Abstract
Selection of bridge construction sites over rivers is one of the most important tasks in construction feasibility studies. In this paper, potential sites for the construction of a river bridge are ranked for suitability using analytical hierarchy process for a river in the northern part of Iran. Fuzzy logic is used to incorporate the uncertainty associated with decision making into the model. Geographic information system is used to facilitate the decision-making process by determining alternative sites and evaluating the selection criteria. A floodplain is determined by the river reach using a hydraulic simulation. This is done to identify the length and height of potential bridges for each site. Two scenarios are analyzed in this paper: the first ranks bridge construction sites regardless of the location of an existing bridge and the second ranks bridge construction sites considering the existing bridge. The result of this analysis shows that the existing bridge is one of the best locations but not the best one.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Groenier, J.S.; Gubernick, R.: Choosing the best site for a bridge. J. Transp. Res. pp. 347–354 (2007)
Kuo M.S., Liang G.S., Huang W.C.: Extensions of the multicriteria analysis with pairwise comparison under a fuzzy environment. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 43, 268–285 (2006)
Soroudi, A.; Ehsan, M.: Application of a modified NSGA method for multi-objective static distributed generation planning. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. (2011). doi:10.1007/s13369-011-0077-1
Saaty, T.L.: Multicriteria Decision Making—The Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1988)
Ko, J.: Solving a distribution facility location problem using an analytic hierarchy process approach-Gwangju-Korea. In: ISAHP Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii (2005)
Yanpirat, P.; Panjarongkha, V.: Decision Support Model for site selection of Wafer Fabrication Plant in Thailand—The MCDM Approach. Bangkok (2005)
Mousavi, S.M.; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.; Heydar, M.; Ebrahimnejad, S.: Multi-criteria decision making for plant location selection: an integrated Delphi–AHP–PROMETHEE methodology. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. (2012). doi:10.1007/s13369-012-0361-8
Mohajeri N., Amin G.R.: Railway station site selection using analytical hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis. J. Comput. Ind. Eng. 59, 107–114 (2010)
Dey P.K., Ramcharan E.K.: Analytic hierarchy process helps select site for limestone quarry expansion in Barbados. J. Environ. Manage. 88, 1384–1395 (2008)
Wang Y.M., Liu J., Elhag T.M.S.: An integrated AHP–DEA methodology for bridge risk assessment. J. Comput. Ind. Eng. 54, 513–525 (2008)
Wang T.C., Chen Y.H.: Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection. Omega Int. J. Manage. Sci. 35, 384–388 (2007)
Deng, H.: Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pair-wise comparison. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 21, 215–231 (1999)
Laarhoven, Van.: Pedrcyz, W.: A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy. Set. Syst. 11, 229–241 (1983)
Buckley, J.J.: Fuzzy hierarchy analysis. Fuzzy. Set. Syst. 17, 233–247 (1985)
Tzeng G.H.: Chen, Y.W.: Optimal location of airport fire station: a fuzzy multi-objective programming and revised generic algorithm approach. J. Transp. Plan. Technol. 23, 37–55 (1999)
Chu, T.C.: Selecting plant location via a fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 28, 839–844 (2002)
Kuo R.J., Chi S.C., Kao S.S.: A decision support system for locating convenience store location through integration of fuzzy AHP and artificial neural network. J. Comput. Ind. 47(2), 199–214 (2002)
Kuo R.J., Chi S.C., Kao S.S.: A decision support system for locating convenience store through fuzzy AHP. J. Comput. Ind. Eng. 37, 323–326 (1999)
Ertugrul, I.; Karakasoglu, N.: Comparison of fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods for facility location selection. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. (2007). doi:10.1007/s00170-007-1249-8
Chen, S.J.; Hwang, C.L.; Hwang, F.P.: Fuzzy multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. Springer, Berlin (1992)
Ashrafi, A.R.; Yuseff, R.M.; Derayatifar, A.R.: Linguistic extension of fuzzy integral for group personnel selection problem. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. (2011). doi:10.1007/s13369-012-0491-z
Cheng M.Y., O’Connor J.T.: Site layout of construction temporary facilities using an enhanced-geographic information system (GIS). J. Aut. Construct. 3, 11–19 (1994)
Moeinaddini, M.; Khorasani, N.; Danehkar, A.; Darvishsefat, A.A.; zienalyan, M.: Siting MSW landfill using weighted linear combination and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methodology in GIS environment (case study: Karaj). J. Waste. Manage. 30, 912–920 (2010)
Malczewski, J.: GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. Wiley, New York (1999)
Boroushaki S., Malczewski J.: Implementing an extension of the analytical hierarchy process using ordered weighted averaging operators with fuzzy quantifiers in ArcGIS. J. Comput. Geosci. 34, 399–410 (2007)
Malczewski, J.: GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. Wiley, New York (2006)
Guiqin W., Guoxue L., Lijun C.: Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: a case study in Beijing, China. J. Environ. Manag. 90, 2414–2421 (2009)
Sharifi, M.; Hadidi, M.; Vessali, E.; Mosstafakhani, P.; Taheri, K.; Shahoie, S.; Khodamoradpour, M.: Integrating multi-criteria decision analysis for a GIS-based hazardous waste landfill sitting in Kurdistan Province, western Iran. J. Waste. Manag. 29, 2740–2758 (2009)
Geneletti D.: Combining stakeholder analysis and spatial multicriteria evaluation to select and rank inert landfill sites. J. Waste. Manag. 30, 328–337 (2010)
Kye P.A.K.: On intractable conflicts participatory GIS applications—the search for consensus amidst competing claims and institutional demand. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 94(1), 37–57 (2004)
Hammad, A.; Itoh, Y.; Nishido, T.: Bridge planning using GIS and expert system approach. J. Comput. Civil. Eng. 7, 42–52 (1993)
GangaRao H., Ward R., Howser V.: Value engineering approach to low-volume road bridge selection. J. Struc. Eng. 114(9), 1962–1977 (1988)
Ostenfeld, K.H.; Andersen, E.Y.: Major bridge projects—a multi-disciplinary approach. Front. Archit. Civ. Eng. China 5(4), 479–495 (2011). doi:10.1007/s11709-011-0137-3
Sasmal S., Ramanjaneyulu K.: Condition evaluation of existing reinforced concrete bridges using fuzzy based analytic hierarchy approach. Exp. Syst. Appl. 35(3), 1430–1443 (2008)
Pan, N.F.: Fuzzy AHP approach for selecting the suitable bridge construction method. J. Aut. Construct. 17, 958–965 (2008)
Zhao, Z.; Chen, C.: A fuzzy system for concrete bridge damage diagnosis. Comput. Struct. 80, 629–641 (2002)
Wang Y.M., Elhag T.M.S.: A fuzzy group decision making approach for bridge risk assessment. J. Comput. Ind. Eng. 53, 137–148 (2007)
USACE (US Army Corps of Engineers), Hydrologic Engineering Centre, HEC-RAS River Analysis System, User’s Manual, Version 4.1, January (2010)
Ministry of Roads and Transportation Road Safety Manual (Road Side Safety) Iran, Manual No. 267-1 (2005)
Aldian A., Taylor M.A.P.: Fuzzy multi-criteria analysis for inter-city travel demand modelling. J. Eastern. Asia. Soc. Transp. Stud. 5, 1294–1307 (2003)
Ross, T.J.: Fuzzy logic with engineering application. McGraw-Hill, New York (1995)
McKay M.D., Conover W.J., Beckman R.J.: A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics. 211, 239–245 (1979)
Post J., Hattermann F.F., Krysanova V., Suckow F.: Parameter and input data uncertainty estimation for the assessment of long-term soil organic carbon dynamics. Environ. Modell. Softw. 23(2), 125–138 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ardeshir, A., Mohseni, N., Behzadian, K. et al. Selection of a Bridge Construction Site Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process in Geographic Information System. Arab J Sci Eng 39, 4405–4420 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1070-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1070-2