Abstract
Marek’s disease (MD) is a lymphoproliferative and neuropathic disease of domestic fowl caused by an oncogenic Gallid Herpesvirus-2 (GaHV-2), also known as Marek’s Disease Virus serotype 1 (MDV-1). A total of forty (n = 40) liver samples of 14 outbreaks at poultry farm suspected for MD were investigated. Collected samples were processed for classical as well as for molecular diagnosis and further characterization of pathogens for the control of the disease. The Meq gene-based real-time PCR, nested PCR and virus isolation in CEF were performed. Out of 40 biological samples, 80% (32/40) samples were detected positive for MDV-1 by real-time PCR, 67.5% (27/40) by nested PCR and only 25.9% (7/27) by virus isolation in CEF. The nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence data analysis of Meq gene revealed the presence of virulent MDV-1 strain in the majority of the samples of outbreaks. The mild virulent strain was also confirmed in only one field samples with maximum sequence identity with vaccine strain from the Netherlands (CVI988) and China (814). Present study conclude that the virulent strain of MDV-1 is circulating in Haryana state of India and responsible for morbidity and mortality among vaccinated poultry birds.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bulow VV, Biggs PM (1975) Differentiation between strains of Marek’s disease virus and turkey herpes virus by immunofluorescence assays. Avian Pathol 4:133–146
Witter RL, Calnek BW, Buscaglia G, Gimeno IM, Schat KA (2005) Classification of Marek’s disease viruses according to pathotype: Phylosophy and Methodology. Avian Pathol 34:75–90
Sung HW (2002) Recent increase of Marek’s disease in Korea related to the virulence increase of the virus. Avian Dis 46:517–524
Atkins KE, Read AF, Savill NJ, Renz KG, Fakhrul Islam AFM et al (2013) Vaccination and reduced cohort duration can drive virulence evolution:Marek’s disease virus and industrialized agriculture. Evolution 67(3):851–860
Calnek BW (2001) Pathogenesis of Marek’s disease virus infection. In: Hira K (ed) Current topics in microbiology and immunology. Springer, Berlin, pp 25–56
Nair V (2005) Evolution of Marek’s disease- A paradigm for incessant race between the pathogen and the host. Vet J 170:175–183
Couteaudier M, Denesvre C (2014) Marek’s disease virus and skin interactions. Vet Res 45(1):36
Jones D, Lee L, Liu JL, Kung HJ, Tillotson JK (1992) Marek disease virus encodes a basic-leucine zipper gene resembling the fos/jun oncogenes that is highly expressed in lymphoblastoid tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:4042–4046
Liu JL, Kung HJ (2000) Marek’s disease herpesvirus transforming protein MEQ: a c-Jun analogue with an alternative life style. Virus Genes 21:51–64
Renz KG, Cooke J, Clarke N, Cheetham BF, Hussain Z, Fakhrul Islam AF, Tannock GA, Walkden-Brown SW (2012) Pathotyping of Australian isolates of Marek’s disease virus and association of pathogenicity with meq gene polymorphism. Avian Pathol 41:161–176
Kannaki TR, Vasudevan G Marek’s disease: time to review the emerging threat in Indian poultry. World's Poultry Sci J. https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2020.1729674
Muniyellappa HK, Satyanarayana ML, Isloor S, Shivakumar Gowda NK (2013) Marek’s disease outbreak among vaccinated commercial layer flocks in the mining area of Karnataka, India. Vet Rec 172(17):452. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.101203
Bhutia LD, Damodar SY (2017) Marek’s disease outbreak in poultry population of Mizoram. India Indian J Vet Patholo 41(3):224–227
Kamaldeep, Sharma PC, Narang G (2007) Occurrence of Marek`s disease in vaccinated poultry flocks of Haryana (India). Int J Poultry Sci 6(5): 372–377
Raja A, Dhinakar Raj G, Bhuvaneswari P, Balachandran C, Kumanan K (2009) Detection of virulent Marek’s disease virus in poultry in India. Acta Virol 53(4):255–260
Suresh P, Johnson Rajeswar J, Sukumar K, Harikrishnan TJ, Srinivasan P (2015) Pathotyping of recent Indian field isolates of Marek’s disease virus serotype 1. Acta Virol 59(2):156–165
Puro K, Bhattacharjee U, Baruah S, Sen A, Das S, Ghatak S, Shakuntala I (2018) Characterisation of Marek’s disease virus and phylogenetic analyses of meq gene from an outbreak in poultry in meghalaya of Northeast India. Virus Disease. 29:167–172
Baigent SJ, Smith LP, Currie RJ, Nair V (2005) Replication kinetics of Marek’s disease vaccine virus in feathers and lymphoid tissues using PCR and virus isolation. J Gen Virol 86:2989–2998
Murata S, Hayashi Y, Kato A, Isezaki M, Takasaki S, Onuma M, Osa Y, Asakawa M, Konnai S, Ohashi K. Surveillance of Marek's disease virus in migratory and sedentary birds in Hokkaido, Japan. 2012; Vet J. 192(3):538–540.
Hall TA BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 1999(35):1547–1549
Baigent SJ, Nair VK, Le Galludec H (2016) Real-time PCR for differential quantification of CVI988 vaccine virus and virulent strains of Marek’s disease virus. J virol methods 233:23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet
Abdul-Careem MF, Hunter BD, Nagy E, Read LR, Sanei B, Spencer JL, Sharif S (2006) Development of a real-time PCR assay using SYBR Green chemistry for monitoring Marek’s disease virus genome load in feather tips. J Virol Methods 133(1):34–40
Islam A, Harrison B, Cheetham BF, Mahony TJ, Young PL, Walkden-Brown SW (2004) Differential amplification and quantitation of Marek’s disease viruses using real-time polymerase chain reaction. J Virol Methods 119(2):103–113
Davidson I, Natour-Altoury A, Raibstein I, Dahan Y (2017) Differential amplification of Marek’s disease CVI988 vaccine and of wild-type isolates from organs of commercial chickens using single or duplexed probes in real-time PCR. Avian Pathol 46(6):610–614
Cheng Y, Cong F, Zhang YP, Li ZJ, Xu NN, Hou GY, Liu CJ (2012) Genome sequence determination and analysis of a Chinese virulent strain, LMS, of Gallid herpesvirus type 2. Virus Genes 45(1):56–62
Schat KA (2005) Isolation of Marek’s disease virus: revisited. Avian Pathol 34(2):91–95
Mohamed MH, El-Sabagh IM, Al-Habeeb MA, Al-Hammady YM (2016) Diversity of Meq gene from clinical Marek’s disease virus infection in Saudi Arabia. Vet World 9(6):572–578
López-Osorio S, Piedrahita D, Espinal-Restrepo MA, Ramírez-Nieto GC, Nair V, Williams SM, Baigent S, Ventura-Polite C, Aranzazu-Taborda DA, Chaparro-Gutiérrez JJ (2017) Molecular characterization of Marek’s disease virus in a poultry layer farm from Colombia. Poult Sci 96(6):1598–1608. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew464
Coussens PM, Velicer LF (1988) Structure and complete nucleotide sequence of the Marek’s disease herpesvirus gp57-65 gene. J Virol 62(7):2373–2379
Acknowledgements
The poultry farmers, field veterinarians and non-teaching staff of the Department of Animal Biotechnology are acknowledged for their help in the study. We acknowledge funding support from LUVAS Hisar.
Funding
LUVAS, State Scheme Number 121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Significance statement: Marek’s disease (MD) is a lymphoproliferative and neuropathic disease of domestic fowl caused by an oncogenic Gallid Herpesvirus-2 (GaHV-2), also known as Marek’s Disease Virus serotype 1 (MDV-1). Present study has explained the circulation of virulent strain of MDV-1, responsible for morbidity and mortality among vaccinated poultry birds in Haryana state of India. It has not been published elsewhere and that it has not been submitted simultaneously for publication elsewhere.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, A., Maan, N.S., Mahajan, N.K. et al. Isolation and Molecular Characterization of MDV-1 from Vaccinated Poultry Birds in Haryana State of India. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 92, 679–690 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-022-01363-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-022-01363-1