intensity of the XRD peaks indicates that the Ag NPs are highly crystalline.

Fig. 1
figure 1

XRD pattern of cubic silver nanoparticles

Thermogravimetric analysis was performed on the Ag nanoparticles to evaluate their purity and estimate the amount of organic species adsorbed on the silver nanoparticle surface and their resistance against oxidation under air. Typical thermogram in Fig. 2, does not show any weight loss or gain during the whole measurement till 800 °C, suggesting the absence of organic species on the surface (surfactant-free) and the high stability against oxidation. Differential thermal analysis (DTA) shows a very slight decrease of the heat capacity (−0.4 mW/mg) with the increase of the temperature that could be attributed to a probable aggregation of the Ag MNPs together.

Fig. 2
figure 2

TGA and DTA performed under N2 of silver nanoparticles

The morphology and size distribution of Ag nanoparticles were also studied by (S)TEM. The HAADF-STEM electron micrograph in Fig. 3a gives an overview of the nanoparticles. The size distribution of the nanoparticles lies within a range of 5–20 nm. A few larger particles were also observed with sizes of around 50 nm. The HRTEM image in Fig. 3b is of a 10 nm crystalline Ag nanoparticle oriented along the [110] zone axis of the Fm-3 m cubic structure with a lattice parameter of 0.4 Å.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a STEM image overview of Ag nanoparticles dispersed on a carbon grid. b HRTEM image of Ag nanoparticle oriented along [110] zone axis

XPS measurements were performed on Ag MNPs to confirm their purity and study the nature of their surface. XPS study was performed 6 months after the synthesis of the Ag NPs that were stored in the powder form under ambient air. Figure 4 presents the XPS survey spectra, showing only binding energy peak from Ag metal [15] and no visible peak of nitrogen (see inset) or oxygen. The carbon binding energy peak is certainly due to air contamination that cannot be avoided. Due to the nanosize of the Ag MNPs and the high surface to volume ratio, any oxidation of the Ag MNPs surface would be detected by XPS analysis. The position of the Auger peak corresponds here to metallic silver. In addition, the Ag 3d5/2 photoelectron peak corresponds to metal Ag (368.3 eV), thus confirming the purity and the metal nature of Ag MNPs. The XPS study then confirm the purely metallic nature of these Ag NPs and their high stability against oxidation.

Fig. 4
figure 4

XPS survey of Ag MNPs, inset shows the absence of N binding energy peak

Two methods to test the biocidal properties of Ag were used: broth liquid solution and decoration of the straw with Ag MNPs dispersed in ethanol solutions at different concentrations. The antifungal study based on broth dilution assay on Aspergillus spp. showed that this method was not an adapted one as the Ag MNPs are surfactant-free. In fact, the broth medium contains amino acids that contain several chains of sulfur groups and these groups are able to bond on Ag MNPs surface and then passivate them, neutralizing their biocidal properties. For this reason we have developed a second method that consists of immersing the straw samples into a vessel filled with a solution containing Ag MNPs dispersed in ethanol for 1 h under magnetic stirring and then taken out for drying under air. A ratio of 1 mg and 2.5 mg of Ag MNPs for 1 g of straw were dispersed in ethanol. Previous tests showed that concentration of 100 mg/L of Ag NPs was sufficient to observe a biocidal effect [11]. Two reference samples where straw samples dipped into pure ethanol or water were also prepared. The four samples were covered and contaminated by placing them in outdoor conditions for 21 days. Covering them ensured protection from direct sunlight and rainfall during the month of May which most probably also promoted the rapid development of microorganisms. After 3 weeks, some straws were taken from each straw bale and deposited directly onto the agar plates [11] and printed into agar plates for 72 h at 25 °C for microorganisms staining and identification.

From the first observation, bacteria were present on all straw samples due to the highly nutritious agar which promoted the growth of bacterial colonies; Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria were equally represented and no specific effect on one particular bacterial group was witnessed (Fig. 5). However, the agar plates which contained straws treated with silver nanoparticles, showed differences in the straw surface (color and smoothness) compared to untreated counterparts (Fig. 5c, d). Untreated straw displayed color change due to the direct growth of colonies on the straw surface. Additionally, treated samples did not contain any visible fungal activity that was observed in the case of untreated and only ethanol-treated straw. In fact, fungi need less favorable conditions including low moisture content to grow in houses [15]; therefore, the absence of fungi in this study was rewarding.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Penicillium hyphae and conidiophore (small picture) isolated from untreated straw

Penicillum spp. and Cladosporium spp. were clearly identified on untreated and ethanol-treated straw (Fig. 5).These fungi species are known to produce hazardous mycotoxins, which compromise the health of house residents due to their allergenic and probably even carcinogenic properties [16, 17]. Moreover, some fungal spores retain their toxicity even after their death, indicating that threat to health is persistent once mold has grown on the building material. The difference is clearly displayed in Fig. 6, where straw bale samples treated with ethanol solution containing 1 and 2.5 mg of Ag MNPs per gram of dry straw showed less microorganism growth on the straw surface and complete absence of fungal growth on the plates.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Straw printed to the plate count agar (PCA) after 72 h at 25 °C, a untreated straw, b straw soaked with ethanol, c straw treated with 1 mg of silver nanoparticles per gram of dry straw, d straw treated with 2.5 mg of silver nanoparticles per gram of dry straw

The antimicrobial mechanism of silver nanoparticles is not yet fully understood; however, experimental data suggest a combination of multiple effects on microorganisms that can occur simultaneously or separately [1621]. In addition, the experimental evidence also shows that silver nanoparticles are normally more effective against bacteria than fungi [22]. Fungi are eukaryotes and have more resistant cell boundaries viz., a cell wall, which consists of hard substance called chitin. Compared to bacteria, fungal cells should in principle be less affected by silver nanoparticles. However, for the series of outdoor tests, we observed that typical bacteria that colonize straw seem to be less sensitive to the Ag MNPs than the typical straw-colonizing fungi.

Due to the metallic nature of the surface of the nanoparticles and the absence of oxidized silver on their surface, the most probable origin of the biocidal properties is through direct contact. In fact, no Ag cation could be released from a purely metallic surface. Nevertheless, one explanation of this phenomenon implies that bacterial colonies have the capacity to grow a protective biofilm around them, when facing aggressive environment. This biofilm is usually not produced in agar plates as they tend to be in a highly favorable environment. This biofilm is not easily penetrable and, therefore, can provide protection to colonies against Ag MNPs. On the flip side, the biofilm also self-limits the growth and expansion of the bacterial colonies. This is further manifested by the clean surfaces of the treated straw, not affected by bio-organisms. The latter demonstrates that Ag nanoparticles can inhibit the growth of biofilm protected colonies by confining them to only certain areas and curbing their proliferation. Furthermore, the absence of color change on the straw treated with silver nanoparticles supports the claim that silver nanoparticles specifically inhibit fungal development. Absence of fungal colonies on the agar plates, which contained silver nanoparticle-treated straw, can be explained by the fact that these fungal colonies cannot generate protective biofilm layers around them. Contrary to the results of our experiment, in real life environmental stress conditions fungi tend to dominate over bacterial colonies because they need less suitable conditions to proliferate [15]. As a result, fungi are more problematic within the walls of residential buildings. This study shows that Ag MNPs dispersed in ethanol can be a promising ecological option for the protection of straw bales that are used in eco-housing and leading a healthy lifestyle and taking into account that the cost of treatment Ag treatment is similar to conventional chemical treatment in straw bales.

Before using these silver nanoparticles as antibacterial and antifungal treatment for the protection of straw bales, it is necessary to study the toxicity of these Ag MNPs against human cells. HEK cells are very commonly used for testing the toxicity of metal nanoparticles [23]. Therefore, the cytotoxicity of these Ag MNPs was investigated on HEK cells. Different concentrations of Ag MNPs dispersed in PBS solution were studied by MTT assay. Figure 7 shows MTT assay performed on Ag MNPs solutions of concentration ranging from 10 to 200 mg/L. Figure 7 shows the mean ± SEM of duplicate measurements of a representative sample of three independent experiments. This toxicity study toward HEK cells shows that mortality rate is over 50 % only for very high concentration of silver nanoparticles (200 mg/L). For a lower concentration, the Ag MNPs are not toxic to human cells (Table 1), which makes them a suitable material for antimicrobial and antifungal treatment applications.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Toxicity test of silver metal nanoparticles on human HEK cells

Table 1 Result of MTT assay test

Conclusion

This study supports the fact that the origin of the biocidal properties of the Ag MNPs produced by non-hydrolytic sol–gel method is related to direct contact of the Ag MNPs with the micro-organisms. In fact, these Ag MNPs are surfactant-free and their surface is metallic preventing ion release in the medium. In addition, fungal species were more affected than bacterial colonies that can produce protective biofilm. These results suggest that it is possible to apply Ag MNPs in ecological straw bale construction as a protective agent. MTT assay toxicity showed that these Ag NPs are only toxic for high concentrations. Unlike several chemical repellents, which are toxic to human health and degrade over time, Ag MNPs represent a cheaper, harmless, and more permanent solution for eco-friendly house development.