In Sect. 3, the results of examining the bonding performance of the simulated concrete fabricated by performing surface modification on crushed stone coarse aggregate and observing the specimens microscopically showed that it was possible to improve the mechanical performance (improvement of ITZ) of concrete through surface modification. Also, based on the results, it is deemed possible to enhance the mechanical performance of concrete and improve the interface enhancement between cement matrix and low-quality recycled coarse aggregate (LRCA) through surface modification (Xiao 2013). Thus, in this section, an experiment was conducted, according to Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS), for the purpose of reviewing the permeability and durability performance (drying shrinkage, neutralization, freezing-thawing) and mechanical performance of concrete by examining the effect of surface modification on improving the adhesion quality of recycled aggregate.
Materials
In the experiment, ordinary Portland cement (density: 3.16 g/cm3; symbol: C) was used as the cement material and land sand (density in saturated surface-dry condition: 2.61 g/cm3; water absorption ratio: 1.43 %; fineness modulus (FM): 2.53; symbol: S) was used as the fine aggregate. The coarse aggregate contained large amounts of recycled aggregates, as shown in Fig. 10b and c, and fell under the category of “Recycled Aggregate L” (hereafter referred to as low-quality recycled coarse aggregate; LRCA) in JIS A 5023. This aggregate was treated with surface modification and the resulting modified aggregate was used. The results of quality of density and water absorption ratio assessment on each type of aggregate showed that the surface modification of low-quality recycled coarse aggregate (LRCA) resulted in increased density and reduced water absorption rate (Table 5). It is considered that the multiple pores in the adhesive paste used in the low-quality recycled coarse aggregate (LRCA) were filled with high-fluidity modification paste, making water penetration more difficult and thereby reducing the absorption rate. Table 5 shows the results of the pre- and post-modification property-test performed on the aggregates, and Table 6 shows the composition of the modification paste. Figure 10 shows the types of recycled aggregates.
Table 5 Type and quality of coarse aggregates.
Table 6 Composition of modification paste (based on 1 kg of original coarse aggregates) (Choi et al. 2014a).
Composition of Concrete
In this experiment, the amount of chemical admixture and concrete W/C were adjusted so that its performance would be equivalent to that of the low-quality recycled coarse aggregate (LRCA) concrete with W/C of 55 %, as shown in Table 7 (Choi et al. 2014a, b). Also, even though concrete generally comprises cement, water, and fine and coarse aggregates, in the case of modified concrete, the amount of cement paste added during modification of the original aggregate must be taken into consideration in the concrete-mix design. In other words, the amount of cement and water in the modification paste used to coat the low-quality coarse aggregate is considered so that the unit cement volume (in m3) would remain constant (Choi et al. 2014a, 2012). In this experiment, the target slump and air content were set at 18 ± 2.5 cm and 4.5 ± 1.5 %, respectively, and the results satisfied the target values, as shown in Table 8.
Table 7 Composition of concrete.
Table 8 Slump and air content of each type of concrete.
Results and Discussion
Mechanical Characteristics
Figures 11 and 12 show the results of the experiment on compressive and splitting tensile strength. The compressive strength increased by about 15 % in M concrete at each material age. The splitting tensile strength increased at a higher rate than the compressive strength, and it increased by 30–35 % higher in L concrete than in M concrete. It is considered that this occurred because of the stronger chemical and physical bonds and material densification resulting from the modification paste coated on the interface between the aggregate and cement matrix of L concrete. In addition, the fracture plane of the concrete specimens was examined following the splitting-tensile-strength test to determine the bonding performance of each concrete specimen; the results are shown in Figs. 13 and 14. Fractures were observed at the aggregate interface in many areas of L concrete, but in the case of M concrete, the majority of the cracks caused by loading occurred in a through pattern.
Permeability
The modification treatment of the surface of adhesive paste consist of a porous causes densification on the surface of recycled coarse aggregates, resulting in higher density and lower absorption ratio compared to low-quality recycled aggregates as shown in Sect. 4.1. On the other hand, large amounts of adhesive paste are present in the low-quality recycled coarse aggregates (Fig. 10) and modified aggregates used in this study, and due to the large sizes of internal pores compared to general coarse aggregates, there may be an increased possibility of penetration of water and harmful substances into the concrete from the external environment. In other words, the progressive penetration of deterioration factors such as water, CO2 gas and chloride ions (Cl−) into the concrete increases permeability, which is highly associated with durability. This in turn accelerates deterioration of concrete and as a consequence, there are concerns of fatal damage to the concrete structure concerned (Jacobsen 1996; Wang et al. 1997; Khatri and Sirivivatnanon 1997). Accordingly, after fabricating concrete using low-quality recycled coarse aggregates and modified coarse aggregates, the water and air permeability coefficients of each specimen were measured and the correlations between the water and air permeability coefficients and compressive strength were analyzed as a means to determine the water tightness and air tightness of each concrete specimen.
The results of the experiment on water permeability showed that the water permeability coefficient of the M concrete was 0.87 × 10−9 m/s, as shown in Fig. 15., indicating that its water permeability resistance was 3.9 times higher than that of the L concrete, the water permeability coefficient of which was measured to be 3.41 × 10−9 m/s. Also, the results of the experiment on air permeability showed that the air permeability coefficient of the M concrete was 2.26 × 10−9 m/s, indicating that its air permeability resistance was 4.2 times higher than that of the L concrete, the air permeability coefficient of which was measured to be 3.41 × 10−9 m/s. This was similar to the results of the water permeability experiment (Fig. 15). In addition, as for the correlations between the water and air permeability coefficients and compressive strength, Fig. 16 shows that the higher the strength of the M concrete resulting from the modification treatment of the surface of low-quality recycled aggregates using an inorganic material (Sect. 4.3.1), the higher the water and air permeability resistances were (Hilsdorf and Kropp 1995). In other words, modification treatment of the porous adhesive paste surface (Fig. 10) caused densification in the surface of the recycled coarse aggregates and improvement of the interfacial adhesive performance between the low-quality recycled coarse aggregates and the cement matrix within the concrete. Based on this, when this is applied to an actual structure made of modified aggregate concrete, it will effectively improve its strength and inhibit the penetration of deterioration factors. Figure 17 shows the cross-sections of low-quality recycled coarse aggregate concrete (L concrete) and modified aggregate concrete (M concrete). In the case of L concrete shown in Fig. 17a, the interface between the porous adhesive paste and the cement matrix is not well-defined, and it is expected that the area with the porous adhesive paste will become a penetration route for deterioration factors from the external environment. However, in the case of M concrete in Fig. 17b, the interface between the porous adhesive paste and the cement matrix has become clearly defined as a result of the modification treatment of low-quality recycled aggregate surface, and the densification in the interface is expected to effectively inhibit the penetration of deterioration factors.
Durability
Both L concrete and M concrete, whose surface was coated, exhibited a high water-absorption rate of about 7 %. Aggregates with a high absorption rate can have a significant negative impact on concrete properties and durability. Thus, in order to review the durability performance of each concrete specimen, the resistance against drying shrinkage, neutralization, and freezing–thawing was reviewed. The results are shown in Figs. 18, 19 and 20. Figure 18 shows the results of the drying-shrinkage test. The specimens were removed from the formwork at day 1, and water cured until day 7. After that, the drying-shrinkage deformation was observed at a constant temperature of 20 °C and a humidity level of 60 % RH. Substantial differences were observed in the concrete specimens starting at week 1, and the drying-shrinkage rate was lower in M concrete by 10–20 % compared to L concrete between week 4 and week 6. Based on these results, it is considered that moisture evaporation in the coarse aggregates was suppressed somewhat because the SMCP was added to the cement, and the micro-filler effect and accelerated hydration reaction caused the ITZ structure to grow denser. Figure 19 shows the results of the freezing–thawing experiment. The difference in the relative elastic modulus between L concrete and M concrete was small for the first 150 cycles. After 150 cycles, however, the difference gradually increased, and the modulus of elasticity was lower in M concrete than L concrete by about 7 % at the end of 300 cycles. Generally, in the case of aggregates with high water absorption rate, there is a larger volume of water that can freeze inside the concrete, which means concrete deterioration resulting from freezing and thawing is likely to occur. For L concrete, the resistance against freezing and thawing was improved as the surface modification reduced the absorption rate of the aggregate and at the same time, the material was densified as a result of the improved performance of the aggregate surface. In addition, based on the proportional relationship between the water absorption ratio and the carbonation rate coefficient (Nagataki et al. 2000), it was initially speculated that there was a possibility that M concrete, with a slightly lower water absorption ratio than the L concrete, could exert a negative impact on the concrete properties as it would facilitate the movement of substances within the concrete. As shown in Fig. 20, the carbonation depth in M concrete was decreased by approximately 3–5 % at weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12, compared to L concrete. Based on this result, it is difficult to argue that there was a substantial difference in terms of carbonation resistance and that the quality of the density and water absorption ratios of M concrete was sufficient in this regard.