Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of the nonflow corrections in \(p-\)Pb collisions at the ALICE acceptance

  • Original Paper - Particles and Nuclei
  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Long-range two-particle azimuthal correlations have been used to study collective behaviors of produced particles in high-energy heavy-ion collisions. In small collision systems like pp and pA, it is essential to estimate and subtract correlations from jets and particle decays called nonflow effects. Experiments at the LHC have developed several techniques to deal with the nonflow effects. Details of the methods are different, so it is crucial to understand how it works in other circumstances where it was initially designed, such as kinematic regions and multiplicity ranges. In the ALICE experiment, the TPC acceptance (\(|\eta |<0.9\)) is quite limited, so other detectors at forward rapidity like FMD can be used for the long-range two-particle correlation study. We perform a detailed study on how different nonflow subtraction methods work at the ALICE kinematic region using Monte Carlo event generators AMPT and PYTHIA. The results in events without flow indicate that the template fit method better estimates the nonflow contribution than the peripheral subtraction method. In the case of events with both flow and nonflow, the flow coefficients obtained using the peripheral subtraction method are lower than the template fit method because it includes uncorrelated pair yields in low multiplicity events when calculating the flow coefficients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS), JHEP 09, 091 (2010)

  2. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS), Phys. Lett. B 718, 795 (2013)

  3. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS), Phys. Lett. B 765, 193 (2017)

  4. B.B. Abelev et al. (ALICE), Phys. Lett. B 726, 164 (2013)

  5. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 182302 (2013)

  6. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 172301 (2016)

  7. C. Aidala et al. (PHENIX), Nature Phys. 15, 214 (2019)

  8. R.D. Weller, P. Romatschke, Phys. Lett. B 774, 351 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. J.L. Nagle, W.A. Zajc, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68, 211 (2018)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. S.H. Lim, Q. Hu, R. Belmont, K.K. Hill, J.L. Nagle, D.V. Perepelitsa, Phys. Rev. C 100, 024908 (2019)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J.L. Nagle, R. Belmont, S.H. Lim, B. Seidlitz, Phys. Rev. C 105, 024906 (2022)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE), JHEP 05, 290 (2021)

  13. Z. Moravcova (ALICE), in Presentation of the Quark Matter Conference (2022), https://indico.cern.ch/event/895086/contributions/4736573

  14. Z.-W. Lin, C.M. Ko, B.-A. Li, B. Zhang, S. Pal, Phys. Rev. C 72, 064901 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J.R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C.O. Rasmussen, P.Z. Skands, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Bierlich, G. Gustafson, L. Lönnblad, H. Shah, JHEP 10, 134 (2018)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Adare et al. (PHENIX), Phys. Rev. C 97, 064904 (2018)

Download references

Acknowledgements

S.J. Ji and S.H. Lim acknowledge support from the BK21 FOUR Program by Pusan National University Research Grant 2021 and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) under Contract No. 2020R1C1C1004985. We also acknowledge technical support from KIAF administrators at KISTI.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to SuJeong Ji or SangHoon Lim.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A: Two-particle correlations in AMPT events without parton/hadron scatterings

Appendix A: Two-particle correlations in AMPT events without parton/hadron scatterings

We study AMPT events without parton/hadron scatterings as another case of events including only nonflow. Figure 10 shows the comparison of correlation functions, and the correlation functions of 60–100% events are vertically shifted to match the minimum value of the correlation functions of 0–20% events. Figures 11 and 12 show the results of nonflow subtraction with the template fit and peripheral subtraction methods.

Fig. 10
figure 10

1D correlation functions in 0–20% and 60–100% \(p-\)Pb events from AMPT without parton/hadron scatterings. The correlation functions in 60–100% events are shifted to match the minimum yield of the correlation functions in 0–20% events to compare the correlated part

Fig. 11
figure 11

Template fit results with correlation functions in 0–20% \(p-\)Pb events from AMPT without parton/hadron scatterings. Red lines represent the template fit results, and blue lines represent the flow components. Blue lines are shifted vertically for a better visibility

Fig. 12
figure 12

Peripheral subtraction results with correlation functions in 0–20% \(p-\)Pb events from AMPT without parton/hadron scatterings. Red lines represent the Fourier fit results, and blue lines are results after scaling. Blue lines are shifted vertically to the minimum value of the correlation function (\(\mathrm {Y}^\mathrm {HM-LM}_\mathrm {min}(\Delta \phi )\)) for a better visibility

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ji, S., Lim, S. Investigation of the nonflow corrections in \(p-\)Pb collisions at the ALICE acceptance. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 81, 615–628 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-022-00585-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-022-00585-w

Keywords

Navigation