Abstract
Visual inspection method is a widely used technique for periodically assessing the condition of existing bridges. The visual inspection method is simple, easy to use and requires minimum investment. As a result, it is particularly suitable for developing countries where paucity of fund and availability of advanced equipments for condition assessment of bridges are limiting factors. However, the effectiveness and reliability of the assessment depend largely on factors such as the technical competence of the inspector, his/her experience, perception, judgment, etc. Such subjectivities, inherent in visual inspection method, may however be addressed by fuzzy approach. This technique has the capability to analyze a complex system, inherent with uncertainties, using approximate reasoning which is neither exact nor inexact. Therefore, fuzzy logic-based visual inspection approach couples the simplicity and economy of visual inspection method and mathematical rigor of fuzzy logic to minimize the uncertainty and unreliability of visual inspection data. As a result, it has the potential to be used as an effective tool for condition assessment and rating of bridges in developing countries. Hence, in this paper an effort is made to review the existing literature on this technique and its components under a few broad categories and discuss the advantages as well as limitations of each of them. Finally, knowledge gaps and challenges are discussed to motivate future research in this field for practical implementation in developing countries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M.J. Ryall, Bridge Management (Elsevier Ltd., Oxford, 2010)
K.K. Jain, B. Bhattacharjee, J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 138, 399 (2012)
T. Omar, M.L. Nehdi, Infrastructures. MDPI 3, 36 (2018)
A.E. Aktan, D.N. Farhey, D.L. Brown, V. Dalal, A.J. Helmicki, V.J. Hunt, S.J. Shelley, J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2, 108 (1996)
J. Žnidaric and I. Perus, in 16th Congr. IABSE, Lucerne (Lucerne, 2000)
S. Sasmal, K. Ramanjaneyulu, Expert Syst. Appl. 35, 1430 (2008)
D. Agdas, J.A. Rice, J.R. Martinez, I.R. Lasa, J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30, 1 (2016)
S. Sengupta, A.K. Datta, P. Topdar, Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct. 12, 1565 (2015)
C. Koch, K. Georgieva, V. Kasireddy, B. Akinci, P. Fieguth, Adv. Eng. Informatics 30, 208 (2016)
V. Gattulli, L. Chiaramonte, Comput. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 20, 95 (2005)
R.B. Testa, B.S. Yanev, Comput. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 17, 358 (2002)
Y.M. Wang, T.M.S. Elhag, Expert Syst. Appl. 34, 689 (2008)
A.B. Tee, M.D. Bowman, and K.C. Sinha, Civ. Eng. Syst. 5(1), 27 (1988)
A. Tarighat, in Fuzzy Inference Syst. Theory Appl., edited by Dr. Mohammad Fazle Azeem (InTech Published, Croatia, 2012), pp. 445–470
Y.M. Kim, C.K. Kim, S.G. Hong, Eng. Struct. 28, 1286 (2006)
X. Lu, S.H. Simmonds, Autom. Constr. 6, 121 (1997)
L.A. Zadeh, Inf. Sci. (Ny). 8, 199 (1975)
IRC:SP:35, Guidelines for Inspection and Maintenance of Bridges (The Indian Road Congress, New Delhi, 1990)
FHWA, National Bridge Inspection Standards, 23 Cfr Part 650 (Washington. D.C, 2004)
TDOH, BMMS: Bridge Management and Maintenance System (Bangkok: Department of Highway, 1989)
IRC:SP:18, Manual for Highway Bridge Maintenance Inspection, 6th ed. (Indian Road Congress Special Publication 18, New Delhi, 1978)
FHWA, Bridge Inspector’s Training Manual, Federal Highway Administration U.S. (Department of Transportation Bureau of Public Roads, Washington D.C., 1970)
D. Pushpakar and S. V Barai, in Int. Conf. Ind. Inf. Syst. Sri Lanka (Sri Lanka, 2007), pp. 101–105
H. Li, X. Nie, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 67, 91 (2018)
M.-Y. Cheng and D. Prayogo, Eng. Comput. (2016)
C.B. Brown, J.T.P. Yao, J. Struct. Eng. 109, 1211 (1983)
M. Das, A.K. Dey, KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 22, 1677 (2018)
H.R. Ahmed, T. Akram, KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 22, 1661 (2018)
Z. Luo, B. Hu, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 168, 102874 (2019)
Y. Tu, X. Zhou, J. Gang, J. Xu, W. Shen, B. Lev, J. Infrastruct. Syst. 04017003, 1 (2017)
A. Ardeshir, N. Mohseni, K. Behzadian, M. Errington, Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 39, 4405 (2014)
N.F. Pan, Autom. Constr. 17, 958 (2008)
T. Omar, M.L. Nehdi, T. Zayed, J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 31, 1 (2017)
A. Tarighat, A. Miyamoto, Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 12077 (2009)
M.-T. Liang, J. Wu, C.-H. Liang, J. Infrastruct. Syst. 7, 144 (2001)
P.W. Mullarkey, S.J. Fenves, Civ. Eng. Syst. 3, 58 (1985)
A.B. Tee, M.D. Bowman, Civ. Eng. Syst. 8, 49 (1991)
S. Sasmal, K. Ramanjaneyulu, S. Gopalakrishnan, N. Lakshmanan, J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 20, 261 (2006)
J.N. Hooker, Hybrid Optim (Springer, New York, 2011), pp. 11–62
N. G. Seresht, R. Lourenzutti, A. Salah, and A. R. Fayek, in Fuzzy Hybrid Comput. Constr. Eng. Manag. (2018), pp. 37–107
K. Kawamura, A. Miyamoto, Comput. Struct. 81, 1931 (2003)
H.G. Melhem, S. Aturaliya, Micro Comput. Civ. Eng. 11, 421 (1996)
S. A. Moufti, T. Zayed, and S. A. Dabous, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, No.- 2431 88 (2014)
M.B. Anoop, B.K. Raghuprasad, Comput. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 27, 170 (2012)
E.K. Zavadskas, J. Antucheviciene, Z. Turskis, H. Adeli, Sci. Iran. 23, 1 (2016)
Z. Gao, J. Li, Civ. Eng. J. 4, 843 (2018)
P. Jakiel, D. Fabianowski, Expert Syst. Appl. 42, 4054 (2015)
T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation (New York, USA, 1980)
X. Deng, Y. Hu, Y. Deng, S. Mahadevan, Expert Syst. Appl. 41, 156 (2014)
T.L. Saaty, Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (RWS Publications, Pittshburg, 1994)
T.L. Saaty, Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1, 83 (2008)
Acknowledgements
These authors are thankful to Editor and Reviewer for providing feedback on our manuscript and for valuable improvements to our paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Das Khan, S., Topdar, P. & Datta, A.K. Applicability of Fuzzy-Based Visual Inspection Approach for Condition Assessment of Bridges in Developing Countries: A State-of-the-Art Review. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A 101, 835–846 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-020-00465-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-020-00465-1